Daily Archives: January 11, 2026

Invasion of the KILLER bedbugs

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | 2 comments

A huge fireball is seen over a rental car where a Long Island man tried to kill bedbugs with alcohol

WASHINGTON – A A guy in Detroit – the No. 1 city in America for bedbug infestation – got so bugged early Sunday by the lingering problem in his apartment that he sprayed himself with alcohol to kill the pests.

But, later, when he lit a cigarette he nearly killed himself along with the bedbugs.

bedbug

He’s recuperating from severe burns.

Not everyone plagued with bedbugs is as fortunate as this victim. It turns out the bedbug infestations spreading through major cities in America are actually killing people.

  • Last month, an 89-year-old Minnesota woman’s only child was charged with killing her by suffocating her in a garbage bag after beating her with a sculpture and choking her didn’t work – all because their home was infested with bedbugs. Michael Theodore Gallagher, 62, is facing a single count of a single count of second-degree unpremeditated murder. The bedbugs have not been charged.
  • Last April on Long Island a man set his rental car ablaze while trying to kill bedbugs inside the vehicle. Scott Kemery suffered first- and second-degree burns in the incident outside an Eastport, New York, supermarket. He, too, poured alcohol over the insects, then sat in the car and lit a cigarette, setting off the blaze.
  • In February, a baby died and four young siblings were left in critical condition after they were accidentally exposed to bedbug fumigation chemicals at their western Canada home. Shazia Yarkhan’s sister was trying to kill bed bugs with a chemical brought from Pakistan, where the family had recently vacationed. Within hours of the fumigation taking place, all five children that were present in the home became seriously ill, with the youngest losing her life.

Tough to eradicate, people are improvising in their war on bedbugs. Since bedbugs drop dead at temperatures of 115 degrees Fahrenheit, victims are increasingly turning to heat as their favorite weapon.

But, like rubbing alcohol, that brings other problems, say fire departments across the country. Recently, firefighters in Richmond, Virginia, introduced new rules to require exterminators who use heat to kill bedbugs to register annually with the department.

bedbug-infestation-graphic

The bedbug fighters use propane or electric heaters to raise indoor temperatures to 135 degrees, which fire departments worry can kill more than bedbugs and have caused plastic objects to melt and sprinkler systems to be damaged.

The Richmond Fire Department has introduced a local ordinance that would require exterminators who use heat to kill bedbugs to register annually with the department. In addition, if combustible material isn’t removed before the treatment, the whole house can go up in smoke.

The pest-control company Terminix came out this week with its list of the top 15 cities in America – with Detroit winning the dishonor of No. 1, replacing Philadelphia, which dropped to No. 3.

“We’ve seen a steady increase in bedbugs since the 1990s, which has been influenced by increased international travel and infestations left untreated,” said Paul Curtis, manager of technical services at Terminix. “Most of the cities in our top 15 are big tourist and business destinations, making travelers even more at risk for encounters with bed bugs – whether it’s on the plane, at their hotel, in a movie theater or riding in a taxi. The name ‘bedbug’ is deceptive, as these pests can thrive just about anywhere.”

Bedbugs do like beds. They like Detroit and they like beds. But they can also be found in airplanes, daycare centers, schools, restaurants and, most of all, hotel rooms.

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/01/michael-gallagher-bedbug-killer-mugshot-600.jpg

Michael Gallagher allegedly killed his own mother after bedbugs drove him crazy

Michael Gallagher allegedly killed his own mother because their home was infested with bedbugs

They’re hard to find because of their small, flat bodies. One surefire trick is to turn up the sheets on your bed at the corners to look for tiny black spots. With the prevalence of bedbugs in even expensive hotel rooms, it’s a good idea to do this as soon as you check in to your room. Take a close look in mattress seams. If you smell a musty odor or see small blood spots, pack your bags, call the bellboy and get your money back.

Bedbugs have developed resistance to most pesticides used in the U.S., explaining why people are driven to distraction – and even murder – by their presence.

The town of Bucyrus, Ohio, discovered over the New Year holiday an unusual bedbug problem that has officials scratching their heads, their legs, their arms and other body parts.

“Our ambulances, police cars and school buses transport people with bedbugs,” city law director Robert Ratliff said this week. He related how over the New Year’s holiday weekend EMS personnel on three separate occasions had to transport a person who was infested with bedbugs.

“We’re going to see a lot of costs in hidden ways,” he said. “At a certain level it becomes a mental health issue.”

And that is true.

Bedbugs are driving Americans crazy.

Older Americans remember a time when the country was virtually free of the pests. DDT killed them. But then DDT was banned. No other pesticide was as effective. And, despite the environmental fears DDT raised, it was relatively safe for humans.

The bedbug problem is now sweeping across America and is a particular problem for apartment dwellers who can kill them only to see them come back because the guy next door didn’t kill his.
Hotel and motel rooms are a big problem – and don’t think paying a big price will save you from getting eaten.

A California couple checked into a $400-a-night Central Park hotel room over the New Year holiday and discovered hundreds of bedbugs lurking beneath their mattress.

“It looked like black mud was jammed into the seam of the bed,” said Elgin Ozlen. “I lost it. They looked like they could hurt horses. It was a colony, a breeding ground.”

Ozlen posted video to YouTube of the skin-crawling sight that greeted him when he flipped the mattress inside the Astor on the Park hotel.

His girlfriend suffered about 75 bites and blemishes on her fingers, toes, arms and stomach from the ravenous bugs. Ozlen, of Long Beach, California, spent the first few hours of New Year’s Day searching for soothing ointment.

See astonishing video of a hotel guest exposing a massive bedbug infestation:
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/invasion-of-the-killer-bedbugs/#UKfovqPEyLOr71X3.99

2 Comments

Posted in Health

Tagged

PIRATE TAKEOVER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | 2 comments

BY VICKY DAVIS FOR TVOINEWS.COM

The power of the nation-state to deal with external threats is the military. The power of the nation-state internally is the Administrative or Bureaucratic State. Our Administrative State has been infiltrated and the infiltrators are attempting to impose policies through administrative regulatory systems that are foreign to the American systems of government, the American people and our way of life. At the center of those foreign policies is the United Nations which sits on the East River in Manhattan within the jurisdiction of the New York/New Jersey Port Authority.

Last September there was a major spill of toxic mine waste into the Animas River in Colorado. A man named Mathy Stanislaus was in charge of the EPA clean-up site. Mathy was not in any way qualified to oversee a western mine clean-up operation. He was put into that position as many have been put into position within our government because of their affiliation with the United Nations. Their loyalties are to the United Nations and that’s their agenda. It’s more complicated than this, but one could think of it as a colonizing operation – the attempt to implement a colonial management system within the Administrative State.

Mathy was in charge of the Gold King mine cleanup that spilled toxic mine waste into the Animas River in Colorado. You can read his biography HERE. The following is an excerpt:

Mathy Stanislaus was nominated by President Barack Obama for the position of Assistant Administrator in EPA’s Office of Land and Emergency Management (OLEM) on March 31, 2026 and began in his service on June 8, 2026 after confirmation by the U.S. Senate.

“Mr. Stanislaus has also been an advisor to other federal government agencies, including Congress and the United Nations on a variety of environmental issues. He chaired an EPA workgroup in 1997 that investigated the clustering of waste transfer stations in low income and communities of color throughout the United States. He has served on the board of the NYC Environmental Justice Alliance. In June 1994, as a member of United Nations Environment Programme – Environmental Advisory Council, he served as counsel to the United Nations’ summit that examined environmental issues affecting New York’s indigenous communities of the Haudaunosaunee Confederacy, as part of United Nations’ International Year of the Indigenous Communities.

He received his law degree from Chicago Kent Law School and Chemical Engineering Degree from City College of New York. He was born in Sri Lanka and his family immigrated to this country to seek freedom and opportunity.”

Mathy is just one example because our government is filled with United Nations people pretending to be Americans. They may have gone through the naturalization process, they may have Americanized their names, they may have taken diction training but none of that makes them Americans – and especially when they are engaged in covert and subversive occupation of the American government. That makes them international war criminals.

Here are two screen prints from the Employee Directory on the website of Health & Human Services (HHS). I’ve written about it several times over the years, but this morning after a couple of screen captures followed by a problem with my machine that took a reboot to fix, and the Employee Directory disappeared. It doesn’t matter though. I did capture two pages of it:

And for the record, most of the people being brought into the country as “refugees”, they are not refugees. They people being brought into the country to embed into the Administrative State in one capacity or another.

Managerial State

It’s a corporate notion that all countries of the world could be managed by a professional management staff implementing governance policies of global bodies through regional organizations assisted by the private sector – or what John W. Gardner called the Independent Sector (non-profits). It is a system designed for colonial rule. This managerial, administrative system exists outside of our elected representative system of government effectively making our elected government merely a façade with the colonial managers acting as the puppet masters.

It’s not possible for me to bring forward in this article all of the documentation I have on the construction of the colonial Administrative State. For the sake of brevity, the takeover started during the tail end of the Bush 41 Administration and all through the Clinton Administration. The Clinton-Gore “reinvention of government” was an all of government project to redesign government systems to be replaced by the managerial, administrative state. The idea that they could do it no doubt derived from the fact that large corporations manage vast numbers of resources – including human resources – across great distances through their corporate computer systems.

The Workgroup that Mathy Stanislaus chaired in 1997 was a Clinton-Gore Workgroup for the reinvention of government project to redesign the systems of government to fully utilize the capabilities of the Internet. The EPA partnership with the United Nations no doubt derived their ostensible authority from the La Paz Border Environmental Cooperation treaty (TIAS 10827) signed with Mexico in 1983. They operate under international law as long as they are within an international port district under maritime law (either inland port or seaport).

The pirate occupiers counted on human psychology for the takeover. Most people will not challenge an authority figure regardless of what the authority figure tells them to do. (See Milgram Experiment). In developed countries where there is a great deal of respect and/or fear of the law, people react reflexively to obey when the law is told to them by an authority figure. Again, very few people will challenge the authority figure or research the law for themselves for the purpose of a challenge.

The pirate occupiers also counted on secrecy. The United States government has been operating behind a curtain of secrecy since 1947 (National Security Act) supposedly because of the Cold War but more likely so that they could build up the United Nations organization for the big moment – the imposition of the global governance system through a system of colonial, shadow government rule.

The takeover was planned for right about the time the baby boomers were close to retirement. Tens of thousands of American government employees were either released or were allowed early retirement. Those government employees – and in particular, the Information Technology employees were replaced by foreign IT workers. There was no shortage of Americans to take those jobs because the baby boomers did have children and computer systems do reduce staff requirements. It was a choice made by traitors to the American people to facilitate the takeover of the American Administrative State by foreign operatives representing a foreign power.

Speaking the Law

Last summer there was an issue in Idaho regarding Idaho’s participation in an international treaty in violation of Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution. The legislation was written by the Uniform Law Commission out of Chicago. The legislation called for recognition of the Hague Convention on International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance. The legislation authorizes state courts to recognize international child support orders from foreign countries without judicial review.

The propaganda campaign for this legislation focused on errant parents who left their families in foreign countries to come to the U.S. In Congressional testimony however, it was admitted by Vicki Turetsky of the HHS that international child support cases were not a big issue. They were just planning for the future. And that future was without doubt, the establishment of a system of convenience for pirate occupiers within the U.S. government.

During the battle on that legislation, it was discovered that there are 113 attorneys operating within the Idaho State government – embedded within the agencies of government. When Butch Otter called a special session of the legislature to vote on this legislation, it was apparent that the people of Idaho were not represented at the legislative hearing that preceded the vote on S.1067/HB1 and it was noted at the time in the following articles:

The Legislature and the Sob Sister Circus

The Empty Chair

The SAG Syndicate Paradox

The analysis is that in addition to foreign IT people, the strategic plan for the takeover and conversion of the American government to a managerial, administrative state under colonial rule, included lawyers – either real or pretend with fake credentials to “speak the law” to state government – and probably county government officials – again relying on obedience to authority and reflexive response to spoken law.

The Jig’s Up – The Dance is Over

To put all of this in the context of what is happening in Harney County, Oregon, the purpose of the Committee of Safety is to begin the process of reclaiming the American government for the American people. The next step for the Committee of Safety is to establish a People’s American Common Law Grand Jury to investigate the form of government now in operation in Harney County and to restore a lawful, constitutional government in Harney County.

Nobody could have predicted the trigger. The Hammond Case and Ammon Bundy’s leadership in exposing it just put Harney County out there in the lead in reclaiming the American government for the American people. Our job now is to follow in the footsteps of Harney County and do the same within our own counties and our own states.

To the pirates of the Administrative State, our best advice is for you to leave the country now while you still can because we are not going to surrender our country to you. And that’s a promise – not a threat.

2 Comments

Posted in Agenda 21

Tagged ,

Idaho III% Dropped by the FBI Stronghold in Burns, OR

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | Leave a comment

Yesterday in an historic event, the Idaho III% dropped by the FBI stronghold in Burns, Oregon to introduce themselves and to explain to the heavily harmed agents, exactly what they were doing in Harney County. The first few minutes were tense as the surprised FBI agents sought to figure out what was going on.

TVOI News gives a standing salute to the Idaho III% for their boldness and to the FBI Agents for remaining calm in what was no doubt a first for them.

The video of the meeting was shot by Michael Emry, owner and cameraman for The Voice of Idaho News (TVOI News).

The second video is an interview between Pete Santilli and Brandon Curtis concerning the Idaho III% meeting with the FBI and their purpose for being in Burns, Oregon in the County of Harney.

Leave a comment

Posted in Government

Tagged , , ,

TED CRUZ ELIGIBILITY - SOMETHING EXTRAORDINARY HAPPENING

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | Leave a comment

PART 2 of 2

By: Devvy
January 10, 2026
NewsWithViews.com

The following was written by Leo Donofrio. It is an excerpt from his longer analysis here.

NATURAL BORN CITIZEN DEFINED THROUGH HISTORY

I could understand rabid attacks if the legal theory I was relying upon had been thoroughly discredited by a Supreme Court decision or by statute, or even by historical texts, but it’s quite the opposite. Beside 200 years of Presidential precedent, the great weight of authority supports the argument that Obama is not a natural born Citizen.

I understand the countering argument and I’ve welcomed debate of both sides of the issue in comments to this blog. But most of the published arguments on the natural born Citizen issue are recently published law review articles which haven’t done a very good job of presenting the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

THE FRAMERS OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT

Despite popular belief, the 14th Amendment does not convey the status of “natural born Citizen” in its text. It just conveys the status of “Citizen”. And it’s very clear that in the pre-amendment Constitution, the Framers made a distinction between a “Citizen” and a “natural born Citizen”. The requirement to be a Senator or Representative is “Citizen”, but the requirement to be President is “natural born Citizen”.

From the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.”

But even as to this conveyance of citizenship, those who were responsible for drafting the 14th Amendment made it clear that - to them - the meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant subject only to the jurisdiction thereof.

Dr. John Fonte, Senior Fellow of The Hudson Institute had this to say about the issue at a Congressional hearing on dual citizenship from September 29, 2005:

The authors in the legislative history, the authors of that language, Senator Lyman Trumbull said, ”When we talk about ’subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,’ it means complete jurisdiction, not owing allegiance to anybody else.” Senator Jacob Howard said that it’s ”a full and complete jurisdiction.”

This illustrates that Congress recently discussed the issue, and they can’t claim they were unaware. But we don’t have to take Dr. Fonte’s word for it. The following discussion by the various 14th Amendment Framers took place on the Senate floor. I took it from P.A. Madison’s research at http://www.14thamendment.us(use his link for footnotes):

It is clear the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment had no intention of freely giving away American citizenship to just anyone simply because they may have been born on American soil. Again, we are fortunate enough to have on the record the highest authority tell us, Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee… and the one who inserted the phrase:

[T]he provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ’subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

Then Madison quotes Sen. Howard, another Framer, concurring with Trumbull:

Sen. Howard concurs with Trumbull’s construction:

Mr. HOWARD: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois [Trumbull], in holding that the word “jurisdiction,” as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.[3]

Mr. Madison continues with even more proof of what the 14th Amendment Framers meant:

Sen. Johnson, speaking on the Senate floor, offers his comments and understanding of the proposed new amendment to the constitution:

[Now], all this amendment [citizenship clause] provides is, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign Power–for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before us–shall be considered as citizens of the United States. That would seem to be not only a wise but a necessary provision. If there are to be citizens of the United States there should be some certain definition of what citizenship is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself and the United States, and the amendment says that citizenship may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the United States, born to parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States.[4]

No doubt in the Senate as to what the citizenship clause means as further evidenced by Sen. W. Williams:

In one sense, all persons born within the geographical limits of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States…All persons living within a judicial district may be said, in one sense, to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in that district, but they are not in every sense subject to the jurisdiction of the court until they are brought, by proper process, within the reach of the power of the court. I understand the words here, ’subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,’ to mean fully and completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.[5]

Madison saves for last the greatest authority on the issue:

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:

[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]

It’s important to note this statement was issued by Bingham only months before the 14th Amendment was proposed.

In conclusion, I would like to thank reader “John Boy” for pointing to Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia Et Al. v. Heller. In that case, Justice Scalia took into consideration a certain historical legal reference:

The common references to those “fit to bear arms” in congressional discussions about the militia are matched by use of the same phrase in the few nonmilitary federal contexts where the concept would be relevant… Other legal sources frequently used “bear arms” in nonmilitary contexts.[10]

Now look at “footnote 10?:

E. de Vattel, The Law of Nations, or, Principles of the Law of Nature 144 (1792) (“Since custom has allowed persons of rank and gentlemen of the army to bear arms in time of peace, strict care should be taken that none but these should be allowed to wear swords”);

Since Justice Scalia cited to this legal textbook in March of 2008, it’s not outrageous to think he might also refer to “The Laws of Nations” on the natural born Citizen issue?

I’ll leave you now with the relevant textbook definition of natural born citizen. The following was published in 1758. This definition, added to all of the above, certainly establishes a rational legal basis to hold that Barack Obama is not a natural born Citizen. And more than that, it puts the burden on those who deny it to don the tin foil hat of despair and bring forthwith to the table of honest debate their own bed of authority to lie in:

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. For part one click below.

Click here for part —-> 1, 2,

[Just a short note about 9/11 and Smart Electric Meters. The cost of America’s undeclared “war” (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released: The Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation, but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or give a copy as a present. I’ve purchased half a dozen copies and given them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It’s very powerful simply because it’s one ‘ordinary’ man’s story who ask a simple question that led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in this film that many have never heard about but everyone should. Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend. Also, must see video on the dangers of Smart Meeters on your home, titled: Take Back Your Power.]

© 2016 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved

Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn’t left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Devvy is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.

 

Devvy’s regularly posted new columns are on her site at: www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.

E-mail is: [email protected]

Leave a comment

Posted in 2016 Election

Tagged

TED CRUZ ELIGIBILITY - SOMETHING EXTRAORDINARY HAPPENING

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | 3 comments

PART 1 of 2

By: Devvy
January 10, 2026
NewsWithViews.com

My, my, how things have changed since the first volley of lawsuits to keep the criminal impostor in the White House, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama [fictitious, made up name] off the ballot. Immediately shrill squawking came from the ethically bankrupt Democrat/Communist Party USA. Why, to challenge the constitutional eligibility of a candidate was racist pure and simple. The object of scrutiny has black skin, therefore, any attempts to uphold the Constitution were being done by kooks, racists, Kool-Aid drinkers and as Yule Brenner said in the 1956 movie, The King And I, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera .

‘Conservative’ biggies were just as outraged as the left that anyone should question Barry’s eligibility:

Obama Citizenship Crisis & Industrial Strength Stupidity

“David Horowitz, much admired by conservatives, makes an astonishing and completely anti American statement on the issue of the law: Obama Derangement Syndrome

“The continuing efforts of a fringe group of conservatives to deny Obama his victory and to lay the basis for the claim that he is not a legitimate president are embarrassing and destructive…What difference does it make to the future of this country whether Obama was born on U.S. soil? Advocates of this destructive campaign will argue that the constitutional principle regarding the qualifications for president trumps all others. But how viable will our Constitution be if five Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?”

“What difference does it make whether Obama was “born on U.S. soil?” That’s not the issue and it’s a shame someone like Horowitz shoots off the pie hole in his face without even knowing the correct legal argument. How viable would it be if the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the supreme law of the land? Shame on you, Mr. Horowitz, for your cavalier attitude about the law.” Since Barry Obama was not eligible no one had the ‘right’ to vote for him, period.

The very dangerous Mark Levine (his book promoting a constitutional convention) is going ballistic over anyone challenging Ted Cruz’s eligibility:

“He added that the birther issue with both Cruz and President Obama is “stupid,” no one has standing to challenge it, no court would take it up, and is “just not true.” Levin continued that “the liberals love this stuff.”…

“Levin then said anyone who is born to a US citizen can run for president, regardless of where they were born. He then read the 5th clause of Article II, Section I of the US Constitution, and argued that children born to US citizens abroad are natural born US citizens under US law.

“He continued by pointing to arguments that child born in the US are not automatically natural born citizens under the 14th Amendment, that he and other conservatives have embraced, contrary to the “amnesty crowd, the establishment Republicans, [and] dummies on TV”…Levin then declared that Cruz’s eligibility was “resolved,” and questions over Cruz’s eligibility are “for the kooks.”

Well, Mark, liberals didn’t “love this stuff” when their boy, Barry, was in the spotlight back in 2008. Levin’s comment “read the 5th clause of Article II, Section I of the US Constitution, and argued that children born to US citizens abroad are natural born US citizens under US law” is completely disingenuous:

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;

neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

No where in that clause does it say children born to US citizens abroad are natural born citizens under US law. His comment regarding no one having standing to challenge eligibility deliberately skips over two things:

1. When Leo Donofrio filed his lawsuit in NJ to keep Barry Obama, Juan McCain and Róger Calero (born in Nicaragua) off the ballot, standing was not challenged although that judicial hallucination was used in most of the other lawsuits to get rid of them. There was a great deal of confusion regarding McCain because everyone assumed the hospital he was born in was on a military installation. Not so and I do encourage you to take the time to read this entire piece: A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?

“According to the birth certificate and COLB of John McCain, McCain was born in Colon Hospital, city of Colon, Panama. While the BC states at the top that it is from the “Canal Zone”, the document also states that McCain was born in Colon Hospital, city of Colon. The city of Colon and the hospital were not in the Canal Zone. The common story you hear is that McCain was born in the Canal Zone, but these documents posted online do not testify to that. Furthermore, there is no official document that has ever surfaced which states that McCain was born in the Canal Zone.”

Why Senator John McCain Cannot Be President: Eleven Months and a Hundred Yards Short of Citizenship by Gabriel J. Chin, University of California, Davis - School of Law, August 13, 2026

Abstract:

“Senator McCain was born in 1936 in the Canal Zone to U.S. citizen parents. The Canal Zone was territory controlled by the United States, but it was not incorporated into the Union. As requested by Senator McCain’s campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law.

“The Tribe-Olson Opinion suggests that the Canal Zone, then under exclusive U.S. jurisdiction, may have been covered by the Fourteenth Amendment’s grant of citizenship to “all persons born . . . in the United States.” However, in the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court held that “unincorporated territories” were not part of the United States for constitutional purposes. Accordingly, many decisions hold that persons born in unincorporated territories are not Fourteenth Amendment citizens. The Tribe-Olson Opinion also suggests that Senator McCain obtained citizenship by statute. However, the only statute in effect in 1936 did not cover the Canal Zone. Recognizing the gap, in 1937, Congress passed a citizenship law applicable only to the Canal Zone, granting Senator McCain citizenship, but eleven months too late for him to be a citizen at birth. Because Senator John McCain was not a citizen at birth, he is not a “natural born Citizen” and thus is not “eligible to the Office of President” under the Constitution.

Because of the flap in 2008 over Juan McCain, the Senate passed a resolution to accomodate a presidential candidate. S.Res.511 - A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen. It certainly pays to have friends in high places.

I deliberately decided to make a Part II to this column because it is historical FACTS regarding the Fourteenth Amendment and natural born as written by Leo Donofrio.

2. Mark Levin knows not a single lawsuit was decided on merits of the argument regarding what constitutes a natural born citizen. Not one single court allowed a true legal discussion of what constitutes natural born.

Cruz, naturally has come out saying it’s ‘settled law’. Yes, it is and you, Ted Cruz are ineligible. Cruz knew this was going to become an issue which is why he began legal proceedings to give up his dual citizenship finalized in 2014. If he didn’t think his dual citizenship would be a problem, why go to all the trouble to renounce his Canadian citizenship?

“News” media giants, including FOX led the charge to discredit anyone questioning Barry’s eligibility. Haaavard grad and telly clown, Bill O’Reilly, has proclaimed over the years that a birth announcement in a Hawaii newspaper was proof positive Barry was a natural born citizen. And, so all these years, Barry Obama has gotten away with usurping the office of president aided and abetted by the left and the right. And now they’re deliberately doing it all over again using the same talking points from 2008 & 2012 to protect Ted Cruz.

Rep. Alan Grayson: I Will File Lawsuit Over Ted Cruz’s Citizenship If He’s Elected President, November 27, 2015. Grayson is a stupid, rabid Democrat. His proclamation is baloney. I can tell you exactly what a judge will say: Mr. Grayson, if you had a problem with Cruz’s citizenship, you should have filed before the election. Grayson’s comments in that article demonstrates he’s a run of the mill dummy on the issue of natural born citizen.

Nancy Pelosi Wades Into Cruz Eligibility Dispute, Jan. 7, 2016

Like Barry Obama, Cruz has one parent who was a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth - his mother. A plethora of hot articles have flooded the Internet over the past few days. This one is a prime example of ignorance:

Why Ted Cruz Is Vulnerable on Canadian Birth Issue: “That is not because Cruz is ineligible for the presidency. In an article in the Harvard Law Review in March 2015, former Solicitors General Neal Katyal and Paul Clement made a compelling argument that the Framers of the Constitution intended “natural-born citizen”–a requirement for the presidency–to include those born to U.S. citizens abroad.”

Going back to JB Williams column regarding Ted Cruz being ineligible to run for the senate, he provides copies of critical legal documents:

“The above Canadian document is proof of Canadian Citizenship at birth for Senator Ted Cruz. The next piece of authenticated evidence released by Ted Cruz is a Canadian document proving that he remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing that citizenship in May of 2014, which means, he was still a legal citizen of Canada in 2012 when he ran for, was elected and took the oath of office for the US Senate.

“Again, the above authenticated evidence proves that Ted Cruz was born Canadian in 1970 and remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing his Canadian citizenship in May of 2014. These official documents also prove that Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada in 2012, when he sought and claimed a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal US citizen….

“Ted’s parents were at no time serving in the U.S. Armed Forces, employed by the U.S. Government or by any of the certain international organizations, during their eight years in Canada, between 1966 and 1974. Further, Ted’s father Rafael, was at no time a legal citizen of the United States prior to naturalizing in 2005, from Canada. Rafael’s known legal citizenship status as of 1970 was Cuban, not American.

“This is an EXAMPLE of a US CRBA Form (Consular Report of Birth Abroad)

“Unfortunately, there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and not any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records for Ted Cruz are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies.

“As a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims that Ted Cruz is either a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States.”

Shall we look at that Haaavard Law Review? A Response to Neil Katyal and Paul Clement on the Meaning of a Natural Born Citizen By Mario Apuzzo, Esq. Take the time to read Mario’s response because he quite succinctly proves the authors of the aforementioned ‘law review’ piece are wrong.

As I mentioned in my last column, Mario is the attorney for a ballot eligibility case in Vermont assisted the plaintiff in preparing his filing. A lawsuit has been filed to keep ineligible candidates off the primary ballot in Florida: Michael Voeltz, registered Republican Party voter of Broward County Florida v. Senator Ted Cruz, of Texas, Senator Marco Rubio, of Florida, Secretary of State of Florida, Republican Party of Florida Executive Committee. A challenge has also been made in Illinois.

1974 Canadian Electors’ List Named Ted Cruz’s Parents

“Canadian immigration authorities declined a request by Breitbart News for additional documents, citing Canadian privacy laws. Under U.S. law, Cruz would have inherited his citizenship at birth in 1970 from his mother, provided she remained a U.S. citizen. She likely would have retained her U.S. citizenship even if she had become a naturalized Canadian citizen, though Canadian law required naturalized citizens formally to renounce all foreign allegiances until 1973.”

There’s that nasty thing again: privacy laws. This is Barry Obama and the Hawaiian birth certificate all over again. I wonder if Ted will spend, as did the fraud in the White House, more than a million dollars to keep official records under wraps? The article above ends with the boiler plate stupidity about what constitutes a natural born citizen.

It’s not Barry or Cruz or Rubio’s birthplace, it’s the citizenship of the parents at the time of the child’s birth. They key word being parents, not parent. Every single article or commentary written since Donald Trump brought up the issue last week always ends with Cruz’s mother is a U.S. citizen therefore Ted Cruz is a natural born citizen. Intellectual laziness or political bias does not erase historical facts.

There was a reason the ‘natural born citizen’ clause was grandfathered into the Constitution: To keep any president that might have foreign interests he would use to betray this country. Think Barack Hussein Obama. I don’t doubt Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio love this country, but in the future do we want another Barry Obama? Since 2008, there have been a lot of articles by individuals, mostly foreign born, who want to get rid of the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution to suit their own agenda, but we can not let that happen.

In my column last week I provided links to legal analysis by two individuals who have been heavily involved in this issue that Americans should read if they want to fully understand why Cruz and Rubio are not natural born citizens:

• Leo Donofrio’s Amicus Brief
• A Citizen is One Thing, But a Natural Born Citizen is Another

Something is happening that is quite extraordinary. When the issue was Democrat Barry Obama, FOX and other powerful ‘conservative’ mouth pieces bent over backwards to help an ineligible candidate. Now the issue is a popular GOP senator (who usurped that office), Ted Cruz, and his eligibility and those same media mouthpieces and ‘conservative’ legal geniuses are again bending over backwards to make sure another ineligible candidate can run for president.

Why hasn’t Marco Rubio’s ineligibility been brought up in all this frenzy? If the argument being put forth by all the above is that a natural born citizen means one parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth, that sure as hell eliminates Marco Rubio. He was born in May 1971 in Miami, Florida. His parents did not become U.S. citizens until November 1975 - four years after his birth. Since neither of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth, he’s out.

Why this screeching from all of the above to protect Cruz’s candidacy? Because the top four GOP candidates are Trump, Cruz, Rubio and Carson. If you knock out Cruz and Rubio that leaves Donald Trump and Dr. Ben Carson - unless one figures Paul, Fiorina, Bush and the rest of the single digit candidates can be resurrected from the dead. Democrats and their lackeys in the media don’t want Trump. The GOP establishment and their lackeys in the media don’t want Trump. Can the jury make the inference that both sides are working feverishly to keep Cruz and Rubio in the contest hoping Donald Trump will flame out or lose the early primaries? I submit to you that’s exactly what’s going on.

Everything possible is being done by the GOP, with help from Megyn Kelly over at FOX, to keep Donald Trump from securing the GOP nomination: GOP Planning ‘Firewall’ to Stop Trump in South Carolina. A pathetic attempt to bolster the pathetic Jeb! Bush’s chances: “GOP leaders increasingly see South Carolina as their last best chance to stop Donald Trump’s populist political juggernaut. On Wednesday, influential South Carolina Republican Katon Dawson issued a plea for former President George W. Bush to step into the ring in the Palmetto State’s Feb. 20 primary. Bush is quite popular among South Carolina Republicans, and Dawson called his involvement a potential “game changer.”

GOP “leaders” are so far out of touch with voters it defies imagination. As for a game changer, dream on. If voters wanted Jeb! he would be leading the pack.

So, what happens now? Well, we have Barry Obama who usurped the office of president and has gotten away with it. His mother was a natural born citizen, but his father was a foreign national who never applied for citizenship. Barry Obama was born with dual citizenship and ineligible to be president.

Marco Rubio was four years old when his parents became citizens. Rubio is hardly a natural BORN citizen and therefore, clearly ineligible.

Ted Cruz’s mother’s birth certificate shows she is a natural born citizen, but Cruz’s father was a foreign national and not a U.S. citizen at the time Ted was born. Cruz believes because he renounced his Canadian citizenship at age 44 and his mother being a U.S. citizen he can be a natural born citizen.

Likely more lawsuits will be filed. Donald Trump could file a lawsuit; ‘standing’ would not be an issue; or shouldn’t be. But, make no mistake: The stakes are as high as they can get because if Ted Cruz is not eligible then neither was the criminal fraudster in the White House in 2008 and 2012. If anyone thinks the shadow government is going to let this new challenge regarding Ted Cruz blow that whole thing out of the water, they are sadly mistaken. Ted can continue to ‘cruz’ along hoping he would be Trump’s pick for VP. But, since he’s ineligible for the presidency he’s also ineligible to be VP.

Should Donald Trump dive in or continue steamrolling his competition? Baring some catastrophe, if he stays on course and doesn’t fall into the trap of filing a lawsuit, he will be the nominee regardless of what GOP “leaders” want. As I said in a past column, big hay is being made Cruz is ahead in Iowa.

So what? Santorum won in 2012 and Mike Huckabee in 2008. Both flamed out and never made it to the White House. The same fate was dished out to John Kerry, Al Gore[bechev] and others. Predictions are Trump will take New Hampshire and South Carolina. If that happens, Cruz will likely continue spending millions to catch Trump for the next set of primaries.

We shall see if the lawsuits that have been filed move forward like Leo Donofrio’s did only to be kicked to the curb by a deceitful batch of disgraceful “justices” on the U.S. Supreme Court. I sincerely hope they do and that there is just one judge, one, who believes in the supreme law of the land.

As for the darling of the right, Mark Levin, referring to people like me as kooks, shame on you. Questioning the constitutional eligibility for president or even members of Congress is not kooky. It’s our duty and obligation to make sure the Constitution is upheld.

3 Comments

Posted in 2016 Election

Tagged

Donald Trump’s New Ad - Superb

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | Leave a comment

FROM REDSTATEWATCHER.COM

New campaign video

Beautiful.

Leave a comment

Posted in Donald Trump

Tagged

Idaho 3% Militia Group with Historical Action to Diffuse Oregon Standoff

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | Leave a comment

Suggested and resourced by Patricia Badish REPOSTED FROM HEATANDLIGHT.US

History has been made! A militia group (Idaho 3 %) has moved into the Oregon standoff situation and represented the Pacific Patriots Network in a historical first. They wrote and delivered Articles of Resolution to the occupiers (Ammond Bundy group) at the Wildlife Refuge, the FBI contingent at the FBI staging area (local airport) and the Harney County (Oregon) Sheriff.

Though the purpose of the Articles of Resolution is to help the parties reach a peaceful solution that protects citizens’ rights, the delivery of the Articles was quite tense. When a large convoy of armed men show up unexpected, people naturally get nervous.

The good news is that each of the three parties ultimately received the Articles in good faith and are considering the next move, hopefully an agreement to peace that does not compromise citizens’ rights.

In the first video (below), Brandon Curtis the founder and leader of the Idaho 3% talks with Pete Santilli for 45 minutes. He thoroughly explains the intent and actions of the 3% and their armed delivery convoy. He provides a pretty clear picture of the events. And, he expresses a great hope for the outcome.

Mr. Curtis is a brave, but humble man. He never mentioned the historical precedent that was set by his actions. The formal delivery of Articles of Resolution (Terms of Settlement?) by Militia, to law enforcement, must be considered “historical.” Pete Santilli finally points it out. Curtis nearly blushes.

It is very important to point out Curtis’ complimentary attitude toward the FBI and the Sheriff’s Department reactions to the Articles. You will see it in the first video. No one wants a shootout. Almost everyone wants a legal and peaceful solution.

The second video (below the first) is the impromptu meeting at the FBI’s compound at the airport. (Delivery of the Articles) The audio is very poor. But you can see how the tension slowly melts into mutual respect and perhaps a little bit of relief (on both sides).

Thanks again to Patricia for keeping us posted on all this.

 

Leave a comment

Posted in Government

Tagged ,

This Email Proves Hillary Was Lying. Lynch Must Prosecute!

Posted on January 11, 2026 by | Leave a comment

If This doe’s not prove Hillary was lying, than I don’t know what will.——————————————————————————-

Smoking Gun: Email Suggests Hillary Broke Law

Clinton instructed an aide to remove the classification marking from information, a federal offense

by Keith Koffler

The latest batch of Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department early Friday contain what may be the smoking gun that forces the Justice Department to charge the former secretary of state with a crime, according to former federal prosecutor Joseph diGenova.

“This is gigantic,” said diGenova. “She caused to be removed a classified marking and then had it transmitted in an unencrypted manner. That is a felony. The removal of the classified marking is a federal crime. It is the same thing to order someone to do it as if she had done it herself.”

On the June 17, 2011, email chain with senior State Department adviser Jake Sullivan, Clinton apparently asked Sullivan to change the marking on classified information so that it is no longer flagged as classified.

Clinton, using her private email server, asks for “the TPs,” apparently a reference to talking points being prepared for her. Sullivan, who is using his official State Department email, responds, “They say they’ve had issues sending secure fax. They’re working on it.” Clinton responds, “If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w[ith] no identifying heading and send nonsecure.”

It’s not clear if Sullivan actually followed through on Clinton’s orders. But if he did, it may expose Clinton to serious legal jeopardy.

“This makes it impossible for the bureau not to recommend charges,” diGenova said of the FBI. “This makes it impossible not to go forward, and it certainly ties the hand of the attorney general.”

Some have speculated that while the FBI may recommend charges, Attorney General Loretta Lynch might try to avoid doing so for political reasons.

Related: The Pallid Prince: Bill Can’t Rescue Hillary

The revelation also appears to put the lie to Clinton’s claim that she never handled classified information on her server.

“I did not send nor receive anything that was classified at the time,” she has claimed. By instructing her aide to send her material marked classified, it is clear that she not only may have received classified information, but that it was indeed “classified at the time.”

“This means that when she said, ‘I never received anything marked classified,’ she in fact did,” diGenova said.

David Bossie, president of the watchdog group Citizens United, said the email could become the emblem of Hillary’s email scandal.

“It proves that Hillary Clinton affirmatively instructed senior staff to send classified data to an unsecured server,” he said. “With that, it cements into history, much like the famous Bill Clinton finger wag.”

~Steve~

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/smoking-gun-email-suggests-hillary-committed-a-crime/

Leave a comment

Posted in 2016 Election, Clintons, Hillary Clinton, Politics, Treason

Tagged , ,