Tag Archives: Fox News

Move Over, Megyn Kelly, America is Calling


With America the Beautiful crying out in death throes for rescue from its undeserved ‘Fundamental Transformation’, Fox News seems intent on making the 2016 presidential election all about—Fox News.

Move over, Megyn Kelly, America is calling.

BY JUDI MCLEOD FOR CANADAFREEPRESS.COM

It doesn’t take a conspiracy theorist to recognize a conspiracy, and as the Kelly File proved last night, it only takes a single television show.

One night after immigration opportunist/Univision ‘reporter’ Jorge Ramos broke the queue taking over the mic at Donald Trump’s Dubuque, Iowa event, Megyn Kelly gave him the floor on her Kelly File—the same way she gave DNC motor mouth Debbie Wasserman-Schultz rant time as her first guest after the mainly Fox-touted ‘Great Debate’.

In short, Ramos who was given the bum’s rush from the Iowa event, got to make a comeback on last night’s Kelly File.

“Kelly very knowingly asked him, “What is it like to be caught in the crosshairs of a billionaire presidential runner?” Ramos answered, “Well, you know exactly how it feels.” (Mediaite.com, Aug.26, 2015)

In one fell swoop, all the attention went running back to Kelly.

Related:
• Trump’s not perfect, but neither is Megyn Kelly
• Levin calls Bush & O’Reilly out on Birthright Citizenship
• Fox News, newest Reality TV
• The Talking Head Election Debate

“Kelly did acknowledge “it’s not unusual” for reporters to do what he did, but asked Ramos why Trump would want to engage with him when he has repeatedly referred to Trump as a voice of extreme hate. (Mediaite)

“Ramos said it shouldn’t matter if Trump is a fan of his or Univision’s or not, he has an obligation as a presidential candidate to answer reporters’ questions. Ramos did add, though, that Trump clearly can’t deal with questions that make him “uncomfortable.”

Sure didn’t take long for Kelly to get back to everything being about Megyn Kelly.

What good is Fox News doing for America if the 2016 presidential race isn’t all about how Obama is destroying America, and if it’s all about the non-stop bickering between Donald Trump and Megyn Kelly?

Peculiar, isn’t it that Trump’s become the Fox arch enemy all because he’s trying to ‘Make America Great Again’ and laying out the truth while he’s at it?

Time is running out on bringing America back from the brink. All other GOP contenders should be doing the same as The Donald.

Americans are worried about their children and grandchildren having to grow up in an unstable fundamentally transformed America.

Trump’s in hot water for calling Kelly a “bimbo”. After last night, perhaps the word “cunning” would be more applicable.

In his unbridled passion to ‘Make America Great Again’, Trump is bumptious, brash and bold, but a least he employs the frontal attack, leaving no room for second guessing about his intent.

Tired of the Republican run-around, people are trying to press home the message to Fox News that their golden boy Jeb Bush, like Mitt Romney, just doesn’t cut it and that their network regular Karl Rove is full of it.

The focus should be on presidential election 2016 and prima donnas like Megyn Kelly told to leave their inflated egos at the back door.

Meanwhile, the Fox News attack on The Donald is all about ratings when at least half of America is all about saving their country from fundamental transformation.

A cry needs to go up across the land:”Move Over, Megyn Kelly, America is calling”.

Halperin: Trump Reached ‘Turning Point,’ ‘Most’ Estab Cands Think He Can Win Nomination

Bloomberg Politics Managing Editor Mark Halperin stated that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has “reached a turning point” where the “establishment candidates” think he can win Iowa, “most” believe he can win the nomination, and “a significant number think he could win the White House” on Monday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Halperin was asked his writing that “Most importantly, we’ve reached a turning point with Trump, the major establishment campaigns of both parties now think Trump could win Iowa, and most of them think he could win the nomination, and a significant number think he could win the White House.” And that the campaigns were in “full freak out mode.”

He said, “Trump may not end up as the nominee, but right now, he’s changed the race, not just leading in the Fox poll, but coming to the fair. I’ve been to the fair with Barack Obama at his peak, Sarah Palin at her peak, with other candidates, George Bush. The reception Trump got here was not just about celebrity. I walked with him for 45 minutes after the helicopter ride, he came to the fair, and people were yelling things to him with passion. ‘Save us,’ ‘You’re the only one who can stop Hillary,’ ‘Thank you for making America great again.’ The other campaigns — the other leading Republican campaigns, monitored Trump’s behavior here. And that was part, along with the Fox poll, and along with the developments of the last couple of weeks, of them saying, as you just quoted, they now believe Trump can win Iowa.”

Host Joe Scarborough then remarked, “that really changes everything in this campaign about how they react to him.” Halperin agreed with this point.

Go back to the site to watch the video

Fox News Rupert Murdoch And Obama Advisor Sunni Muslim Valerie Jarrett Working Together

My Comments: Fox News has heavily funded Hillary Clinton for the last two years. And allegedly, 96% of the Fox News employees vote Democrat. So why does anyone still watch them? Rupert Murdoch owns Fox News and WSJ along with Saudi Prince, Al Waleed Bin Talal. Think you’re getting the truth about the Islamic invasion of America? Not with Rupert and Valerie having such a grand time together!

valerie

“Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” Amos 3:3

REPOSTED FROM INFILTRATEDNATION.COM

This is why you reject the false paradigm of the main stream media

The powers that be want nothing more than for you and I to believe the completely false construct of the Conservative-vs-Liberal paradigm. The reality of the situation is that there is one group pulling the strings, and they have created false flags to wave that both sides rally around. Fox News is no exception to this.

No where is this seen more clearly than in last Tuesday’s dinner meeting between core Obama advisor and Sunni Muslim Valerie Jarrett and Fox News CEO Rupert Murdoch. The Washington Examiner reported that the two dined at the posh Blue Duck Tavern on Tuesday night in Washington’s Foggy Bottom, and Jarrett described the evening as “very enjoyable.”

“Good policy sometimes makes strange bedfellows,” she told reporters at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor Friday, adding that she was impressed by Murdoch’s passion for passing comprehensive immigration reform.

Why on earth would the head of Fox News be not only meeting with Obama’s main Muslim advisor for any reason, much less a strategy-planning breakfast meeting to discuss flooding America with illegal immigrants? Because Fox News is a fake, a total sham. They are a Muslim-front organization that’s filled with homosexuals and liberals, whose #2 owner is Prince Alwaleed from Saudi Arabia. Having spent years getting millions of Americans to trust and believe in their highly-biased and false programming, they now plan on leading Conservative America right into the lion’s den of Islam and Sharia Law.

Number one ratings attraction on Fox News, Bill O’Reilly, recently cooed that in his opinion, “Barack Hussein Obama is a patriot”. That should tell you the reliability of the content on his O’Reilly Factor program. Muslim Prince Alwaleed owns the largest chunk of News Corp. stock outside the Murdoch family. Shortly after his purchase of 5.5 percent of News Corp. voting shares in 2005, Alwaleed gave a speech that made it clear just what he had bought. As noted in The (U.K.) Guardian, Alwaleed told an audience in Dubai that it took just one phone call to Rupert Murdoch — “speaking not as a shareholder but as a viewer,” Alwaleed said — to get the Fox News crawl reporting “Muslim riots” in France changed to “civil riots.”

Fox News is the ultimate false flag operation, in bed with Muslim owners and now with the Obama-Jarrett White House planning the best way to flood America with millions of illegal immigrants so the system will collapse. They are not “patriots”, and they are counting on you to be the “pinhead”.
And that’s the memo…

Prevent Megyn Kelly From Hosting Any Further REPUBLICAN Debates. UH-OH, Did Roger Ailes Apologize?

BY TERI AMICI for CHANGE.ORG

kelly

Megyn Kelly characterizes the Presidential selection process as “fun”, dismissing the millions of Americans that find it much more serious. We deserve better than Megyn Kelly. Below, please find a list of reasons we believe Megyn Kelly should be barred from all future debates:

  1. Megyn Kelly had a clear agenda: attack Donald Trump. Even if she “attacked equally”, we’re not looking for a hatchet-man; we’re looking for a moderator to thoroughly, and fairly, vet the Presidential candidates.
  2. With over 90 million Americans out of the labor force, they are more concerned with their future than whether or not someone engaged in name calling.
  3. She tenaciously covered (to the point of voyeuristic obsession) Mr. Trumps past rather than his vision for the future.
  4. Megyn Kelly’s feeling, however valid, should come second to the interest of our Nation.
  5. She focused on candidates personally, rather than politically.
  6. Megyn Kelly failed to cover many things more relevant to a Presidential candidate. For example, Marco Rubio’s gang of eight bill, Jeb Bush’s fascination with common core and feckless immigration policy, Rand Paul’s specific position on constitutional issues, Ted Cruz’s track record of telling the truth on everything he’s ever done, politically, Ben Carson’s honest, calm and collected “outsider” approach (mixed with his questionable second amendment stance), etc.

Ultimately, neither she nor Fox News lived up the “fair and balanced” standard: were it not for closing statements, the American people may have viewed an entire debate without understanding a single issue for which the candidates stand.

While her disdain for Mr. Trump was evident, this petition is a call for truly fair and balanced coverage of all candidates. Therefore, and as evidenced by her clear bias and poor performance, Megyn Kelly should be barred from hosting or moderating all future Republican Presidential debates.

In addition to the significant amount of signatures, here is what some people have to say, in particular:

  • MARK LEVIN: FOX NEWS, MEGYN KELLY ‘HOSTED A NATIONAL ENQUIRER DEBATE, NOT A REPUBLICAN DEBATE—OWE AMERICAN PEOPLE AN APOLOGY’
  • “This was more of an inquisition than it was a debate. It was a missed opportunity to talk about things that really mattered.” - Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
  • “I have done every step needed on this petition..it didn’t take long at all and I feel good I didn’t just sign, but followed through all steps. We the people can bring her down, but not if we don’t follow through and complete all steps. I have been a troll for the first time on fb I’ve gone to Megyn’s page and posted this on every post on her page, I’ve posted to trumps page, I posted on Hilary’s page, I have posted on right wing page, I’ve shared on my wall, and I posted on fox page! Do all the steps if you truly want this witch hunt to stop.” - Darla Germer
  • “Megyn Kelly doesn’t want women treated like sex objects-ha! http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/786421” - Kimber Lee
  • “megyn kelly and fox news is to blame… I have been a loyal follower of fox news for many years…. in one night they stooped as low as cnn.. fair and balanced… they owe donald trump and the public an apology” - Nicholas Sommerfield
Letter to
News Corp.
21st Century Fox Rupert Murdoch
Prevent Megyn Kelly From Hosting Any Further REPUBLICAN debates.
Updates

  1. 2 hours ago
    40,000 supporters
  2. 2 hours ago
    Petition update

     

AILES
Teri Amici

Cocoa Beach, FL

Aug 10, 2026 — According to a tweet by Donald Trump (with information we are trying to verify), he and Roger Ailes talked by phone and it appears, by implication, Roger Ailes apologized.

“Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 7m7 minutes ago
Roger Ailes just called. He is a great guy & assures me that “Trump” will be treated fairly on @FoxNews. His word is always good!
303 retweets579 favorites”

If you assure Donald Trump he will be treated “fairly” in the future, is that an admission that he was not treated fairly in the past? If so, how can Roger Ailes praise Megyn Kelly immediately after the debates and now apologize?

The answer: this petition and the onslaught of ridicule directed toward Fox News and Megyn Kelly through social media is a backlash they are taking seriously. And they want it to stop.

Here’s the problem, we’re not asking for an apology (not by Roger Ailes and not even by Megyn Kelly), we’re demanding that Megyn Kelly be removed from future debates.In fact, even if Megyn apologized, she would then be accused of lobbing softballs at Trump by his rival candidates and their supporters. She is tainted!

Therefore, this petition shall remain and continue to grow with your support and from those with whom you share it:

https://www.change.org/p/news-corp-rupert-murdock-prevent-megyn-kelly-from-hosting-any-further-republican-debates

Megyn Tells Trump Women aren’t Sex Objects….

Looks to me like Trump got this one absolutely right!!!!!!!!

skank

skank 2

trump

Image

Close and Cozy - Jeb Rupert and Valerie

Making the rounds on Facebook, this one is a keeper!

WHY FOX NEWS ORDERED “CODE RED” ON DONALD TRUMP?

Jeb Rupert & Valerie

 

Trump Explains 3rd Party Comment On Hannity.

Folks Trump keeps saying over, and over he wants to run as a Repub. He was pushed into a corner with this question, and he explains his answer to Hannity, and more. I do not believe he would run as a 3rd party candidate. He just wants to be treated nicely. In fact I think as he said it’s leverage so if he keeps leading , and the GOP does not back him it will be the GOP’s fault if he goes 3rd party. Do you follow my logic? If he’s not I think he will back the nominee.

He has said “I want to be the Repub Nominee”. Period. So if he is last man standing after primaries and whatnot it will be the GOP’s duty to back. If not we have an obligation to turn our backs on the GOP forever.

————————————————————————————————-

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump shocked viewers Thursday night when he refused to rule out a third-party run, but in a post-debate interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, he said he did so only for “leverage” with the Republican establishment.

Right out of the gate, Fox News anchor Bret Baier asked the 10 top-tier presidential candidate if they would pledge to support the eventual GOP nominee and not run as a third-party candidate.

“Raise your hand now if you won’t make that pledge tonight,” Baier said.

Trump was the lone candidate to raise a hand. Much of the audience reacted in boos.

“I can’t say I have to respect the person — if it’s not me — the person who wins,” Trump said.

Trump explained his reasoning further after the debate on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity.”

“I’ll make the pledge if I win,” he told the host. “Why should I give up that leverage if they don’t treat me well? You’re talking about the establishment Republicans.”

He added, “I may at some point do it. I’m starting to really like the establishment people.”

Watch the interview.

~Steve~

More at Bizpacreview.com

Explosive prediction for Trump in Fox debate

BY JOE KOVACS FOR WND

With Fox News televising a debate among Republican candidates this Thursday, radio host Rush Limbaugh thinks Donald Trump may “blow up” the event with “fireworks” because of its “stale, stupid” formula.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump’s objective is to blow up this whole format, because it’s predictable, it’s stale,” Limbaugh said Monday on his national broadcast. “I think at some point, Trump’s just gonna say how stupid he thinks this is, and how unproductive he thinks this is.”

“He’ll talk about how it’s not productive toward choosing a candidate, that it just muddies the waters and it doesn’t give anybody enough time to do anything, and there’s no way that all 10 people can personally interact with each other. Then you’ve got the moderators trying to interject and keep control of the thing, and trying to make names for themselves, too, even though they deny that.”

Limbaugh noted Trump might break out of the format after he thinks he’s scored a big point.

“I don’t think he would do this if he thinks he’s not doing well,” he explained.

“I think he would only do something like this from a position of perceived strength and he would basically start lambasting the whole format and say, ‘You know what? This is what’s wrong with choosing a president! What does this got to do with anything? We’re all up here, everybody knows that nine out of 10 of these people aren’t going anywhere. What are we doing here? This is crazy! All we’re gonna do for two or three hours here is tell everybody how rotten each other is. It’s crazy. It’s not gonna matter a hill of beans at the end of the day. What are wasting our time here for? Making TV ratings for other people.’ Or something like this. I mean that would be in character. And how many people do you think would stand up and go, ‘Right on!’”

Limbaugh claims many conservative voters in the Republican Party are often disillusioned after debates take place because, “A northeastern liberal moderate establishment candidate gets the nomination. And if not a northeastern liberal, then an Arizona moderate or liberal. But an establishment candidate gets it. And the conservative candidates all seem to winnow themselves out. I don’t see Trump – as front and center as he is, as dominating as he is – willing, permitting himself to be seen as an equal among 10. By shutting up when he’s supposed to shut up. By not speaking when he’s not supposed to speak.”

RELATED: Democrat debates vanish: 6 scheduled, none in works

“I’m not saying any of it’s going to be disrespectful,” Limbaugh continued. “I’m saying it’s going to be like everything else he’s doing in the campaign. It’s gonna be fresh, it’s gonna be new. It’s gonna be, to use the cliché, a breath of fresh air. And people are going to be applauding it, except the Drive-Bys and the Establishment Media who, when it’s over, are gonna wring their hands and worry about what does this mean for our politics.

“The formula’s everything to the Drive-Bys. The formula’s everything to the Establishment. Because they control it. And that’s one thing Trump is not. Controllable. Particularly when it comes to the Establishment. So, it could be fireworks.”

Radio host Rush Limbaugh

Limbaugh postulated if he’s wrong and the debate has few eruptions, it’s going to be considered “a yawner,” and “the Establishment Media is going to claim that their Establishment Candidates did the best.”

That’s another thing Trump has to consider, Limbaugh concluded.

“As a lone-wolf candidate, as a guy who’s busting out of formulas, and is not being contained by them, it’s incumbent on him to step out and somehow control not only what happens during the debate, but the message afterwards. …

“The last thing Trump wants is for the post-debate analysis to be: ‘Donald Trump was also on stage and was heard from … .’ The last thing Trump wants is that he was just one of the gang, just one of the 10. So, it’s bound to be fireworks of some kind. It has to be. And the real question for me is: Are the other nine ready for what may be headed their way?”

The Fox News debate for the top 10 polling Republican candidates is slated to air at 9 p.m. Eastern. The network will also broadcast a 5 p.m. Eastern debate for the seven candidates who are in bottom part of the polls.

Meanwhile, the first televised debate takes place Monday night in Manchester, New Hampshire, to be broadcast on C-SPAN at 7 p.m. Eastern

Trump has decided not to participate in the event which is not sanctioned by the Republican National Committee, assessing he will not get the local newspaper’s endorsement after an editorial critical of his comments about Sen. John McCain’s status as a war hero, CNN reported.

Look Who Just Pledged $32 Billion To Promote Islam And Sharia Law In America

My Comments: What this article does not tell you is that Alwaweed bil Talal is also invested in Fox News and Wall Street Journal with Council on Foreign Relations member, Richard Murdoch. He certainly affects what is shown on Fox and printed in the WSJ.

stupidsImage credit: demidoff / Shutterstock.com

Anti-Islam activist Pamela Geller sees Alwaleed’s generosity as a Trojan Horse.

By Randy DeSoto for WESTERN JOURNALISM CENTER

Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a senior member of the Saudi royal family, announced that he will be giving away his entire $32 billion fortune to charity–but his past statements and commitment to promote Islam in the United States have raised red flags for some.

Alwaleed Philanthropies’ statement regarding the prince’s intentions indicates his donation would “help build bridges to foster cultural understanding.”

“Philanthropy is a personal responsibility, which I embarked upon more than three decades ago and is an intrinsic part of my Islamic faith. With this pledge, I am honoring my life-long commitment to what matters most – helping to build a more peaceful, equitable and sustainable world for generations to come,” says Prince Alwaleed.

Alwaleed is CEO of the Saudi investment conglomerate Kingdom Holding Company and has large stakes in Citigroup, Apple, Twitter, General Motors, 21st Century Fox, Euro Disney, and other companies, according to the Huffington Post. He has been called Saudi Arabia’s Warren Buffet.

Investor’s Business Daily notes that Alwaleed has extensive ties to Muslim Brotherhood leaders. “For example, he tapped ‘tele-Islamist’ Tariq Al-Suwaidan, widely reported to be a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in Kuwait, as the channel director of his Islamic religious TV outlet Al Risala.”

The network’s “Supreme Advisory Committee” has included Abdullah Omar Naseef, whom ex-federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy says is “a major Muslim Brotherhood figure” who has helped raise funds for al-Qaida.”

In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, Alwaleed gave a check for $10 million to the Twin Towers Fund to aid victims of the terrorist attacks. However, after making the donation, he also released a statement, CNN reports, which called on the United States to “re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stand toward the Palestinian cause.”

“While the U.N. passed clear resolutions…calling for the Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza Strip decades ago, our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis while the world turns the other cheek,” the statement said.

bin

Image Credit: Facebook/His Highness Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud

Then New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani directed the check be returned. “To suggest that there’s a justification for [the terrorist attacks] only invites this happening in the future,” he said. “It is highly irresponsible and very, very dangerous…So I think not only are those statements wrong, they’re part of the problem,” the former mayor added.

According to Investor’s Business Daily, in 2002, Alwaleed “gave $500,000 to the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, which federal authorities have linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.”

In 2005, the prince contributed $40 million to expand Islamic studies in the United States. Twenty million dollars went to Harvard to create a campus-wide Shariah law studies program, while another $20 million was pumped into Georgetown University for a “Muslim-Christian understanding” program.

In his statement released earlier this week, Alwaleed indicates that he plans to model his philanthropic work after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The money will go towards “supporting needy communities, through health promotion, eradication of diseases, provision of electric power to remote villages and hamlets, building orphanages and schools, and much more, as well as providing disaster relief and empowering women, youth and poverty alleviation.”

Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, commented: “Prince Alwaleed’s generous commitment promises to significantly extend the great work that his foundation is already doing. His gift is an inspiration to all of us working in philanthropy around the world.”

Anti-Islam activist Pamela Geller sees Alwaleed’s generosity as a Trojan Horse, believing the money will primarily go towards what she calls the “Islamization of America.”

The Saudis have spent billions already: 80% of the mosques [built] in America are Saudi funded. Islamic groups working to impose the sharia are largely funded by the Saudis.

“We can look forward to 32 billion more of the kingdom’s brand of Islam, while censoring criticism of Islam,” writes Geller.