Anchor Babies My Butt. 14th Amendment Does Not Say That!

History Has forgotten Original Intent Of 14th Amendment.

Every whiny Liberal, and idiot Rhino who has helped destroy this Country with Illegal Immigration has either done it on purpose or out of ignorance of what our Constitution says. They all stand on The 14th Amendment and proclaim it is the reason so called “Anchor Babies” get immediate citizenship. Well I’m here to say they are all wrong. Here is the true history of the 14th. You must read what is called the “Original Intent” from the original authors of the amendment Then there are SCOTUS decisions to back it up.———-
————————————————————————————————

The 14th Amendment, ratified July 9, 1868, reads: “Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
If one wishes fully to understand the Constitution, one must also read what the Founders said and wrote regarding it. This is what is called original intent. By doing so one can glean not only what they wrote but the motive behind it — many letters the founders wrote to each other and of course the Federalist Papers. In short, go back to the source.
Senator Jacob Howard (1805-1871) authored the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment. “He [Howard] told us what he meant. He defined who would fall within the jurisdiction of the United States.”
This is what Howard said as referenced by Mark Levin:
“Every person born within the limits of the United States, subject to their jurisdiction, [meaning the states — their jurisdiction] is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the United States

. This will not, of course, include persons in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States,

but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great issue in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.”
Senator Lyman Trumbull (1813-1896), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, supported Howard, contending that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant “not owing allegiance to anybody else … subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States.”
Well, it doesn’t get much clearer than that. There can be no question of his intent and no longer any question of what he meant by “and subject to their jurisdiction.”
In other words, Levin writes:
“You can’t self-immigrate. You can’t claim jurisdiction because you happen to walk into the United States,” and you can’t magically become a citizen if both your parents have fidelity to another nation.
This phrase has been also been interpreted by the US Supreme Court to exclude anyone who is subject to the rule of a foreign government.
They specifically and appropriately confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called “Slaughter-House cases” [83 US 36 (1873) and 112 US 94 (1884). In the 1884 Elk v.Wilkins case the phrase “subject to its jurisdiction” was interpreted to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states born within the United States.
(May I just add, And then there is the little matter of being here Illegally. That should count for something in my book. Like all of the referenced matter here would be for naught if we just enforced the damn laws already on the books like say …Mexico does. Know what happens when you sneak into Mexico? They don’t give you free stuff. You may get a free case of severe “Lead Poisoning”)
~Steve~————————————————————————————-
http://godfatherpolitics.com/24537/who-knew-donald-trump-was-a-constitutional-scholar/#ddbAd3zm7veZ4DJD.99

To Further clarify here is a simple explanation by PUBLIUS HULDAH.

Birthright Citizenship: What’s That About?
Yes, it has certainly come to be perverted. Here is the Truth:
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment says:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside…”.
The purpose of this Section was to extend citizenship to freed slaves
and to protect them from southern Black Codes which denied them basic
God-given rights.
This Section does not provide that illegals who invade our Country
and drop a baby here are automatically the parents of a US citizen.
The key is “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”:

Consider the French
ambassador and his lovely young wife stationed in Washington, DC. She
gives birth to a child here. Her child was born here. But is her child
“subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States? No! The child is
subject to the same jurisdiction as his parents: France.
Consider the American Indians: Sec.1 of the 14th Amendment did NOT
confer citizenship on American Indians. They were not “subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States” – they were subject to the
jurisdiction of their tribes.
An illegal alien who invades our Country is in the same status as the
French Ambassador’s wife. The baby she drops here is “subject to the
jurisdiction” of the Country she left.
So the 14th Amendment does NOT confer citizenship on babies of
illegals born here – just as it does not confer citizenship on the
babies of foreign diplomats stationed here.
Pursuant to Art. I, Sec. 8, clause 4, US Constitution, Congress may make laws deciding how people become naturalized citizens.
But Sec. 1 of the 14th Amendment does not confer citizenship status on babies born here of illegal aliens.
This is important.

Above by Publius Huldah.