Daily Archives: September 8, 2026

FORCED BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION !

My comments: Remember folks that Ben Carson thinks mandated vaccines for all Americans is just fine. Not with me it isn’t.

Note: Taken from Health Sciences Institute e=Alert - Jenny Thompson - 9/6/15

Dear Reader,

It’s something you’d expect to see in North Korea or some old Soviet prison camp — not in America’s Heartland.

United States citizens are being hauled off to “re-education” classes where they’re being brainwashed and pressured into following government orders.

These people aren’t spies or part of some underground terrorist cell. They’re parents who have exercised their right to skip potentially dangerous vaccines for their kids.

This forced indoctrination — already happening in states like Michigan and Oregon — is part of the government’s latest attempt to shame and humiliate families into getting every shot the CDC recommends.

And some parents are saying the embarrassment of attending these classes — where they’re treated like idiots who can’t make informed decisions for their children — isn’t nearly as bad as a document they’re being forced to sign at the end.

One that says that they may be choosing to kill their kids.


Under duress

Vi coactus.

It’s a Latin term that means “under duress.”

That’s what Connie Rubino, a mother from St. Clair Shores, Michigan, wrote after her name on a horrifying document the state made her sign for not vaccinating her kids.

You see, under a new Michigan law, all kids entering kindergarten or even day care must have the full schedule of CDC vaccines. And if their parents refuse — or seek a waiver — they’re dragged into an “education session” on the wonders of vaccines with a state health agency.

Is Michigan trying to vaccinate children — or make kids out of grown adults?

Even worse, at the end of this little propaganda lecture, Rubino had a form shoved under her nose that shouldn’t be put in front of any parent. It said:

“I may be placing my child and others at risk of serious illness should he or she contract a disease that could have been prevented through proper vaccination.”

Rubino had two choices under state law — sign or yank her kids out of school. And that’s when she wrote vi coactus after her name.

But Michigan isn’t the only state where parents are under duress for deciding to choose which vaccines are appropriate — or even safe — for their kids.

Parents in Oregon who want to opt out are also are required to either watch a video on the health benefits of vaccines or get an “education certificate” from a doctor’s office. And you can bet that video doesn’t say a word about the fortune our government has paid out to vaccine injury victims over the past couple of decades — or how some shots like the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine contain tissue from aborted fetuses.

And as I’ve told you before, California and Rhode Island now have laws that force the full vaccination schedule on children. No exceptions.

In Rhode Island, children won’t be allowed to attend public or private schools unless they roll up their sleeves for the risky HPV shot (Gardasil or Cervarix). And I’m talking about both boys and girls — starting with those in the seventh grade.

Even if you don’t live in California, Rhode Island, Oregon or Michigan, it’s obvious that the agenda of “vaccines for all” is spreading around the country like a wildfire.

And it looks like our government is ready to borrow tactics — like re-education campaigns — from totalitarian regimes to get its way.

To Your Good Health,

Jenny Thompson

Sources:
“Vaccination waivers: New Mich. rule reignites the debate” Lori Higgins, August 13, 2015, Detroit Free Press, freep.com

“Refugees” in Europe young, fit and overwhelmingly male

REPOSTED FROM PAMELAGELLER.COM

If these were real refugees, where are the women? Where are the elderly people? Where are the weak and the sick? It is increasingly clear that what I have said is true: this is not a refugee crisis. This is a hijrah, a migration to Islamize a new land.

refugees

“The New Face Of EU Immigration Is Young, Fit And Overwhelmingly Male,” by Simon Kent, Breitbart [1], September 6, 2015:

BUDAPEST,Hungary (Sep. 6) – Meet the self-styled ‘Aleppo Boys’. Pictured above, they are the collective face of mass immigration entering Europe from the Middle East. Their story is indicative of so many you can hear right now at Budapest Keleti railway station.

They are young. They are fit. They clearly know what they want. They have no intention of staying and fighting in Syria. Instead they have travelled overland through Lebanon, Turkey, Greece, Macedonia, Serbia and into Hungary. They say their last stop is Germany.

None of them wants to stay in Hungary or any of they countries they have transited. As one they see Germany as a future because Chancellor Angela Merkel told [2]them so. Besides, Hungary police want to fingerprint them, check any travel documents and stop their progress as specified by EU regulations.

The Aleppo Boys want none of it. They understand why some of their compatriots broke out [3] of a refugee camp on Friday night and decided to try and walk to Germany.

“No good here in Hungary. No good,” said their leader Muhammad. “They try and lock us up. But we want Germany, there it is good. We have to worry about nothing there. They give us food and house and job.

“Hungary just want to watch us all the time.”

Which is not to say they aren’t grateful. As one they seem tremendously happy and unfailingly polite. They are also in the majority amongst the thousands who arrive each day on their way north.

more refugees

Yes, there are families in the throng at Keleti. Plenty with young children. But if you stand and take a rough count it is hard not to come to the conclusion that young men are in the overwhelming majority. They have been dressed by charity and have cash for tickets. They want to charge their iPhones, eat more pizza and board their trains.

The families sit in tight groups or they sleep underneath the station concourse waiting for their chance to leave. Local Budapest volunteers have delivered food and clothing, showing goodwill which the travellers are only too willing to accept.

Moving around the station the sheer scale of the tide of humanity now crossing Europe is apparent. I spoke to two young men from Bangladesh. There were Pakistanis and Sudanese. I even met a family from Nepal. Syrians are the highest number followed by Iraqis and some Jordanians and they all seem amply versed in the ways and means of securing a passage to Germany.

Social media is the one connecting link. Everyone either has an iPhone or knows someone else who does. They use them to talk to family members on the other side of the world or network with each other sharing information. It also helps them to know what lies ahead.

According to local police, up to 10,000 immigrants crossed the Austrian/Hungarian border over a 24- to 48-hour period after Budapest station was closed to all travellers on Friday afternoon due to the surge in numbers.

Around 1,500 spent Saturday night in Nickelsdorf waiting to be processed, half in the open air, the Austrian Red Cross said. Those left in Budapest heard the news and waited knowing that when trains resumed they would be ready to board them.

For the young men travelling on their own, there is safety in numbers but a deep suspicion of anyone who is not another fellow immigrant. Most do not want their photograph taken but if they agree, it is under the strict understanding their family name will not be included.

[5]

Like Ahmed (pictured right). He refused to let me have his family name. Ahmed, 21, just wants wants to get to Norway and settle in Oslo. He has also made the overland trip from Damascus in Syria, a journey he said cost around US$5,000. He was waiting to board a train to Vienna and when he arrives in Oslo he feels he will be safe.

He told me: “I want new life. I want to go to university. Make money. I want to work in a bank, be a banker. Bring my family.”

I asked why he didn’t stay and fight. His answer revealed he thinks there is nothing left to fight for.

“Oh no, no. There is no future there. I see babies and…” He makes a cutting motion across his neck. “I see families killed. Women die. All people killed who not want to work with terrorists… no future. Europe is the new hope for all of us.”

As Breitbart News has already [6] reported from Budapest, nobody knows how many more are to follow across the Mediterranean, although it could be ‘uncountable millions.’

This is the future that awaits Europe today.

###

Dan Friedman NYC

The War on Police

REPOSTED FROM THE JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY WEEKLY MEMBER UPDATE

Attacks on law enforcement by radical left organizations continue almost daily. They are fed by the liberal press and the official organs of the Communist Party. For a century, Marxists and their front groups have focused on demonizing local police with demonstrations, riots, and false accusations. They then count on leftists in the media to have their poison appear on television and radio, and in liberal newspapers. Their goal is to convince Americans that local police are a serious problem and the solution is a national police force.

Every tyranny on earth logically relies on a national police organization to assure control over the citizens it enslaves. One only need recall Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the past, and Cuba and China in the present, to understand the terror inflicted by criminal regimes through their national police.
In June of 1961, the U.S. Senate Internal Security Subcommittee released a small report that detailed Communist plans to discredit and destroy local police forces. Called “A Communist Plot Against the Free World Police,” it was ignored by much of the mass media. Here, in part, is what it said:
Our police are among the foremost guardians of freedom and thus a major target of the Communists.
The better the force … the more vital it is for the Communists to destroy it….
The Communist technique [of war against police] has been directed primarily toward discrediting the police in the eyes of the people….
There is a natural antipathy between the police and Communists. The police learn early in their careers that the Communist Party is not just another political movement but is an international conspiracy….
A campaign against the police of one free country is not planned and directed by the Communist Party of that country; it is planned and directed by the strategists of international communism.
Over 50 years ago, this Senate panel had it right. Images of recent demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland, showed an unruly mob carrying signs with the Revolutionary Communist Party’s website address prominently displayed. The people in these communities know that communism is not dead and has not gone away.
The John Birch Society is in the process of rejuvenating the Support Your Local Police program. We will start with a special issue of The New American (cover date September 21) on the subject. In addition, there will be a number of videos, a pamphlet, an updated booklet, and a manual for starting a Support Your Local Police committee (this manual will only be available from your Coordinator). Members should contact their Coordinator for information on starting a committee.
If you’re not yet a member, we encourage you to join The John Birch Society to help expose the truth and work toward keeping police independent and accountable to local communities and not the federal government!
War on Police: It’s Time to ‘Support Your Local Police’

In this week’s “Analysis Behind the News,” JBS Director of Communications Bill Hahn discusses how the recent execution of a Texas sheriff’s deputy has focused national attention on an ongoing war on police.
Watch the video. Then like, share, and Tweet it.

End Times: Europe crumbles under the devastating Impact of Mass Immigration

The CEO Of Starbucks Just Issued THIS Stern Warning For Those Who Support Traditional Marriage…

My comments: They needn’t worry about us ever entering their establishment. I used to occasionally buy one of their coffees in the grocery store in the winter, but that will never happen again. This CEO made a stupid statement, one that certainly isn’t all inclusive, and one that tells us exactly who he doesn’t want in his establishments. A smart CEO would have said everyone is welcome!

REPOSTED FROM AMERICANOVERLOOK.COM

STARBUCKS

During the annual Starbucks shareholder meeting, CEO Howard Shultz sent a message to everyone who buys coffee at the large chain. If you support traditional marriage over gay marriage, Starbucks doesn’t want your business.

Because Starbucks aims to “embrace diversity of all kinds,” Shultz told a specific shareholder, who supports traditional marriage, he should sell his shares and go to another company.

A Forbes report stated that Shultz seemed extremely intolerant of any shareholder who opposed gay marriage.

During the meeting, Tom Strobhar, founder of the Corporate Morality Action Center and Starbucks shareholder, pointed out that when Starbucks backed gay marriage in Washington State, traditional marriage supports boycotted the coffee store and sales venues dropped.

When Strobhar mentioned the facts, Schultz responded by telling him to sell his shares and invest in another company.

Do you think Shultz overreacted? Was he being tolerant of the diversity of opinions as it comes to gay marriage?

Obama’s Theological Roots Behind Black Lives Matter

REPOSTED FROM POLITICALLYSHORT.COM

BLACKS

When the organization known as Black Lives Matter (BLM) was first formed right after George Zimmerman’s acquittal in the death of Trayvon Martin on July 13, 2013, most overlooked the true intentions of the group beyond their calls for “justice”. Fast forward to today and it can no longer be overlooked that their calls for justice now result in retaliatory violence against those whom they believe are the oppressors, namely those being white people in general and police officers specifically. By tracing the origins of the organization back to its philosophical formation in the 1960’s, we can begin to see how BLM is rooted in the radical ideological beliefs espoused by none other than President Barack Obama.

Before we get to that point though, it is crucial for us to understand that BLM was founded by three militant feminists by the name of Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opel Tometi. While each played their part in contributing to the creation of the group, Garza is the driving force as she detailed the philosophy behind BLM in her October 2014 article titled A Herstory of the #BlackLivesMatter Movement. Garza writes the following in regards to BLM’s philosophy:

“Black Lives Matter is a unique contribution that goes beyond extrajudicial killings of Black people by police and vigilantes. It goes beyond the narrow nationalism that can be prevalent within some Black communities, which merely call on Black people to love Black, live Black and buy Black, keeping straight cis Black men in the front of the movement while our sisters, queer and trans and disabled folk take up roles in the background or not at all. Black Lives Matter affirms the lives of Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, Black-undocumented folks, folks with records, women and all Black lives along the gender spectrum. It centers those that have been marginalized within Black liberation movements. It is a tactic to (re)build the Black liberation movement.”

The key takeaway from Garza’s statement is found in the last two sentences primarily as she notes that BLM was created with the intention to “(re)build the Black liberation movement.” The reason this statement is of utter importance is because it ties directly to the idea of Black Liberation theology, which was the doctrine taught to Obama for over twenty years at his church in Chicago made famous by Obama’s pastor, Jeremiah Wright. Black Liberation theology was first formed on July 31, 1966. In an article published by NPR it is noted that:

“Black liberation theology originated on July 31, 1966, when 51 black pastors bought a full page ad in the New York Times and demanded a more aggressive approach to eradicating racism…echo[ing] the demands of the black power movement.”

What is often overlooked in the formation of the group is the linkage between the Nation of Islam and Black Liberation theology as Wright’s mentor and founder of Black Liberation theology James Cone credited Malcolm X with “shaking him out of his theological complacency.” Stanley Kurtz of National Review highlighted this synergy in noting that according to Cone, “The black intellectual’s goal is to aid in the destruction of America as he knows it.” Such destruction requires both black anger and white guilt. The black-power theologian’s goal is to tell the story of American oppression so powerfully and precisely that white men will “tremble, curse, and go mad, because they will be drenched with the filth of their evil”, wrote Cone.

In an excerpt from Stanley Kurtz’s piece drawing on the influence of Malcom X on Black Liberation theology, Kurtz states:

So what exactly is “black power”? Echoing Malcolm X, Cone defines it as “complete emancipation of black people from white oppression by whatever means black people deem necessary.” Open, violent rebellion is very much included in “whatever means”; like the radical anti-colonial theorist Frantz Fanon, on whom he sometimes draws, Cone sees violent rebellion as a transformative expression of the humanity of the oppressed…“Theologically,” Cone affirms, “Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man the devil. The false Christianity of the white-devil oppressor must be replaced.”

Couple these words to Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright’s statement that “there will be no peace in America until whites begin to hate their whiteness” and you can begin to understand that the rhetoric behind Black Lives Matter that blames “white privilege” for virtually everything is rooted in Black Liberation theology.

“However Wright was radicalized”, notes Bud White of NoQuarterUSA, “it is clear that he consciously appropriated the language and tenor of the Nation of Islam.” White documents the following:

Wright’s statement that 9/11 was deserved retribution (“We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans…America’s chickens are coming home to roost”) is a perfect echo of Malcolm X’s statement that “The assassination of Kennedy is a result of that way of life and thinking. The chickens came home to roost.” Although it appears that Wright began his focus on Black Liberation Theology sometime after 1966, his racial attitudes and rhetoric have imitated that of NOI since at least 1970. Wright’s blaming the United States for creating AIDS to kill minorities is but just one example of his thinking being in lockstep with NOI.

The Nation of Islam and Black Liberation Theology are two doors to the same room. Black Liberation Theology is a “palatable” form of “Christian” black nationalism. The fiery anti-American, race-baiting words of Wright, Cone, and others behind the theology of Black Liberation “are from the same philosophical cauldron as the Nation of Islam”, concludes White.

From the beliefs that served as Obama’s bedrock foundation for his ideology, is it any wonder that today that the radicals behind Black Lives Matter and the Nation of Islam are allowed a free pass to incite as much hatred and retaliation against those they deem are the oppressors? As violence has ramped up in the first half of 2015 in targeted assassinations against police officers, little to no coverage by the media is given to a meeting that was hosted by the White House on December 1st.

On December 1, 2014, Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Attorney General Eric Holder met with seven Black and Latino organizers – from Ferguson, Mo.; Columbus, Ohio; Miami, Florida; and New York City, who had been leading the ongoing actions to disrupt the status quo. In an article posted by the website FergusonAction, it is explained that during this meeting activists such as Ashley Yates were given the platform by the White House in order to reaffirm their belief that “most violence in our (their) community is coming from the police departments, and something needs to be done about it.” On December 20th “something was done about it” as two uniformed NYPD officers were assassinated in their marked car by Ismaaiyl Brinsley in what Brinsley himself boasted as an act of retaliation for the death of Michael Brown in Missouri and Eric Garner in New York at the hands of the police.

The reason Yates is emphasized here is because she, like BlackLivesMatter founder Alicia Garza, praise cop killer and former Black Liberation member Assata Shakur as a martyr for their cause. Yates even created T-shirts and hoodies that read ‘ASSATA TAUGHT ME‘ in a reference to Shakur that has become part of BLM’s iconography. The fact that the president would even entertain the thought of meeting with those like Yates and other “activists” who hold cop killers as icons for their movement further goes to show how Obama’s belief in Black Liberation theology, primarily that retaliation and violence should be used to further their cause, has never left him. Why else would Obama have met with these “activists” unless he was sympathetic to their plight, which given the fact that Obama spent over twenty years of his life listening to Jeremiah Wright’s sermons, he very much is. Since this meeting though, what cannot be dismissed is the fact that violence in the form of targeted assassinations of both white people and police officers, have ramped up.

And it will only get worse the longer we continue to allow Obama’s Department of Justice to remain idly complicit.