Every single vendor demands criminal background check
Comment: EXPOSED>>>what you knew all along. The mainstream media promoting the bald faced lie that “automatic weapons” are sold everywhere because of the imaginary “legal loophole” at gun-shows. Enjoy the expose’ of the reaction of firearms dealers when Crowder tries to buy a firearm of any kind without a background check… Many sheeple believe the lies of the gun-grabbing prestitutes who are deliberately twisting the truth to suit their own agenda…. How can we ever wake them up? F.R.
Despite claims that gun shows facilitate easy access to guns, it’s impossible to purchase a firearm at a gun show or gun store without a background check, comedian and political commentator Steven Crowder proved in a recent stunt.
In an undercover video compilation produced for his web series Louder with Crowder, the prankster visited multiple gun stores and inquired about purchasing “automatic weapons,” which the media and politicians such as President Obama regularly confuse for semi-automatics.
“Fully automatic? Oh, no. I don’t have a class three license,” one gun store vendor tells Crowder.
Another vendor says he doesn’t sell automatic weapons because doing so would require a “super crazy license.”
When Crowder does find a vendor selling Title II weapons, the dealer tells him ATF regulations require “paperwork signed off by your chief local law enforcement officer,” as well as proper identification and a host of other documentation.
“You could come in with a million dollars cash and I still wouldn’t give it to you,” the vendor says.
Crowder also approaches several firearms dealers at various gun shows and stores inquiring about purchasing a gun without having to undergo an FBI National Instant Criminal Background check, to which all vendors refuse.
“I was told that I could go to a gun show and there would be no background check,” Crowder tells a vendor who proceeds to laugh at him.
“I was told by the president that I could go here,” Crowder tells the vendor.
“You believe him?” the man asks.
The stunt shows how politicians blatantly misconstrue the facts to manipulate the American public into supporting legislation and executive actions that will only make it harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain firearms.
“We’ve already covered how the gun show loophole was a giant myth and a distraction, but this realllly puts it into perspective,” notes Crowder. “Guns are not easy to buy. Guns are so difficult to buy, we nearly got arrested for trying to buy guns the way Obama says people by guns. Which means, Obama is, as we already knew, a giant liar. He hates your Second Amendment rights almost as much as he hates people who work for a living.” *******************************************************************
Here I something I added just for your enjoyment. Crowder taking apart the Young Turks attempt to misinterpret the Second Amendment:
My Comments: Oh isn’t this just special Teddy Cruz, that you’ve joined with Grassley, Graham and Coats…and you’re pushing for reporting of mental health records. Not only that, but you want to fund your Cruz Task Force with asset forfeiture monies…unconstitutional! Doesn’t this sound leftist to everyone else too?
Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) unveiled an alternative gun control bill on Wednesday.
The announcement comes on a day when the Senate appears likely to block further debate on a bipartisan background checks bill.
“Rather than restricting the rights of law-abiding Americans, we should be focusing on keeping guns out of the hands of violent criminals, which this legislation accomplishes,” Cruz said. “While the Obama Administration continues to politicize a terrible tragedy to push its anti-gun agenda, I am proud to stand beside my fellow senators to present common-sense measures that will increase criminal prosecutions of felons who try to buy guns, criminalize straw purchasing and gun trafficking, and address mental health issues.”
Grassley and Cruz, along with Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Dan Coats (R-Ind.) introduced the bill at a press conference Wednesday morning, just hours before the Senate will vote on it and other gun control measures.
One of the primary criticisms Republicans had before a vote to move forward on a background checks bill last week was that they didn’t have time to read it before the vote.
Cruz said that despite the late hour, his legislation has 20 co-sponsors and had been circulated among Republicans and Democrats with no negative feedback. He predicted that despite the small window before the vote, the bill would garner bipartisan support.
The bill would increase the resources available to prosecutors for violators of gun laws, and creates a “Cruz Task Force” to prosecute those who fail criminal background checks. The task force is funded through an Asset Forfeiture Fund.
The bill criminalizes straw purchasing and trafficking, measures Grassley supported in committee hearings on the gun control bill that will go before the Senate later this month. It also seeks to increase safety at schools, keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, and increases accountability for prosecutions at the executive level by requiring the Department of Justice to submit reports to Congress.
The senators were particularly critical of the Obama administration’s record of prosecuting background check violations, saying it only took up a small portion of such cases.
The bill does not expand background checks, but rather “focuses on making the backgrounds system work better…by encouraging states to report mental health records,” Cruz said.
The National Rifle Association said it supports the bill.
The bill includes provisions making it easier to purchase and transport firearms across state lines.
The bill would allow for the interstate sale of firearms, and for the interstate transportation of firearms providing certain conditions are met. Guns transported across state lines will have to be unloaded, locked in a vehicle or kept in the trunk.
Another pro-gun provision of the bill will allow military members to buy guns in the states where they’re stationed.
Grassley said the bill was the result of “the combined efforts of many members of the Senate,” and called it “a sensible alternative” to Democratic gun control reform efforts that “addresses problems we’ve seen without burdening law abiding citizens.”
Last December, Ammon Bundy and armed militia members gathered in Burns, Oregon (about 280 miles southeast of Portland), to protest the jailing of local ranchers Dwight and Steven Hammond. (Ammon is the son of Nevada rancher Clive Bundy who had an armed standoff with federal authorities in 2014 over grazing rights. That matter was settled peacefully, after the Bureau of Land Management backed off and left the scene.)
Dwight Hammond, 73, and his son, Steven, 46, are due to go to jail for 5 years for lighting fires on federal properties in 2001 and 2006 in order to scale back invasive plants and to protect their private lands from wildfires.
After a peaceful rally in Burns, Ammon Bundy and the militia took over a facility at the Mahleur National Wildlife Refuge near Burns.
Yesterday, matters between the militia and the feds took an ugly turn.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on Wednesday night lashed out at Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly in his first appearance on the network since he announced he’d boycott the next GOP debate.
He also refused to reconsider his decision to sit out the network’s Thursday night debate – the last before the Iowa caucuses in five days – and said he’d move forward with his own competing event to raise money for wounded veterans.
Speaking on “The O’Reilly Factor,” Trump continued his long-running feud with Kelly, who he has been criticizing ever since she challenged him on his past derogatory remarks about women at the first GOP debate in August.
“I have zero respect for Megyn Kelly,” Trump said. “I don’t think she’s good at what she does and I think she’s highly overrated. And frankly, she’s a moderator; I thought her question last time was ridiculous.”
* Note taken from Health Sciences Institute e-Alert - Jenny Thompson - 1/27/16
Dear Reader,
If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with prostate cancer, you’re about to make some of the biggest decisions of your life.
You’ll get an earful about how important it is to jump on it right away, and that usually means one of four choices: radiation, chemo, hormone treatments, or even surgery.
But there’s a fifth option that most guys never hear about — and that’s none of the above.
And another study is proving that skipping aggressive treatment for months (or even years) could spare you a whole lot of misery — and maybe even save your life.
Good things come to those who wait
If there’s one thing that drives me crazy about prostate cancer treatment today, it’s how routine the mainstream tries to make it sound.
You’ll hear all about “targeted” radiation or their new favorite — robotic surgery.
They’ll practically promise they can pull out your prostate tumor over lunch and have you back on the golf course by 2.
Of course, there’s plenty they won’t tell you — like how the radiation treatments have been proven to cause aggressive colorectal cancer down the road. Or how the surgery could wreck your sex life, or even leave you in adult diapers.
It’s always easy when they’re talking about your prostate and not theirs, right?
Fortunately, if you’re not anxious to rush into one of these barbaric treatments (and who could blame you?), researchers have just proven that waiting may be the best choice you can make.
They just wrapped up a study of more than 900 men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers at VA hospitals across the country. Now lots of these guys were veterans who are used to taking action — and you can bet that asking them to hold off on treatment wasn’t easy.
But the men who opted for “active surveillance” — where their tumors were monitored and there was no treatment until it was really necessary — ended up saving themselves a lot of heartache.
After about two and a half years:
Not a single patient in the active surveillance group died.
More than three-fourths of the men didn’t see their tumors get worse at all — and of the guys who did, a third of them still didn’t need treatment.
Researchers found that most men in the study were going to be able to delay treating their prostate cancer for at least five years. Some were never going to need treatment.
Now, believe me, I get it. I could throw around every statistic under the sun, or remind you how slowly most prostate tumors develop — but putting off those radiation sessions or that surgery is still going to make you nervous.
What if you’re one of those unlucky guys whose prostate cancer spreads?
Well, that’s why it’s important to understand that active surveillance isn’t the same thing as doing nothing. You still get regular checkups and prostate exams to make sure your cancer isn’t getting any worse.
And if you ask me, visiting your doc a few times a year sounds a lot better than going under the knife or getting strapped to a chemo drip.
Of course, most guys who get diagnosed with prostate cancer are never given active surveillance as an option. And there’s one good reason for that — there isn’t a lot of money in it.
In fact, just last year I told you how a study proved that most docs don’t make prostate cancer treatment recommendations based on your age or even how serious your cancer is. They just recommend whatever it is they specialize in.
That’s why it’s so important that when you or a loved one is diagnosed with prostate cancer, you take the time to get a second or even third opinion.
And don’t be shy about asking your doc what he thinks about active surveillance — or whether he ever recommends it at all.
Because a little legwork could keep you from getting an aggressive treatment you don’t really need — or that may come with a lot more risks than the mainstream ever lets on.
To Your Good Health,
Jenny Thompson
Sources:
“A ‘real-world’ study of prostate cancer surveillance” Nick Mulcahy, January 22, 2016, Medscape
SET-UP? FOX INVITES MUSLIM ADVOCATE WHO HATES TRUMP TO DEBATE
Experience taught me a few things. One is to listen to your gut, no matter how good something sounds on paper. The second is that you’re generally better off sticking with what you know. And the third is that sometimes your best investments are the ones you don’t make. Donald Trump
In the end, you’re measured not by how much you undertake but by what you finally accomplish. Donald Trump The Art of the Deal
Mr. Trump’s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, has announced that Donald Trump will definitely skip Thursday night’s debate in Iowa on Fox News due to a “deepening rift” with the channel.
Here is the statement made by Mr. Trump’s campaign regarding the situation with Fox News and Megyn Kelly. It states that Mr. Trump knows a bad deal when he sees one.
There is no negotiation. Trump said he most likely will hold a competing event during the debate and give any monies to veterans.
The Donald said he was outraged by a “wise guy” Fox press release that mocked him earlier in the day, and posted an Instagram video stating, “Megyn Kelly’s really biased against me. She knows that, I know that, everybody knows that. Do you really think she can be fair at a debate?”
A Fox network spokesperson issued a tongue-in-cheek statement imagining Trump conducting Twitter polls in the Oval Office, and put this out, “We learned from a secret back channel that the Ayatollah and Putin both intend to treat Donald Trump unfairly when they meet with him if he becomes president — a nefarious source tells us that Trump has his own secret plan to replace the Cabinet with his Twitter followers to see if he should even go to those meetings.”
When Trump read the statement, he shot back with a tweet, calling it a “pathetic attempt by Fox News to try to build up ratings for the GOP Debate.” He added, “Without me they’d have no ratings!” (He’s right!)
Megyn Kelly Interviews Glenn Beck
Last night on Kelly’s show, she interviewed Cruz supporter, Glenn Beck, and he spoke almost uninterrupted for 20 minutes. She went to a break, then came back and repeated few minutes of what Beck had said again. Of course she never brought up the fact that Beck urged Cruz’s supporters to, “vote for Bernie Sanders” if Ted doesn’t win the nomination. Here is a part of that interview.
Her next guest was a pro-Trump person who was on for five minutes and continually interrupted by Kelly. Fair and balanced my backside!
Tonight, Sean Hannity’s first guest was none other than Ted Cruz. Cruz stated that Mr. Trump is afraid of him and Megyn Kelly and that’s why he backed out. (Oh sure Ted, we really believe that.) So, Ted says he’ll debate Donald Trump anytime either on Glenn Beck’s program or Mark Levin’s program! Right Teddy, Mr. Trump, who knows a bad deal when he sees one, is going to let you and two of your supporters who signed that insane National Review “Against Trump” garbage lead a debate between you two. Get Real! And all three of these cool-aid drinkers, Cruz, Beck, and Levin want a Constitutional Convention…birds of a destructive feather flock together. God help us if the good people don’t see through this and wake up, and soon!
I will not be tuning in to the debate on Thursday, because I really have no desire to hear the same pabulum from the same globalists that I’ve heard for 50 years. If Trump wasn’t in this race, there really would have been no reason to watch any of the debates.
I’ve had over a hundred emails and here’s a sample of what they’re saying “I don’t blame him one bit for snubbing those neocons at Faux News.” and “Guess what WE’LL be watching! faux can kiss our grits!!! I can’t stand Kelly anymore any way. She’s a self serving low life lawyer. She has gotten so full of herself it stinks.” and “I only watch Faux News to see what the liars are saying now, what a bunch of traitors.” I wonder what Faux will say to their advertisers that paid BIG Bucks for high expected viewership, and they didn’t deliver?
Personally, this is the strangest thing I believe I’ve ever seen in a presidential race, but it proves what I’ve been saying for decades about the right being in bed with the left. You’ve got a bunch of so called right wingers (they’re leftists in republican drag) attacking the best thing to come along in the Republican party in 5 decades and they want him destroyed. Fox News’ “Fair and Balanced” is horse manure and everyone knows it.
Google and Faux Add Three Trump Haters to the Debate
According to an article on Breitbart, Fox News has invited three YouTube personalities to ask questions at the Jan. 28 GOP debate — including a Muslim advocate who describes Donald Trump as a bigot and visually portrayed him as being in agreement with national socialist Adolf Hitler.
Google and Fox announced Tuesday afternoon that an anti-Trump Muslim advocate, Nabela Noor, would be allowed to play a role in the debate. She was apparently chosen by Youtube, with help from the RNC and Fox. African American, Mark Watson, and Latino, Dulce Candy —will also join the moderators in the debate to ask the candidates a question on an issue that matters to them and their communities.
Isn’t this just typical of Faux News!
Last August during the first debate, Megyn Kelly made an absolute fool of herself with her rancorous attitude toward Donald Trump. Even the questions were structured to attack the man. Everyone who tuned in to that first debate saw her in action. It has become so obvious that Fox News and Megyn Kelly are the RNC mouthpieces out to destroy Donald Trump.
As I stated in my last article, about these Piranhas, they are eating their own while the likes of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are totally ignored. It looks pretty obvious that Fox News wants a globalist as president and it doesn’t matter if they’re from the left or the right.
The daughter of LaVoy Finicum, the Oregon militiaman shot dead by police during a traffic stop on Highway 395 yesterday, claims that her father was “murdered” execution-style with his hands in the air, an account backed up by an eyewitness to the incident.
Protesters involved in the weeks-long occupation of a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, including leader Ammon Bundy, were apprehended by law enforcement as they traveled to the city of John Day to attend a community meeting set up by local residents.
“Everyone obeyed orders to surrender except two people: LaVoy Finicum and Bundy’s brother, Ryan Bundy,” a law enforcement official told CNN.
Media reports about the incident simply state that “shots were fired,” although Finicum’s daughter Thara Lynn Tenney posted a message on her Facebook page last night asserting that her father had already surrendered before he was gunned down.
“I want the world to know how my father was murdered today. His hands were in the air and he was shot in the face by the American authorities. Ammon Bundy reported there are 6 witnesses to this evil,” wrote Tenney.
I want the world to know how my father was murdered today. His hands were in the air and he was shot in the face by the American authorities. Ammon Bundy reported there are 6 witnesses to this evil.
Her testimony was echoed by another eyewitness, Victoria Sharp, who was in the car with Finicum when the group were pulled over by cops and federal agents.
Sharp claims that Finicum put his hands out of the car window and asked the police to allow the women to leave the car.
“They shot at him, but they missed him,” said Sharp, adding that the group then attempted to drive away in the car but were shot at again by police.
“When we crashed and stopped for a second, he got out of the car, he had his hands in the air, he’s like ‘just shoot me then’….and they did, they shot him dead,” said Sharp.
“He was just walking, with his hands in the air, I swear to God, and they shot him dead and after he was down on the ground, shot him three more times,” said Sharp, adding that the vehicle was again “bombarded with bullets” as well as tear gas rounds.
Sharp says that the group tried to “find something white” so they could display it as a sign of surrender. She challenges news reports that only six shots were fired, asserting, “they shot at least 120 shots altogether.”
Sharp also claims that none of the individuals in the car pulled out a gun at any point and that the incident was an “ambush” with “FBI snipers in the trees” surrounding the vehicle.
“They had their hands out of the window to show they were not firing, nothing, we showed no aggression at all,” said Sharp.
Sharp’s testimony is contradicted by another individual who said he spoke to Ammon Bundy’s security guard and that LaVoy Finicum had “charged” at police officers after he exited the vehicle.
Protesters who remain at the occupied federal building have vowed to continue their stance as authorities continue to insist they want a “peaceful” resolution to the matter.
Ever wonder what happened to Glenn Beck? Remember, he was the guy on CNN and then on Fox News who exposed so much about what Obama wasreally up to. Now it seems as though he’s totally lost his footing, and his friendships with David Barton and Ted Cruz are costing him his audience. Many former Beck listeners have dropped him saying he’s gone off the rails, that he needs a long vacation in a padded room.
On his show, Beck proclaimed that if Donald Trump becomes president he would be a “monster much, much worse than anything that Barack Obama could have dreamt. Trump is the same narcissistic character; he is the same ‘hope and change,’ make America great nonsense; he is the same ‘I’ll run it better,’” that President Barack Obama was eight years ago,” he said. [Link] Really Beck? You really believe that?
On January 23, 2016, Breitbart reported that Glenn Beck administered a mock presidential “oath of office” to Senator Ted Cruz as he endorsed him on stage—and Cruz got the oath wrong when he took it. Beck and Barton are in Iowa campaigning for Cruz. The desperation of these people is becoming absolutely comedic. Beck even told the crowd he prefers democratic socialist, Bernie Sanders, over Trump. [Link]
According to former radio personality, Jim Sumpter, when Beck worked atClear Channel, he was called to Kennebunkport by George H.W. Bush, for a private meeting. One has to wonder just what Beck was told at that meeting. One also wonders if that visit contributed to Beck’s hatred for Mr. Trump. Whatever the case, it truly appears that Beck has lost credibility with the majority of his audience.
Last year, (2014) Beck tried and failed to strike a deal with CNN. During that time, he attempted to moderate his image for television executives. He apologized for his inflammatory comments about Obama. As Breitbart News noted, Beck started positioning himself toward the political center, bashing Americans who were against illegal immigration during last summer’s border crisis. Trying to distance himself from politics, he also proclaimed on CNN that he would rather be Walt Disney than Edward R. Murrow or Rush Limbaugh.
Here’s where the rubber meets the road. Barton and Beck are extremely close friends, both living in Texas. Barton, of course is for Cruz, and now so is Beck. Unfortunately, Beck’s attacks on Mr. Trump have just succeeded in alienating his listening audience, because he’s become so vitriolic with his statements.
In fact, last week Beck went on O’Reilly’s program and stated as fact that Donald Trump had voted for Obama. He had found it on some crazy website. Needless to say, this week he had to go on O’Reilly’s program again and apologize. His desire to destroy Mr. Trump is eating this man alive.
Cruz, Barton, and Beck are all for a Constitutional Convention, and by now most folks understand there is a very dark purpose in wanting a Con-con. The promoters state that changing the Constitution will make politicians obey it, but in reality changing it will only succeed in destroying the freedoms granted by our founders. Instead, force them to obey what we have, or vote them out! Cruz supporter, Mark Levin wants a Con-con, and the son of his fiancé is a full time staffer for Senator Cruz.
The hatred for Trump continues from the GOPe at Fox News.
Megyn Kelly’s January 21st, 2016, Fox News Show featured the National Review’s “Conservatives Against Trump” article. Kelly had all the political piranhas in a feeding frenzy trying to destroy Mr. Trump.
Remember that the National Review was founded by William F. Buckley, who was a member of the CFR, a CIA agent, and a member of Skull and Bones. It was Buckley and his buddy, Irving Kristol, father of Bill, who destroyed old right Constitutional Conservatism and brought in the mediocre moderates who have much the same agenda as the leftists. William F. Buckley, Pied Piper for the Establishment, by John McManus, documents everything I’ve stated, as well as referencing the sources. Today, Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He was appointed by Buckley in 1992.
The Weekly Standard is edited by founder, Bilderberger William Kristol, and sidekick, Fred Barnes. It has never been profitable, but has stayed in circulation by its benefactor, CFR member, Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News, and WSJ.
At the end of this article I’ll list those who have signed on to National Review’s, “Against Trump.” Many of them are members of the secretive Council for National Policy, the right arm of the Council on Foreign Relations. The former is loaded with members who are Dominionists/Reconstructions.
Megyn Kelly first showed Sarah Palin endorsing Mr. Trump. By the way, Willie Robertson of Duck Dynasty has also endorsed Donald Trump. As well, Michelle Wiles – one of the Palmetto State’s most influential conservative activists – is leaving the South Carolina leadership team of Ted Cruz and joining the campaign of Donald Trump. [Link]
Megyn then introduced the editor of National Review, Rich Lowry, who is behind the push to destroy Donald Trump’s candidacy. Lowry says that Trump doesn’t understand the ideas and principles that make this country great, that true conservatives believe in limited government, the Constitution and liberty.
When I heard him say this, I thought to myself, “Excuse me Rich, but Donald Trump epitomizes exactly those principles. He is not GOP establishment like those going against him or even running against him!” Well, hate to tell you Lowry, but Trump is the King of Testosterone, and you’re just another bug who hit the windshield. [Link]
Kelly then introduced three of the signers of Lowry’s “Hate Trump” campaign. First was Dana Loesch, who is TV host of Glenn Beck’s Blaze (no doubt there, she’s for Cruz), then L. Brent Bozell III, chairman of the group, For America, and finally, Katy Pavlich who writes for Townhall.com and is a Fox News contributor.
If you missed this bit of anti-Trump drama, here it is for you to watch in full, if you can avoid destroying your television. It’s obvious that Megyn Kelly hates Trump with a passion and that she’s is not Fair or Balanced.
What I’d like to ask of all these people and the rest of the phony rightwing politicians…Where were you when we were fighting to keep Obama out of our White House? Had you put this much effort into keeping that Marxist Muslim away from DC, we would not be in the dire straits we’re in now. Instead, these establishment rightwing neo-cons are trying to destroy the best hope we’ve had in 53 years of having a true conservative leader who loves America.
In June millions of Fox News viewers saw FOX’s entire line-up of professional pundits proclaim borders shouldn’t matter; border walls won’t work; illegal alien amnesty was the only viable solution to decades of unenforced immigration law; and this was only in week #1 of Donald Trump’s campaign.
Since June ’15, on almost every issue those same pundits have now openly aligned themselves with GOPe agenda items like global trade, tax policy, big government spending, and advocacy to including advancement of Speaker Paul ‘Omnibus’ Ryan.
However, a sharp reader, DrudgeAddict, smartly points out these same voices were the exact group who gathered together in an exclusive meeting with President Obama in 2009 to sing his praises after the ’08 election. Including :
• George Will • Michael Barone • David Brooks • Charles Krauthammer • Bill Kristol • Lawrence Kudlow • Rich Lowry • Peggy Noonan
The post-meeting/dinner report in The New Yorker Magazine holds the quotes told by the glowing participants of their time with President Obama. Check it out!
And what about Hillary? Why are they attacking one of our own instead of going after the corrupt and scandalous political machinations of Hillary Clinton, from Whitewater to Benghazi, from the Clinton Foundation to Clinton emails? Where are they in destroying the socialist enemies? Instead, National Review and these establishment Republicans are trying to destroy the best hope we’ve had in over five decades to turn back the New World Order tide in America. It’s because the reality is, they are socialists at best, and probably worse than that. Trump has thrown a wrench in the entire New World Order plans, and they hate him for it. Davos is scared to death of him, and hopes he loses. [Link]
They call Mr. Trump a narcissist, when the man in our White House today is the real narcissist. Mr. Trump is confident, something we want in a president! Marcus Tullius Cicero said, “If you have no confidence in self, you are twice defeated in the race of life. With confidence, you have won even before you have started.”
Want to see what a real Trump supporter thought of Megyn Kelly’s program, and National Review? Watch this video!
Here is the list of the Establishment Neo-Cons who have signed on to National Review’s “Against Trump” band wagon:
•Glenn Beck of CNN, Fox News, the Blaze, owned by Glenn Beck & his production co., Mercury Radio Arts, fka GBTV, TheBlaze TV •Libertarian David Boaz who also writes for National Review •L. Brent Bozell III, owns Media Research Center, his wife is the sister of William F. Buckley, and he too writes for National Review. He claims he is not a Republican. •Mona Charen former regular commentator on CNN and author for National Review. •Ben Domenech who blogs for editor Erick Erickson’s Red State, also writes for National Review. •Erick Erickson, Red State, was also a commentator on CNN, and left to become a commentator on Fox News. •Steven Hayward, writes for Weekly Standard, National Review, NY Times, Los Angeles Daily News, Cleveland Plain Dealer, etc. •Mark Helprin, Council on Foreign Relations member, writes forThe New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Atlantic Monthly, the NewCriterion, the National Review, andAmerican Heritage. • Bilderberger Bill Kristol, son of Trotskyite Irving Kristol. •Yuval Levin, The New Republic has dubbed Levin “the right’s new Irving Kristol, God help us, just what we need, another Trotskyite (slow Marxist). Levin writes for National Review and Weekly Standard. • Blaze employee Dana Loesch, Blaze is owned by Glenn Beck. •Andrew McCarthy, another columnist for National Review. •Club for Growth‘s David McIntosh who backs Cruz because both are for open borders, which Ted needs as president to pass the North American Union, which his wife helped to write at the Council on Foreign Relations. •Michael Medved, radio host, commentator. •Edwin Meese III, member of secretive Council for National Policy and sits on the board of controlled opposition, Heritage Foundation. •Russell Moore of the Manhattan Declaration led by CFR member and UNESCO promoter Robert George, communitarian. •Michael Mukasey who has advised the Jeb Bush campaign, was US Attorney General for George W. Bush 2007-2009. •Katie Pavlich, National Review Washington fellow, writes for Townhall, Fox News contributor. •John Podhoretz, contributes to National Review and Weekly Standard • R.R. Reno, editor of First Things •Thomas Sowell who, in his 20s was a Marxist. Sadly, Tom is like the rest of them. • and USA Today columnist and Fox News contributor, Cal Thomas.
Note, most of the signees are contributors to National Review or Fox News.
Who is Climbing in Bed With Whom?
Brilliant researcher, writer, and expert on heretical doctrines, Sarah Leslie, tells it plainly:
It is disturbing that the Neo-Cons are getting in bed with the Charismatic Dominionists. [Link] For decades they’ve been in bed with the Dobson-ites of the world, funding and controlling much of the mainstream Religious Right. But this is a new development. The Neo-Cons and their cohorts don’t like Trump, and are supporting Cruz. (Not to mention the endorsement for Cruz by Mike Bickle and Glenn Beck — both who support a “Seven mountain mandate” for Dominionism.)
The Neo-Cons really didn’t control the Charismatic Dominionists — until now. The Neo-Cons had to make inroads into the Charismatics, some of which were impassable due to the insular nature of the elites in the New Apostolic Reformation. And part of the problem, frankly, is that the Neo-Cons are hardened rational atheist type MEN. They really didn’t appeal to the touchy-feely experientialism of the Charismatics.
But the mainstreaming that we’ve been warning about on theHerescope blog is finally happening. The Neo Cons are a nasty group with a bad agenda, and they tend to alienate everyone by their excessive controlling agendas. They share a common mandate with Dominionists to rule the world.
Many on the Religious Right do not like the Neo-Cons -there is a long history of dislike. So Trump seems to be currently appealing to a group of people who are not beholden to the Neo-Cons, may have had no previous experience with them, or who may be the ones who have a long history of warning about their agenda.
The fact that the Neo-Cons are now going to bed with Bickle, Beck, and Cruz is a scary development. Neither group tolerates anything but 100% compliance with their message and mandate.
Conclusion
Remember, a false friend is far more dangerous than an open enemy. This is what we have today and frankly, it gives me the willies.
really up to. Now it seems as though he’s totally lost his footing, and his friendships with David Barton and Ted Cruz are costing him his audience. Many former Beck listeners have dropped him saying he’s gone off the rails, that he needs a long vacation in a padded room.
stage—and Cruz got the oath wrong when he took it. Beck and Barton are in Iowa campaigning for Cruz. The desperation of these people is becoming absolutely comedic. Beck even told the crowd he prefers democratic socialist, Bernie Sanders, over Trump. [
Clear Channel, he was called to Kennebunkport by George H.W. Bush, for a private meeting. One has to wonder just what Beck was told at that meeting. One also wonders if that visit contributed to Beck’s hatred for Mr. Trump. Whatever the case, it truly appears that Beck has lost credibility with the majority of his audience.
campaign of Donald Trump. [
• 
previous experience with them, or who may be the ones who have a long history of warning about their agenda.
Cathy
chulai1968
Truth Prevailing
Publius Huldah
Freedom Rider
radioroger2015
revaustinmiles