DHS to start building border wall prototypes this summer

“We own that land, have access to it and it’s a good place to start testing in a real-world environment.”

American Pravda: CNN Part 2 – Van Jones: Russia is “Nothing burger”

Exclusive: Finicum Widow Interview & Monckton’s Warning To BLM

Bureau of Land Management could be facing RICO actions, Monckton reveals

Millie also caught up with Lord Christopher Monckton to discuss the federal government’s mistreatment of the Finicum family and the news that the Bureau of Land Management could be facing RICO actions as well as the closure of their agency.

Monckton says he’s been diligently working in the back channels with the Trump administration and won’t quit until justice is served.

Enraged Monckton Warning to BLM: You’re Days Are Numbered!

 

Leftists Promising to ‘Desecrate Graves’ and Protest During 154th Anniversary of Battle of Gettysburg

They plan to fight against the country, to “desecrate” history, and to disrupt the thousands of Americans and foreign visitors who intend to honor our past

Macy’s Stock Crumbles After Dumping Trump

Huge decline in sales for 9 straight quarters

Macy’s dumped Trump merchandise in July 2015 after the then-Republican presidential candidate made “derogatory” comments about Mexican immigrants.

“Macy’s is a company that stands for diversity and inclusion,” the company said at the time. “We are disappointed and distressed by recent remarks about immigrants from Mexico.”

Trump responded by calling for a boycott of the store, tweeting: “Those who believe in tight border security, stopping illegal immigration, [and] SMART trade deals [with] other countries should boycott Macy’s.”

Read more

Sen. Durbin’s Office Won’t Release Emails With GOP Baseball Shooter

An Associated Press report says, “Hodgkinson also visited the office of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders”

 

TUCKER CARLSON ON CNN GETTING EXPOSED BY JAMES O’KEEFE

American Pravda: CNN Producer Says Russia Narrative “bullsh*t”

Dyke March Organizers Ban Jewish Flag

 

 Jewish symbolism was “triggering” people who took offense

Jewish pride flags were banned from a Chicago gay parade because they were “triggering” people, according to organizers.

 At least three people with the Jewish pride flags, which feature a Star of David superimposed on a rainbow flag, were asked to leave the parade on Saturday because “triggered” people took offense.The Dyke March later released a statement apologizing for the incident but said the three marchers were asked to leave after they “repeatedly expressed support for Zionism.”

“Sadly, our celebration of dyke, queer and trans solidarity was partly overshadowed by our decision to ask three individuals carrying Israeli flags superimposed on rainbow flags to leave the rally,” organizers said on social media. “This decision was made after they repeatedly expressed support for Zionism during conversations with Dyke March Collective members.”

One of the banned participants said she felt unwelcome.

“The Dyke March is supposed to be intersectional. I don’t know why my identity is excluded from that,” she said. “I felt that, as a Jew, I am not welcome here.”

This year was likely the first time Jewish symbolism was banned from the march.

“It was a flag from my congregation which celebrates my queer, Jewish identity which I have done for over a decade marching in the Dyke March with the same flag,” said participant Laurel Grauer.

She also said she “lost count” of the number of people who harassed her, with one person reportedly telling her the march was “pro-Palestinian” and “anti-Zionist.”

Additionally, organizers singled out Grauer for “provocative actions at other LGBTQ events and for using Israel’s supposed ‘LGBTQ tolerance’ to pinkwash the violent occupation of Palestine” and claimed the Jewish pride flag was part of this “pinkwashing.”

The Chicago Dyke March, which began in 1995, is billed as a “anti-racist, anti-violent, volunteer-led, grassroots mobilization and celebration of dyke, queer, bisexual and transgender resilience.”

Interestingly, American flags were apparently not welcome either because they are seen as a “symbol of oppression” by marchers, despite the fact that gays and lesbian refugees routinely come to America to escape violent, anti-LGBT regimes that are common in the Middle East and Asia.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealKitDaniels

MORE Videos: Resistance News

‘Clear Victory for National Security’: Trump Celebrates Supreme Court Travel Ban Ruling

‘As President, I cannot allow people into our country who want to do us harm’

“Today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision is a clear victory for our national security. It allows the travel suspension for the six terror-prone countries and the refugee suspension to become largely effective,” the Trump team wrote in a statement Monday

View image on Twitter

“As President, I cannot allow people into our country who want to do us harm. I want people who can love the United States and all of its citizens, and who will be hardworking and productive.”

“My number one responsibility as Commander in Chief is to keep the American people safe. Today’s ruling allows me to use an important tool for protecting our Nation’s homeland. I am also particularly gratified that the Supreme Court’s decision was 9-0.”

On Monday, the nation’s highest court ruled the ban could prohibit entry from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen unless there’s a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”

“All other foreign nationals are subject to the provisions of [the executive order],” the court wrote.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions also claimed the court’s ruling as a victory for the separation of powers.

“We have seen far too often in recent months that the threat to our national security is real and becoming increasingly dangerous,” Sessions stated.

“Groups like ISIS and al Qaeda seek to sow chaos and destruction in our country, and often operate from war-torn and failed countries while leading their global terror network. It is crucial that we properly vet those seeking to come to America from these locations, and failing to do so puts us all in danger.”

Democrats on the other hand viewed the court’s decision as an attack on the First Amendment.

“Donald Trump’s Muslim ban is an unconstitutional and un-American assault on our country’s foundation of religious freedom,” said DNC chairman Tom Perez.

“As a nation, our diversity is our greatest strength, and we cannot allow such prejudice to shut the doors of progress. Democrats will continue to fight this hatred every step of the way.”

The Trump administration has said the ban will go into effect 72 hours after the court’s announcement.

The court will look at further travel ban arguments in October.

 

Deep State Trio: Comey, Rosenstein And Mueller Aim To Destroy Trump

For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness.  None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity. —Isaiah 59:3-4 KJV

Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller

While everyone is looking at Robert Mueller as the culprit in this witch hunt of our President, we had better take a closer look at Rosenstein, the Deputy AG who appointed Mueller as special counsel for the DOJ and establishment infiltration.  Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller are long time affiliates.

Never Trumpers Infiltrate Administration

Roger Stone feels that the Never Trumpers have infiltrated the administration via Reince Priebus, but I believe VP Pence is also responsible. How else does one explain CFR member, Dina Habib Powell, best friend of Valerie Jarrett, Huma Abedin, and CFR member Condoleezza Rice? Powell is Arabic and a former Goldman Sachs employee. She is the current U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy to President Donald Trump under McMaster. She is also an Assistant to the President and Senior Counselor for Economic Initiatives.

Powell is being promoted by Jared and Ivanka to be our President’s next Chief of Staff, yet throughout her career Powell has opposed everything Trump stands for. As Stone says, this would be jumping from the frying pan into the fire, when there are already way too many quislings in the administration whose allegiance belongs, not to Donald Trump, but to the RNC, and that appears to be true for Rod Rosenstein.

Rod Rosenstein, Deputy AG

Harvard graduate Rosenstein was nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as Deputy Attorney General for the United States DOJ on January 13, 2017. Rosenstein was confirmed on April 25, 2017.  This certainly does not mean he’s a conservative, or an anti-globalist.

I would love to know who suggests these people, and then who vets them for our President…perhaps Pence and Priebus? There are only a few in this administration who are truly conservative, and one of them is already gone, General Michael Flynn, and several others never even made it to confirmation.

Rosenstein is being hailed as a brilliant choice who is admired and respected and completely free of controversy.  Excuse me, but wasn’t Comey hailed with the same exact rhetoric before he angered the left, and disappointed the right?

Leftist Slate Magazine stated that Rosenstein would be a good check against Jeff Sessions, and the Washington Com-Post even called Rosenstein a fabulous choice for the position and completely free of controversy!  Bah Humbug!  Obviously, he’s an establishment insider if these leftist rags love him.

Rosenstein and Mueller

Rosenstein joined the U.S. Department of Justice through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. From 1990 to 1993, he prosecuted public corruption cases as a trial attorney with the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division, then led by Assistant Attorney General Robert Mueller.  They’ve been joined at the hip for a long, long time.

Mueller and Rosenstein are both part of the “Deep State.”  In fact, as Stone reports, both of them have ties to the Bush machine.  Remember the Clinton theft of FBI documents?  Craig Livingstone, director of the White House Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports concerning several hundred individuals without asking permission.

Mueller served as clean up man for Bill and Hillary Clinton.  As independent counsel from 1995 to 1997, he found no criminal prosecution against White House officials who had rummaged through FBI records to get background reports in the use of political blackmail.

In 2001, top Justice Department official Lee J. Radek, roundly criticized for steering the China gate probe away from the White House, had a friend in Robert S. Mueller, President Bush’s pick to replace FBI Director Louis Freeh.  Radek ran the campaign finance task force that was charged with looking into rampant 1996 Clinton-Gore fund-raising abuses that included Chinese money-laundering and possible influence-peddling.  Many branded Radek a “bureaucrat” who was more interested in throttling the case against the Clinton White House, and thereby keeping his job, than pushing it.  Mueller even received a glowing endorsement from China cheerleaders like Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Hillary Clinton. [Link]

In the 1990s, Rosenstein was on a team of prosecutors appointed by Kenneth Starr to investigate Bill and Hillary Clinton’s “Whitewater” business dealings in Arkansas. In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder tapped him to investigate national security leaks to news outlets, a response to heavy criticism of the Obama administration by congressional Republicans.  Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr exonerated both President Clinton and the First Lady with respect to the FBI files matter in 1998.  And Ken Starr is telling the President not to fire Mueller.

Clintons and Comey

In the mid-1990s, Comey joined the Senate Whitewater Committee as a deputy special counsel. There he dug into allegations that the Clintons took part in a fraud connected to an Arkansas real estate venture gone bust. No charges were ever brought against either Clinton, but the scandal would eventually lead to independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s probe that would result in the Lewinsky scandal.

How about the Sandy Berger affair?  Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, who was sentenced in 2005 to two-years’ probation and fined $50,000 as the result of a plea bargain, for stealing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them.  He had also been functioning as a Hillary Clinton campaign adviser before his death last December.

James Comey, was the deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, and apparently limited the scope of the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger.  The documents Berger stole basically proved Bill Clinton could have gone after and killed Osama bin laden, but didn’t, proving he was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11 terrorist attack.

As I mentioned in my previous article, Comey also gave Bill Clinton a pass with his pardon of Marc Rich and others.  Then came his pass on Hillary and her email debacle, where she set up a private email server for herself, her family and Abedin which was not accessible by the federal government or congress, and on which classified documents were passed.

Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act of 1913 by allowing national defense information to be “lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed” through “gross negligence.”  And get this, Comey had Hillary Clinton’s definitive backup email device during the entire charade of an investigation into the former Secretary of State, according to court records obtained by Judicial Watch.

Godfather of Comey’s Daughter is Pence Lawyer

Here is a timeline of Comey’s career, note that he worked for McGuire Woods law firm from 1993-1996.  VP Pence’s office confirmed that he retained Richard Cullen, chairman of McGuire Woods LLP, to assist him in responding to inquiries by special counsel Robert Mueller.  Cullen and Comey used to work together at McGuire Woods, and Richard Cullen is the Godfather to one of Comey’s daughters.  Too close for comfort if you ask me.

Comey / Mueller Buddy-Buddy Connections

The fact that Robert Mueller, the former FBI head who “bungled” the post-9/11 anthrax attack, is leading the “Russia-gate” investigation should be a matter of grave concern for Americans.  Mueller’s appointment to investigate our President for sacking Comey is a conflict of interest, especially since they have worked closely together in the past.

“Former Director Mueller is exactly the right kind of individual for this job. I now have significantly greater confidence that the investigation will follow the facts wherever they lead.” Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) stated. Schumer, Dick Durbin and other Democrats echoed these comments, along with neo-cons John McCain and Paul Ryan, which should worry constitutional conservatives.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plamegate

Remember in 2003, Valerie Plame’s name being inadvertently leaked by Richard Armitage who confessed to his boss, Colin Powell?  This was a scheme against Vice President Cheney that ended in the conviction of his aide, Scooter Libby, for a weakly proven process crime.  Tag team Comey was the special prosecutor and Mueller was FBI Director.  They may well have honed their Deep State purge of political opponents then, something clearly at the bottom of this investigation into fictional “Russian collusion” and now “Obstruction of Justice” with the Trump campaign. [Link]

Amerithrax

Comey is a very close friend of Mueller, and covered for the erstwhile director in the Amerithrax affair and the upcoming inquiry could very well be a quid pro quo transaction.

Mueller thought he had his man in the bungled Anthrax investigation because two drug sniffing doggies liked scientist Steven Hatfill when he petted them.  Mueller used this flimsy proof on this conservative government scientist, when in fact, the FBI ignored a 2002 tip from a scientific colleague of the alleged anthrax killer, who turned out to be a Fort Detrick scientist named Bruce Edwards Ivins.  There was no firm proof he was responsible either, and he ended up committing suicide.  Comey seconded Mueller’s opinion, and they were both wrong.

Also check out Comey and Mueller’s showdown at John Ashcroft’s hospital bed.  Link

And don’t forget Mueller’s purposely botched probe and coverup of the BCCI scandal.

Mueller and Islam

Robert Mueller purged FBI training documents after 9/11. As reported by Rick Wells, FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom spoke to Maria Bartiromo.  The topic of the interview shifted to the issue of the real collusion, that of the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR taking a prominent role and infiltrating the FBI. He described how the White House, under both George W. Bush and the Obama regime and the FBI, including specifically Robert Mueller, changed to accommodate the demands of the terrorist front organization after the Twin Towers came down.  Mueller acquiesced with Muslim Brotherhood front group, CAIR.

He also met with Nihad Awad, executive director of Hamas doing business as CAIR, as well as senior leadership of the Islamic Institute, the American Muslim Council and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (all Muslim Brotherhood affiliates) in 2002 at FBI headquarters.

In 2005, under Mueller’s administration, the FBI presented an award to Mohamed Magid, the imam of the infamous ADAMS center – a hardline Wahhabis mosque – and the president of ISNA.

There have been several other instances of Mueller’s Muslim Brotherhood collusion and investigative “incompetence.”

In 2013, Mueller testified that he was unaware that the mosque attended by the Tsarnaev brothers, the perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombing that resulted in three deaths and close to 300 injuries, was founded by Al Qaeda financier Abdurahman Alamoudi.  Incredibly, Mueller’s department had been conducting “outreach” activities with the facility’s imam at the time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gohmert Exposed Mueller as Terrorist Facilitator

Rep. Louis Gohmert, (R-TX) knows what Robert Mueller is, and does not share the fawning reverence for him as the DC swamp creatures do.  Mueller, has a long record of being an official cover man for jihadists choosing to operate in the United States. Remember the fact that Mueller purged all of the FBI training materials and other records which indicated reference to Islamic terrorism in the months following the 9/11 attacks, but then he also ignored warnings about the Tsarnaev brothers and never even attempted to investigate their mosque.

Judicial Watch exclusively obtained droves of records back in 2013 documenting how, under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI purged all anti-terrorism training material deemed “offensive” to Muslims after secret meetings between Islamic organizations and the FBI chief. Judicial Watch had to sue to get the records and published an in-depth report on the scandal in 2013 and a lengthier, updated follow-up in 2015.  Read the full report.

When Gohmert questioned Mueller two months after the Boston bombing, he forced admissions from him of his failures or complicity in creating the situation in which the terrorist attacks occurred.  Here’s the full story.

Watch the video:

Many Uncomfortable with Mueller

Why should we be uncomfortable with Mueller? 1) The leftist establishment is comfortable with him. 2) He worked in tandem with Comey on a couple of high profile cases. 3) He was chosen as FBI head by George W. Bush (hater of Trump and owner of the words “That was some weird shit,” in describing Trump’s Inauguration speech. 4) Obama felt so comfortable with Mueller that upon taking office he extended Mueller’s ten-year tenure an additional two years.

Not exactly a resume I feel comfortable in handing our president’s fate over to.

Conclusion

One way to counter the Mueller probe is to discredit Mueller, using the facts about his terrible treatment of a series of American scientists in the anthrax case. In the end, the FBI paid off one scientist, to the tune of millions of dollars in damages, and drove another to his death. Meanwhile, the al-Qaeda operatives who carried out the attacks got away. That Mueller could survive this debacle with a sterling reputation is evidence of the corruption in the Washington, D.C. swamp.

Next up, Mueller hires 13 lawyers for this phony Russian probe and plans to hire more.

 

print

Click Here For Mass Emailing

Kelleigh Nelson

James Comey, The FBI’s, And Clinton’s Politically Corrupt Dirty Cop

Contrary to numerous false press accounts leading up to today’s hearing, Mr. Comey has now finally confirmed publicly what he repeatedly told the President privately:  The President was not under investigation as part of any probe into Russian interference.  He also admitted that there is no evidence that a single vote changed as a result of any Russian interference. Marc  Kasowitz, President Trump’s personal lawyer

How does a man with absolutely no law enforcement experience become the head of the most modern crime fighting organization in the United States? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James Comey has proven himself to be a poisonous swamp snake who was paid to deliberately provide cover for high-level corruption by the Clintons and Obama.  And now he has been offered a $10 million-dollar book deal following his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, with a movie to follow making this louse out as a hero.

We know that Comey has been central in trying to destroy the Trump campaign and then the Trump administration. He is as dirty as they come in DC.  His level of cover, the FBI, was deep into an effort to dump Trump.  And what Trump and Sessions’ DOJ did was spectacular.  When Comey was 3,000 miles away, they fired him and dumped his entire office.  Trump moved quickly, and exactly at the right time to cut off the head off the snake of this traitorous Obama/Clinton insider.  Superb inside job by Trump and Sessions!

Comey’s Clinton Connections

James Comey was also director and board member of HSBC Bank until 2013, which is tightly connected to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation received up to $81 million from clients of the controversial bank. This is the same HSBC that was accused of laundering drug cartel money, was heavily involved in the LIBOR scandal (huge price fixing scandal), and who knows what else, and all while our esteemed FBI Director James Comey says “she didn’t intend it.”  Yeah, right!

Top that off with Loretta Lynch telling Comey to call the Hillary investigation a “matter,” because the words “criminal investigation” insinuated that a crime had been committed.  Uh, yeah, it had.  Comey admitted to colluding with Loretta Lynch to falsify his statements to benefit Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Limbaugh asked where the Republicans were on Comey’s admissions about Loretta Lynch?  Not a word from them…other than Louis Gohmert.

Remember the Whitewater Investigation?  Twenty years ago, Comey, an attorney on the Senate Whitewater Investigation, was looking into the conduct of President Bill Clinton and the first lady, Hillary.  The investigation was to determine whether Bill used his political position as Governor of Arkansas in the 80s to push through an illegal loan to benefit their business partner in Whitewater.  Several people involved went to jail, but no criminal prosecution came down for the Clintons.  James Comey was the Deputy Special Counsel for the investigation.

Remember all those last-minute Bill Clinton pardons right before he left the White House? The list was supposed to be given to Congress for approval well ahead of Bill’s last day.  Among the many questionable pardons was billionaire Marc Rich (who traded illegally with America’s enemies, including Iran).  The whole deal reeked of impropriety after learning that Rich’s wife donated $450,000 to the Clinton Library.   Again, James Comey oversaw investigations of the pardons, and he did not recommend charging Clinton in any of these matters.  Barbara Olson exposed this in her book, The Final Days.  She was my friend, and died on 9/11 in the plane that hit the Pentagon.

Remember the interesting chance meeting of Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport where they allegedly spoke about their grandchildren?  Shortly after the meeting, FBI Director Comey released his decision not to press charges on Hillary.  He couldn’t wait to exonerate Hillary Clinton, and he said, “I can’t find any intent on her part to share classified data, and therefore no prosecutor would do so.”

 

 

 

 

 

AND, in an unprecedented move, he imposed a gag order on all the agents involved with the Hillary email investigation.  Suspicious?  You bet!

So, we have Lynch, previously appointed by Bill Clinton, and formerly an employee of the law firm that is connected to Hillary’s email scandal, in charge of the investigation into Hillary’s email scandal.  The lead investigative agency is led by a man who twice investigated the Clintons and both times found them not guilty of wrong doing.  He was also appointed by the current President, Obama, who appointed Lynch, who is Comey’s boss.  Comey and Lynch have known each other for decades as well.  Coincidence?  I don’t think so.

Trump Never Under Investigation

President Trump was never under investigation and Comey told him that three times, beginning in January.  Marco Rubio even made the point that everything in the administration had been leaking except that Trump was not under investigation! That didn’t leak, and of course, we know why.

The entire Senate and House Intelligence communities have known since January that Trump was not under investigation.  Every socialist Democrat as well as the Republicans, have known this. Comey had told everyone in a closed session up on Capitol Hill that Trump was not under investigation.

Many of the Democrat Senators knew our President was not being investigated, yet they continued to make those false media charges.  And guess who the worst ones were…Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren.

Dan McLaughlin, National Review: Just think how many times Schumer made the charge while knowing all along it wasn’t true. All these Democrats charging Trump, alluding to it, alleging. Some of them saying they haven’t seen any evidence of collusion. They were honest about that. But they did not divulge that they knew Trump was not under investigation. This is a huge media scam. Contrast this with Hillary.

Now the Dems are claiming they never said that Trump was under investigation by the FBI.  However, it is blatantly false, their claims appeared in numerous leftist rags.

Again, where were the Republicans shouting for the cameras, for the people, the idea that Trump had not been a target for three months and that everybody knew it? Where were the Republicans on TV excoriating this investigation and chastising the Democrats for perpetrating this fraud? Where are the Republicans?  Silent, and capitulating as usual.

Comey a Big Leaker

He leaked data, property of the FBI, to the New York Times via his professor buddy.  He’s a leaker, and for that he should be charged.  His on-camera admission was stunning.

And, while testifying, Comey stated nine times that he might be wrong. “Although I could be wrong. I might be wrong. I could very well be wrong.” Nine times. Like Limbaugh said, he was definitely covering his arse.

Here is the Director of the FBI, the nation’s top cop, and what does he do?  He acts like a whiny school boy and plays very dastardly games behind the scenes.  So, when he testifies, he tries to explain it away by saying that he was afraid of President Trump.  The guy is 6’8” tall, and he’s afraid of Trump…really?

Comey said he only started writing memos after he met Trump, because he said he thought Trump was a liar and a mean person.  He’s lying again.  He also wrote memos when he spoke to George W. Bush, and admitted it in the book, Angler, which he helped Barton Gellman write about Dick Cheney.  Perhaps he decided he’d collect info on presidents to keep in files just like those of J. Edgar Hoover.

He claimed Trump was lying about him and lying about the FBI, and that he was afraid of Trump.  So, what did he do? He called a buddy of his at the Columbia School of Journalism, Columbia University, and asked him to “share” the memos, his inside private information from talks with our President. This is not “sharing” anything; this is leaking!  And he hoped his buddy would leak it to the media.

Mark Bauerlein, writes, “During his testimony, James Comey didn’t sound like the head of a fearsome investigative agency. He sounded like a middle manager in business who’s just attended a human resources seminar on inappropriate behavior in the workplace.”

No Russian Collusion

There never was any evidence that votes were tampered with by Russia, and Comey admitted it over and over again.  So, if Trump was never part of any investigation, what is all this fake news about Russian involvement in the presidential election.  It’s horse hockey promoted by the commie Democrats and media, and we all know it.  What a waste of taxpayer dollars on this fake news garbage investigation.

Dershowitz: Dem Pundits Endangering Civil Liberties

Democrat Alan Dershowitz, a strict interpreter of the law, has been stellar in exposing the truth.  This is the crowning glory of truth to the lying leftist media from a fellow Democrat who knows the Constitution.  He has made mincemeat of the leftist commentators who haven’t a clue of what our Constitution says.  Watch his interview with Anderson Cooper.

Dershowitz’s article, Comey Confirms That I’m right — and All the Democratic Commentators Are Wrong, explains everything constitutionally.  Here’s part of what he said:

The left seems to believe the FBI Director has powers independent of the President which is totally untrue.  (Dershowitz has pointed out over and over again that the left does not understand our Constitution.)

Look, when Obama was president, he ordered the FBI to do exactly what he wanted done, and no one spoke against it.  That’s the president’s privilege.

Comey confirmed that under our Constitution, the president has the authority to direct the FBI to stop investigating any individual. The president can, in theory, decide who to investigate, who to stop investigating, who to prosecute and who not to prosecute.  The president is the head of the unified executive branch of government, and the Justice Department and the FBI work under him and he may order them to do what he wishes.

As a matter of law, Comey is 100 percent correct.  As I have long argued, and as Comey confirmed in his written statement, our history shows that many presidents—from Adams to Jefferson, to Lincoln, to Roosevelt, to Kennedy, to Bush 1, and to Obama – have directed the Justice Department with regard to ongoing investigations. The history is clear, the precedents are clear, the constitutional structure is clear, and common sense is clear.

Yet virtually every Democratic pundit, in their haste to “get” President Trump, has willfully ignored these realities.  In doing so they have endangered our civil liberties and constitutional rights.

Now that even former Director Comey has acknowledged that the Constitution would permit the president to direct the Justice Department and the FBI in this matter, let us put the issue of obstruction of justice behind us once and for all and focus on the political, moral, and other non-criminal aspects of President Trump’s conduct.

Donald Trump cannot be prosecuted for exercising constitutional authority.

Kasowitz Files Complaint

President Trump’s personal lawyer Marc Kasowitz will file a complaint with the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General asking for an inquiry into James Comey over his leaking the details of his conversations with the president and the memos about those conversations, according to a source close to the Trump legal team.

Kasowitz is also drafting a similar submission to be sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the former FBI director’s Senate testimony and “other matters,” according to ABC news.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

Trump Follows Constitution, Withdraws From Paris Accord

There is no proof that carbon dioxide is causing or precedes global warming…All indications are that the minor warming cycle finished in 2001 and that Arctic ice melting is related to cyclical orbit-tilt-axis changes in earth’s angle to the sun.  John Williams, agricultural scientist, researcher, author, and educator, University of Melbourne

The Constitution gives the President the power to commit the United States to treaties – but only with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the US Senate, and only if the agreement does not contravene the Constitution. Keep that in mind as we look at Obama’s actions with the signing late in his presidency of the Paris Accord.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signature of Paris Accord Unconstitutional

Obama claimed that the Paris Agreement was not a treaty, thus he did not submit the Agreement to the Senate for approval. The problem is that the Paris Agreement is certainly a treaty, but it was a unilateral act by President Obama that had no basis in the U.S. Constitution.

It should have and would have required Senate ratification by a two-thirds majority, under the Constitution’s Treaty Clause (Art 2, Sec. 2, Clause 2). That’s how the Framers of the Constitution understood the Clause.

The reason we’re being told that the Paris Accord is a nontreaty is because it evades the requirements of the Constitution to ratify it. Why? Because of something called the “Treaty on Treaties.”

What Makes Paris Accord a Treaty?

The Paris agreement is a treaty as defined by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, i.e., “an international agreement concluded between two or more States in written form and governed by international law….”

So why does Senate confirmation matter? Our Framers wisely believed that it would be unsafe to give one man alone the power to bind the country through a treaty, and they were right, because the Senate would not have ratified the Paris Accord!

So, how did we legally bypass the Constitution and get a treaty?  Well, we can thank former President Nixon.

Nixon’s Treaty on Treaties

In 1970, President Richard M. Nixon signed a monstrosity known as the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. It is referred to as the “Treaty on Treaties,” — even though our Constitution is clear that a treaty requires a supermajority of two-thirds of the Senate to ratify.  The U.S. Senate has not given its advice and consent to this treaty either, so it should be withdrawn as well.

Don’t start nodding off, this is important…hang in there with me. Under Article 18 of this Treaty on Treaties, once a nation signs a treaty — or merely does something that could be interpreted as “expressing its consent to be bound by the treaty” — that nation is “obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of the treaty.”  Here’s what it says:

Article 18. OBLIGATION NOT TO DEFEAT THE OBJECT AND PURPOSE

OF A TREATY PRIOR TO ITS ENTRY INTO FORCE

A State is obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of a treaty when:

(a) It has signed the treaty or has exchanged instruments constituting the treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, until it shall have made its intention clear not to become a party to the treaty; or

(b) It has expressed its consent to be bound by the treaty, pending the entry into force of the treaty and provided that such entry into force is not unduly delayed.

In other words, the Constitution notwithstanding, once a presidential administration signs or otherwise signals assent to the terms of an international agreement, the United States must consider itself bound – even though the Senate has not approved it, even though it has not been ratified.  Totally unconstitutional.

The Treaty on Treaties claims the equivalent of Senate ratification. Obama’s signature is what triggered the Treaty on Treaties obligation to follow it, even though it hasn’t been ratified.

Clinton signed Kyoto and Bypassed Senate

Of course, presidents don’t like going to the Senate for approval of their pet projects. Back in 1998 Bill Clinton signed the Kyoto Treaty on global warming without submitting it to the Senate for ratification. He knew that if he did so the treaty would be DOA.

President George W. Bush withdrew the signature of the United States from the treaty in 2001, even as Donald Trump backed out of the Paris Accord. In both cases there was a lot of huffing and puffing from the left, but Mr. Bush and Mr. Trump were simply doing what their voters wanted. They were also more faithful to the Constitution than Clinton or Obama had been.

Basically, Obama’s signing of this Agreement had no Constitutional standing whatsoever, so President Trump’s withdrawal was officially burying a legally dead horse.

Some Claim Withdrawal Takes Years

Any number of leftist articles have claimed that actual withdrawal from this agreement would take three or four years with considerable administrative and legal costs.  They also claim we’re the highest per capita emissions producer, but they forget China is in a pollution league by itself accounting for 30 percent of worldwide emissions.  Article 28 of the Agreement purported to prohibit any signatory nation from withdrawing until three years after its entry into force on Nov. 4, 2016. But that restriction—like the entire Agreement—was constitutionally null and void.

Other articles claim the agreement is fundamentally symbolic, which we also know is hogwash, it would have thoroughly destroyed America’s economy.  Link

This Treaty on Treaties is a mechanism to commit the United States to things that are drastically, horribly detrimental to us without going through the constitutional process that ratifies such treaties. It substitutes verbal consent of agreement in principle, as the equivalent of a signature and two-thirds of the Senate voting to affirm. The American people are being told, “It’s only symbolic, just a piece of paper, means nothing.” They’re also being told that Trump would gain a foothold with the left if he kept it in force.  What nonsense!  The left is the enemy, we need to defeat them at every turn.

Andrew McCarthy is Right

Here’s what he wrote in his article, Don’t Stop With Paris!

President Trump should not stop at Paris. While he’s at it, he should affirmatively withdraw the United States from the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. We don’t need an international convention on that. We have a Constitution that renders multilateral boondoggles unbinding in the absence of super-majority Senate consent. Want to put “America first?” Then it is past time to rectify our sovereignty and the rule of law — our law.

Mysterious illness tied to marijuana use on the rise in states with legal weed

NEW YORK (CBS) – For more than two years, Lance Crowder was having severe abdominal pain and vomiting, and no local doctor could figure out why. Finally, an emergency room physician in Indianapolis had an idea.

“The first question he asked was if I was taking hot showers to find relief. When he asked me that question, I basically fell into tears because I knew he had an answer,” Crowder said.

The answer was cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, or CHS. It’s caused by heavy, long-term use of various forms of marijuana. For unclear reasons, the nausea and vomiting are relieved by hot showers or baths.

“They’ll often present to the emergency department three, four, five different times before we can sort this out,” said Dr. Kennon Heard, an emergency room physician in Aurora, Colorado.

He co-authored a study showing that since 2009, when medical marijuana became widely available, emergency room visits diagnoses for CHS in two Colorado hospitals nearly doubled. In 2012, the state legalized recreational marijuana.

“It is certainly something that, before legalization, we almost never saw,” Heard said. “Now we are seeing it quite frequently.”

Outside of Colorado, when patients do end up in an emergency room, the diagnosis is often missed. Partly because doctors don’t know about CHS, and partly because patients don’t want to admit to using a substance that’s illegal.

CHS can lead to dehydration and kidney failure, but usually resolves within days of stopping drug use. That’s what happened with Crowder, who has been off all forms of marijuana for seven months.

“Now all kinds of ambition has come back. I desire so much more in life and, at 37 years old, it’s a little late to do it, but better now than never,”he said.

CHS has only been recognized for about the past decade, and nobody knows exactly how many people suffer from it. But as more states move towards the legalization of marijuana, emergency room physicians like Dr. Heard are eager to make sure both doctors and patients have CHS on their radar.

The TSA is going to look through your books but promises not to notice what you’re reading

June 1, 2017

The TSA began a new screening policy for paper products at airport checkpoints in Missouri last month, and now the agency’s branch in Sacramento, California, is testing out more invasive searches for books and food items.

In the new system, passengers are required to take all reading material and food out of their carry-on luggage and place it in a separate bin. TSA screeners can “fan” through travelers’ books to see if anything is hidden in the pages, but agency officials insist they will not pay attention to the content. Critics have long argued passengers selected for extra screening are not chosen as randomly as the TSA claims, and book content — particularly of a political or religious nature — could re-ignite that debate.

“It’s always been a series of insults,” said Julie Sze, a University of California, Davis, professor who experienced the test procedure at Sacramento. “Books, magazines, food, those are like my three treasured things. It feels personal on a whole different level.”

Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said Sunday he will likely expand the new searches nationwide and may also ban laptop carry-ons for all international flights in and out of the United States. Bonnie Kristian