Category Archives: DEEP STATE

Ex-CIA officers running for Congress as Democrats

The Daily 202: Ex-CIA officers running for Congress as Democrats

October 18, 2017

THE BIG IDEA: The spooks have come in from the cold, and they’re running for Congress.

Alarmed by President Trump and galvanized by Russian interference in the 2016 election, Democratic alumni of the Central Intelligence Agency are challenging Republican incumbents from Virginia to Michigan and New York.

Abigail Spanberger spent eight years as an operations officer for the CIA, recruiting and developing spies, with a focus on counterterrorism. Before joining the agency, she worked in law enforcement for the U.S. Postal Inspection Service — targeting drug dealers and money laundering. In 2014, Spanberger left the agency and moved home to the Richmond suburb of Glen Allen, near where she and her husband grew up, to raise their three kids. The 38-year-old is now challenging Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.), the Freedom Caucus leader who toppled then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in a 2014 primary.

“There is a lot of concern among people living in our district about where we find ourselves on the international stage,” Spanberger said in an interview. “I believe very firmly that the United States of America is the world’s superpower, and we have a responsibility to be a stabilizing force.”

The Sept. 11, 2001, attacks happened during Elissa Slotkin’s first week living in New York City. She had just started her graduate studies at Columbia University. Because she was fluent in Arabic, the CIA recruited her to be a Middle East analyst and then deployed her to Baghdad. She served three tours in Iraq over five years. She left to become the director for Iraq policy on the National Security Council, moved to the State Department and finally the Pentagon. When Barack Obama left office in January, she was the acting assistant secretary of defense for international security. Now 41, she’s moved home to Michigan and is running against GOP Rep. Mike Bishop. She outraised him last quarter.

Making this a trend story: Jeff Beals, 40, spent four years as a CIA intelligence officer after graduating from Harvard in 1998. He moved to the State Department in 2002 and spent four years working on Middle East peace there. Now a high school history teacher in Woodstock, N.Y., he is one of several Democrats vying to take on GOP Rep. John Faso.

— A handful of other Democratic House candidates also have intelligence backgrounds, though not at the CIA. Patrick Ryan, one of the top-tier contenders to face Faso in New York’s Hudson Valley, served two combat tours in Iraq, including one as the lead intelligence officer for an infantry battalion in Mosul. After retiring as a captain, the West Point grad started a successful cybersecurity firm. “The thing being an intelligence officer taught me is that there is no simple answer that can be captured in 140 characters,” Ryan said in an interview. “I don’t think our commander in chief understands the complexity and the second- and third- order consequences of his decisions. … War has to be the last resort in all cases”

— Trump has antagonized the intelligence community by questioning the expertise and professionalism of employees at the various spy agencies. He has never fully accepted their conclusion that Vladimir Putin ordered a comprehensive cyber campaign to boost his campaign and sabotage the presidential election. “The whole Russia thing was an excuse for the Democrats losing the election,” Trump said again Monday during a news conference in the Rose Garden.

Shortly before taking office, Trump memorably compared the intelligence community he now oversees to Nazi Germany. The day after being inaugurated, Trump visited CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., and drew criticism for delivering self-referential remarks before a wall of stars memorializing fallen officers. Visiting Poland in July, the president said U.S. intelligence analysts were wrong about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction — so they could also be wrong again about the Russians. In March, Trump asked two of the nation’s top intelligence officials to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government. Both refused.

Across the “deep state,” there are pockets of concern about the president’s fitness for office. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) spoke for many who cannot go on the record when he expressed fear that Trump’s behavior is setting the nation “on the path to World War III.”

— But the CIA prides itself on being independent and nonpartisan. People from across the ideological spectrum work there. “It is wholly unfortunate that the president — at least through his actions and words — isn’t appreciating what they do,” said Spanberger, who is running in Virginia. “At the end of the day, it’s a nonpartisan institution. To be a professional intelligence officer is really a unique path. They have a job to do: to serve the American people. So they just continue to do their jobs.”

Spanberger said what’s frustrated her the most this year has been when Trump and congressional Republicans make hasty decisions without having all the facts. Her mission at the CIA was to collect as much intelligence as possible so that policymakers could make more informed choices. “We’d ask ourselves: what information do we not have? What information are the analysts looking for? Then on the operations side, we’d look to figure out how to get that information,” she explained. “My role was to encourage people to take great risks so that our government could act wisely and make decisions based on that information.”

That’s one of the reasons that the House health-care debate really got her goat. “As a former CIA officer, the idea that the legislative body would put through a bill without so much as a CBO score was shocking to me,” Spanberger explained. “It runs antithetical to everything I believe in.”

— The former CIA officials, seeking elected office for the first time, are full of wisdom about how to deal with global hotspots, but they also understand that voters are primarily motivated by breadbasket issues. On the stump, each puts the heaviest emphasis on the economy and health care. That said, they’ve also discovered that — because the world is such a tinderbox right now — people are remarkably engaged on national security.

Back in Michigan, Slotkin said that she routinely gets asked about global events people read about in that day’s newspaper: “Businessmen ask me, ‘I have a trip coming up in Seoul. Should I cancel?’ Or, ‘My kid is supposed to study abroad in Asia. Should they go?’ People are concerned about the instability.”

Because both women are challenging Republican incumbents and Trump won each district by 7 points last year, they are running as pragmatic moderates who are eager to work across the aisle.

“I am out there every day talking with Trump voters,” Slotkin said. “For the first two minutes of the conversation … they think I am a Republican because of my CIA and DOD experience. Then they ask what I am running as. I say I am running as a Midwestern Democrat and that I have worked for Democrats and Republicans proudly. People will then say they consider themselves independent. That’s Michigan.”

Each could be well positioned to ride a wave of backlash in the midterms — if it materializes. “There’s no doubt that former CIA officers and national security experts have strong records of service to our country and authentic messages that appeal to Democrats, independents and Republican voters alike,” said Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Tyler Law.

— Republicans note that all the Democratic candidates mentioned above need to make it through primaries, which could force them to the left. Spanberger, running against Brat, faces five other Democrats in a primary that won’t take place until next year.

GOP operatives expect they will probably wind up fielding a couple of candidates of their own who have intelligence backgrounds, though no one who has announced for 2018 yet has worked at the CIA. Andrew Grant, running against Rep. Ami Bera (D-Calif.), was a Marine Corps intelligence officer before working at the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department.

Rep. Will Hurd (R-Tex.), who is facing a tough reelection fight in a district carried by Hillary Clinton, is a former CIA agent who was stationed in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Two of his Democratic challengers have intel backgrounds. Gina Ortiz Jones is a former Air Force intelligence officer who deployed to Iraq and worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency. Jay Hulings was a staffer on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and worked as legislative director for retired Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.). Both of his parents were CIA agents.

— A cautionary tale: After nearly a decade in Langley as an analyst, Kevin Strouse was the Democratic nominee in 2014 against former congressman Mike Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.). But he lost. Shortly afterward, Strouse wrote a fascinating post for a blog called Overt Action about the pitfalls of running for office as a CIA alumnus:

“Many regarded my intelligence background with skepticism,” he recalled. “Some believed I had spent my time bombing people in Pakistan from unmanned aircraft, while others assumed that I had overthrown foreign governments. … In one instance I was presumed accountable for the Phoenix Program during the Vietnam War, an impressive feat since that effort preceded my birth by two decades. Also, I was constantly asked if I watched Homeland, if I liked Homeland, and if I was trying to ‘be’ Homeland …

“While very comfortable discussing foreign policy issues, I often knew things I could not discuss publicly,” he added. “Over the course of the campaign, media reporting surrounding the intelligence community often drove voter interest in the topic, and usually not in a good way. I was frequently asked about the Intelligence Community spying on American citizens after Edward Snowden began leaking classified information about NSA programs in June 2013. I also was often asked about the attack on the US diplomatic post in Benghazi…

“I also discovered very quickly that the skills required for being a top-notch Agency analyst are far different than what is necessary to be a successful Congressional candidate,” Strouse concluded. “CIA analytic briefings are usually dry and stuffy. They focus on data, nuance, and uncertain outcomes. Policy recommendations are a big no-no. Briefings are presented dispassionately. Suffice to say, the way CIA analysts are trained to give briefings and answer questions will not get people on their feet cheering. Voters expect their elected leaders to be definitive and show passion and convictions for their beliefs.”

— The former CIA officers who will be on the ballot in 2018 are preparing for the Russians to once again wage an influence campaign — and they expect that they will be targets. At the Pentagon last year, Slotkin was the lead negotiator with Moscow on the memorandum of understanding related to Syria. The goal was to make sure that U.S. aircraft could fly over that country without being shot down by the Russians. She said they secretly filmed her during one negotiating session and put the video on YouTube until the U.S. government complained. She routinely receives spearfishing emails and other notifications of attempted hacks.

It’s quite a big concern,” she added in a recent interview. “We will be, of course, watching the Facebook ads that are put out, and we’ll do our best to monitor how they’re going to try to sow chaos in my election and probably many, many others. … If the Russians are really doing what we believe them to be doing, then I would be a choice target. They already know me, and they don’t love me. So we’ve done a lot of work to make sure that anyone associated with the campaign has gone through proper training for cybersecurity. Even the interns.”

Who Said~Our Country Is Safe Because We Accept ZERO Illegals

MUST SEE=> Polish MP Slaps Down Liberal Reporter “Our Country Is Safe Because We Accept ZERO Illegals

Gateway Pundit

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/must-see-polish-mp-slaps-down-liberal-reporter-our-country-is-safe-because-we-accept-zero-illegals/

=======================================================

WWG1WGA!

FREEDOM RIDER…

 

Mad Max Vs. the Super Elite

By Jim O’Neill

Let’s face it, they’ve been stone cold losers, the elite.  So, let them keep calling themselves the elite.  But we’re going to call ourselves – and remember you work harder than they do and you are indeed smarter than them — from now on let’s call ourselves the super elite.  We are the super elite.

President Donald Trump at Fargo, ND 6/27/18

During his speech in Fargo, ND last night President Trump named Congresswoman Maxine “Mad Max” Waters the new face of the Democratic Party.   Her and Pelosi — yikes.

Between Pelosi and Waters voters will be falling over each other to vote Republican next fall.  It won’t be a red wave, it’ll be a red tsunami.  The GOP already has a great video ad that underlines the morally bankrupt, vicious, mentally unhinged nature of today’s Democratic Party.

Democrats have been well and truly outed as the sly, lying, fiscally moronic anti-American dweebs that they have devolved into.  They have no answers that have not already been shown to be lame and worthless.  So, all they can of think to do is “resist.”  Resist America becoming great again, and double down on slurs, smears, threats, insults, and violence.  It is their ultimate fallback position and all they have left.

We the People are America’s backbone, its heart and soul, its bedrock foundation of honor and integrity.  We are indeed America’s super elite, and we should accept that label with pride and strive to be worthy of it.  We work toward a shared glorious future — while watching anti-American loons endlessly, pointlessly, running on their hamster-wheels of hate.

Time to Get Frosty

By Jim O’Neill

“When you’re violent and cursing and screaming and blocking me from walking into a movie, there’s something wrong.  The next people are going to come with guns. That’s what’s going to happen.”

Pam Bondi, Florida Attorney General “The Left Loses Its Cool

Recently most Americans have been shocked by open calls for, not just resistance to the Trump agenda, but increasing calls for violence and even outright revolution.  …It is going to get ugly violent.  Yes, this is sedition, and it is time to call the behavior out.  …Freedom isn’t free, there is no resting.

Bill Still “Is Soros Funded Border War Coming?

Now that a United States Congresswoman has called for harassment against Republicans and the inevitable violence that will come of it, I urge all of you to a) get armed, and b) vote. Your life literally depends on it.

James Woods

Sedition is defined as conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.  The “Resist” movement is by its very nature seditious – preaching anti-American hate and intolerance…and it is by inuendo and subtle (and not-so-subtle) means advocating the violent overthrow of President Trump’s administration.  There are laws against that sort of stuff you know.  For example:

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

U.S. Code 2385

But America has an Attorney General who is MIA, and a DOJ and FBI that are…how to put this…less than trustworthy?  So, I for one am not holding my breath waiting for the hammer to fall on those calling for violent insurrection.  Large portions of the US government appear to be hell bent on destroying America as a free republic, and encourage, through their silence if nothing else, those who wish America ill.

All of this brought to mind an article I wrote in July of 2011 titled “Time to Reboot America.”  I reread it yesterday and was surprised at how relevant it is to the situation we find ourselves in today.  Rather than reinvent the wheel, I edited, updated, and otherwise revised “Time to Reboot America” in order to address today’s concerns.  The result immediately follows.

It is time for We the People to remind ourselves of the instructions left to us by America’s Founders:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…. 

…when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

There you have it; there it is, those are our marching orders.  It is not only our right; it is our duty to fight a tyrannical, despotic government that holds sway over us, no matter under what label it hides — even when that government is wearing the garb of the United States of America.  That we are indeed suffering under “a long train of abuses and usurpations” is no longer in doubt; no longer to be denied; no longer to be endured.

So, the question becomes “What to do?”  How best to affect the overthrow of a blatantly anti-American political/social cabal — as large, powerful, and entrenched as the so-called Deep State?  I include the various anti-American NGOs and well-funded social “movements” as well.

As the Declaration of Independence notes, such an important and monumental task is not to be undertaken for “light and transient causes,” nor should We the People commit ourselves to a foolish or impatient course of action.

America has been so thoroughly infiltrated and infested with traitorous elements that it has become difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff, the patriot from the traitor.  Nonetheless we must move to save America (and with it, freedom), and we must move with some alacrity.

When your house is on fire because of arson, finding out who the arsonist is and why they lit the fire should not top your “To Do” list.  Putting out the d–n fire should be your number one priority.  Nevertheless, “putting out the fire” in this case will involve jailing some of the lead “arsonists” as part of the process.

I am talking about pointing fingers and naming names.  I am talking about jail time — serious jail time.  I am talking about mass movements to unseat treasonous Americans across the country.  I am talking about a “house cleaning” from top to bottom; side to side, inside and out.  I am talking about some serious stuff folks.  Things you would not dream of doing for “light and transient causes.”

Freedom itself is at stake here.  Future generations will live in freedom and light or darkness and shackles depending on what We the People do today.  We did not want this fight, but it has fallen to us to be the torch-bearers, the Minute Men, the American patriots who once more take the fight to the enemy and make them rue the day they messed with America.  Most of you already know the score, so I will not bother going over the long list of “abuses and usurpations” — which go back for decades, even though they are coming to a head just now.

It is once again up to We the People to put out the fire (“Once more unto the breech, dear friends, once more”).  By the term We the People I mean that strong backbone of America that the country has always called upon in time of dire need, and who have always responded.  It includes blue and white-collar workers, high school dropouts and the highly educated, farmers and businessmen, soldiers and sailors…patriots all.

Our country needs us — once again.  The stakes involved are as big and the outcome as uncertain as in any situation we have ever faced — including the Civil War, and the Revolutionary War.  God willing, this revolution will not be as painful and bloody as those in our past.  But if it is — what of it?  It is our watch, our duty, and our time to stand tall on the battlements of freedom — come hell or high water.

The time has come to reboot America.  The time for talk is done.  We should be about the business of forming patriotic cadres, groups and movements — from the national level down to splinter cells.  We should do this now.  Some of you have no doubt been involved in such activities for some time.  Now is the time to go into full battle mode — this is no drill.

We should keep on sending emails and letters, placing phone calls, knocking on doors, saying prayers, et al. — but there needs to be a new sense of urgency about it all.  We need to ratchet things up — kick out the jams, pull out the stops, throw back the throttle.  We need to broaden our scope, deepen our commitment, and fire up our righteous indignation.

If America can keep the lid on things till then, the elections this coming fall will be every bit as important as the 2016 presidential election.  We simply must come out fearlessly and in force – a tsunami of patriotism and sanity.  But, at the same time, we must be prepared to deal with anti-American violence should it erupt beforehand.

I understand and respect the need for secrecy some of you must work under, but there is strength in numbers, and we should be about the business of openly organizing national as well as local NGOs to fight the enemy tooth and nail.  Unseat them, impeach them, disgrace them, and otherwise use every legal means at our disposal to get rid of these anti-American parasitic leeches that have infested our country.  Make sure that they understand just how much they are despised and how unwelcome their traitorous, arrogant, anti-American agendas are.

It is not a major concern that a sizable portion of Americans are still largely clueless about what is going on.  It is to be expected after decades of intentional dumbing down and a steady diet of disinformation, propaganda, and frivolous distractions via America’s various venues for “news” and entertainment.  We do not need their participation.  They are dead weight — but they are not the enemy.

If someone is an NWO one-world-government globalist then they are the enemy — you know their catch phrases and lingo by now.  If someone is advocating the overthrow of American rule of law then they are the enemy.  If someone is a Muslim Islamist bent on world conquest through blatant or stealth jihad then they are our enemy.  I won’t go through the whole list — most of you know it by now anyway.

They are the enemies of liberty and “unalienable rights.”  They are the enemies of freedom and choice.  They are the enemies of tradition and values.  They are the enemies of family and marriage.  They are the enemies of truth and honor.  They are the enemies of the United States of America.  They are the enemies of civilization itself. They are my enemy and they are your enemy.

It may appear that the enemy is vast and formidable, and I would certainly never underestimate them, but in fact they are only a relative handful.  The sheeple who swell their ranks will be the last ones to awaken to how they have been played — but awaken they will.   Many of them are simply greedy, arrogant, self-centered twits, who wouldn’t know common-sense if it came up and bit them on the butt.  Their mind-sets are largely dysfunctional and self-absorbed (arrogance, angst, and ennui, oh my).

The dyed-in-the-wool fanatics are much fewer in number than We the People, and they are much less impressive when stripped of their media propaganda “megaphones,” and their political clout.  That is, after all, why they went to such pains to subvert our media and government.  It is the puppet-masters behind the fanatics, behind the sheeple, behind our corrupt politicians, who are most dangerous — very dangerous indeed.

 

Patriotic organizations such as we currently have need to step things up a notch — make that several notches.  At the same time, we need to take as a given that any openly patriotic movement will attract enemy infiltrators like a magnet.  Also, there are bound to be enemy sources of discord and disinformation masquerading as patriotic NGOs.  These should be lumped together with other elements of controlled opposition and dealt with as time and opportunity allow.

There is a rapidly closing window of opportunity in which we have the luxury of doing things legally and non-violently.  After that window closes all bets are off.  Après cette, le déluge.

Although We the People no doubt have numerous patriots in our midst who would make eco-terrorists look like bumbling amateurs, if the situation deteriorates to guerrilla warfare and sabotage, then we have lost America as a country, and it will devolve into a Balkanized network of splinter factions, regions, and enclaves.  If that scenario should become a reality, then we will be well and truly screwed.  That eventuality must be prepared for as well.  May God grant we avoid it.

Lest you think that the views expressed in this article are extreme, I suggest that you find and read some far-left and far-right blogs and websites.  By comparison, I am the voice of prudent moderation itself.  My point here is that while the liberal propaganda outlets no doubt consider the views I express here to be extreme; the truth of the matter is that they are the ones who are extreme — extremely to the left.  What is essentially a rather moderate view becomes skewed through their warped perception into something radically far-right.

At worst, they can accuse us of being what — anti-globalists?  We the People are certainly not anti-American.  America is what we are fighting for.  We are not the ones leading our country into dark ruination through arrogant stupidity, avarice, and design.  We are not the one’s lauding one-world-government over America — disdaining America, reviling America, destroying America.  That is their job, and they excel at it.

As I close, let me say that America needs to bring God back into our national fabric.    This, more than anything else is what our country sorely needs.  We have lost our moral anchor, our guiding star, and only acceptance of God and His natural law can return us to our intended course.  God either exists or He does not.  If He does not exist then nothing ultimately matters, and we are left with naught but the ash heap of atheistic nihilism.  Such an attitude is a soul sickness, and sadly America is sick in her soul.

It is time to reboot America.  May God guide, bless, and protect us in our endeavors to keep the torch of freedom lit.  We the People did not ask for or want this fight, but with God’s grace we will d–n sure win this fight — for ourselves, for our children, for humanity, and for freedom.

Laus Deo.

 

 

Please Watch ~ “U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World must be Extermination” Pt. 1,2 and 3

Deep State Trio: Comey, Rosenstein And Mueller Aim To Destroy Trump

For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness.  None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity. —Isaiah 59:3-4 KJV

Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller

While everyone is looking at Robert Mueller as the culprit in this witch hunt of our President, we had better take a closer look at Rosenstein, the Deputy AG who appointed Mueller as special counsel for the DOJ and establishment infiltration.  Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller are long time affiliates.

Never Trumpers Infiltrate Administration

Roger Stone feels that the Never Trumpers have infiltrated the administration via Reince Priebus, but I believe VP Pence is also responsible. How else does one explain CFR member, Dina Habib Powell, best friend of Valerie Jarrett, Huma Abedin, and CFR member Condoleezza Rice? Powell is Arabic and a former Goldman Sachs employee. She is the current U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy to President Donald Trump under McMaster. She is also an Assistant to the President and Senior Counselor for Economic Initiatives.

Powell is being promoted by Jared and Ivanka to be our President’s next Chief of Staff, yet throughout her career Powell has opposed everything Trump stands for. As Stone says, this would be jumping from the frying pan into the fire, when there are already way too many quislings in the administration whose allegiance belongs, not to Donald Trump, but to the RNC, and that appears to be true for Rod Rosenstein.

Rod Rosenstein, Deputy AG

Harvard graduate Rosenstein was nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as Deputy Attorney General for the United States DOJ on January 13, 2017. Rosenstein was confirmed on April 25, 2017.  This certainly does not mean he’s a conservative, or an anti-globalist.

I would love to know who suggests these people, and then who vets them for our President…perhaps Pence and Priebus? There are only a few in this administration who are truly conservative, and one of them is already gone, General Michael Flynn, and several others never even made it to confirmation.

Rosenstein is being hailed as a brilliant choice who is admired and respected and completely free of controversy.  Excuse me, but wasn’t Comey hailed with the same exact rhetoric before he angered the left, and disappointed the right?

Leftist Slate Magazine stated that Rosenstein would be a good check against Jeff Sessions, and the Washington Com-Post even called Rosenstein a fabulous choice for the position and completely free of controversy!  Bah Humbug!  Obviously, he’s an establishment insider if these leftist rags love him.

Rosenstein and Mueller

Rosenstein joined the U.S. Department of Justice through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. From 1990 to 1993, he prosecuted public corruption cases as a trial attorney with the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division, then led by Assistant Attorney General Robert Mueller.  They’ve been joined at the hip for a long, long time.

Mueller and Rosenstein are both part of the “Deep State.”  In fact, as Stone reports, both of them have ties to the Bush machine.  Remember the Clinton theft of FBI documents?  Craig Livingstone, director of the White House Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports concerning several hundred individuals without asking permission.

Mueller served as clean up man for Bill and Hillary Clinton.  As independent counsel from 1995 to 1997, he found no criminal prosecution against White House officials who had rummaged through FBI records to get background reports in the use of political blackmail.

In 2001, top Justice Department official Lee J. Radek, roundly criticized for steering the China gate probe away from the White House, had a friend in Robert S. Mueller, President Bush’s pick to replace FBI Director Louis Freeh.  Radek ran the campaign finance task force that was charged with looking into rampant 1996 Clinton-Gore fund-raising abuses that included Chinese money-laundering and possible influence-peddling.  Many branded Radek a “bureaucrat” who was more interested in throttling the case against the Clinton White House, and thereby keeping his job, than pushing it.  Mueller even received a glowing endorsement from China cheerleaders like Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Hillary Clinton. [Link]

In the 1990s, Rosenstein was on a team of prosecutors appointed by Kenneth Starr to investigate Bill and Hillary Clinton’s “Whitewater” business dealings in Arkansas. In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder tapped him to investigate national security leaks to news outlets, a response to heavy criticism of the Obama administration by congressional Republicans.  Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr exonerated both President Clinton and the First Lady with respect to the FBI files matter in 1998.  And Ken Starr is telling the President not to fire Mueller.

Clintons and Comey

In the mid-1990s, Comey joined the Senate Whitewater Committee as a deputy special counsel. There he dug into allegations that the Clintons took part in a fraud connected to an Arkansas real estate venture gone bust. No charges were ever brought against either Clinton, but the scandal would eventually lead to independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s probe that would result in the Lewinsky scandal.

How about the Sandy Berger affair?  Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, who was sentenced in 2005 to two-years’ probation and fined $50,000 as the result of a plea bargain, for stealing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them.  He had also been functioning as a Hillary Clinton campaign adviser before his death last December.

James Comey, was the deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, and apparently limited the scope of the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger.  The documents Berger stole basically proved Bill Clinton could have gone after and killed Osama bin laden, but didn’t, proving he was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11 terrorist attack.

As I mentioned in my previous article, Comey also gave Bill Clinton a pass with his pardon of Marc Rich and others.  Then came his pass on Hillary and her email debacle, where she set up a private email server for herself, her family and Abedin which was not accessible by the federal government or congress, and on which classified documents were passed.

Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act of 1913 by allowing national defense information to be “lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed” through “gross negligence.”  And get this, Comey had Hillary Clinton’s definitive backup email device during the entire charade of an investigation into the former Secretary of State, according to court records obtained by Judicial Watch.

Godfather of Comey’s Daughter is Pence Lawyer

Here is a timeline of Comey’s career, note that he worked for McGuire Woods law firm from 1993-1996.  VP Pence’s office confirmed that he retained Richard Cullen, chairman of McGuire Woods LLP, to assist him in responding to inquiries by special counsel Robert Mueller.  Cullen and Comey used to work together at McGuire Woods, and Richard Cullen is the Godfather to one of Comey’s daughters.  Too close for comfort if you ask me.

Comey / Mueller Buddy-Buddy Connections

The fact that Robert Mueller, the former FBI head who “bungled” the post-9/11 anthrax attack, is leading the “Russia-gate” investigation should be a matter of grave concern for Americans.  Mueller’s appointment to investigate our President for sacking Comey is a conflict of interest, especially since they have worked closely together in the past.

“Former Director Mueller is exactly the right kind of individual for this job. I now have significantly greater confidence that the investigation will follow the facts wherever they lead.” Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) stated. Schumer, Dick Durbin and other Democrats echoed these comments, along with neo-cons John McCain and Paul Ryan, which should worry constitutional conservatives.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plamegate

Remember in 2003, Valerie Plame’s name being inadvertently leaked by Richard Armitage who confessed to his boss, Colin Powell?  This was a scheme against Vice President Cheney that ended in the conviction of his aide, Scooter Libby, for a weakly proven process crime.  Tag team Comey was the special prosecutor and Mueller was FBI Director.  They may well have honed their Deep State purge of political opponents then, something clearly at the bottom of this investigation into fictional “Russian collusion” and now “Obstruction of Justice” with the Trump campaign. [Link]

Amerithrax

Comey is a very close friend of Mueller, and covered for the erstwhile director in the Amerithrax affair and the upcoming inquiry could very well be a quid pro quo transaction.

Mueller thought he had his man in the bungled Anthrax investigation because two drug sniffing doggies liked scientist Steven Hatfill when he petted them.  Mueller used this flimsy proof on this conservative government scientist, when in fact, the FBI ignored a 2002 tip from a scientific colleague of the alleged anthrax killer, who turned out to be a Fort Detrick scientist named Bruce Edwards Ivins.  There was no firm proof he was responsible either, and he ended up committing suicide.  Comey seconded Mueller’s opinion, and they were both wrong.

Also check out Comey and Mueller’s showdown at John Ashcroft’s hospital bed.  Link

And don’t forget Mueller’s purposely botched probe and coverup of the BCCI scandal.

Mueller and Islam

Robert Mueller purged FBI training documents after 9/11. As reported by Rick Wells, FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom spoke to Maria Bartiromo.  The topic of the interview shifted to the issue of the real collusion, that of the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR taking a prominent role and infiltrating the FBI. He described how the White House, under both George W. Bush and the Obama regime and the FBI, including specifically Robert Mueller, changed to accommodate the demands of the terrorist front organization after the Twin Towers came down.  Mueller acquiesced with Muslim Brotherhood front group, CAIR.

He also met with Nihad Awad, executive director of Hamas doing business as CAIR, as well as senior leadership of the Islamic Institute, the American Muslim Council and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (all Muslim Brotherhood affiliates) in 2002 at FBI headquarters.

In 2005, under Mueller’s administration, the FBI presented an award to Mohamed Magid, the imam of the infamous ADAMS center – a hardline Wahhabis mosque – and the president of ISNA.

There have been several other instances of Mueller’s Muslim Brotherhood collusion and investigative “incompetence.”

In 2013, Mueller testified that he was unaware that the mosque attended by the Tsarnaev brothers, the perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombing that resulted in three deaths and close to 300 injuries, was founded by Al Qaeda financier Abdurahman Alamoudi.  Incredibly, Mueller’s department had been conducting “outreach” activities with the facility’s imam at the time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gohmert Exposed Mueller as Terrorist Facilitator

Rep. Louis Gohmert, (R-TX) knows what Robert Mueller is, and does not share the fawning reverence for him as the DC swamp creatures do.  Mueller, has a long record of being an official cover man for jihadists choosing to operate in the United States. Remember the fact that Mueller purged all of the FBI training materials and other records which indicated reference to Islamic terrorism in the months following the 9/11 attacks, but then he also ignored warnings about the Tsarnaev brothers and never even attempted to investigate their mosque.

Judicial Watch exclusively obtained droves of records back in 2013 documenting how, under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI purged all anti-terrorism training material deemed “offensive” to Muslims after secret meetings between Islamic organizations and the FBI chief. Judicial Watch had to sue to get the records and published an in-depth report on the scandal in 2013 and a lengthier, updated follow-up in 2015.  Read the full report.

When Gohmert questioned Mueller two months after the Boston bombing, he forced admissions from him of his failures or complicity in creating the situation in which the terrorist attacks occurred.  Here’s the full story.

Watch the video:

Many Uncomfortable with Mueller

Why should we be uncomfortable with Mueller? 1) The leftist establishment is comfortable with him. 2) He worked in tandem with Comey on a couple of high profile cases. 3) He was chosen as FBI head by George W. Bush (hater of Trump and owner of the words “That was some weird shit,” in describing Trump’s Inauguration speech. 4) Obama felt so comfortable with Mueller that upon taking office he extended Mueller’s ten-year tenure an additional two years.

Not exactly a resume I feel comfortable in handing our president’s fate over to.

Conclusion

One way to counter the Mueller probe is to discredit Mueller, using the facts about his terrible treatment of a series of American scientists in the anthrax case. In the end, the FBI paid off one scientist, to the tune of millions of dollars in damages, and drove another to his death. Meanwhile, the al-Qaeda operatives who carried out the attacks got away. That Mueller could survive this debacle with a sterling reputation is evidence of the corruption in the Washington, D.C. swamp.

Next up, Mueller hires 13 lawyers for this phony Russian probe and plans to hire more.

 

print

Click Here For Mass Emailing

Kelleigh Nelson

James Comey, The FBI’s, And Clinton’s Politically Corrupt Dirty Cop

Contrary to numerous false press accounts leading up to today’s hearing, Mr. Comey has now finally confirmed publicly what he repeatedly told the President privately:  The President was not under investigation as part of any probe into Russian interference.  He also admitted that there is no evidence that a single vote changed as a result of any Russian interference. Marc  Kasowitz, President Trump’s personal lawyer

How does a man with absolutely no law enforcement experience become the head of the most modern crime fighting organization in the United States? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James Comey has proven himself to be a poisonous swamp snake who was paid to deliberately provide cover for high-level corruption by the Clintons and Obama.  And now he has been offered a $10 million-dollar book deal following his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, with a movie to follow making this louse out as a hero.

We know that Comey has been central in trying to destroy the Trump campaign and then the Trump administration. He is as dirty as they come in DC.  His level of cover, the FBI, was deep into an effort to dump Trump.  And what Trump and Sessions’ DOJ did was spectacular.  When Comey was 3,000 miles away, they fired him and dumped his entire office.  Trump moved quickly, and exactly at the right time to cut off the head off the snake of this traitorous Obama/Clinton insider.  Superb inside job by Trump and Sessions!

Comey’s Clinton Connections

James Comey was also director and board member of HSBC Bank until 2013, which is tightly connected to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation received up to $81 million from clients of the controversial bank. This is the same HSBC that was accused of laundering drug cartel money, was heavily involved in the LIBOR scandal (huge price fixing scandal), and who knows what else, and all while our esteemed FBI Director James Comey says “she didn’t intend it.”  Yeah, right!

Top that off with Loretta Lynch telling Comey to call the Hillary investigation a “matter,” because the words “criminal investigation” insinuated that a crime had been committed.  Uh, yeah, it had.  Comey admitted to colluding with Loretta Lynch to falsify his statements to benefit Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Limbaugh asked where the Republicans were on Comey’s admissions about Loretta Lynch?  Not a word from them…other than Louis Gohmert.

Remember the Whitewater Investigation?  Twenty years ago, Comey, an attorney on the Senate Whitewater Investigation, was looking into the conduct of President Bill Clinton and the first lady, Hillary.  The investigation was to determine whether Bill used his political position as Governor of Arkansas in the 80s to push through an illegal loan to benefit their business partner in Whitewater.  Several people involved went to jail, but no criminal prosecution came down for the Clintons.  James Comey was the Deputy Special Counsel for the investigation.

Remember all those last-minute Bill Clinton pardons right before he left the White House? The list was supposed to be given to Congress for approval well ahead of Bill’s last day.  Among the many questionable pardons was billionaire Marc Rich (who traded illegally with America’s enemies, including Iran).  The whole deal reeked of impropriety after learning that Rich’s wife donated $450,000 to the Clinton Library.   Again, James Comey oversaw investigations of the pardons, and he did not recommend charging Clinton in any of these matters.  Barbara Olson exposed this in her book, The Final Days.  She was my friend, and died on 9/11 in the plane that hit the Pentagon.

Remember the interesting chance meeting of Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport where they allegedly spoke about their grandchildren?  Shortly after the meeting, FBI Director Comey released his decision not to press charges on Hillary.  He couldn’t wait to exonerate Hillary Clinton, and he said, “I can’t find any intent on her part to share classified data, and therefore no prosecutor would do so.”

 

 

 

 

 

AND, in an unprecedented move, he imposed a gag order on all the agents involved with the Hillary email investigation.  Suspicious?  You bet!

So, we have Lynch, previously appointed by Bill Clinton, and formerly an employee of the law firm that is connected to Hillary’s email scandal, in charge of the investigation into Hillary’s email scandal.  The lead investigative agency is led by a man who twice investigated the Clintons and both times found them not guilty of wrong doing.  He was also appointed by the current President, Obama, who appointed Lynch, who is Comey’s boss.  Comey and Lynch have known each other for decades as well.  Coincidence?  I don’t think so.

Trump Never Under Investigation

President Trump was never under investigation and Comey told him that three times, beginning in January.  Marco Rubio even made the point that everything in the administration had been leaking except that Trump was not under investigation! That didn’t leak, and of course, we know why.

The entire Senate and House Intelligence communities have known since January that Trump was not under investigation.  Every socialist Democrat as well as the Republicans, have known this. Comey had told everyone in a closed session up on Capitol Hill that Trump was not under investigation.

Many of the Democrat Senators knew our President was not being investigated, yet they continued to make those false media charges.  And guess who the worst ones were…Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren.

Dan McLaughlin, National Review: Just think how many times Schumer made the charge while knowing all along it wasn’t true. All these Democrats charging Trump, alluding to it, alleging. Some of them saying they haven’t seen any evidence of collusion. They were honest about that. But they did not divulge that they knew Trump was not under investigation. This is a huge media scam. Contrast this with Hillary.

Now the Dems are claiming they never said that Trump was under investigation by the FBI.  However, it is blatantly false, their claims appeared in numerous leftist rags.

Again, where were the Republicans shouting for the cameras, for the people, the idea that Trump had not been a target for three months and that everybody knew it? Where were the Republicans on TV excoriating this investigation and chastising the Democrats for perpetrating this fraud? Where are the Republicans?  Silent, and capitulating as usual.

Comey a Big Leaker

He leaked data, property of the FBI, to the New York Times via his professor buddy.  He’s a leaker, and for that he should be charged.  His on-camera admission was stunning.

And, while testifying, Comey stated nine times that he might be wrong. “Although I could be wrong. I might be wrong. I could very well be wrong.” Nine times. Like Limbaugh said, he was definitely covering his arse.

Here is the Director of the FBI, the nation’s top cop, and what does he do?  He acts like a whiny school boy and plays very dastardly games behind the scenes.  So, when he testifies, he tries to explain it away by saying that he was afraid of President Trump.  The guy is 6’8” tall, and he’s afraid of Trump…really?

Comey said he only started writing memos after he met Trump, because he said he thought Trump was a liar and a mean person.  He’s lying again.  He also wrote memos when he spoke to George W. Bush, and admitted it in the book, Angler, which he helped Barton Gellman write about Dick Cheney.  Perhaps he decided he’d collect info on presidents to keep in files just like those of J. Edgar Hoover.

He claimed Trump was lying about him and lying about the FBI, and that he was afraid of Trump.  So, what did he do? He called a buddy of his at the Columbia School of Journalism, Columbia University, and asked him to “share” the memos, his inside private information from talks with our President. This is not “sharing” anything; this is leaking!  And he hoped his buddy would leak it to the media.

Mark Bauerlein, writes, “During his testimony, James Comey didn’t sound like the head of a fearsome investigative agency. He sounded like a middle manager in business who’s just attended a human resources seminar on inappropriate behavior in the workplace.”

No Russian Collusion

There never was any evidence that votes were tampered with by Russia, and Comey admitted it over and over again.  So, if Trump was never part of any investigation, what is all this fake news about Russian involvement in the presidential election.  It’s horse hockey promoted by the commie Democrats and media, and we all know it.  What a waste of taxpayer dollars on this fake news garbage investigation.

Dershowitz: Dem Pundits Endangering Civil Liberties

Democrat Alan Dershowitz, a strict interpreter of the law, has been stellar in exposing the truth.  This is the crowning glory of truth to the lying leftist media from a fellow Democrat who knows the Constitution.  He has made mincemeat of the leftist commentators who haven’t a clue of what our Constitution says.  Watch his interview with Anderson Cooper.

Dershowitz’s article, Comey Confirms That I’m right — and All the Democratic Commentators Are Wrong, explains everything constitutionally.  Here’s part of what he said:

The left seems to believe the FBI Director has powers independent of the President which is totally untrue.  (Dershowitz has pointed out over and over again that the left does not understand our Constitution.)

Look, when Obama was president, he ordered the FBI to do exactly what he wanted done, and no one spoke against it.  That’s the president’s privilege.

Comey confirmed that under our Constitution, the president has the authority to direct the FBI to stop investigating any individual. The president can, in theory, decide who to investigate, who to stop investigating, who to prosecute and who not to prosecute.  The president is the head of the unified executive branch of government, and the Justice Department and the FBI work under him and he may order them to do what he wishes.

As a matter of law, Comey is 100 percent correct.  As I have long argued, and as Comey confirmed in his written statement, our history shows that many presidents—from Adams to Jefferson, to Lincoln, to Roosevelt, to Kennedy, to Bush 1, and to Obama – have directed the Justice Department with regard to ongoing investigations. The history is clear, the precedents are clear, the constitutional structure is clear, and common sense is clear.

Yet virtually every Democratic pundit, in their haste to “get” President Trump, has willfully ignored these realities.  In doing so they have endangered our civil liberties and constitutional rights.

Now that even former Director Comey has acknowledged that the Constitution would permit the president to direct the Justice Department and the FBI in this matter, let us put the issue of obstruction of justice behind us once and for all and focus on the political, moral, and other non-criminal aspects of President Trump’s conduct.

Donald Trump cannot be prosecuted for exercising constitutional authority.

Kasowitz Files Complaint

President Trump’s personal lawyer Marc Kasowitz will file a complaint with the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General asking for an inquiry into James Comey over his leaking the details of his conversations with the president and the memos about those conversations, according to a source close to the Trump legal team.

Kasowitz is also drafting a similar submission to be sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the former FBI director’s Senate testimony and “other matters,” according to ABC news.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved