Florida Parkland School shooting survivor David Hogg is a fraud

Here it is folks…fake students, fake reporting from same student…another crisis ACTOR.

Fellowship of the Minds

In the aftermath of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, metropolitan Miami, Florida, a young man named David Hogg has appeared in many TV news videos and interviews, such as this one:

This is what David Hogg claims to be:

  • A 17-year-old student, a senior, atMarjory Stoneman Douglas High School (CNN).
  • The son of a FBI agent — the federal agency that is so maligned by President Trump.
  • He and his family moved to Florida several years ago, when he was a freshman. Hogg once wrote on Reddit about moving in the middle of his freshman year and how hard it was because so many people in high school weren’t authentic (Heavy).
  • Hogg is an aspiring broadcast journalist.
  • He said he was in his environmental science class when he heard the first gunshots, and that they never had…

View original post 496 more words

The crisis actors of Florida Parkland School shooting

When people doubt what you say, show them this! There’s David Hogg, crisis actor…and it’s proven

Fellowship of the Minds

On the afternoon of February 14, 2018, Valentine’s Day, America was subjected to another mass school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, metropolitan Miami, Florida.

We are told that 17 people were killed and 15 more were taken to hospitals. The alleged perpetrator, 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz, a former student of the high school, was arrested shortly after the shooting and charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder. He confessed to the shooting, according to the Broward County Sheriff’s Office. (Wikipedia)

And, as in the case of past school shootings, calls for gun control immediately followed the Parkland school shooting but with a new twist. In addition to the “usual suspects” of politicians and amoral celebrities, students are also clamoring for gun control, never mind that Cruz had obtained his AR-15 legally and passed the required background checks. (See DCG’s “Hashtag solutions: Washington state…

View original post 568 more words

President Trump and the Darkest Hour

By Jim O’Neill

Never give in, never give in — never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense.  Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) “Never Give In Speech” Harrow School, 1941

Never, ever, give up!  …Demand the best from yourself and be totally unafraid to challenge entrenched interests and failed power structures.  …Relish the opportunity to be an outsider.  Embrace that label.  Being an outsider is fine, embrace the label, because it’s the outsiders who change the world and who make a real and lasting difference.  

President Donald J. Trump “Commencement Speech” Liberty University 1917

If you support President Trump and have not yet seen the movie “Darkest Hour” permit me to suggest that you do so at the earliest opportunity.  If you are anything like myself you will be struck by the similarities between the challenges faced by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in the early days of WW II, and those faced by American President Donald Trump almost eighty years later.

The details of the challenges each man faced during their initial time in office of course differ greatly, but the general tone of political nastiness and waging an uphill battle…that is remarkably similar.

Churchill followed hard on the heels of Prime Minister Neville “Peace in Our Time” Chamberlain and his efforts to appease Adolph Hitler.  Trump followed President Barack “Lead from Behind” Obama, who tried to appease…damn near everyone.

Winston Churchill confronted the eugenics and social engineering constructs of Hitler’s vile Nazi fascism.  A British victory was far from certain in the early stages of the war – it was, in fact, highly unlikely.  Nonetheless, failure was not an option.

But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.

Sir Winston Churchill “Their Finest Hour” speech, June 18, 1940

President Trump confronts a globalist vision that when stripped of its veneer of civility and bonhomie is every bit as power hungry, debased, and delusional as anything the Nazis planned.  The globalists wish to destroy nation states – President Trump wants to make America great again.  These desires and viewpoints are diametrically opposed.

Americanism, not Globalism, will be our credo.

Donald J. Trump “Acceptance Speech” July 21, 2016

Churchill faced the immense juggernaut of Hitler’s military might.  President Trump faces the collectivist agenda of an entrenched, fanatical, ruthless, well-funded and prolific globalist elite (and their attendant useful idiots).

Both Trump and Churchill share the quality of being good men who know that they are not saints – and we know it too, and that’s okay, that’s more than okay.  Leave sainthood to the saintly.  When the times call for a courageous street fighter you don’t call on Mother Theresa.

Great Britain needed Churchill – especially during the dire early days of WW II — its lion to face off against Hitler and provide an inspiring roar.  Likewise, some eighty years later, America needs its lion to roar the will of We the People in the face of the Machiavellian duplicity of our government and media, and share our outrage at the desecration of our beloved country.

In any event, if you have not yet seen “Darkest Hour” I recommend you check it out.  Perhaps you will see the similarities between Prime Minister Churchill and President Trump that I do.  In my opinion God blessed the United Kingdom with Churchill when they desperately needed him…and God has blessed America, indeed the world, with the light of President Trump during another dark and challenging time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hollywood Now Demands Moral Conduct in Film Industry

by Rev. Austin Miles

Strict Morality Code Making a Comeback

For years, Hollywood deftly swept all the sexual exploits, (straight gay and inventive), under the red carpet. That carpet was difficult to peek under since everyone walked or marched over it.

Hollywood’s bizarre secrets were located right under everyone’s noses, so close that nobody actually noticed. If they did, everyone kept their mouths shut.

Something not so secret from the early days, was the infamous Casting Couch, which was a multi-functional office fixture that served many purposes including casting parts for new films.

They were clearly seen in every producer’s office.  Even though well-known, when it was mentioned in discussions, people spoke in whispers.

Movies began changing tone–which all started when Clark Gable in the final scene of Gone with the Wind said to Vivian Leigh, “Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn!”  

Shocked audiences gasped. That was to be the first time that a swear word had ever been uttered on-screen.

From their language in film gradually became street talk, then “F” words, even blasphemous words and just plain gutter talk. Then the movies began having explicit sex scenes. So much so that one actor said, “Now they are doing on screen what they used to do off-screen in order to get on-screen.”

In the early days, there was indeed a strict morality code. Any hanky panky on or near the set would make the front pages while ending careers. Adultery, when found out, even while overseas would hit headlines and the careers of both went down the tubes.

This means that in their private lives as well as their public lives, they had to exhibit appropriate conduct at all times and present themselves properly at all times. They had to be well-groomed, neatly dressed, (mostly in suits), anytime they were in public. After all, they represented millions of dollars in investments in their films.

You would never see an actor or actress on an interview program with unwashed hair going in all directions, “five o’clock shadow”–remember that?– when one had a partial beard (fuzz) simply for not shaving and dressed like they had just fallen out of a trash bin.

One would never hear curse words, vulgar words, gutter talk in general. Today movie dialogue contains many “F” words, “S” words (advanced word for bowels) and all slang street talk, not only in their films, but constantly in their personal lives.

A good example is reading interviews in The Hollywood Reporterespecially the actresses–women, who constantly use those words which are printed in full. Why do the women use more “F” words in everyday conversation than the men?

Then cometh Harvey Weinstein, who was under the impression that all women in his path were created solely to satisfy his out-of-control lusts.

Weinstein was one of the wealthiest most influential people in Hollywood who could make or break a career simply by his word. Nobody dared cross him.

In the early days of Hollywood, movie stars were really movie stars by the way they conducted and carried themselves. There was a strict code of ethics and morality. Even portrayed married couples slept in twin beds. Every movie first was screened before the Hayes Movie Code, basically censors, who checked all content.

That board also had a code book that went to every producer’s office, explaining among other things, ‘no scene shall be shot that will stimulate the lower emotions’.

There would be a credit before each movie stating that this movie has met the criterion of the Hayes Movie Code.

Restraints gradually loosened as movies became more daring, raunchy and political to move from entertainment to persuasion.

Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy a Senator from Wisconsin was a patriot who was appalled at the number of Communists he found in government positions. In the 1940’s he found 205 Communists working on Capitol Hill in the State Department!

He then focused on the motion picture industry where he saw subtle Communist references. In the 1950’s he joined the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) and trials were held to determine if an actor was or had ever been a member of the Communist Party. The Senator feared that the Party would influence movie audiences to embrace Communism.

Those actors, writers and producers who were tried, wound up on a “black list” meaning that no one in Hollywood could hire them.

Dalton Trumbo, a gifted writer was one of those blacklisted. Even though a brilliant writer nobody would hire him to write the screen play of an upcoming movie. In later years, he started again, but using a new name. Most of the producers knew who he was and the quality of his work so they went along with the name change for the screen credit.

Senator McCarthy knew his history. When Hitler was coming into power he wanted to purge all Jews from Germany, indeed from humanity. Several Communist Jews there worked in films and quickly escaped Germany to come to the U.S. where they almost immediately found employment in the fledgling movie business.

And they brought their Communist roots with them. These filmmakers, very skilled, grew in power as the movies turned from entertainment to indoctrination. This was the concern of Senator Joseph McCarthy.

The movies became anything BUT entertainment as they glamorized every form of filthy lifestyles, increasing movie-goers taste for the bizarre and bringing us to Harvey Weinstein who sexually harassed, raped and fondled too many women to count.

Movie attendance had already begun to drop with less box office returns. Business became worse. Then, Producer Harvey Weinstein blew up due to sexual accusations. He was kicked out of his own studio while more sexual violations exploded from all studios. Even Fox News made the front pages for Sexual harassment crimes that took place there.

Millions of dollars have been lost, millions spent on re-shooting scenes in order to put another actor in place of the one who could not keep his zipper activated.

The movie, All the Money in the World had already been shot with Kevin Spacey in the lead role. Spacey who preferred little boys was caught.  It cost the movie company an extra $10 million to re-shoot those scenes with Christopher Plummer taking over the lead role.

Moral Turpitude is now included in every studio contract with broad morality clauses into its talent deals, giving it the ability to terminate any contract “if the talent engages in conduct that results in adverse publicity or notoriety or risks bringing the talent into public disrepute, contempt, scandal of ridicule.”

There has been talk about Sex Abuse Insurance. That is a gamble that any insurance agency should refuse. That is too much of a risk. Hollywood actors, producers, directors have proved to be too passionate to really be trusted. (Passionate was a more sophisticated word than horny).

It’s about time that morality, decorum and responsibility return to those in a public life.  Movies that glorify brutality, glamorize thieves, criminals, adultery, and even hookers make a huge impression on young people. They need to see movies that give positive examples of life and conduct that they could emulate.

Instead of allowing movies to train us and our children, perhaps it is time to devote more time to your church, support your pastor and socialize with those with family values who successfully encourage one another to live a life without reproach with dignity, joy, love,  and  determining to grow closer to God and Jesus.

It has been proven that the other way does not work. This one absolutely does. As the former spokesman for Men’s Warehouse would say; (lower your voice)  “I guarantee it.”

What the MOO can do for YOU

NOTE:  HIGH FAT diets have been used to stop epilepsy in babies and adults.

Last time I was at a coffee shop, they had 1 percent, 2 percent, skim, and soy milk all out on the counter.

Notice what’s missing?

I sure did. The half-and-half was hidden behind the counter, like some kind of dirty magazine, because — let’s face it — that’s just the reputation that full-fat dairy has these days.

Well, friend, it’s time for a reputation rescue, as new research shows that you don’t want to skim the fat at all.

When it comes to milk, those fats aren’t dangerous.

They’re ESSENTIAL to your health!

Now, I’m not saying that you should glug half-and-half (although it sure is great in coffee).

But if you want some milk, get the real deal. Get real, fresh, full-fat WHOLE milk, as new research shows that it doesn’t do ANY of the horrible things that the mainstream naysayers have been mooing about.

Just the opposite: It can PROTECT your heart and CUT your health risks by at least one critical measure.

Milk can stimulate your body into cranking out HDL cholesterol, the form of cholesterol that even the mainstream calls “good,” since it helps clear all the junk out of your arteries and cuts your risk of heart attack and stroke.

The more HDL you’ve got, the lower your risk — a link so clear that Big Pharma has, of course, tried to make drugs to boost those levels.

Tried… and FAILED.

But who needs meds when you’ve got some moo?

In the new study, folk were given a tall, cool 16-ounce glass of milk a day for three weeks. Some were forced to gag on skim, while the rest got smooth and delicious whole milk.

Then, they did the whole study all over again, with everyone switching places.

It didn’t matter who got what or when. All that mattered was the whole milk: When folks drank it, their HDL levels rose.

Of course, you can hear the health nags going on and on already about all of the extra calories and fat in whole milk and how it can cause OTHER problems even if it raises HDL levels.

Except it didn’t.

It didn’t raise LDL levels (which don’t matter nearly as much as the mainstream claims), and it didn’t raise glucose or insulin, either.

That shouldn’t be too surprising, as studies have repeatedly shown that the extra fat and calories can HELP, not hurt.

People who drink delicious and filling whole milk eat less later, and they are less likely to gain weight.

Time to take all of the weak and watery low- and no-fat milks and dump them down the drain.

You never wanted that watered-down milk anyway.

It’s time to go back — it’s time to take real whole milk out of hiding and put it back into your fridge.

Getting a mooooooove on,
Jack Harrison

P.S. One of my favorite ways to drink milk is by warming it up before I go to bed — but every now and then, even ol’ Jack here needs something a little more powerful to bring on some good Zzzzz’s.

When I want to fall asleep in minutes and not stare at the ceiling for hours (and, let’s face it, who doesn’t want that?), there’s a crazy trick I use that goes to work INSTANTLY — even faster than that warm milk. And I’ll tell you, this thing is a GODSEND.

I’ll have more on this trick that can help ANYONE fall asleep in minutes, so keep an eye on your inbox.

 

 

Was crash of Russian flight 6W703 another Arkancide?

This article covers this entire tragedy and why it probably happened

Fellowship of the Minds

On 11 February 2018, a Russian commercial plane, Saratov Airlines flight 6W703, crashed shortly after take off from Moscow’s Domodedovo airport, killing all 71 people (65 passengers, 6 crew) on board.

Witnesses said the plane, an Antonov An-148 aircraft, was in flames as it fell from the sky. Russia’s gazeta.ru website cited unnamed investigators as saying the pilot had reported a technical malfunction and asked for clearance for an emergency landing at the nearby Zhukovsky International airport. Other reports said one of the plane’s engines may have exploded before the crash. The flight-tracking site Flightradar24 tweeted that the 7-year-old passenger jet had gone into a steep descent five minutes after take-off, after which it vanished from radars. (The Guardian)

The Guardian maintains that plane crashes are common in Russia, where airlines often operate ageing aircraft in testing conditions. Some recent examples:

  • In November 2017, a light aircraft crashed…

View original post 1,062 more words

Obama CONNED By Portrait Painter – Smithsonian About To Rip Painting Off The Wall And Destroy It

BREAKING: Alzheimer’s? Hillary Forgets Who She is on Live TV

FDR’S ‘NEW DEAL’ SOCIAL SECURITY ACT JUST THAT

by Rev. Austin Miles

Have you noticed that Social Security is now identified as an ‘entitlement’ like welfare, food stamps, housing, medical, and education?

That is exactly how the government and their phony newspapers describe this today to the public. This is a typical government and newspaper lie.

How can this be like a welfare “entitlement” when all S.S. recipients paid into a special government savings account all their working lives “so that they would receive an income when they retire.”

What is more the citizens had no choice in joining this government program. On May 6, 1933 it was made clear by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) that funds would be automatically taken from our paychecks for our futures….why after all, we would get it all back with interest when we retired saith they.

What is more, our first progressive president stated, that the Social Security Card and number would not be used for identification. Get that? Got it.

That statement was printed clearly on the right hand bottom of the cards issued as you can see clearly on the photo of Elvis Presley’s S.S. Card as was printed on all SS Cards during those years.

So we were all told that the social security card and ID number would NOT be used for identification. Another lie. They were thinking well ahead. Fortunately, Donald Trump was elected as President of the U.S. before this plan could go a full circle.

The post-plot was to construct a ‘chip’ that would be implanted in Americans so the government can keep track of all of us. This means our transactions, medical treatment and Big Brother will know at all times where we are and where our kids go to school.

The FDR years inched us very subtlety into progressiveness; from there to socialism, to leftism and now….Communism. So we fell for the ‘New Deal’ which was actually a Raw Deal. This was and is an example of gentle persuasion, even though today there is nothing gentle or subtle about it. Thank God, President Trump is now in charge and will push back the Communist invasion.

Let’s take another look at the Social Security Card and number which was intended to be the forerunner of creating the welfare society totally dependent upon the government, which has happened already, advancing the Communist goal.

Now take a close look at the info below which shows the history of the March of The Reds.

A HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.

Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.

Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION message on the cards were removed.

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises with updates are shown.

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and Spent].

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed].

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US.

AND MY FAVORITE:

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.

How many people can YOU share this with? Actions are required if change is to come.

WHITE HOUSE OPINION LINE: 202.456.1111

GOD BLESS AMERICA AND OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP.

Capitol Switchboard for your Senators and representatives (202)-224-3121

We are grateful to column contributor Lawrence Craig for gathering these facts.

And One Last One For The Mind-Scrubbed Kiddies… [Have A Nice Day — Bit@h]

Neil deGrasse Tyson Exposed | Hollywood Actor

10 MIINUTES: #Q #QANON – 7 MISSING CHILDREN – FBI LITMUS TEST #followthewhiterabbit #thestormishere

America’s Nightmare Begins –

It’s Only 20 Minutes… LISTEN UP My Friends… Please…

Our Beloved #Republic Is Under #DeepState Attack: Let the #Revolution Begin Anew | Here’s What to Do.

Blood pressure targets get TRASHED in shocking new report

You read it here first in the Daily Dose: The new blood pressure targets pushed on the masses by the drug-shilling stooges of the American Heart Association will HURT and maybe even KILL innocent Americans.

Now, at least one major mainstream medical organization agrees!

The American College of Physicians has just cranked out a blistering statement slamming both the AHA and American College of Cardiology for their thickheaded new guidelines.

These guidelines are a flat-out assault on sanity, dropping the definition of “hypertension” down from 140/90 to 130/80 mm Hg.

That 10-point switch means more than 30 million Americans went from “normal” BP to “dangerously high” BP practically overnight. And many of them — 4.2 million new patients, to be exact — will be told by their docs that they need meds.

Talk about a wet kiss for the drug industry!

That has members of the ACP’s Clinical Guidelines Committee absolutely livid.

They fired off an editorial in the Annals of Internal Medicinepractically declaring war on these nonsensical guidelines.

“Are the harms, costs, and complexity of care associated with this new target justified by the presumed benefits of labeling nearly half the U.S. population as unwell and subjecting them to treatment?” they wrote. “We think not and believe that many primary care providers and patients would agree.”

You’re darned right they’d agree.

Any doc who’s been around the block a few times knows the dirty secret of BP meds: They hurt far more patients than they help.

And that’s especially true for older folks.

Instead of cutting the guidelines, many top scientists think that we should be RAISING them and pushing for FEWER older patients on the meds.

That’s what the ACP itself did last year.

It upped its guidelines to 150 in folks ages 60 and older, and it’s hardly alone in blasting the new guidelines.

Another editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine says that the guidelines are not only set too low, but they’re also bat-poop crazy in at least one other way: They’re trying to push a one-size-fits-all formula on the masses.

A 30-year-old and an 80-year-old now have the same exact goal, something the editorial notes is “virtually impossible” for the folks on the older side of the coin.

It’s always good to see the time-tested wisdom of the Daily Dosebacked by a major group such as this one. But let’s face it: While they’re arguing with each other, docs are already busily pushing meds onto millions of patients.

If your doc is one of them, point out these new reports and see if you can talk him out of it.

If you’re a little on the bigger side, you’ll make a better case for yourself if you drop a few pounds — which will bring BP down with it — so you can show the doc that you can take care of business on your own.

Keeping up the pressure,
Jack Harrison

The cancer risk you DON’T know about

The Chernobyl disaster of 1986 is STILL causing cancer more than 30 years later, and it’s not just smack in the middle of the nuke zone over there.

It’s happening RIGHT HERE…. RIGHT NOW… more than 4,000 miles away!

A new study finds that folks who had simply been in the same region as Chernobyl — even as far as Poland, some 500 miles away — and then left are still, today, developing cancer.

These aren’t just folks who moved a short distance away, either.

The new study focused on a cancer cluster in New York City, where 10 people developed a rare form of the disease called vitreoretinal lymphoma, which hits the eyes.

The one thing that those people have in common is that — decades ago — they had the bad luck to be within a few hundred miles of Chernobyl.

This might seem like a random bit of disaster trivia. You’ve never come within 1,000 miles of Chernobyl, right?

But this is just the tip of a spooky glowing iceberg.

You could STILL be getting slammed by invisible radiation… right now… that triggers the damaging free radicals that pound your cells with 8 billion strikes per second.

Some of it’s from nuclear disasters such as Chernobyl… Fukushima… Three Mile Island… or the dozens of “small incidents” that get no attention. (Don’t even get me started on how little we know about the military nuclear facilities scattered around the nation.)

They can slam you even if you’re hundreds (in some cases, even thousands) of miles away.

But these aren’t the only sources of radiation. They’re not even the biggest sources of radiation.

All over the world — including (or ESPECIALLY) here in the United States — people are exposed to constant low-level radiation from medical screenings, cellphones, microwave ovens, and more.

That radiation doesn’t go in and out of your body quickly like a drug.

It stays inside and builds up over time.

Right now, SO many people are accumulating SO much radiation from SO many sources at once that some of the world’s leading scientists — including researchers from Harvard Medical School, Johns Hopkins, and Columbia University — issued a statement on radiation to the United Nations and World Health Organization.

They’re URGING governments to reveal the truth about the damage of this constant low-level radiation exposure and calling on them to create “harm reduction strategies” to prevent both exposure and the risks associated with it.

They haven’t yet. They don’t even want to talk about it. And by the time they get around to it, it could be too late for many cancer victims.

Fortunately, you can act on your own.

You can’t clear the radiation out of the atmosphere, but you can arm your body to face it, fight it, defend against it, and protect you from the consequences.

Look for a quality defense formula built around essential antioxidants that’s proven to fight the free radicals unleashed by exposure to radiation and other sources.

Fighting back,
Jack Harrison