Daily Archives: September 5, 2026

GoFundMe nixes fundraiser for Kentucky clerk: Site claims Kim Davis’ case violates updated terms and conditions

My Comments: Why didn’t she allow others under her to issue the licenses…surely some of them wouldn’t have had a problem with it. I give more credit to the two in TN who quit so they didn’t have to issue these licenses, than I do to this woman. I know that God’s law supersedes these immoral laws of men, but I also know there are other ways to avoid doing something that is against your Christian faith. She could have done that. As for GoFundMe, they obviously hate Christians, so why ever use them…Actually Trump was right, it is the law, and she could have avoided all of this by allowing those under her to issue the licenses. Sadly, that Supreme court is ruled by those who hate Christians and guess what? The Republicans put those people in there…including Sotomeyer and Kagan and Kennedy. In the state of TN, our two Republican Trotskyite Senators voted to approve the nomination of Sotomeyer and Kagan…
REPOSTED FROM WND.COM

kim davis

Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis

The left-leaning fundraising site GoFundMe has declined to accept a fundraising campaign for jailed Rowan County, Kentucky, clerk Kim Davis.

Davis was jailed on Thursday for defying a federal court order to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges in June. She was ordered detained for contempt of court and later rejected a proposal to allow her deputies to process same-sex marriage licenses that could have prompted her release. She has become the symbol of religious opposition to the heavy-handed tactics of the “gaystapo” who are ramming same-sex marriage through at the federal level across the nation in opposition of religious conservatives.

U.S. News and World Report noted, “In sending her to jail, U.S. District Judge David Bunning ignored the American Civil Liberties Union’s request that Davis be fined to compel compliance with orders that she issue marriage licenses. ACLU attorney Heather Weaver, who is working on the case, said there was testimony about fundraising efforts on Davis’ behalf, apparently a factor in the judge’s decision not to impose financial penalties.”

Davis will remain incarcerated until she agrees to resume issuing licenses, including those for same-sex marriage.

Supporters attempted to initiate a GoFundMe campaign for her defense, but were thwarted by the site’s Terms and Conditions, which were updated on April 29 to specify the site can choose not to allow “campaigns in defense of formal charges or claims of heinous crimes, violent, hateful, sexual or discriminatory acts.”

These terms were updated in response to the massive support behind the bakery Sweet Cakes By Melissa, which declined to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple and were slapped with a $135,000 fine. A GoFundMe fundraiser raised over $109,000 within a few hours in support of the family before being abruptly shut down, possibly in response to the complaints of a competing bakery.

GoFundMe has developed a reputation for punitively denying fundraising efforts for causes it deems contrary to its progressive agenda. As one website put it, “GoFundMe bans Christians from trying to help other Christians.”

In a statement regarding their decision to close the Sweet Cakes account, GoFundMe wrote: “After careful review by our team, we have found the ‘Support Sweet Cakes By Melissa’ campaign to be in violation of our Terms and Conditions. The money raised thus far will still be made available for withdrawal. While a different campaign was recently permitted for a pizzeria in Indiana, no laws were violated and the campaign remained live. However, the subjects of the ‘Support Sweet Cakes By Melissa’ campaign have been formally charged by local authorities and found to be in violation of Oregon state law concerning discriminatory acts. Accordingly, the campaign has been disabled.”

However, a fast search through GoFundMe confirms the fundraising site has many requests for financial assistance from those facing legal actions, including criminal convictions. These include criminal trespassing and obstructing official business; possession of psychedelics; and prescription forgery (convicted of a third degree felony).

Most disturbingly, there is a GoFundMe campaign for aggravated sexual assault on a child (resulting in a 99-year prison sentence).

On Saturday, hundreds of people rallied in Grayson in support of Davis.

 

The 2030 Agenda: This Month The UN Launches A Blueprint For A New World Order With The Help Of The Pope

BY MICHAEL SNYDER FOR ENDOFTHEAMERICANDREAM.COM

Did you know that the UN is planning to launch a “new universal agenda” for humanity in September 2015? That phrase does not come from me – it is actually right in the very first paragraph of the official document that every UN member nation will formally approve at a conference later this month. The entire planet is going to be committing to work toward 17 sustainable development goals and 169 specific sustainable development targets, and yet there has been almost a total media blackout about this here in the United States. The UN document promises that this plan will “transform our world for the better by 2030“, and yet very few Americans have even heard of the 2030 Agenda at this point. Instead, most of us seem to be totally obsessed with the latest celebrity gossip or the latest nasty insults that our puppet politicians have been throwing around at one another. It absolutely amazes me that more people cannot understand that Agenda 2030 is a really, really big deal. When will people finally start waking up?

As I discussed in a previous article, the 2030 Agenda is taking the principles and goals laid out in Agenda 21 to an entirely new level. Agenda 21 was primarily focused on the environment, but the 2030 Agenda addresses virtually all areas of human activity. It truly is a blueprint for global governance.

And later this month, nearly every nation on the entire planet is going to be signing up for this new agenda. The general population of the planet is going to be told that this agenda is “voluntary” and that it is all about “ending poverty” and “fighting climate change”, but that is not the full story. Unfortunately, there is so much positive spin around this plan that most people will not be able to see through it. Just check out an excerpt from a piece that was published on the official UN website yesterday…

The United Nations General Assembly today approved a resolution sending the draft ‘2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’ to Member States for adoption later this month, bringing the international community “to the cusp of decisions that can help realize the… dream of a world of peace and dignity for all,” according to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

“Today is the start of a new era. We have travelled a long way together to reach this turning point,” declared Mr. Ban, recounting the path the international community has taken over the 15 years since the adoption of the landmark Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) towards crafting a set of new, post-2015 sustainability goals that will aim to ensure the long-term well-being of our planet and its people.

With world leaders expected to adopt the text at a 25-27 September summit in New York, the UN chief said Agenda 2030 aims high, seeking to put people at the centre of development; foster human well-being, prosperity, peace and justice on a healthy planet and pursue respect for the human rights of all people and gender equality.

Who doesn’t “dream of a world of peace and dignity for all”?

They make it all sound so wonderful and non-threatening.

They make it sound like we are about to enter a global utopia in which poverty and inequality will finally be eradicated. This is from the preamble of the official 2030 Agenda document…

This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development. All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda.

If it is a “universal agenda”, then where does that leave those that do not want to be part of it?

How will they assure that “no one will be left behind” if there are some nations or groups that are not willing to go along with their plan?

The heart of the 2030 Agenda is a set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals…

Goal 1 End poverty in all its forms everywhere

Goal 2 End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture

Goal 3 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

Goal 4 Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all

Goal 5 Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

Goal 6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

Goal 7 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

Goal 8 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all

Goal 9 Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation

Goal 10 Reduce inequality within and among countries

Goal 11 Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

Goal 12 Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

Goal 13 Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*

Goal 14 Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development

Goal 15 Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

Goal 16 Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

Goal 17 Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

Once again, many of those sound quite good.

But what do many of those buzzwords actually mean to the elite?

For instance, what does “sustainable development” actually mean, and how does the UN plan to ensure that it will be achieved globally?

Continue reading at http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-2030-agenda-this-month-the-un-launches-a-blueprint-for-a-new-world-order-with-the-help-of-the-pope

The Purpose of Geoengineering and Chemtrails is Death

REPOSTED FROM THE ACTIVISTPOST.COM

CHEMTRAILS

Paul Adams, J.D.
Activist Post – Special Report

Urgent Alert: Throughout May of 2013, Southern California, home of 22 million people, received by far the most powerful daily aerosol attacks this writer has ever seen since learning of the Geoengineering issue in 2007. The sky remains whited-out and mountains ten miles away are barely visible due to toxic chemtrail fallout. Humanity, as motivated individuals of conscience, must unite and take immediate action to save lives and nature. Everyone must be informed quickly to stop this soft-kill murder operation, which is clearly escalating.

In earlier times it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people then to control a million people. – Zbigniew Brzezinski (National Security Advisor, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group)

Geoengineering, often referred to as Chemtrails, exists as a global nuisance for the primary purposes of causing severe bodily injury and premature death with malice aforethought.

Geoengineering involves large aircraft constantly spraying tiny particles of aluminum and barium, amongst many other harmful toxins, into the air/atmosphere. All people and animals then inhale these toxins while breathing, without informed consent. The toxins also poison the soil and fresh water sources.

It is well known and documented that long-term exposure to air pollution consisting of particulate matter significantly increases the risk of dying from lung cancer and heart disease. Over many years, the danger of breathing soot-filled air is comparable to the health risks associated with long-term exposure to second-hand smoke. In 2010 alone, 1,200,000 Chinese were killed by particulate air pollution.

The principle dangers of inhaling particulate matter applies to smoke and second-hand smoke causing lung cancer; coal miner’s lung (anthracosis), a lung disease due to inhalation of coal dust; and baker’s lung, inhaling flour and other allergens causes severe asthma. These dangers can be avoided, while Geoengineering particulate fallout cannot.

On a massive scale Geoengineering will likely result in democide if not stopped completely. According to Professor R.J. Rummel of the University of Hawaii, Democide is the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder. Democide does not include soldiers killed in battle. During the 20th Century (1900s) alone, Rummel calculates that government power was used to murder approximately 262,000,000 people. It appears that history is repeating itself with improved technology.

Secondary purposes of Geoengineering include controlling the climate/weather for warfare and profits, and destroying the natural world while furthering the transhumanist/synthetic biology agenda.

The evidence indicates that Geoengineering is an essential element of the elite’s Endgame move to depopulate the planet. The public must be educated and the stratospheric spraying stopped immediately.

Photos by Writer. Taken during May of 2013 in Southern California. Use as you wish.

Do Geoengineering and Chemtrails Exist?

For the purposes of this article, “Geoengineering” and “Chemtrails” are defined as a military-industrial complex program, in partnership with private contractors and possibly major airlines, whereby planes spray particulate matter (particles/substances) into the atmosphere that otherwise would not be there.

Simply searching for images and videos of Chemtrails online will quickly provide overwhelming visual evidence demonstrating that they exist all over the world. Thousands of images containing strange aerial spraying formations can be seen in a matter of seconds. Numerous documentaries like What in the World are They Spraying and Why in the World are They Spraying have been watched by millions of people.

There is abundant documentation that Chemtrails exist. The Air Force’s 1990 Chemtrails chemistry manual is available online for download. Evergreen Aviation admits that it has chemtrail contracts with the Air Force. Exclusive lists of chemtrail patents are available. Congressman, Dennis Kucinich tried to stop Chemtrails with his Space Preservation Act of 2001.

In 2010 Scientists and Aerospace Engineers presented conclusive evidence for Covert Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering, (aka “Chemtrails”) in a 336-page report called “Case Orange“. The term “Chemtrails” is in the text of 2001 legislation, (HR-2977) where “Chemtrails” are defined as an “exotic weapon”. The Case Orange report was commissioned by The Belfort Group, who held a “Chemtrail Symposium,” where the conclusions were presented by Aerospace Engineer, Dr. Coen Vermeeren.

Germany and Sweden admit to Chemtrails.

Many military whistleblowers like Kristen Meghan and Ben Livingston have courageously stepped forward to expose Geoengineering. Now, even government entities, such as the State of Texas, openly acknowledge that they are engaged in Geoengineering for weather modification.

Private pilots have taken up-close videos that prove beyond all doubt that the population is being sprayed from planes above without informed consent. There is also video evidence of Chemtrails being turned on, then turned off, then turned back on again.

Scientists and weathermen discuss Chemtrails, and many believe it is the most important topic in the world today.

This map appeared in The Guardian

Scientist and researcher Clifford Carnicom and many others have sacrificed much to inform the public about the dangers of Chemtrails/Geoengineering. Governments spend billions of dollars per year on Chemtrail spraying without telling the citizens.Geoengineering programs are having the effect of blocking out sunlight. The emergence of the Chemtrails phenomenon coincided with an average 22% drop in sunlight reaching the earth’s surface. Even the New York Times recently published a story stating that the Globe Grows Darker as Sunshine Diminishes 10% to 37%. Geoengineering is not mentioned in the Times article and no place for readers to comment was provided.

To be blunt, governments are Geoengineering and realize Chemtrail dangers yet refuse to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.

What is being Sprayed?

Hundreds of laboratory tests reveal that the primary components of Geoengineering are aluminum and barium. Other components include Synthetic polymers, Ethylene dibromide, Morgellons disease, viruses, fungi, and bacteria. The toxic metal particulates are rapidly absorbed from the respiratory system and / or the gastrointestinal tract and are deposited in the lungs, muscles, and bone.

According to Medscape, aluminum accumulation in tissues and organs results in their dysfunction and toxicity. If a significant load exceeds the body’s excretory capacity, the excess is deposited in various tissues, including bone, brain, liver, heart, spleen, and muscle. This accumulation causes morbidity and mortality.

No living systems use aluminum as part of a biochemical process. It has a tendency to accumulate in the brain and bones. The Material Safety Data Sheet for aluminum states that the most notable symptoms of aluminum poisoning are diminishing intellectual function, forgetfulness, inability to concentrate and, in extreme cases, full-blown dementia, and Alzheimer’s. Its toxicity also causes bone softening and bone mass loss, kidney and other soft tissue damage and, in large enough doses, can cause cardiac arrest. Additionally, aluminum is strongly linked to Autism.

Barium is toxic to humans and animals and causes a dramatic drop in potassium levels in the body. For this reason (and others), barium is known to considerably increase the frequency of heart attacks in persons 65 years and older.

Sulphur is another toxin associated with Geoengineering. Laboratory tests with test animals indicate that Sulphur can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests also indicate that certain forms of sulfur can cause fetal damage and congenital defects. Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning over to their children through their milk. Sulphur can also damage the internal enzyme systems of animals.

The Purpose of Geoengineering is Injury and Death

There are still large numbers of people who remain in denial about the openly stated agenda for global population reduction, as well as the consequences of this program that are unfolding. Abundant evidence proves that a criminal global elite has been obsessed with eugenics and its modern-day incarnation, population control, for well over 100 years and that goal of global population reduction remains a priority.Chemtrails and Geoengineering are clearly part of the death agenda and represent the equivalent of spraying ants to death with a can of slow-acting poison. However, in this case, the poison is mega-tons of particulate aluminum, barium, and other toxins consistently sprayed from above, the can is a jet plane, and the target is humans. Scientific studies prove that breathing particulate matter associated with Chemtrails over time will harm and kill us.

A 16-year study by New York and Brigham Young Universities proved that “long-term exposure to air pollution that contains high concentrations of tiny particles of soot and dust significantly increases the risk of dying from lung cancer and heart disease.” The researchers calculated that the number of deaths from lung cancer increases by 8% for every 10 micrograms of fine particulate matter per cubic meter, according to the study.

Likewise, a study that analyzed 52 years of historical surface measurements of haze data in the Chinese city of Guangzhou demonstrated that the dramatic increase in the occurrence of air pollution events between 1954 and 2006 was followed by a large increase in the incidence of lung cancer.

Many other reputable studies have also proven the link between particulate matter in the air, cancer, and death.

Investigative journalist and author of Chemtrails Confirmed, William Thomas, found that Chemtrails inflict eye infections, nosebleeds, skin sores, muscle pain, chronic exhaustion, weakened immunity, acute asthma and allergies, short-term memory loss and heart attacks on people in more than a dozen countries. Thomas writes:

Small particulates like the aluminum oxide found in Chemtrails also kill.

According to the New York Times, “microscopic motes… are able to infiltrate the tiniest compartments in the lungs and pass readily into the bloodstream.” Particles in the size range called for by the Welsbach Patent describing Chemtrails are “most strongly tied to illness and early death, particularly in people who are already susceptible to respiratory problems.” [New York Times Oct 14/06]

The Welsbach Patent calls for megatons of 10 micron-size aluminum oxide particles to be spread in the atmosphere. The EPA calls particles this small “an extreme human health hazard” leading to 5% increased death rate within 24 hrs.

“Hearts as well as lungs can be damaged by ultra-fine particles small enough to get into the bloodstream and inflame tissues and cells,” reports the LA Times. “After they reach the heart, the particles are thought to cause a stress reaction in cells, producing inflammation that contributes to heart disease. The particles also may cause blood clots.” [Los Angeles Times Dec 29/03]

The Neurotoxicology (brain poisoning) division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says that exposure to airborne Particulate Matter “is an environmental health risk of global proportions.” [Health Risks of Aerosoled Particulates PubMed Abstract]

The EPA explains that by penetrating deep into the lungs and circulatory system, these dust-size particles “are implicated in tens of thousands of deaths annually from both respiratory and coronary disease.”

During 2010, 1,200,000 Chinese were killed by air pollution. “Air pollution is a fact of life in cities such as Beijing, where many people wear breathing masks when travelling outdoors to guard against “PM2.5 particles [particulate matter]” – tiny pollutants that can go deep into the lungs and cause cancer, bronchitis and asthma.”

Based upon the above studies, one must conclude that breathing Chemtrail fallout will harm and kill humans.

Alzheimer’s Disease

Russell Blaylock, M.D., states that tons of nanosized aluminum compounds are being sprayed daily over our skies. These nanosized particles induce intense inflammation in a number of tissues, particularly the brain and spinal cord. Nanoparticles of aluminum penetrate the brain by a number of routes, leading to Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Lou Gehrig’s diseases. Blaylock writes:

Inhaling this environmentally suspended nanoaluminum will also produce tremendous inflammatory reaction within the lungs, which will pose a significant hazard to children and adults with asthma and pulmonary diseases.

I pray that the pilots who are spraying this dangerous substance fully understand that they are destroying the lives and health of their families as well. This is also true of our political officials. Once the soil, plants, and water sources are heavily contaminated there will be no way to reverse the damage that has been done.

Steps need to be taken now to prevent an impending health disaster of enormous proportions if this project is not stopped immediately. Otherwise we will see an explosive increase in neurodegenerative diseases occurring in adults and the elderly in unprecedented rates as well as neurodevelopmental disorders in our children. We are already seeing a dramatic increase in these neurological disorders and it is occurring in younger people more than ever before.

Chart from CDC National Vital Statistics 2000 report page 9

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Empirical data also confirms that Autism symptoms are related to aluminum exposure. A study from MIT concluded that “children with the autism diagnosis are especially vulnerable to toxic metals such as aluminum.”

Another study from the University of British Columbia found that “children from countries with the highest ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) prevalence appear to have the highest exposure to aluminum from vaccines. The increase in exposure to aluminum adjuvants significantly correlates with the increase in ASD prevalence in the United States observed over the last two decades. A significant correlation exists between the amounts of aluminum administered to preschool children and the current prevalence of ASD in seven Western countries, particularly at 3-4 months of age.”

The rate of autism among American children has nearly doubled over the past decade, according to a report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), jumping from about one in 150 children back in 2000 to about one in 88 children in 2008. Currently, 1 in every 50 American kids has been diagnosed with autism yet the CDC pleads ignorance as to the obvious causes.

The elite know very well what happens when children daily inhale particulate aluminum sprayed by planes while walking outside, playing at the park, or sitting in their air conditioned homes or classrooms.

Geoengineering Harm with Malice Aforethought

The actions of those involved with Geoengineering also demonstrate an intent to do harm.

Geoengineer advocate Ken Calderia, an atmospheric scientist who works at the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Department of Global Ecology, proposes spraying chemicals in our skies to “blunt the worst effects of global warming.” But when confronted at a Geoengineering debate in Berkeley, he was forced to admit there has been no global warming for at least 17 years (“it has leveled off”) and that when he worked at a nuclear weapons lab, he discussed poisoning the sky, “putting pathogens in a cloud” to “rain down on your enemy and do chemical and germ warfare.”

Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a book, Ecoscience, in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.

Holdren also proposed Geoengineering at a 2007 Goldman Sachs Conference. Perhaps Holdren sees Geoengineering as the best method to cull humans into a “sustainable” population.

Ted Gunderson, former chief of the Los Angeles division of the FBI, demanded that Geoengineering be stopped and referred to it as “death dumps… genocide, poison, and murder. This element within our society that is doing this must be stopped. This is a crime against humanity.” Gunderson also notes that the Geoengineering pilots are poisoning themselves and their families.

According to one Chemtrail pilot, stopping Geoengineering may be our last chance to save humanity from psychopathic genocidal maniacs.

Who are the Geoengineers?

As a population under physical attack from Geoengineering, we must know who is responsible for crimes against humanity and nature.

David Keith is a professor at Harvard University and advocate of Geoengineering. He says that his team studied the toxic and harmful effects of Geoengineering on the population but did not publish their findings. Keith’s infamous quote on the dangers of Geoengineering is: “ And by the way, it’s not really a moral hazard, it’s more like free-riding on our grandkids.

Steve Rayner is a Professor of Science and Civilization at the University of Oxford. He is one of the Co-directors of the Oxford Geoengineering Program. Steve was previously a member of the Royal Society Working Group on Geoengineering.

The Royal Society is an organization made up of renowned eco-fascists and depopulation fanatics. It released a report calling for the “stabilization” of global population and reductions in consumption in developed countries. In the report, renowned population alarmist and Ecoscience co-author, professor Paul Ehrlich, called for a “move to population shrinkage as humanely and as rapidly as possible”

David Victor is a professor at Stanford University and the University of California, Sand Diego. He also directed the science and technology program at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, where he directed the Council’s task force on energy and was senior adviser to the task force on climate change.

The Council on Foreign Relations is in essence the not-so-secret acting government of the United States, and in the view of many researchers, a powerful global crime syndicate that controls the mainstream media.

Bill Gates funded a Harvard University project, in which sun-reflecting particles were sprayed from a balloon at an altitude of 80,000 feet above Fort Sumner, New Mexico. In 2012, Gates threw his financial muscle behind manipulating the earth’s climate via Geoengineering

Bill Gates is a radical eugenicist. In addition to sponsoring vaccine research to reduce the population, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation supports Planned Parenthood. Bill Gates’ father even served on the board of Planned Parenthood. In 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) $8,800,000.

In its annual report, Planned Parenthood boasted that its affiliates around the nation performed 333,964 life terminating abortions during 2010-11, up from 332,278 pre-born deaths in 2009, the previous yearly record. The latest number represents an abortion performed every 94 seconds.

Bill Gates and his globalist friends clearly have plans to reduce the world’s population. It must also be noted that The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto in 2010, valued at more than $23 million. This is significant because Monsanto, known as one of the world’s most unethical companies, released an aluminum-resistant seed which is genetically modified to tolerate aluminum in high levels in the soil. The primary ingredients of Chemtrails are aluminum and barium, what a coincidence!

As well as Gates, other wealthy individuals including Sir Richard Branson, tar sands magnate Murray Edwards and the co-founder of Skype, Niklas Zennström, have funded a series of reports into future use of the Geoengineering technology. Branson, who has frequently called for Geoengineering to combat climate change, helped fund the Royal Society’s inquiry into solar radiation management last year through his Carbon War Room charity.

Why would anyone trust these Malthusian Geoengineers adding toxins and heavy metals to the air we breathe?

History of Government’s Testing on Population

Individuals who still find it hard to believe that the purpose of Geoengineering is to kill should review the history of governments conducting tests on their own populations.

A 1977 Senate hearing on Health and Scientific Research confirmed “that 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969, including San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, and St. Louis.”

The U.S. government has been repeatedly caught engaging in illegal bio-weapons tests over American skies that have maimed and killed not just animals, but humans. The history of US government biological testing includes deliberately infecting Americans with syphilis, malaria and other bacteriological agents.

Indeed, the EPA’s own policy states that government and industry scientists can treat children as human guinea pigs in chemical experiments, which allows pesticides to be tested on mentally handicapped children and orphans.

From 1944 to 1974, both the Defense Department and the Atomic Energy Commission conducted hundreds of secret experiments in San Francisco and around the country that exposed unsuspecting patients to dangerous doses of radiation, including injections of plutonium.

In 2010, the US government had to issue an apology after it was revealed that 700 people in Guatemala were intentionally infected with sexually transmitted diseases in the 40s.

Kathleen Sebelius and Hilary Clinton issued this joint statement:

The sexually transmitted disease inoculation study conducted from 1946-1948 in Guatemala was clearly unethical…Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research could have occurred under the guise of public health. We deeply regret that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were affected by such abhorrent research practices.

In England, The Ministry of Defense turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public. A government report provides a comprehensive official history of Britain’s biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979. Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.

Let skeptics also learn of the darker side of America’s history before dismissing the dangers of geoengeneering. The Nazi’s eugenic policies were modeled after those of California.

Elements of the [Nazi eugenics} philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in “colonies,” and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.

We should not overlook the fact that both Hitler and Trotsky were aided and funded by the U.S. elite power structure.

Public Nuisance/Informed Consent

Geoengineering is clearly a public nuisance. The South Coast Air Quality Management District and most other jurisdictions define nuisance as follows:

A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

As demonstrated by the studies summarized earlier, spraying aluminum, barium, and other toxins onto the public without any disclosure causes injury, detriment, nuisance, and annoyance to the public, and endanger the comfort, repose, health and safety of the public.

Geoengineering for Death of the Natural World and Transhumanism

According to the so-called elite, as they drive technological progress towards the singularity – man merging with machine (transhumanism) – the majority of humans will cease to have a purpose or even be able to function in a brave new world run by a scientific dictatorship, which is why the ruling classes have formally reached the decision to begin a ruthless program of extermination.

As Sun Microsystems’ Bill Joy explained in an April 2000 Wired Magazine piece entitled “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” the elite sees the mass of humanity as expendable. In the coming decades, all the functions performed by what can loosely be termed the lower classes will be carried out by robots. Joy writes:

Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity. If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite.

Geoengineering appears to be one to the elites’ primary methods culling the human herd.

In addition to humans, the natural world dies around us due to chemtrail fallout because soil and fresh water sources are also being contaminated with aluminum and barium. Chemtrails are prevalent at Mount Shasta, California, where aluminum in pond water tested 24,000 times normal and snowdrift at 8,000 feet tested 122,200 times normal. Soil around a house (exposed to the air) in Northern California contained 3,000 times more aluminum than soil tested from under the house (not exposed to the air.

Companies like Monsanto are engaged in planetary engineering, which includes bioremediation measures to bring us patented genetically engineered trees and crops, such as GMO corn, soy, and sugar beets that are in 90% of processed foods and strongly linked to numerous diseases including cancer. As discussed earlier, Monsanto has already developed an aluminum resistance gene for profit.

And what of humans themselves? How are we being transformed from the inside out by the synthetic biology that is being sprayed in Chemtrails in addition to the heavy metals?

To understand how Geoengineering is related to synthetic biology and transhumanism, please watch From Chemtrails to Pseudo-Life. The Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology.

Read the rest of the article at http://www.activistpost.com/2013/06/the-purpose-of-geoengineering-and.html

 

Vets Died Waiting for VA to Process Huge Paperwork Backlog

BY MICHAEL TENNANT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN MAGAZINE

The Veterans Administration (VA) has an enormous backlog of paperwork, and as a result, hundreds of thousands of veterans have died waiting for the VA to process their records. Meanwhile, over 10,000 records were deleted without processing, and the employees responsible were not disciplined. Those are the conclusions of a new report from the VA’s inspector general (IG).

At the request of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the IG undertook an investigation of a series of allegations made against the VA. The IG substantiated the allegations with only minor caveats.

The first allegation was that the VA had a backlog of 889,000 healthcare applications. The IG found “about 867,000 pending records as of September 30, 2014,” most of which had “been inactive for many years.” One veteran who applied submitted an enrollment application for care at a VA facility in 1998. Two years later, the application was placed on pending status because of additional information needed, and it remained pending for the next 14 years.

Not all of the pending records are necessarily applications for care. But since “enrollment program data were generally unreliable for monitoring, reporting on the status of health care enrollments, and making decisions regarding overall processing timeliness” (at least 477,000 of the pending applications were not dated, for example), the IG “could not reliably determine how many records were associated with actual applications for enrollment.”

The second allegation was even more serious, claiming that 47,000 veterans had died while their healthcare applications were pending. In fact, the situation was possibly far worse. The IG found that over 307,000 pending records “were for individuals reported as deceased by the Social Security Administration [SSA].” Once again, though, the IG could not determine how many of the pending records were actual enrollment applications because of the VA’s less-than-optimal enrollment program and lack of “adequate procedures to identify date of death information and implement updates to the individual’s status.”

The IG substantiated an allegation that “employees incorrectly marked unprocessed applications as completed and possibly deleted 10,000 or more transactions from the Workload Reporting and Productivity (WRAP) tool over the past 5 years.” Once more, it was impossible for the IG to determine the full extent of the problem because of “information security deficiencies within WRAP,” including allowing bulk deletions, permitting employees who had moved to positions in other agencies to retain their deletion privileges, and giving the contractor who developed WRAP unfettered access to the software and data. In addition, the Office of Information and Technology has neither audit logs nor data backup processes for WRAP.

The VA’s Health Eligibility Center (HEC) conducted a 2010 investigation of the allegations of document destruction and decided not to report its findings, which substantiated the allegations, to the IG’s office, supposedly because the HEC couldn’t determine whether the destruction was deliberate. However, according to the IG, a December 2010 HEC memo revealed that “HEC management identified individual HEC staff who had incorrectly marked applications as complete in WRAP and had hidden the applications in their desks for processing at a later time. According to the HEC memorandum, a CBO [Chief Business Office] human resources management official advised them against pursuing disciplinary action against staff because HEC leadership implemented the work process and thus had contributed to the situation.”

In other words, the VA ignored the problem because it would have made certain officials look bad, thereby letting both those officials and their subordinates off the hook. Contrast that with the treatment meted out to VA whistleblower Scott Davis. Davis, who made many of the allegations that the IG investigated, told Fox News that “he was asked by his superiors to sign a notice stating that he would not speak publicly again” after he made his allegations public in hopes of spurring action that had not occurred after he submitted the claims through the official chain of command. Davis said he had also felt threatened by his superiors in other ways. Apparently, in the eyes of some officials, telling the embarrassing truth about a government agency’s misdeeds is deserving of punishment while actually committing them is not — as long as they can be covered up.

The last allegation the IG investigated was that 40,000 unprocessed applications, spanning a three-year period, were discovered in January 2013. The IG concluded that the alleged number of records was relatively accurate, but only about 11,000 of them were applications, with the rest being “transactions related to health care application updates, correspondence, and alerts.” In addition, the oldest application was only four months old at the time.

Once the backlog — which, according to the IG, arose because “HEC did not adequately monitor and manage its workload” — was reported to HEC management in January 2013, they took action to clear it. But this action came at a cost to taxpayers: The IG estimated that HEC put in “at least 7,700 hours of overtime to process the backlog.”

“As a result of the backlog,” wrote the IG, “approximately 11,000 health care applications were delayed for up to 6 months and approximately 28,000 updates for service members anticipating demobilization were delayed for up to 15 months.”

The backlog issues at the VA all boil down to this, said the IG: “CBO has not effectively managed its business processes to ensure the consistent creation and maintenance of essential data.” The IG made various recommendations to remedy this, and officials agreed to implement them, but chances are slim that any significant improvement will occur. As Hot Air’s Taylor Millard points out:

The federal government’s efforts to “help” veterans has [sic] been rife with fraud all the way back to the 1920s. The very first Veterans’ Bureau commissioner, Charles R. Forbes, spent two years in federal prison for defrauding the U.S. Government. The Senate discovered he’d left thousands of pieces of mail from veterans unopened and hardly awarded any disability insurance to wounded vets. This should have been a klaxon warning of the highest order and signaled why the Veterans’ Bureau shouldn’t have existed. But the federal government wouldn’t get rid of the bureau because it would make elected officials look heartless.

One might be tempted to look at the VA’s backlog, think that its employees are simply overwhelmed with paperwork, and argue for increasing the agency’s budget so it can hire more people and improve its technology. But, notes Millard, the VA’s budget has already grown from $87.6 billion in 2009 to $152.7 billion in 2014, and the agency is requesting $165.5 billion next year. “So,” Millard adds, “the department is asking for plenty of money to ‘help’ veterans, but isn’t spending the money wisely” — no surprise since, like all other government agencies, it’s spending other people’s money.

The VA is a perfect illustration of the disaster that is socialized medicine: bureaucracy, backlogs, and bungling — some of it merely frustrating, some deadly. Millard suggests, while knowing the advice is extremely unlikely to be followed, shuttering the VA and letting private charities see to veterans’ care. That would be a good start. Then it’s time to repeal ObamaCare and the myriad other government interventions into healthcare that have made a visit to the doctor increasingly like dealing with the VA.

Image

She Goes to Jail

davis

Dr. Chew is Wrong

* Npte: Taken from Health Sciences Institute e-Alert - Jenny Thompson - 9/4/15

Dear Reader:

Is our government using 30 minutes of research to take away one of the most important and proven supplements for your brain?

It’s happening right under our noses — and plenty of doctors and reporters are falling for it.

You may have seen the story splashed all over the news last week. A new study is claiming that decades of science is wrong and that the omega-3 fatty acids in fish oil won’t do a thing to protect your brain or prevent Alzheimer’s, dementia or cognitive decline.

And there’s nothing that mainstream medicine — or the press — likes more than a study attacking supplements.

But I did some digging around and it turns out you wouldn’t trust the scientists behind this study any farther than you could throw them.

They’re basing their findings on research that lasted about as long as your favorite sitcom — and the consequences will be no laughing matter for anyone who follows their advice.


30 minutes of nonsense

If you needed a triple bypass, I’m guessing you wouldn’t go to a knee surgeon. And if you’re looking for advice on how to prevent Alzheimer’s, you probably wouldn’t turn to an eye specialist.

But that’s exactly what Dr. Emily Chew and every media outlet that reported on her research are asking you to do.

You see, Dr. Chew is the lead researcher on this study you’re hearing so much about — the one that claims it didn’t find any evidence that omega-3s can improve your memory or stop cognitive decline.

That’s almost as believable as a study claiming that water won’t get you wet. Your brain actually depends on omega-3s to function — and you can only get them through diet and supplements.

How did Dr. Chew and her colleagues come up with such an unbelievable finding — one that contradicts years of science and could actually harm patients who cut back on omega-3s?

Well, what you might not have heard on the evening news is that Dr. Chew isn’t a brain scientist or a memory expert. And she doesn’t work for some Alzheimer’s research foundation or a university studying cognitive decline.

She works for the government’s National Eye Institute — and she specializes in the retina.

So what exactly qualifies Dr. Chew — or the NEI for that matter — to conduct a study on Alzheimer’s and brain health?

Absolutely nothing. And, for the most part, they didn’t conduct a study at all.

You see, Dr. Chew and her colleagues were researching around 4,000 people to see whether omega-3s and other supplements like lutein could help slow age-related macular degeneration.

And the supplements worked, just as they had in previous NEI research.

But here’s where things get crazy.

Since they already had thousands of volunteers enrolled — and since these folks were taking omega-3s anyway — Dr. Chew and her team of “retinal specialists” decided to test their memories, too.

Not with anything thorough like brain scans or personal examinations, mind you. But with three phone calls, spread out over five years — using a test that usually runs for about 10 minutes.

Imagine talking to someone you don’t even know — a complete stranger — for half an hour or so over 60 months. Do you think you’d be able to tell whether their memory was improving?

But mere minutes of research was all it took for Dr. Chew (and the media that covered her study) to set aside years of science on omega-3s and fish oil and claim you should stop taking them for your brain.

Well, before you toss those fish oil capsules in the trash, let me set the record straight on omega-3s — using some real research by scientists who actually knew what they were doing:

  • In 2011, a large study at Rhode Island Hospital’s Alzheimer’s Center found that people taking fish oil supplements had better recall, clearer thinking, and their brains were larger. That’s important because the brain tends to shrink with Alzheimer’s.
  • Just last May, a study out of the University of Illinois found that those who consume more DHA and EPA — two kinds of omega-3s found in fish oil — had much better “cognitive flexibility.” That’s a fancy way to say you’re better at multi-tasking and problem solving.
  • A study from the Alzheimer’s Association found that elderly people with memory problems improved their memory after just six months of taking DHA every day.

And I could keep going. But unfortunately, far too many people will just read those new headlines and miss out on the amazing benefits of getting enough omega-3s from their diets and supplements.

It’s just a shame that so many reporters were too dimwitted to spot a worthless study when they saw one.

Maybe we should get them some fish oil.

To Your Good Health,

Jenny Thompson

Sources:
“Omega-3 supplements don’t improve memory: Study” Alice Park, August 25, 2015, Time, time.com