Category Archives: Government

Book Exposes IRS 501c3 Church Scam

by Rev. Austin Miles

The Communist-George Soros Democrats running the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have managed to bully churches into becoming partners with them by the creation of the 501c3 (Not-for-Profit) status. This action pushed churches to incorporate themselves as franchises of the United States in order to avoid taxes they never owed in the first place. Don’t forget that last sentence.

According to an informative book; Things You Need to Know about Non-profits-Making Sense of Non-Profit Status, by Carleton C. Booker, a ministry and a church are automatically tax exempt. Indeed, this was established from the very beginning of the U.S. since churches with their charitable work took a heavy burden away from the government by providing services so needed by so many.

The church was totally separate from the government. When a couple was to be married, that was strictly a function of the Church that counseled the couples, performed the marriage ceremonies and issued the official marriage certificate which was recognized as a legal instrument. When a couple decided to get married, they would first look for a preacher.

Then, in an incredible paradox, the government suddenly declared that in order to get married, the couple first were required to obtain (by paying a fee) a “marriage license” from a government office, making the government a partner to the marriage. This became a forced partnership between government and church. Without the government license, the public was informed, the marriage would be null and void.

And it is to be noted that since the time the government intruded into the church function of marriage, the words, Bride and Groom on the license have been changed to; Party one and Party Two. Anything the government gets their hands on becomes an aberration, even a church function.

Strangely enough, this was during the time that the government declared that there is a distinct command demanding Separation of Church and State, a faulty ‘command’ that came as the result of a letter Thomas Jefferson sent to the Danbury Baptist Association showing that the government would not favor one church over the other. It had absolutely nothing to do with taking God out of public places.

In typical fashion, the feds jumped on that, perverted it, and made it law that in no way, can the church be associated with government, meaning no more prayers to Jesus in public places, demanding an end to saying, Merry Christmas, and dictating what can and cannot be preached from the pulpits. The government also ordered that military chaplains cannot even pray in the name of Jesus. This all was locked in place by the misuse of the letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Baptists.

The former IRS head, Lois Lerner, who should be prosecuted and charged, used the IRS as a sledgehammer against any and all conservative organizations who asked for not-for-profit status which she denied even though any and all Soros Democrat organizations were waltzed right through the process.

This minister-columnist knows all too well how the democrat IRS operated. This ministry and church met all the qualifications for tax-exempt status. Proper application was made. All questions answered. Still they demanded more information and after that even more. They demanded excessive information about this work. This went on for two years.

Meanwhile, the North America Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) a pedophile homosexual organization that want to make it legal to sexualize little boys applied the same time I did and within two weeks they had their 501c3 tax exemption recognition. Not only that, they were and are allowed to use the public library event rooms for meetings (meetings for degenerates), even though no Christian organizations are allowed to hold meeting in those same public rooms.

This means that it is OK to teach sexual deviance targeting children in their public rooms, but not OK to teach about Jesus and morals or to study the Bible in those public rooms.

Finally, after two years I was told by Lois Lerner’s leftist IRS that I must send them $700.00 in order to process my application. That was money I could hardly afford, but scraped it together and sent it in. The moment the check was cashed, they informed me that my ministry and church were denied tax exempt status.

Yes, they refused to send the money back–they kept it. Talk about dirty deeds. They knew they would block my non-profit recognition but made sure they milked me for 700 bucks before they dealt the final blow.

Carleton Booker, the author of the non-profit book showed me specifically in his book how to apply the law to be given this status, walked me through it, and he had the 501c3 exemption papers in my hand a short time later. The only thing I had to pay was a very nominal filing fee to receive the paper.

This book can be obtained at Amazon.com. Mr. Booker, a successful businessman has other titles to look for including books on business and marketing.

To reiterate; if you have a ministry and a church you are automatically tax exempt. This book shows you how to cut through the road blocks and simply claim it. With our new President Donald Trump, no doubt the IRS will be cleaned up. We can and must stop the mandated partnership with the government and churches. They have no business intruding themselves into church work.

Here’s the title again: Things You Need to Know About Non-Profits–Making sense of Non-Profit Status by Carleton C. Booker, at Amazon.

Photo of Book Cover Courtesy of Amazon.com

 

SNAKES IN THE GRASS

 

In 2013, President Barack Obama appointed James Comey as FBI Director.  I have had my experiences with Presidents and their appointments.  In my years of Army service, I learned and had it reinforced multiple times through service secretaries, defense secretaries, joint chiefs, and major command generals is that they closely mirror the President in ideology and worldview.  I certainly understand that.  If I was picking people for my team, I would certainly pick people with a similar worldview as mine.  At least we would be in the same neighborhood of thinking.  Following the Army, during federal government service, if I knew the President I never had to wonder about incoming Secretaries or, in Comey’s case, Directors because I knew them and I knew their views and policies would closely mirror the President’s.  One should not expect anything different.  For what other reason would any President select someone?  So my view of Comey does not differ from my view of any other administration Secretary or Director.  My view of Obama, by default, is my view of Comey.  Just as it is my view of Lynch, Holder, Clinton, Kerry, et al.  I know Comey is supposedly a registered Republican, but so are many others who would rather see Trump fail.  This is why President Trump needs to thank him for his service and send him on his way – and if Trump is to survive, Comey is but one of many who need to be shown the door.

Comey’s recent work history puts him as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York from January 2002 to December 2003.  From there he was appointed as Deputy Attorney General of the US under Attorney General John Ashcroft.  In this capacity, he appointed friend Patrick Fitzgerald as Special Counsel to investigate and prosecute the Valerie Plame lie.  It was an almost endless investigation that failed to prosecute the person who actually leaked CIA agent Plame’s name.  It was common knowledge that Colin Powell’s man Richard Armitage leaked the identity of Plame and not anyone in the Bush Whitehouse.  At the end of this political fishing expedition, Vice President Cheney’s Chief of Staff, Scooter Libby was sacrificed for fibbing to the FBI. From there, Comey moved to a job as General Counsel and Senior Vice President at Lockheed Martin, a mega defense contractor who also likes to spread a lot of political cash including to the Clinton Foundation while Comey was there. He then became General Counsel at Bridgewater Associates, billed as the world’s largest (and maybe weirdest by some accounts) global hedge fund managing more than a $150 billion in assets.  His next adventure in public life, excluding his College Professorship, was a seat on the Board of Directors for HBSC Holdings also a Clinton Foundation donor during his tenure.  This Swiss bank gained much notoriety for laundering drug cartel money (Bloomberg, The Guardian, Reuters, Rolling Stone, Financial Times).  He held that position until July 2013 just prior to his appointment as FBI Director.

A September 2016 Breitbart article laid out Comey’s connections to the Clinton Foundation through his former employers and his brother.  This information was also placed into the Congressional Record.  Since Washington is big on demanding recusals these days, maybe the question should have been asked of the FBI Director relating to Mrs. Clinton.

To the legacy news media that most Americans still rely on these days, Hillary Clinton’s violations of federal law involving conducting government business and mishandling classified material on an unsecured private server is old news, except for their attempts to pin everything to Trump/Russian collusion.  The alternative media (Daily Caller, Huffington Post, Hot Air – Mark Levin) and others view it differently. The investigation was closed as nothing to see here by Director Comey.  Still most people, including legal scholars on all sides, but not the legacy media of course, believed and still do that Mrs. Clinton should have been held accountable for breaking federal laws but, according to Director Comey:

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

I guess.  Maybe what he meant was that a reasonable prosecutor would appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate a lie called a leak only to let the known leaker walk.  Amazingly, the FBI gave immunity to Clinton Aides, in return for nada which also amazed some legal scholars and prosecutors.  So Attorney General Lynch met with Bill Clinton (CNN, Washington Times) to discuss their grandchildren after which Director Comey schooled us on what a reasonable prosecutor would do.

It is not just the mail server and mishandling of classified information, but also questionable corruption of the Clinton Foundation itself.  It is the Uranium One deal and more cash to the Clintons (World Net Daily, New York Times) and we didn’t even make it down the bribe, or speech fee list.  Damn Russians have been working hard to make the Clintons look bad.  Sure would like to know how they did that.

And, make no mistake.  Comey is knee deep in the surveillance of Trump and associates as far back as July 2016.  How could he not be aware?  He would be an incredibly stupid FBI Director if he wasn’t.

Mr. President you have over 2000 appointments to fill.  Git jiggy widdit.

© 2017 J. D. Pendry

Govt. Went Off Medications-Obviously

by Rev. Austin Miles

WASHINGTON, D.C. 4/1/17–Yes it is April Fools’ Day, the official holiday for atheists. This is verified by The Bible which states: “The Fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.” Psalm 14:1. So this day is for them.  However, what you are about to read is NOT an April Fool’s Day Joke, as unbelievable as it is, even though we were the fools for going along with it.

The United Nations is a total failure in its stated mission to bring countries together “in order to have peace.” Indeed, the assembled nations seem to spend more time plotting against each other than stabilizing the world. And who funds this gathering? The United States. Not only funding it heavily but furnishing property and real estate for its buildings in New York.

And how do these countries of the world benefit the U.S. and work with us on issues we present? Take a look. Below are the actual voting records of various Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records:

Kuwait votes against the United States 67% of the time.

Qatar votes against the United States 67% of the time.

Morocco votes against the United States 70% of the time.

United Arab Emirates votes against the United States 70% of the time.

Jordan  votes against the United States 71% of the time.

Tunisia votes against the United States 71% of the time.

Saudi Arabia votes against the United States 73% of the time.

Yemen votes against the United States 74% of the time.

Algeria votes against the United States 74% of the time.

Oman votes against the United States 74% of the time.

Sudan votes against the United States 75% of the time.

Pakistan votes against the United States 75% of the time.

Libya votes against the United States 76% of the time.

Egypt votes against the United States 79% of the time.

Lebanon votes against the United States  80 % of the time.

India votes against the United States 81% of the time.

Syria votes against the United States 84% of the time.

Mauritania votes against the United States 87% of the time. 

We are supporting the UN with our own tax money that we worked hard to pay, yet none of these nations stand with us on important issues. Indeed they do everything to hinder us. And if this is not enough, here is what we give these nations who hate us, in U.S. Foreign Aid:

Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2,000,000,000 annually US Foreign Aid.

Jordan votes 71% against the United States and receives $192,814,000 annually  in US Foreign Aid.

Pakistan votes 75% against the United States receives $6,721,000,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

India votes 81% against the United States receives $143,699,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

And this is only a portion of the ‘foreign aid’ we give out.

So these countries we support work against us and receive these huge sums of money as “foreign aid?”

Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.

WHO STARTED THIS AND WHY? The Democrats put this together to weave the United States into the One World Order under Communist dictatorship, while taking the tax money that we all worked hard to pay to finance all of this.

Meanwhile, we have also been privileged to witness a solid demonstration of the mantra of the Communist Party: “Re-distribute the wealth.” It is past time to get rid of the UN, at least kick it out of the United States.

Thank God, we now have a new sheriff in town that will make some drastic changes. He brought something to the Oval Office that we have not seen in years….common sense.  It was the people–disgusted outraged citizens–who determined to put a stop to the spiraling plunge to hell the Leftists had ushered us onto, and voted in as President, Donald Trump. Russia had nothing to do with it nor anyone or anything else. It was the people who spoke. Even a dimwit can see this.

We must let President Trump do his job without interference for the sake of all Americans. Otherwise…

And it is time to take action against the Democrats who should never have stopped taking their medications, along with their leader, George Soros. They are throwing up roadblocks against everything President Trump is trying to do to preserve our country. Those who are undermining and interfering in the function of a lawful government can and must be charged and prosecuted for treason and sedition. What are we waiting for?

Our thanks to reader William Doell, also known as the Wellness Doc, for alerting us to these stats.

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

Going for the Party of Treason’s Jugular

By Jim O’Neill

I wish to enter my dying protest against what is called the Democratic Party.  I have watched it closely since the days of Jackson and know that all the misfortunes of our nation have come to it through this so-called party, therefore beware of this party of treason[italics added]

Nathaniel Grigsby (1811-1890), Civil War vet, from his tombstone

Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose — The more things change, the more they remain the same.

Any remaining doubts that “we the people” may have had about where the Democrat’s loyalties lay were put to rest during President Trump’s recent “State of the Union” address.  When he promoted jobs for the jobless the Democrats sat on their hands.  When he advocated giving aid to victims of crime the Democrats booed.  And when President Trump honored the widow of a fallen American SEAL the Democrats sat stone-faced and silent.

The Democrats (and their #NEVER TRUMP Republican cohorts) are globalists – and globalists are by nature anti-nation states.  More to the point, Democrats and their Republican cohorts are anti-American.  In a word, they are treasonous — and their treasonous nature was on full display for the nation to see during Trump’s speech.

There can no longer be any doubt whatsoever that “the progressive agenda is a dagger aimed at the heart of America’s social contract and the security of the American people.”  Conservative Republican members of Congress had best stop playing their “hail fellow well met” colligate games with these Democratic a–holes and get serious about saving the United States of America – NOW.

The quote from the paragraph directly above comes from David Horowitz’s bookBig Agenda: President Trump’s Plan to Save America” – a book that I strongly suggest conservative members of Congress purchase and read.  Horowitz understands the war and the nature of the enemy – he pulls no punches.

Reluctance to go for the jugular and willingness to accept defeat can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.  If you are reluctant to fight, you are inevitably headed toward defeat when the other side is relentless and despises you.  It is only for those who persist in the battle and never let up that the possibility of changing the result comes into view.  P.80

If they attack you as a racist or call you an obstructionist and you are not prepared to throw those charges back in their faces, you are already losing the war.  If your first response is to defend yourself by denying the charge, you are losing the war.  To have a chance of winning, your first response must be to attack them in a way that is equally strong, that throws them off balance and puts them on the defensive.  Mike Tyson summed up this strategy with the following observation: “Everybody has a game plan until you punch them in the mouth.”  To turn around the political battles conservatives have been losing for so long, they must begin every confrontation by punching progressives in the mouth.  To do so conservatives must develop an attack that takes away progressives’ moral superiority and smugness.  P.82,83

Exactly how does one go about taking away the Democrat’s sense of “superiority and smugness?”  By exposing them for the lying, corrupt, traitors that they are.  Throw their hypocritical lies back in their face and go on the offense – and stay on the offense!  Nothing less than the world is at stake – as goes America so goes the world.

The globalists envision a world ruled over by an arrogant godless elite.  They call that “utopia,” I call it hell on earth.  Make no mistake, “we the people” are in a war, and the stakes could not be higher.

So, we go for the jugular, we “hit ‘em where it hurts” – and hit, and hit, and hit until they don’t get up.  As Sir Winston Churchill said, never give in.

Never give in.  Never give in.  Never, never, never, never—in nothing, great or small, large or petty—never give in, except to convictions of honor and good sense.  Never yield to force.  Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.

Winston Churchill  (1874-1965)

Hit the Democrats in what Horowitz calls “their Achille’s heel” – their abject failure to help inner-city blacks rise out of squalor and dependency.  The Democrats demonize the Right and stoke the fires under entitlement and victimhood, thereby deflecting the justifiable rage of inner-city blacks away from themselves – the true perpetrators of inner-city violence, despair, and chaos.

Punch them in the mouth with their virulent anti-American globalism.  A globalist is anti-American by their very nature – it cannot be any other way.  You are either with us or against us, simple as that.  And who can doubt that the globalists are against us?

People like to be a part of something greater than themselves.  This emphatically includes their nation.  Patriotism is thus a natural phenomenon.  It is satisfied best when people feel that their nation is strong, or at least not weak.

Michael Anton “America and the Liberal International Order

American patriotism is a natural, healthy, vibrant appreciation and respect for your home turf.  To disdain and mock your home and environment is unhealthy, unnatural, and oh so Democratic.

And hit them with freedom.  Globalism is directly opposed to freedom, is the antithesis of freedom – and freedom rules.

The economic redistribution [of wealth] that progressives demand is not “fairness,” as they maintain.  Socialism is theft and a war on individual freedom…a war on the ability of individuals to work for themselves instead of the government, and therefore an attack on individual freedom.  P. 142

Why in the world would anyone ever be defensive about being pro-freedom. pro-American, and wanting to radically improve life in America, especially America’s inner-cities?  Why indeed.

Be on offense; take no prisoners; stay on the attack.  To stop the Democrats and their societal transformation, Republicans must adhere to a strategy that begins with a punch in the mouth.  That punch must pack an emotional wallop large enough to throw them off balance and neutralize their assaults.  It must be framed as a moral indictment that stigmatizes them in the way their attacks stigmatize Republicans.  It must expose them for their hypocrisy.  It must hold them accountable for the divisions they sow and the suffering they cause.  P. 142

 

 

LIFE INSIDE A BUBBLE

 

We hear a lot these days from people who live inside of bubbles wholly shielded from the everyday challenges of the forgotten men and women who are the overwhelming majority of Americans.  I refuse to refer to these groups of people as elite.  From my background and upbringing, referring to someone or a group as elite was reserved for the best of us.  These people certainly do not make the cut.  Privileged they certainly are, but they fall well short of being the best of America – or the best of people for that matter.  At the end of their road is self-preservation and maintenance of their perceived exalted stature.

We refer to the media elite, the Washington elite, the Hollywood elite and elitists in general based on personal wealth and its accompanying influence.  It is these collectives who work every day to drive the conversational narrative attempting to steer the minds of the forgotten population in the direction of their ideologies and political aims.  They divide people into groups of victims blaming their lot on a straw man enemy.  The people – elitists – and their groups of useful idiots are an insignificant percentage of our population.  Those who try each day to set the tone or drive the narrative attempt to make them appear the majority.  It is a mirage, a potentially volatile and deadly one, but a mirage all the same.

They are failing.  They have failed over the past decade and have experienced a steady decline in political power and influence.  The forgotten of our country that largely exist paycheck to paycheck finally said enough.  This is not their America.  The social justice leveling of the playing field is a fallacy that serves to move middle class farther out of their reach.  No longer are they influenced by these self-titled groups of elites who are losing their influence over the Middle America psyche daily and in great chunks.

The more our vaunted elitists fail the more extreme they become and will become.  They refer to anyone who does not agree with them as fascists.  It shows a level of ignorance amongst these people and their indoctrinated “protestors” that is nothing short of breathtaking.  Fascism wants to silence opposing voices.  It wants to control who has the ability to do business and sale their wares in the public market place.  This is what we see every day.  It is the narrative driven by the “elites” who refer to those disagreeing with them as brownshirts.  Just for the uneducated Hollywood actors and faux journalists making these accusations, understand that it was the Nazis who sent their brownshirts to shut down opposing voices and destroy businesses and property.  This is exactly what the paid for rent-a-thugs are doing almost daily.  The day will come when a business owner or someone wearing the wrong kind of hat will declare enough.  On that sad day for America you may just get the fight you think you want.

Peaceful dissent and protest is a hallmark of American freedom.  Rioting, destroying business, and attacking people who disagree with you are hallmarks of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Communist China, North Korea… .  If you are either too stupid to understand that or you actually embrace this approach, then you are not American.  Not even close.

There is another group.  These are the subversives inside our government agencies.  These are not Presidential appointees, but career federal employees who are selected and promoted into sensitive positions because of their political connections and leanings.  These are the people who willingly commit felonies by releasing transcripts of telephone conversations captured on classified signal intelligence networks.  These are the people inside Congressional offices, NSA, DOJ, FBI, CIA, Homeland… who want to bring down our democratically elected government.  These, not the useful idiots in the streets, are the people most dangerous to our country.  These are the people who must be found and fully prosecuted under Title 18 US Code Chapter 115 Treason, Sedition and Subversive Activities.

But it is all connected.  The elitists drive the media narrative and put the punks in the streets.  The subversives inside the government give meat to the false narrative that “the Russians did it” then it just becomes a loop.  A snowball rolling down the mountain until something pops.  At least that is their hope and aim. Fortunately the indications are that they are losing this fight and will continue to lose as long as our President stands firm and takes the fight to them.

© J. D. Pendry 2017

Left Wing Fascist Anti-fascist Fascism

By Jim O’Neill

That the morally bankrupt, intellectually stunted thugs of ANTIFA (ANTI FAscist) wallow in ignorance is to be expected; as recently demonstrated during the riots in Berkeley – but that purportedly “conservative” writers and pundits continue to regurgitate the same old leftist lies about fascism is simply unacceptable.

As the title of this article implies, the left-wing is up to their standard leitmotif of clueless idiocy yet again.  In this case, they are reincarnating as Hitler’s fascist brown-shirt thugs in order to protest Hitlerian fascist brown-shirt thugs (although in a nod to modernism they have traded in their brown shirts for black ones, a la Hitler’s SS or Mussolini’s “black shirts”).  How thoroughly liberal of them.

I realize that I may have gone a bit overboard with the repetitions of “fascism” and variants in my title, but I am trying to make a point here – and apparently it is a point that bears repeating, and repeating, and repeating.  My point being: FASCISM IS A LEFT-WING IDEOLOGY.

Permit me to highlight, underline, and BOLD why fascism is, always has been, and always will be a LEFT-WING IDEOLOGY.  On the off chance that a liberal might read this article I will go s-l-o-w-l-y in the hope (faint though it be) that they may see the light.

First, some ground rules.  I will be referring to the traditional political spectrum throughout this article – the one that runs from Big Government on the left, to No Government (anarchy) on the extreme right.

The further to the left you move on the political spectrum the bigger and more intrusive the government (individual freedom diminishes).  The further to the right you move the more limited and restrained the government becomes (individual freedom increases).

The United States has traditionally been considered a “center right” country.  Meaning that the majority of “we the people” favor a government slightly to the right of the midway point between the far left and the far right.

I would say that for the majority of “we the people” that is still the case, but our politicians and media (among others) have moved far to the left – resulting in a huge disconnect between “we the people” and our political “leaders” (especially Democrats) and the media, who have become unapologetic propaganda venues for globalism.  (“Globalism” is, of course, the new and improved label behind which the old and unimproved concept of “global communism” hides these days).

So, big government to the left, limited and restrained government to the right.  Fascism, which is big government on steroids, indisputably belongs on the LEFT side of the political spectrum.  Consider the following couple of quotes by Italian dictator Benito Mussolini (1883-1945), who is widely credited with popularizing fascism (and coining the term itself).

All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state!

For the Fascist, everything is in the State, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the State.

Benito Mussolini

Perhaps putting the above quotes in the American vernacular will help to clarify things:

Everything within the federal government, nothing outside the federal government, nothing against the federal government!

For the Fascist, everything is in the Federal Government, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the Federal Government.

Fascism is, always has been, and always will be a big government LEFT-WING ideology.  The battles between communism and fascism during WW II and the Spanish Civil War were essentially turf wars between competing left-wing movements — comparable to Shiite and Sunni Muslims fighting one another.

A few words on the Nazis: Adolph Hitler was a left-wing fascist; whose political party was the “National Socialist German Workers Party” – the operative words being “Socialist Workers Party” – hardly the name for a conservative right-wing outfit.  The leftist nature of the Nazis is rather tellingly spelled out in the 10th item of their party platform:

It must be the first duty of every Citizen to carry out intellectual or physical work.  Individual activity must not be harmful to the public interest and must be pursued within the framework of the community and for the general good[italics added]

Party Platform of the NAZI Party

To associate the Nazis in particular, and fascism in general, with government restraining conservatism is deceitful beyond words.  It is willful ignorance magnified, multiplied, and dished out by the various globalist propaganda outlets.

The “Bill of Rights” from the US Constitution is the antithesis of fascism.  It does not so much list the rights of “we the people,” as it puts chains on government and restricts what government can do.  The US Constitution stands in exact opposition to the leftist big government tenets of fascism/Nazism.

To call the pro-Constitutional moves of President Trump “fascist” is so ludicrously wrongheaded that the absurdity of it all is stunning.   It would be funny, but for the fact that so many people actually buy into this nonsense.

The left-wing can, and will, continue to peddle their nonsense and ignorance, but “we the people” need to WAKE THE F—K UP.  Fascism and Nazism are NOT to be conflated with right-wing patriotism and conservative thinking.  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A RIGHT-WING FASCIST/NAZI.  Such an animal simply cannot exist.  Left-wing fascist/Nazis, on the other hand, are all over the d—n place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obama’s Budget Abuses Can Fund All Necessary Services

by Rev. Austin Miles

money-burn

Working Americans are receiving less and less of their paychecks while being denied basic promised services that they have earned and paid into including Social Security.

Especially hit hard by the Obama Administration is services to wounded veterans who have served our country.  V.A. health facilities are woefully understaffed. In Phoenix, several veterans have died waiting to be seen by a doctor.

It takes four to six months to get an appointment with a primary care physician in the Martinez, California facility. The appointments are usually in a 20 minute time frame. Every appointment is up to an hour late before being seen.

The staff members in Martinez are very caring but cannot do what they should be able to do because of these staff cutbacks by Obama. He has cut back on everything except his families lavish vacations.

You will see below a series of heavily budgeted government spending programs that Paul Ryan and the Republicans are proposing to cut, which does NOT include Social Security and the military. Here are the unnecessary programs that will be affected. Sit down as you read this list and see how much of our tax money is squandered and how much we can save. Warning: Your head will spin.

  • Corporation for Public Broadcasting Subsidy — $445 million annual savings.
  • Save America ‘s Treasures Program — $25 million annual savings.

  • International Fund for Ireland — $17 million annual savings.

  • Legal Services Corporation — $420 million annual savings.

  • National Endowment for the Arts — $167.5 million annual savings.

  • National Endowment for the Humanities — $167.5 million annual savings.

  • Hope VI Program — $250 million annual savings.

  • Amtrak Subsidies — $1.565 billion annual savings.

  • Eliminate duplicating education programs — H.R. 2274 (in last Congress), authored by Rep. McKeon ,

eliminates 68 at a savings of $1.3 billion annually.

  • U.S. Trade Development Agency — $55 million annual savings.
  • Woodrow Wilson Center Subsidy — $20 million annual savings.

  • Cut in half funding for congressional printing and binding — $47 million annual savings.

  • John C. Stennis Center Subsidy — $430,000 annual savings.

  • Community Development Fund — $4.5 billion annual savings.

  • Heritage Area Grants and Statutory Aid — $24 million annual savings.

  • Cut Federal Travel Budget in Half — $7.5 billion annual savings

  • Trim Federal Vehicle Budget by 20% — $600 million annual savings.

  • Essential Air Service — $150 million annual savings.

  • Technology Innovation Program — $70 million annual savings.

  • *Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Program — $125 million annual savings..

    • Department of Energy Grants to States for Weatherization — $530 million annual savings.
  • Beach Replenishment — $95 million annual savings.

  • New Starts Transit — $2 billion annual savings.

  • * Exchange Programs for Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and

    Their Historical Trading Partners in Massachusetts — $9 million annual savings

    • Intercity and High Speed Rail Grants — $2.5 billion annual savings.
  • Title X Family Planning — $318 million annual savings.

  • Appalachian Regional Commission — $76 million annual savings.

  • Economic Development Administration — $293 million annual savings.

  • Programs under the National and Community Services Act — $1.15 billion annual savings.

  • Applied Research at Department of Energy — $1.27 billion annual savings.

  • Freedom CAR and Fuel Partnership — $200 million annual savings..

  • Energy Star Program — $52 million annual savings.

  • *Economic Assistance to Egypt — $250 million annually.

    • U.S.Agency for International Development — $1.39 billion annual savings.
  • General Assistance to District of Columbia — $210 million annual savings.

  • Subsidy for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority — $150 million annual savings.

  • *Presidential Campaign Fund — $775 million savings over ten years.

    • No funding for federal office space acquisition — $864 million annual savings.

    * End prohibitions on competitive sourcing of government services.

    • Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act — More than $1 billion annually.
  • IRS Direct Deposit: Require the IRS to deposit fees for some services it offers

  • (such as processing payment plans for taxpayers) to the Treasury,

    instead of allowing it to remain as part of its budget — $1.8 billion savings over ten years.

    *Require collection of unpaid taxes by federal employees — $1 billion total savings.

    • Prohibit taxpayer funded union activities by federal employees — $1.2 billion savings over ten years.
  • Sell excess federal properties the government does not make use of — $15 billion total savings.

  • *Eliminate death gratuity for Members of Congress.

    • Eliminate Mohair Subsidies — $1 million annual savings.

    *Eliminate taxpayer subsidies to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel

    on Climate Change — $12.5 million annual savings.

    • Eliminate Market Access Program — $200 million annual savings.
  • USDA Sugar Program — $14 million annual savings.

  • Subsidy to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) — $93 million annual savings.

  • Eliminate the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program — $56.2 million annual savings.

  • *Eliminate fund for Obamacare administrative costs — $900 million savings.

    • Ready to Learn TV Program — $27 million savings..
  • HUD Ph.D. Program.

  • Deficit Reduction Check-Off Act.

  • DRUMROLL…..

    *TOTAL SAVINGS: $2.5 Trillion over Ten Years. Yes, @2.5 TRILLION!!

    My question is, what is all this doing in the budget in the first place?!

    If this isn’t outrageous enough, in one last desperate attempt before exiting The Oval Office, Obama

    is attempting to slip in another pricey climate-change initiative before Donald Trump takes office, potentially costing U.S. taxpayers another $90 million if it survives its unveiling – in Asia – next month.
    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/millions-more-for-global-climate-change-in-obamas-final-months/#j7I0l6wKaYqJISDW.99

    The “Climate Change” hoax is a scheme to create a world tax. Al Gore has made over $200 million so far, to promote that faulty science. If he succeeds in pulling this off, he will be awarded a billion dollars.

    First of all, it is not carbon dioxide omissions causing climate change. It is the sun only that creates climate changes which has been observed over the centuries. Carbon omissions contribute heavily to smog and bad air which is harmful to one’s lungs and overall health. But it has nothing to do with the weather being cold or hot. This is confirmed by NASA.

    In addition to the useless spending above, let’s take a look at what the Obama family has spent on personal luxuries paid for by the taxpayers who work hard for a pay check that barely covers a roof over a family’s head, food on the table, and clothing. There is nothing left for actual luxuries in life, but part of that hard earned paycheck goes for the luxurious living demanded by the Obama family. This is, of course, the Communist way. The “peasants,” barely scrape by while the leaders live in luxury.

    The expenses below, paid for by us, are in addition to the wasteful spending listed above. Let’s take a look: As of 11/15/2015 (with more than a year to go) the Obama Family had spent over $1,300,000,000 (one billion, three hundred million dollars) on personal family trips like golfing and vacations and even shopping sprees–remember when Michelle used Air Force One to take her to New York for a shopping spree? These events were personal, not political, or Government related. They use Air Force One as a taxi, at our expense.

    Here are more of her personal expenses we pay for: With the exception of Hillary who had 7 personal assistants, all other first ladies had one.  Michelle has 22 personal assistants, at a cost of $2,075,200 (2 million 75 thousand 200 dollars) annually. Plus she has a hairstylist and make up artist who travel with her on Air Force One for all trips, including their lavish vacations in Hawaii and Europe.

    Yes, Donald Trump will drain the swamp, and in Obama’s case, flush the toilet. He will find enough money by cutting useless spending to better staff the V.A. Hospitals and clinics, We can get the homeless off the streets and into housing. The State of Idaho is the only state in the union that has such a program. And we will get back to classic education seeding intelligence instead of a dumb-downed politically correct and immoral agenda that furthers the Communist Party USA.

    We thank our anonymous minister friend who helped gather the stats above.

    ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

    America’s 2nd Patriotic Revolution

    By Jim O’Neill

    I will only do what is right for our country, which I love.

    President-Elect Donald J. Trump “Crippled America” (p. 90)

    Do you not think an Angel rides in the Whirlwind and directs this Storm?

    John Page (1743-1808) Letter to Thomas Jefferson, 1776

    I fully expect sporadic spasms of the globalist movement’s death throes to continue inflicting posthumous damage for some time.  Yet, like John Page during the 1st American Revolution I sense the Divine Hand of Providence in Trump’s election as POTUS, and share Page’s feeling that an angel rides the whirlwind and directs this storm.  It is through God’s grace that “we the people” have prevailed thus far.

    I agree with Henry David Thoreau’s maxim “That government is best which governs least,” and given humanity’s current level of spiritual/mental/emotional maturity (perhaps immaturity would be the better word) I shudder at the thought of a global government ruled by an arrogant elite.  It would be a decadent hedonistic utopia for the ruling class and a dreary Draconian purgatory for the rest of us.

    Contrary to what progressive globalists have been peddling for decades, the time for nation-states, countries, is not over.  Indeed, patriotism for one’s country is about to experience a renaissance, a resurgence, a revival.  This will occur not just in the United States but around the globe.

    “We the people” may not all be informed about Gramsci and Lukacs, the “Frankfurt School,” political correctness, and the host of other teachings and teachers opposed to freedom, free speech, and patriotism, but we know when we are being lied to, ignored, and ripped off.  We know that when we are called deplorable, irredeemable, and bitter clingers that we are correct in assuming that the political class holds us in contempt. 

    We know that the Democratic Party, which used to identify with and support America’s working men and women, has morphed into a party aligned with wealthy donors, celebrities, Wall Street, and corporate fat cats.  We know that the Republican establishment is joined at the hip with their fellow Democratic political elites and that “we the people” have been left to twist in the wind while our “representatives” line their pockets.

    We know that we love America but distrust our government, our media, and our politicians.  A distrust that has been well and truly earned many times over.  As Mark Twain said, “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.”  “We the people” have staged a peaceful (so far) revolution against a government that we no longer respect – because it no longer respects us – because it no longer deserves respect.

    America’s middle class – historically the backbone of the United States – has come through yet again, and I could not be prouder of “we the people.”  It was the grit, determination, and unapologetic patriotism of America’s much maligned and mistreated middle class that allowed candidate Trump to become President-elect Trump.  That being said, I give God the glory, for without the Hand of Divine Providence I believe that “we the people” were condemned to follow the regressive progressive road to serfdom (to borrow Hayak’s phrase).

    “We the people” ignored the polls, pundits, and propaganda – saw through the smoke ‘n’ mirrors razzle-dazzle and elected a man who despises political bulls–t as much as we do, is angered by the rampant corruption as much as we are, and loves America as only a true patriot can.  Viva la revolucion

    Putin on Trump victory: Russia is ready to restore relations with US

    “Hopefully, with the new US president a more constructive dialogue will be possible between our countries”

    Russia is ready and looks forward to restoring bilateral relations with the United States, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, commenting on the news of Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election.

    “We heard [Trump’s] campaign rhetoric while still a candidate for the US presidency, which was focused on restoring the relations between Russia and the United States,” President Putin said, speaking at the presentation ceremony of foreign ambassadors’ letters of credentials in Moscow.

    “We understand and are aware that it will be a difficult path in the light of the degradation in which, unfortunately, the relationship between Russia and the US are at the moment,” he added.

    Earlier today, in a message to Donald Trump the Russian President expressed confidence that the dialogue between Moscow and Washington, in keeping with each other’s views, meets the interests of both Russia and the US.

    The Russian leader noted in the message that he hopes to address some “burning issues that are currently on the international agenda, and search for effective responses to the challenges of the global security,” RIA Novosti reported.

    On top of it, Putin has expressed confidence that “building a constructive dialogue between Moscow and Washington, based on principles of equality, mutual respect and each other’s positions, meets the interests of the peoples of our countries and of the entire international community.”

    Russian State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin has also expressed hope that Trump’s victory in the presidential election will help pave the way for a more constructive dialogue between Moscow and Washington.

    “The current US-Russian relations cannot be called friendly. Hopefully, with the new US president a more constructive dialogue will be possible between our countries,” he said.

    “The Russian Parliament will welcome and support any steps in this direction,” Volodin added on Wednesday.

    A member of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, Senator Aleksey Pushkov, has meanwhile noted that Hillary Clinton’s stake on the conflict with Russia has eventually done her a terrible disservice.

    “[Playing the] ‘Russian card’ and portraying Putin as a bad guy did not help Clinton. On the contrary, staking on the conflict with Moscow has only caused fear, doing her a disservice,” he tweeted.

    According to many observers, US-Russia relations are now at their lowest point since the Cold War. Putin has repeatedly noted that the worsening of Russia’s relations with the US “was not our choice,” however.

    For things to improve between Moscow and Washington, the US should first and foremost start acting like an equal partner and respect Russia’s interests rather than try to dictate terms, Putin said last month.

    “We are concerned with the deterioration of Russian-American relations, but that was not our choice, we never wanted that. On the contrary, we want to have friendly relations with the US, a great country and a leading economy,” Putin said at an economic forum in Moscow.

    The US will have to negotiate with Russia on finding solutions to international issues as no state is now able to act alone, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said last week, adding that problems in bilateral relations began to mount long before the Ukrainian crisis broke out in 2014.

    Sandy Hoax – Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, MD, PhD – Watch

    $50M BRAND NEW Sandy Hook School!

    http://www.stevepieczenik.com/50m-brand-new-sandy-hook-school/

     

    Russia’s Nuclear Surge: Putin Adding Nukes While Obama Cuts

    Should we be worried that Moscow deployed 429 more warheads than Washington? Why the number may be misleading—and Putin ditching other treaties may be scarier.

    David Axe 10.07.16 12:00 AM ET

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/07/russia-s-nuclear-surge-putin-adding-nukes-while-obama-cuts.html

    As of Oct. 1, Russia had hundreds more nuclear warheads deployed than the United States did. A startling 429 more, in fact, according to the U.S. State Department.

    Don’t panic quite yet. The current warhead gap is probably temporary. But that doesn’t mean all’s well when it comes to potentially world-ending weaponry.

    The reason for the current disparity is simple. While the U.S. military has been steadily cutting the number of nukes it loads on submarines and bombers and in missile silos, Russian forces have recently been adding nukes.

    Seemingly more worrying for the United States, Russia’s 1,796 deployed warheads exceed—by a whopping 246 weapons—the cap of 1,550 deployed nuclear weapons that Moscow and Washington agreed to as part of the 2011 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

    The United States, meanwhile, is already well below the New START cap. America’s missile submarines, nuclear-capable heavy bombers, and land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles are armed with just 1,367 warheads, according to the State Department.

    Both Russia’s nuke surplus and America’s lesser total could change in the next 17 months. Washington and Moscow have agreed on a Feb. 5, 2018, deadline for fully implementing New START. Until then, the countries’ respective nuclear arsenals could fluctuate in size—and often.

    “You have to keep in mind that numbers go up and down on day-to-day basis, so a one-day [snapshot] may mislead about force trends over time,” Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear expert who blogs at Arms Control Wonk, told The Daily Beast.

    Both the United States and Russia have signaled their intention to abide by New START’s terms, meaning Russia will probably start shedding old warheads pretty soon, replacing them with a smaller number of newer atomic munitions and ultimately erasing the current nuclear disparity. “Neither of us is in violation of the agreement,” Lewis stressed.

    New START is actually one of the few reasons for optimism amid the ongoing U.S.-Russia strategic arms race. For starters, the treaty only covers deployed nukes—meaning those on quick alert aboard subs, on planes, and in silos.

    The treaty doesn’t limit how many perfectly functional nuclear weapons the United States and Russia can keep in storage. In many cases, those warheads could go from “stored” to “deployed” with just a few hours’ work.

    Neither Washington nor Moscow discloses the exact number of nukes it keeps in storage, but Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, has estimated each country’s total stockpile to be around 4,500 warheads.

    Neither government has expressed any interest in cutting its overall atomic stockpile. And both governments plan to spend hundreds of billions of dollars in coming decades modernizing their nuclear arsenals with new warheads… and better rockets, bombers, and submarines to carry them.

    “Although these programs do not constitute a buildup of the overall nuclear arsenal, they are very comprehensive and reaffirm the determination by both Russia and the United States to retain large offensive nuclear arsenals at high levels of operational readiness,” Kristensen wrote on his blog.

    While New START seems to be holding strong, a separate disarmament deal—whereby the United States and Russia agreed to dispose of excess fissile material—has just collapsed. The Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement, signed in 2000, covered 34 tons of surplus, weapons-grade plutonium in each country.

    Under the terms of the agreement, both Russia and the United States would render the plutonium unusable for military purposes—not only to decrease nuclear tensions between the two powers, but also to ensure the excess plutonium didn’t somehow wind up in terrorists’ hands.

    Citing a “radically changed environment,” Russian president Vladimir Putin announced on Oct. 3 that Russia was pulling out of the deal. Nevertheless, Moscow informally pledged that it wouldn’t use the old plutonium in weapons—agreement or no.

    “The decision by the Russians to unilaterally withdraw from this commitment is disappointing,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said. “The announcement about the Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement is more in line with those kinds of decisions that have only deepened Russia’s isolation in the international community.”

    Meanwhile, the United States has been insisting for at least three years now that Russia is violating the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which bans many types of short-range nuclear weapons.

    U.S. officials have not said just how Russia is allegedly violating the treaty, but the purported breach might involve the road-mobile SS-25 ballistic missile and the RS-26, a small, nimble ballistic missile apparently designed to thwart U.S. missile defenses.

    Earnest expressed cautious optimism that, despite everything, Russia is still committed to reducing the risk of atomic warfare. He pointed to Russia’s cooperation with the United States in negotiating the deal with Iran to end that country’s nuclear-weapons program. “I think that’s an indication of the priority that Russia has placed on nonproliferation,” Earnest said.

    But Russia’s and America’s equal commitments to maintaining and modernizing their overall nuclear arsenals—regardless of any agreement to cap the number of deployed warheads—speaks to an underlying atomic distrust that lingers a quarter-century after the Cold War ended.

    “How the two countries justify such large arsenals is somewhat of a mystery,” Kristensen noted, “but seems to be mainly determined by the size of the other side’s arsenal.”

    Russian state newspapers predict ‘direct military conflict’ with US as it compares Syria stalemate to Cuban missile crisis

    MOSCOW ON THE OFFENSIVE

    ‘Third World War’ fears have been voiced by the newspapers over the growing tensions between the USA and Syria

    Video: State Department Admits ISIS Smuggling In Terrorists Among Refugees

    “I wouldn’t debate the fact.”

    State Department Spokesperson Rear Admiral John Kirby (Ret.) appeared on Fox & Friends this Morning and said he “wouldn’t debate the fact” that “there’s the potential for ISIS terrorists to try to insert themselves,” among Syrian refugees.

    .@statedeptspox: I wouldn’t debate that there’s potential for ISIS terrorists to try to insert themselves into the refugee population

    “We’ve seen that in some of the refugee camps in Jordan and in Turkey, where they’ll try to insert themselves into the population.” Kirby said.

    Kirby then spent the remainder of the interview attempting to convince viewers that the tens of thousands of refugees being admitted to the country are bring “stridently vetted,” yet he admitted that the vetting system is “not perfect.”

    “I would tell you that the more than 10,000 now Syrian refugees that we’ve admitted into the country, by this month, have all been extremely and very stridently vetted.” Kirby claimed.

    “There’s certainly not the same amount of information you have on individuals there that you would have here.” Kirby said, then claimed “they are going through a very serious inter-agency vetting process, the most that any refugee goes through.”

    “Is it perfect? Can it be perfect? Can it be foolproof? Well, probably not, no. But it is very, very serious.” Kirby said.

    Kirby added “We feel good that it is — it’s done appropriately, it’s done thoroughly, that the vetting is good.”

    The State Department spokesman also argues that the “bulk” of recent terrorist attacks “are not from refugees.”

    National security officials and experts have been warning for months that the refugee vetting system is woefully below par.

    Head of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Michael McCaul, has previously said that “There are a lot of holes — gaping holes,” in US defenses.

    McCaul has said he has spoken with FBI and Homeland Security officials who have repeatedly told him that “We don’t have the databases to vet them.”

    In testimony before the Senate, FBI Director James Comey has stated that “gaps” remain in the vetting process, owing to a lack of intelligence on the ground in Syria.

    ——————————————————————

    Steve Watson is a London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com

     

    New ID Badge Records Employee Conversations

    Your boss can now monitor you 1984-style

    A new Orwellian ID badge developed by a Boston-based company will give employers the ability to monitor their employees’ exact location and record everything they say in realtime.

    The new badge, which hangs from the employee’s neck, is equipped with two microphones that perform real-time voice analysis and sensors that track the employee’s movements.

    To provide some level of comfort to those who fear the new badges will violate their privacy, the company behind the badges has “assured” the public that the beacons used to track movements are not used in bathrooms.

    “Within three or four years, every single ID badge is going to have these sensors,” said Ben Waber, chief executive of Humanyze, an employee analytics company based in Boston. “We are only scratching the surface right now.”

    Waber, along with three scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), developed the technology used as the basis to for the new ID badges as part of their doctoral thesis; they refer to their technology as “people analytics.”

    JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are planning to install systems that monitor worker emotions to “boost performance and compliance.”

    The decision by big banks to pursue such technology comes after an experiment conducted by MIT finance professor Andrew Lo, in which he rigged a conference room with monitors to track 57 stock and bond traders who were equipped with wristwatch sensors to track pulse and perspiration.

    “Imagine if all your traders were required to wear wristwatches that monitor their physiology, and you had a dashboard that tells you in real time who is freaking out,” Lo said. “The technology exists, as does the motivation—one bad trade can cost $100 million—but you’re talking about a significant privacy intrusion.”

    Even Bloomberg agreed that technology used to conduct emotional surveillance “has an undeniably dystopian vibe, like a finance version of George Orwell’s 1984.”

    Obama’s $400m Cash Payout To Iran Is Unprecedented, Say Legal Experts

    No other transaction in US history has involved a planeload of bills, say diplomatic historians, raising questions about payment timed to help free prisoners

    A $400 million cash delivery to Iran to repay a decades-old arbitration claim may be unprecedented in recent US history, according to legal experts and diplomatic historians, raising further questions about a payment timed to help free four American prisoners in Iran.

    The money was sent to Iran on Jan. 17, the same day Iran agreed to release the prisoners. The Obama administration claimed for months the events were separate, but recently acknowledged the cash was used as leverage until the Americans were allowed to leave Iran. Only then, did the US allow a plane with euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency loaded on pallets to take off in the other direction for Tehran.

    “There’s actually not anything particularly unusual about the mechanism for this transaction,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said this week of the initial cash payment.

    But diplomatic historians and lawyers with expertise in international arbitration struggled to find any similar examples.

    Asked to recall a similar payment of the US using cash or hard money to settle an international dispute, the office of the State Department historian couldn’t provide an example.

    Read more