Daily Archives: January 30, 2026

FBI ‘SUPER PISSED OFF’ AT WHITE HOUSE MEDDLING…

REPORTER: DOJ, FBI “SUPER PISSED OFF” at Obama White House Over Clinton Investigation (Video)

On Friday White Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters some officials at the FBI have said Hillary Clinton is not a target of the current investigation.
Hillary Clinton Classified Mediaite

These latest comments by the Obama White House reportedly have FBI and Justice Department officials “Super Pissed Off.”

Catherine Herridge reported:

That statement by Josh Earnest has got the back up of our contacts at the FBI and Justice Department for two reasons… They are SUPER PISSED OFF to use a technical term. Number one, Josh Earnest has absolutely no clearance or visibility in the FBI investigation. Number two, they say it really seems part of a troubling pattern from the White House because the president earlier said he did not see any national security implications to the Clinton emails and then we found out he had never been briefed.

Via On The Record:

Europeans declare war on ‘refugees’ with grenade and vigilante attacks

Fellowship of the Minds

West European governments are beginning to say no to the Muslim invasion, finally recognizing, as Czech president had warned, “It’s practically impossible to integrate Muslims into Europe“. (See also “Muslim migrants mean rape, violent crimes, social instability & revolution“)

  • Both Sweden and Finland are trying to stem the human tidal wave with plans to expel, respectively, 80,000 and 20,000 of ‘refugees’. (See DCG’s “Waking up: Finland plans to boot out 20,000 refugees“)
  • On Thursday, Jan. 28, 2016, Germany moved to tighten asylum rules so as to more easily deny asylum to migrants from Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia. At the same time, family reunions for migrants would be blocked for two years.those countries.

Those European governments are doing that for good reason: Frustrated by their governments’ wrong-headed policy welcoming ‘refugees’ and ‘migrants,’ some native Europeans are taking matters into their own hands.

France

In Paris,there are street…

View original post 586 more words

Syrian Migrants Who Attacked Woman Tell Police They’re Above The Law

Posted by FOR USHERALD.COM

It seems almost unconscionable that within a civil society our collective governments have allowed a perverse criminal element to seep within our culture, for nothing more than political expediency.

History will note that this was the moment that western civilization was once again challenged my Muslim hordes reminiscent of the 7th-10th centuries, and to what extent we finally took to drive them back, if indeed we did.

And it’s within this backdrop that we collectively find ourselves once again, as hundreds of acts of violent sexual assault and robberies were reported in Germany by mostly Middle Eastern and African males swarming through the city molesting and robbing women.

The attackers were believed to have been congregating among the nearly 1,000 Muslim refugees, who were identified as mostly men, at Cologne’s central train station, and then broke off into smaller groups to attack hundreds of women.

Justice Minister Heiko Maas asserted that he believed the attacks to be coordinated and prearranged.

“If such a horde gathers in order to commit crimes, that appears in some form to be planned. Nobody can tell me this was not coordinated or prepared.”

Some of the attackers that have been since apprehended by police have been identified themselves as Syrian refugees, and even expressed that they were above the law.

“I’m a Syrian!” one of the suspects shouted. “You have to treat me kindly! Mrs. Merkel invited me.”

There is no doubt that history is repeating itself, and if we are to survive as a “civil society” then we must once again repel the invading barbarians.

Tags: , ,

 

Imam Says 6-7 Year-Old Girls Can Look Sexy, Even To Their Own Fathers, So Cover Them Up

The culture of Islam at the core is quite sick for fathers of little girls to even think this way in that one of their leaders has to say something this disgusting. Remember, their founder and his 9 year old wife.

REPOSTED FROM CONSERVATIVEPOST.COM

This is sickening, but it is not out of the ordinary. So many Muslim countries under the sharia allow child marriage, in accordance with Muhammad’s preferences for child brides.

Since Muhammad is the supreme example for Muslims to follow, all too often even the youngest girls are married off, and are seen as objects of desire.

Just recently, women in Iraq protested new sharia legislation approved by the Iraqi cabinet that would permit the marriage of nine-year-old girls (the age Muhammad consummated his marriage with his favorite wife, Aisha).

Meanwhile, they have to cover up, even at the earliest ages, to avoid tempting their own fathers. And if their fathers end up tempted anyway, it’s their fault.

Recipe for Chaos in Arizona

From: “Phyllis Schlafly” <[email protected]>
Date: January 29, 2026 at 11:56:38 AM MST

Subject:Recipe for Chaos in Arizona

Dear Fellow Patriot,

Attacks on the U.S. Constitution are coming from all sides – sadly even some misguided conservatives have joined the Left on this issue.

One liberal professor – in the pages of The New York Times – calls our Constitution “imbecilic.” Another claims it contains “archaic” and “evil provisions.”

One even urges us to “rewrite the Second Amendment.”

Out of exasperation with Barack Obama’s flouting of the Constitution – and the Republican Congress’ willingness to help carry out Obama’s liberal agenda – a few conservative authors and pundits have joined these left-wing opponents of our Constitution.

Together they are promoting a national convention to propose amendments to the Constitution.

These ill–advised conservatives wrongly believe a series of amendments can put our country on a wiser path.

The authority for such a procedure is Article V of our Constitution, so they are calling their plan of action an Article V Convention.

However, they are fooling themselves when they suggest that Article V creates a path to bypass Congress with a “convention of states.”

In a convention setting, the U.S. Congress would get a major say in how the process will work.

The only power the states have under Article V is the opportunity to submit an “application” (petition) asking Congress to call a convention. Hundreds of such applications have been submitted over the years, with widely different purposes and wording. Many applications were later rescinded, and some purport to make the application valid for only a particular amendment such as a federal balanced budget or congressional term limits.

Article V states that Congress “shall” call a convention on the application of two-thirds of state legislatures, or thirty-four (34) of them.

The key question is this: how will Congress count valid applications?

The answer is, we don’t know, and so far Congress has ignored them anyway.

If Congress ever decides to act, Article V gives Congress exclusive power to issue the “Call” for a convention to propose “amendments” (plural).

The “Call” is the governing document which determines all the basic rules such as where and when a convention will be held, who is eligible to be a delegate (will current office–holders be eligible?), how delegates will be apportioned, how expenses will be paid, and who will be the chairman.

Article V also gives Congress the power to determine whether the three–fourths of the states required for ratification of amendments can ratify by the state legislature’s action or by state conventions.

Do you trust the current U.S. Congress to determine the rules for how the Constitution will be rewritten?

The most important question to which there is no answer is this: how will convention delegates be apportioned?

Will each state have one vote (no matter how many delegates it sends), which was the rule in the 1787 Philadelphia convention?

Or will the convention be apportioned according to population (like Congress or the Electoral College)?

Nothing in Article V gives the states any power to make this fundamental decision.

If Congress decides apportionment will be determined by population, more populous states will control the outcome.

Do you want California or New York deciding how the U.S. Constitution should read?

Article V doesn’t give any power to the states to propose constitutional amendments, or to decide which amendments will be considered by the convention.

Now imagine Democratic and Republican conventions meeting in the same hall and trying to agree on constitutional changes. Imagine the gridlock in drafting a constitutional plank by caucuses led by Sarah Palin and Al Sharpton.

Everything else about how an Article V Convention would function, including its agenda, is anybody’s guess.

Advocates of an Article V convention can hope and speculate, but they cannot assure us that any of their plans will come true.

If we follow the model of the 1787 Convention, will the deliberations be secret? Are you kidding me? Nothing is secret any more.

What are the plans to deal with protesters at what would surely be the biggest media event of the year, if not of the century? It will be flooded with agitators from the gun–control lobby, the gay lobby, the abortion lobby, the green lobby, plus experienced protesters trained and even paid with George Soros money.

There is no proof that the VIPs promoting an Article V convention have any first–hand knowledge of the politics or procedures of a contested national convention. Don’t they realize that the convention will set its own agenda and that states will have no say over which amendments are considered?

To see how a convention chairman wielding the gavel can manipulate outcomes, take for instance the 2012 Democratic National Convention.

A delegate tried to add a reference to God to the party platform, but the chairman ruthlessly called the vote wrong even though we all saw on television that the “Noes” won the vote.

The whole Article V “Convention of States” process is a prescription for political chaos.

Alas, I don’t see any George Washingtons, James Madisons or Ben Franklins around today who could do as good a job as the Founding Fathers, and I’m worried about the men who think they can.

That’s why it’s imperative you contact your state representative and urge them to vote against all forms of a dangerous Article V “Con Con” in Arizona.

Phyllis Schlafly

Founder, Eagle Forum

Who Is The Real Ted Cruz

By Roger Stone REPOSTED FROM THE STONEZONE.COM

Vladimir Lenin said, “There are no morals in politics; there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.”

I can’t think of a better description of Ted Cruz’s relationship with the DC-Wall Street Establishment – Cruz being the scoundrel of course. Cruz’s claim of not being a tool of the political elite is like Bill Clinton telling the world, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.”

Webster’s definition of a scoundrel is a dishonest or unscrupulous person, and Cruz has become quite adroit at saying one thing while his history shows him doing the other. Rather than the outsider he claims to be, Ted Cruz is the ultimate insider, former top Bush 41 policy aide and globalist, Ivy Leaguer, and establishment insider.

Not many conservatives coming out of Princeton and Harvard. “I’m just sayin,'” Ted, as said in the debate.

There is no better example of this than Calgary Ted’s actions surrounding the big Wall Street banks and their secret funding of his political ascension. Cruz has been gorging at the table of the ultimate insider of all insiders – Goldman Sachs and Citibank.

You may recall in a recent Fox Business Network debate that Cruz, in Mr. Haney from Green Acres voice, declared to one of the moderators, “The opening question [moderator Jerry Seib] asked — would you bailout the big banks again — nobody gave you an answer to that. I will give you an answer — absolutely not.”

What else would you expect a scoundrel to say who had secretly secured big sweetheart loans from Goldman and Citibank — by leveraging his retirement accounts –– to fund his 2012 U.S. Senate campaign. Loans which the Calgary Ted conveniently forgot to disclose to the Federal Election Commission. These are the very retirement accounts that he said he and his wife said he cashed in to fund his senate race. In other words, Ted lied.

At the same time Ted’s bulging 2016 campaign accounts and supporting Super-PACs are stuffed with big oil and gas money. He knows how to play the game.

And perhaps the ultimate hypocrisy of the native born Canadian is that his spouse, Heidi, by all accounts a lovely wife and mother, has been employed by Goldman Sachs since 2005. She is on leave as managing director and regional head of private wealth management. Heidi is a proud member of the lefty Council on Foreign Relations, advocates of one world government and the New World Order.

Heidi is not a bit player in the Cruz campaign with those credentials but rather an integral part of the campaign’s fundraising efforts. As reported by CNN last year, “She works the phones the way she worked them when she was at Goldman,” said Chad Sweet, the Cruz campaign’s chairman, who recruited Heidi to work at the giant investment bank.”

Yet we are to believe that the big Wall Street banks have no leverage over Ted Cruz? Why didn’t Heidi Cruz resign from Goldman Sachs instead of taking a leave of absence? That’s like saying Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky have had no influence on Barack Obama.

The other inside connection that hits one like a baseball bat is the Bush connection. Ted was George W.’s brain when he ran for President. A top policy adviser. Ted maneuvered for Solicitor General in Bush World but settled for a plum at the Federal Trade Commission. Ted’s a Bushman with deep ties to the political and financial establishment.

Ted and Heidi brag about being the first “Bush marriage” – they met as Bush staffers which ultimately led to marriage. Cruz was an adviser on legal affairs while Heidi was an adviser on economic policy and eventually director for the Western Hemisphere on the National Security Council under Condoleezza Rice. Condi helped give us the phony war in Iraq.

Also conveniently missing from Heidi’s Wikipedia bio is her service as Deputy U.S. Trade Representative to USTR head Robert Zoellick. At USTR Heidi worked on U.S.-China trade policy- the one Donald Trump talks about so much.

And Chad Sweet, Ted Cruz’s campaign chairman, is a former CIA officer. Michael Chertoff, George W. Bush’s former Secretary of Homeland Security, hired Sweet from Goldman Sachs to restructure and optimize the flow of information between the CIA, FBI and other members of the national security community and DHS. Chertoff and Sweet co-founded the Chertoff Group upon leaving the administration.

A known tactic of the intelligence community is the use of strategic communications as a “soft power” weapon against it adversaries — the creation of false narratives by the effective use of all media — social, digital, newspaper, print, etc. Combined with denial and deception, it can be a potent force. Glenn Beck and Mark Levin are abetting this.

Despite his ability to lie with a straight face (sadly Nixonian) on his support for amnesty and TPP, he got nailed by Senator Marco Rubio on the debate. Acting like a prick in the U.S. Senate was the core of Ted’s disciplined effort to bury his old school ties and reinvent himself as a modern-day Jesse Helms and supposed Conservative outsider. It’s a ruse.

As we get closer to the Iowa Caucus and New Hampshire Primary, Cruz and his establishment puppet masters are engaged in an aggressive strategy against Trump. The false narrative of course being that Cruz is the outsider while Trump is the insider. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

In its most simplistic terms – the power elite have no leverage over Trump – nothing.
Cruz, on the other hand, is the establishments quisling, spawned by the Bushes and controlled by Wall Street, who became a strident “outsider” only four years ago.

The U.S. Constitution does not defined “native born” citizen, nor have the courts. That Ted was eligible to run for office as a citizen only 15 months ago is weird. Trump’s right the Democrats would have a field day with Calgary Ted, the Manchurian, Canadian Candidate.

Don’t get me wrong. Ted Cruz is a smart, canny, talented guy who has run a great “long race” campaign. He aspires to be Reagan but trust me he’s Nixon. Right down the incredible discipline and smarts playing the political game. Ted Cruz is not who he appears to be. As the bible says, “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” In this case we must beware a Canadian bearing gifts.

Written with Paul Nagy

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/26/who-is-the-real-ted-cruz/

 

23 Reasons Why I Love Trump

Donald J. Trump by Julieta Rienstra

23 Reasons
I ❤ Donald J. Trump
Written & Compiled By: Julieta Rienstra

1. He has been self-funding.

He has not taken any money from special interests or lobbyists. He also has disavowed all SUPER PACs in his name.

2. He is an extremely successful man who has created Billion$ out of thin air. He is now offering to use that ability to fix our country and Make America Great Again.

3. He is a staunch 2nd amendment supporter.

4. He has integrity and guts. He says what he thinks, means what he says and does not back down or fold regardless of how much he is maligned. We need strong leadership not political correctness or pandering.

5. He is ALWAYS right. He has been proven to be correct about every single problem he has raised which our country faces. He is right because he does his homework, is clear thinking and surrounds himself with the highest quality of thinkers and advisors.

6. He will build the wall. Within weeks all of the criminals will be gone and in a matter of months every other Illegal Alien will be too. The wall will include a Big Beautiful Door for Legal Immigration. That means our wages will increase. Crime, especially violent crime, will be drastically reduced. He will end sanctuary cities immediately. He will make eVerify Mandatory and cut off all assistance to people in the country Unlawfully. We will be flooded with resources which have been being used for Non-Citizens. Mexico WILL pay for the wall, or they will cease to make money from the United States.

7. In time he will realize, after thorough investigation, that Islam is Completely, Totally and Utterly Incompatible with American Liberty. He will deal with that situation effectively and fairly while maintaining our commitment to freedom of religion without sacrificing our country to the tender mercies of Sharia Law. He will also help the refugees by getting the Muslim countries to build safe zones.

8. He will build our military So Strong that No One will want to mess with us…OR our friends.
It will be So Strong that we will never have to use it. Daesh will be obliterated in short order.
Plus, he will no longer offer our military protection for FREE!

9. He will figure out how to contain Iran and thwart the massive amount of money (estimated at $100 Billion to $150 Billion) that Obama is getting ready to unfreeze for them. If they become nuclear, he will deal with that too.

10. He will get along with our adversaries including Putin and China. I believe that he will do more to advance global relations than any other President in history.

11. He will rebuild our infrastructure and power grid and put millions of people back to work in the process.

12. He will get rid of Common Core and return education to the States and the People, where it rightly belongs.

13. He will reverse the trajectory of runaway Debt and restore fiscal sanity, saving our country from Certain Economic Death.

14. He will unsign all of Obama’s unlawful Executive Orders on day one…and perhaps other President’s unlawful orders as well.

15. He will send Good Negotiators to procure Good trade deals so that we are trading with partners, instead of robbers.

16. He will bring manufacturing and business back to America by creating a Welcoming Business Environment. I believe he will reduce the amount of regulation substantially. In the process shrinking government considerably.

17. He will allow the over $2 TRILLION overseas to be repatriated at a reasonable tax rate and it will be put to work HERE.

18. He will take care of our VETS. Our Society is an absolute Disgrace with the way we treat them. He will see to it that they get the support they need and the benefits that they have earned.

19. His DOJ will prosecute all of the corrupt people who have been living off of our government. Anybody who has been breaking laws best leave the country before January 2017.

20. He will save Social Security.

21. He will repeal and replace Obamacare with something that works where everyone will be covered and the cost will go down. I hope he chooses a free market and patient centric model.

22. He will show the people how to take care of Themselves. He will lead the people to abundance and excellence… and he will bring UNITY.

23. He LOVES America! He LOVES the American People! He tells us Every Day. He is 100% for MADE IN THE USA! And WE LOVE HIM!

He will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
and he is Funny

Donald Trump Blasts Abortion: Roe v. Wade Started a “Culture of Death” Killing Over 50 Million People

BY STEVEN ERTELT FOR LIFENEWS.COM

donaldtrump2

In some of his clearest and most forceful remarks on the issue of abortion since becoming a presidential candidate, businessman Donald Trump wrote a weekend op-ed in the Washington Examiner newspaper outlining his pro-life views and blasting both abortion and Roe v.Wade.

Trump opens the column explaining that he is pro-life with exceptions only for the very rarest abortions.

“Let me be clear — I am pro-life. I support that position with exceptions allowed for rape, incest or the life of the mother being at risk,” he said. “I did not always hold this position, but I had a significant personal experience that brought the precious gift of life into perspective for me.”

Trump said America has gone astray because it has moved away from the founding principles the nation’s founders put in most — most notably the right to life.

America, when it is at its best, follows a set of rules that have worked since our Founding. One of those rules is that we, as Americans, revere life and have done so since our Founders made it the first, and most important, of our “unalienable” rights.

Over time, our culture of life in this country has started sliding toward a culture of death. Perhaps the most significant piece of evidence to support this assertion is that since Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Count 43 years ago, over 50 million Americans never had the chance to enjoy the opportunities offered by this country. They never had the chance to become doctors, musicians, farmers, teachers, husbands, fathers, sons or daughters. They never had the chance to enrich the culture of this nation or to bring their skills, lives, loves or passions into the fabric of this country. They are missing, and they are missed.

SIGN THE NEW PLEDGE: I Pledge to Vote for a Pro-Life Candidate for President

One of the top things any president can do is ensure that taxpayer funds are not used to pay for abortions or to fund groups like Planned Parenthood that promote and perform abortions. Trump staked out a clear pro-life position opposing government funding of abortions — in stark contrast to Hillary Clinton, who is making a push for free abortions a hallmark of her campaign.

The Supreme Court in 1973 based its decision on imagining rights and liberties in the Constitution that are nowhere to be found. Even if we take the court at its word, that abortion is a matter of privacy, we should then extend the argument to the logical conclusion that private funds, then, should subsidize this choice rather than the half billion dollars given to abortion providers every year by Congress. Public funding of abortion providers is an insult to people of conscience at the least and an affront to good governance at best.

If using taxpayer money to facilitate our slide to a culture of death were not enough, the 1973 decision became a landmark decision demonstrating the utter contempt the court had for federalism and the 10th Amendment. Roe v. Wade gave the court an excuse to dismantle the decisions of state legislatures and the votes of the people. This is a pattern that the court has repeated over and over again since that decision. Roe v. Wade became yet another incidence of disconnect between the people and their government.

“The next president must follow those principles that work best and that reinforce the reverence Americans hold for life,” Trump concludes. “A culture of life is too important to let slip away for convenience or political correctness. It is by preserving our culture of life that we will Make America Great Again.”

 

VIDEO: Leader Urges Muslims To Be Swing Vote In 2016 Presidential Elections

REPOSTED FROM VIRAL247NEWS.COM

The founder and Executive Director of CAIR, Nihad Awad, delivered a speech in Chicago imploring Muslims to be the difference in the 2016 United States Presidential Election.

Awad said, “We have to register every single Muslim to vote in 2016. The Muslim vote can be the swing vote in major states. The swing votes, brothers and sisters you know them: Florida, Ohio.”

He continued citing the swing states, “Do we have people from Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, Iowa, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania? These are predicted to be the seven swing states in 2016 presidential election. The number of Muslims in these states is growing.”

It is no accident that the number of Muslims in these states is growing. Their long-term game plan is clear.

Awad warned his fellow Muslims, “What if those who are attacking Muslims today will be in the White House? America will be a different country. Life for American Muslims would be difficult.”

The converse is also true should Muslims influence the election so that America will be a different country favoring changes potentially more tolerant of Islam’s Sharia law tenants.

Awad encouraged attendees at the conference to get organized, to meet with candidates and negotiate with them. He even suggested attendees explore the formation of a Political Action Committee, registered by law, to advance their objectives. He also recommended a concerted effort to convey their messages “through social media, networks and through other networks to the Muslim community.”

Such tactics may be equally effective to counter their intended advance of their agenda. Encourage those you know to register to vote, vote, and lobby for the ideals that made America great: liberty and self-government.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,415 other followers

%d bloggers like this: