Tag Archives: Hillary Clinton

Connecting Dots Creates Shocking Truth

by Rev. Austin Miles

 Lawrence Craig is a patriot who has an incredible library of research material, papers, old history books, and published records regarding practically everything that concerns American Citizens. Especially Godly citizens who truly care about America. He freely shares his gold mine of information with columnists such as this one. It has been suggested by this writer that he do his own column. However he chooses to stay in the background and simply help those columnists on the front lines fighting for the sovereignty of The United States.

The intermarriage of various office holders in America who combine their abilities to tear down our country is staggering. The unbelievable interconnection of the various ‘movers and shakers’ who work against America is shocking to say the least, and to CONNECT THE DOTS will cause readers to slap their foreheads and say, “WHAT?” 

So put on a pot of coffee….COFFEE…not Brandy, since there is a risk of overdoing it when these stats are read. Especially when it is realized that the politicos have gotten away with it….so far…and how everybody is connected to everybody making one feel alone in a sea of political crabgrass.

So let’s follow the trail…but slowly and patiently. When all the pieces are sewn together, it obviously exposes conspiracy and treason. From 2001 to 2005, there was an ongoing investigation of The Clinton Foundation. A Grand Jury had been impaneled. GOVERNMENTS from around the world donated to the “Charity.”  However, none of these “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.

Any honest investigator would have been able to figure this out. Within the muddle,  this particular individual came forth front and center, to set the record straight. That individual was…..drum roll….JAMES COMEY.

From there a transfer to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Brand of the IRS turned out to be….FANFARE…Lois Lerner!

Meanwhile, the individual who ran the Tax Division inside the department of (in)justice from 2001 to 2005 was none other than, Assistant Attorney General of the United States….trumpets…Rod Rosenstein!

Of course this is all “coincidence” doncha know, but the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame was—Sustaining TYMPANY ROLL— ROBERT MUELLER.

And what did all four characters have in common?  They were all briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation. Wow! Coincidences all over the place.


James Comey left the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin. Hillary Clinton was running the State Department, on her own personal email server.  The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of Hillary. Like all good public servants do in looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of U.S. Uranium to, no other, than the Russians!  Notice that it was not a Donald Trump collusion with the Russians…it was Hillary.

This appeared to be a straight up deal, but was it?  The people got absolutely nothing out of if.  However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton rushed to Moscow, got paid Five Hundred Thousand bucks for a one hour speech, then met with Vladimir Putin at his home for several hours. Again, this was a Clinton, not a Trump.

Meanwhile, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme. And the FBI director during this time?  Yep, Robert Mueller who even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009. And who handled that case within the Justice Department out of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland?  Better sit down…Rod Rosenstein.

As for the informant, The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to put him behind bars if he spoke out about lt.

Sudden Thawt Dept. How did 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole, providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

After the sale was approved, 145 Million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.  Lois Lerner was still at the Internal Revenue Service working with the Charitable Division where she regularly blocked legitimate churches and ministers from receiving a tax exemption.

WHOOSH! It is now 2015:

Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovered that  Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of these emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was and is required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email. (Let’s not forget-at least 10 CIA spies in China were killed by the Chinese because of the leaks, and God knows what else occurred.)  Sparing you the State Departments’ cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now here is the amazing part: Guess who became FBI Director in 2013? Guess who had secured 17 no-bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank  you present when he departed his employer? None other than James Comey. Isn’t it amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at The State Department.?

Comey was the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after his FBI investigated the Lois Lerner “matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerated her. No crimes there. Really?

In April 2016, James Comey drafted an exoneration letter of HIllary Rodham Clinton as the DOJ was handing out immunity deals. A Grand Jury was NOT convened. James Comey then stepped out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July 5th of 2016, and exonerated Hillary from any wrongdoing.

It goes on and on. Rosenstein became Asst. Attorney General, Comey got fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaked government information TO THE PRESS, Mueller then was assigned to the Russian Investigation scam by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ.

FISA Abuse, Political Espionage…pick a crime, any crime, chances are…this group and a few others did it. All the same players. All compromised and conflicted. All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves. ALL CONNECTED IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER TO THE CLINTONS.

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation as being the largest international Charity Fraud in the history of mankind,  has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Let us not forget that Comey’s brother worked for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes. Hillary Clinton was the common denominator to all the crimes above.


She is a U.S. Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protégé of James Comey and Robert Mueller. Brsoomian, with her boss, R Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998.

Her boss, Lawrence, also represented:

Robert Mueller three times;

James Comey five times,

Barack Obama 45 times

Kathleen Sebelius 56 times

Bill Clinton 40 times

Hillary Clinton 17 Times

Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times.

So why should we care about her or her work history?  Someone cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian Court Documents for her Clinton Representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the D.C. District Court of Appeals Court Dockets. Someone cares so much that the Internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.


Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative.  Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. And although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the D.C. office of the U.S. Attorney, her email address is: LisaBarsoomian@NIH gov.  The HIH stands for National Institute of Health. This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities

Why one more attorney with ties to the U.S. Intelligence Community really matters:  Because it deals with President Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports. the Border Wall, Daca, Everything coming out of California. the Imo-Party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper Leaks, the Comey Leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions Recusal and 14 month nap with occasional forays into the Marijuana legalization mix…and last but not least, Mueller’s never-ending investigation into so-called Collusion between the Trump Team and the Russians.



Our gratitude to Lawrence Craig for sharing these files with us.




Snobs to the Left of Me, Phonies to the Right – Here I Am Stuck in the Middle with Trump

By Jim O’Neill

I see the children of the global business elite marry each other and settle in London or New York or Mumbai. They send their children to the same schools and are alert to all class markers. And those elites, of Mumbai and Manhattan, do not often identify with, or see a connection to or an obligation toward, the rough, struggling people who live at the bottom in their countries. In fact, they fear them….

Peggy Noonan “How Global Elites Forsake Their Countrymen”

I am your messenger.

Donald J. Trump

If you still believe in the bogus poll numbers and pro-Hillary fairy tales being promoted by the Main Stream Media…well, stop it. You really should know better by this point in time – and in fact many, perhaps most, of “we the people” are indeed wise to the lies.

The truth is that Donald J. Trump is kicking butt and taking names. Media deception notwithstanding, he has left Clinton in the dust. The pro-Clinton (i.e. pro-globalist) media has been forced to resort to cooking polls, smearing Trump, and playing “hide the Hildabeast.” The question is not who is winning, but how long the media can keep up their bogus façade of a tight race.

Be that as it may, the main focus of this article will revolve around the globalist elites – specifically their hubris, unwarranted vanity, and supercilious snobbery. Twits…and twitettes.

To cut to the chase, like many of you I have been immersed in a very steep learning curve ever since Obama became POTUS. For example, until Obama’s regime I had never heard of (or at least paid attention to) Saul Alinsky, Cloward/Piven, “The Frankfurt School,” Agenda 21, Fabians, George Soros, “Club of Rome,” Gramsci/Lucaks, Frank Marshall Davis, Sunni and Shia Islam, Keynes, Mises/Hayek, and on, and on, and….

One of the more surprising conclusions I reached as a result of my studies is that left wing elites are typically insufferable snobs – and that epiphany soon morphed into the realization that elites, regardless of what political wing they belong to, are all insufferable snobs (well, perhaps not all…but near enough as to make no difference).
Trump – the “Blue Collar Billionaire” – understands the frustrations, anger, and righteous indignation of “we the people” to a degree that perhaps no presidential candidate in my lifetime has (and I’m no spring chicken). Trump has an unapologetic love for America and its people, especially its downtrodden middle class. He says that the people who attend his meetings love him, and you know what – he’s right. And he returns that love.

Compare that to the disdain historically shown by the Left toward the middle class – the long despised bourgeois. Snobbishness is what it comes down to – “How dare they ape their betters. They dare to think they can equal our exalted station in life, our stellar intellects and moral superiority? As if. Down with the bourgeois, up with the proletariat!” (“Down with the bourgeois, up with the proletariat!” can be read as “Down with the uppity middle class and replace them with docile sheep”).

At the end of the day what you get with such corrupt tunnel-visioned arrogance is, of course, the mass of people living in poverty while a relatively small elite lord it over them. That’s not progress, that’s not progressive, that’s the “same old/same old” formula that the world has known forever. One of America’s greatest achievements was its large, robust, respected middle class. Not anymore, not these days – and it is all the result of very intentional social engineering.

I’m not going to try and beat people over the head with how snobbish the elites are…you either see it or you don’t, or you’ll come to see it or you won’t. In any event, I should mention before leaving the topic that, as I implied earlier, the right wing elites (the “I’ll vote for Hillary before Trump” faux conservatives) are every bit as snobbish as anyone on the left.

In closing I would like to remind readers of all the people who have said that they will leave the country if Trump is elected president. A sobering thought indeed — let us all pause and reflect on the results of a Trump win for a moment….

Callooh! Callay! O frabjous day! Here, let me help you pack – musn’t miss your ship or plane or whatever. Bye-bye, so long, see ya – don’t let the door hit you on your butt on the way out. Do forget to write. Sayonara, hasta la vista, bon voyage! Ta-ta, off you go.
Whew, thought they’d never leave! Thank you Lord! Good riddance to bad rubbish.

DNC Jihad Against Trump Led by Muslim

by Rev. Austin Miles


Hillary Clinton hired a Muslim with connections to The Muslim Brotherhood, to speak at the DNC Convention. He was brought there for an ingenious plot to knock Donald Trump out of the presidential race.

The speaker was Khizr Khan accompanied by his wife Ghazala who sat quietly and motionless throughout the talk. Khan appeared to be genuinely sincere as he spoke about his son, Humayun, who was in the U.S. Armed Services and was killed in action.

Pictures were shown of his grave site at Arlington National Cemetery. He explained how his is only one of many Muslim families who love America. So far,so good.

Then, without warning, Khizr suddenly got in the saddle and  charged against Trump with the intention of lassoing him and bringing him to the ground. He accused Trump of having never sacrificed for his country and said his proposal to ban Muslims from coming to the U.S. “violated the Constitution.” NOTE: That is not true. During times of war and serious conflict, The Constitution allows that certain people can be banned from entering the U.S.  Period!

Khan accused him of being a draft dodger (he was deferred due to a medical condition) and the papers, especially Associated Press, ran with it, printing that he made derogatory comments to a Gold Star Family. The Leftist news media headlined: Trump Attacked Parents of a Fallen Soldier, Trump Showed No Respect for a Gold Star Family, Trumps Patriotism Questioned,  

 Now hold on there!  Trump had absolutely nothing to do with the events described on that stage. He did NOT attack the Khans. They did all the attacking with no provocation whatsoever from Trump. They were paid by Hillary to do exactly what they did.

During an interview on Fox News, Trump was asked about why Ghazala just sat there during the speech by her husband. Trump suggested that he did not know, that maybe that is part of the Muslim faith, that the women should be silent.  That was not an accusation but more like an inquiry since, as he said clearly, he did not KNOW why she sat there silently. Yet the newspapers declared that Trump attacked Hahn’s wife.

The leftist news media is milking this for all its worth, stating that (this is the latest today) Trump may withdraw from the race. They can only wish. Still they are trying to convince the world that this is true in an effort to weaken his campaign..

It would be a slander to Obama’s reputation to not expect him to jump into this fray, stating, now get this, that “Trump is woefully unprepared and ‘unfit’ to serve as president” and urged GOP leaders to ‘withdraw their backing for his candidacy. How’s that again?

It is interesting that accusers judge others according to their own standard of conduct.

The Muslims claim that The Crusades sought out Muslims in foreign lands, and tried to force them into Catholicism.  This is another lie. It was ONLY after 458 years of attacks against Christians by Muslims that FINALLY the Crusades took place. The reason for the Leonine Wall around The Vatican was to protect it against Islamic attacks. Donald Trump did NOT go on the warpath with the Khans. He responded after their relentless attacks on him, the same as in The Crusades. Let’s get that straight.

Below is a letter to Khizr Khan by Chris Mark that puts it in proper perspective.

An Open Letter to Khizr Khan July 31, 2016

Dear Mr. Khan,

I want to preface this letter by stating that I respect your son’s sacrifice for this great nation.  By all accounts, he is a true hero that sacrificed himself in service to our country. For that I am thankful.

As a veteran, I watched your comments at the Democratic National Convention with a mixture of sadness, and anger.  The United States has a military comprised of volunteers.

Every single member has made the conscious choice to join the military and serve.  There is not a single service member who has been forced into service.  It is important for all service members (and apparently, their families) to understand that service to this great nation does not imbue one with special privileges or rights.

I found your comments troubling when you said: “Have you ever been to Arlington cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave patriots who died defending the United States of America. You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”

Does it matter whether Mr. Trump has sacrificed “…nothing and no one?”…has Ms. Clinton “sacrificed” for this nation?  How about Mr. Obama?   Your comment stating that Mr. Trump “…has sacrificed no one” is alarming.  Are you intimating that YOU sacrificed?  Sir, your son willingly sacrificed himself.

As a father I cannot imagine the pain you must feel but his sacrifice is his own.  He was not forced to serve.

I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member to parade you into the DNC to denounce Donald Trump.

Did you watch when protesters at the DNC booed and heckled Medal of Honor recipient  Capt. Florent Groberg? Did you notice your party interrupting the moment of silence for slain police officers?  Your own hypocrisy in not denouncing these acts and instead using the DNC as a platform to make a political point is disgraceful.

The simple fact is that whether one served or sacrificed does not give greater power to their statements.  One vote is as valuable as another.  That sir, is why our Country is great.  Your condemnation of one person for a statement while standing idly as your party disparages veterans and police officers is the height of hypocrisy.

To conflate the need to prevent potential terrorists from entering our country with the belief that ‘all Muslims’ should be banned is simply wrong and disingenuous.

As a reminder, Mr. Trump said: ” “Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life.”

The irony of your son’s own death at the hands of these very people in Iraq should not be ignored.  I have little doubt that your son would have recognized the need to protect our country from these very people.  In fact, he held is own troops back so that he could check on a suspicious car.  Your son understood sacrifice and how to protect “his people”…’his soldiers’….’his fellow Americans’…

As you continue to make the media circuit and bask in the glow of affection cast upon you by a party that has little regard for your son’s own sacrifice, and veterans in general, I would ask you to consider your comments and your position more closely.


Chris Mark

US Marine and Navy Veteran.

Photo Caption: Khizr Khan


Gump on Hillary

gump on hillary


Trump and Democratic Political Incorrectness

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

Remember the time a presidential candidate suggested that Gandhi used to run “a gas station down in St. Louis.” No it wasn’t Trump. That was Hillary Clinton. Had Trump said it, we would still be hearing about it. But since Hillary Clinton was responsible for it, it went down the memory hole.

Along with her more recent “Colored People Time” gag.

And who can forget the time that Trump said, “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.” But that wasn’t Trump. It was actually Vice President Joe Biden.

But still it was indisputably offensive when Trump told the Asian Chamber of Commerce, “I don’t think you’re smarter than anybody else, but you’ve convinced a lot of us you are.”

Then he followed that up by joking, “One problem that I’ve had today is keeping my Wongs straight.”

You would have to be ridiculously politically incorrect or an outright buffoon to say something like that to the Asian Chamber of Commerce. And this is exactly why Trump is… but wait, those lines actually came from Democratic Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid.

Reid recently popped up to call Trump’s comments racist. And he ought to know. Harry Reid believed that Obama was electable because he was “light-skinned” with ”no Negro dialect”.

Memories are short when it comes to Democratic racial and ethnic stereotypes. Not to mention slurs.

Trump is certainly not the only prominent politician who says wildly politically incorrect things. Democrats do it all the time. And they do it in more pointed ways.

Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez is running for the Senate. Sanchez is a racist who accused the “Vietnamese” of “trying to take this seat” when running against a Vietnamese-American candidate. Last year she managed to ridicule both Hindus and Native Americans with one slur.

There was the time that Bill Clinton suggested that, Obama “would have been getting us coffee”. Or when Biden described his future boss as the, “first sort of mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and nice-looking guy.” Despite two terms in which Republicans were accused of racially stereotyping Obama with secret dog whistles, nothing any major Republican figure said was anywhere as bad as what Obama’s Democratic predecessor and his own Senate ally had said about him.

Democrats actually say politically incorrect things all the time. Trump has become famous because he’s one of the few Republicans who talks like a Democrat and says the sort of things that Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid have no problem saying in private and even in public speeches.

A Republican who told the Asian Chamber of Commerce that he had trouble “keeping my Wongs straight” would have been forced out in disgrace by a combination of media pressure and Republican shame. And having standards of respectable civic discourse is not a bad thing. But standards that are applied unilaterally to one side are not standards, they’re weapons.

Political correctness is a weapon brought out to punish political opponents for statements that run the gamut from offensive to those whose offensiveness is entirely manufactured by the media’s political echo chamber, such as Romney’s comments about having binders of qualified female candidates. Challenging political correctness does more than challenge these standards. It challenges the dishonest ways in which they are applied for political purposes.

Any of the above comments would have disqualified a Republican, but barely rate mention for Democrats. The truth about Trump is that he hasn’t said anything that plenty of Democrats haven’t said.

Long before Trump’s call for a Muslim ban, President Carter responded to the Iran hostage crisis by banning Iranians from America. Harry Reid had also proposed eliminating birthright citizenship long before Trump did. Building a wall with Mexico? Hillary Clinton called for it back in the Senate. Before she was condemning “talking about building walls”, she was talking about building walls. And warning that, “A country that cannot control its borders is failing at one of its fundamental obligations”.

The media has made a game out of pretending that everything Trump says is shocking. When Trump poses with a taco bowl and posts, “I love Hispanics”, the media gets giddy with outrage. But when Hillary Clinton foolishly panders to black voters by claiming to carry around hot sauce in her purse or posts, “7 Things Hillary Clinton has in Common with Your Abuela”, there are shrugs.

All politicians have their cringeworthy pandering moments. But the media chooses which of them it plays up and which of them it plays down.

That’s why Trump is shocking only in contrast to a Republican field that had been trained to carefully avoid even the faintest suggestion of insensitive or politically incorrect remarks. And that training did no good whatsoever with a media establishment that insisted on manufacturing gaffes no matter what.

Trump is often just as unrestrained as Democrats are. He feels the same freedom to speak his mind that is enjoyed by Joe Biden or Bill Clinton. He pays as little attention to political correctness as Harry Reid.

And it’s time that we were honest about that.

Sensitivity is not a bad thing. But what we have is not sensitivity as a value, but as a weapon. When one side is free to be as offensive as it wishes to be with no consequences whatsoever, then eventually the other side will escalate to match it. When oversensitivity becomes used to enforce an agenda that limits basic personal freedoms then the reaction to that will run roughshod over any and all sensitivities.

Political correctness, like all forms of censorship, is about power. Not fairness, sensitivity or decency. Trump is taking the license to be politically incorrect back from Democrats. The ability to determine what may or may not be said is the essence of power in a system where discourse dictates elections.

If Democrats are truly outraged by Trump, they might want to try looking in a mirror.

Rescue Interrupted

Well worth the watch, Benghazi Truth

Reflections on “13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi”

This Email Proves Hillary Was Lying. Lynch Must Prosecute!

If This doe’s not prove Hillary was lying, than I don’t know what will.——————————————————————————-

Smoking Gun: Email Suggests Hillary Broke Law

Clinton instructed an aide to remove the classification marking from information, a federal offense

by Keith Koffler

The latest batch of Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department early Friday contain what may be the smoking gun that forces the Justice Department to charge the former secretary of state with a crime, according to former federal prosecutor Joseph diGenova.

“This is gigantic,” said diGenova. “She caused to be removed a classified marking and then had it transmitted in an unencrypted manner. That is a felony. The removal of the classified marking is a federal crime. It is the same thing to order someone to do it as if she had done it herself.”

On the June 17, 2011, email chain with senior State Department adviser Jake Sullivan, Clinton apparently asked Sullivan to change the marking on classified information so that it is no longer flagged as classified.

Clinton, using her private email server, asks for “the TPs,” apparently a reference to talking points being prepared for her. Sullivan, who is using his official State Department email, responds, “They say they’ve had issues sending secure fax. They’re working on it.” Clinton responds, “If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w[ith] no identifying heading and send nonsecure.”

It’s not clear if Sullivan actually followed through on Clinton’s orders. But if he did, it may expose Clinton to serious legal jeopardy.

“This makes it impossible for the bureau not to recommend charges,” diGenova said of the FBI. “This makes it impossible not to go forward, and it certainly ties the hand of the attorney general.”

Some have speculated that while the FBI may recommend charges, Attorney General Loretta Lynch might try to avoid doing so for political reasons.

Related: The Pallid Prince: Bill Can’t Rescue Hillary

The revelation also appears to put the lie to Clinton’s claim that she never handled classified information on her server.

“I did not send nor receive anything that was classified at the time,” she has claimed. By instructing her aide to send her material marked classified, it is clear that she not only may have received classified information, but that it was indeed “classified at the time.”

“This means that when she said, ‘I never received anything marked classified,’ she in fact did,” diGenova said.

David Bossie, president of the watchdog group Citizens United, said the email could become the emblem of Hillary’s email scandal.

“It proves that Hillary Clinton affirmatively instructed senior staff to send classified data to an unsecured server,” he said. “With that, it cements into history, much like the famous Bill Clinton finger wag.”




A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. — Thomas Jefferson


Donald J. Trump

What’s not to like about Mr. Trump who wants to Make America Great Again?

His position on US-China Trade is that we need massive reform. Instead of allowing Wall Street insiders who want to move US manufacturing and investment offshore, we need to bring back jobs to America. He says, “We need smart negotiators who will serve the interests of Americans.”

Tax Reform is very much needed. Mr. Trump says too many jobs have been shipped overseas, and too many middle class families can no longer make ends meet. He has a plan and it includes:

1. Tax relief for middle class Americans: In order to achieve the American dream, let people keep more money in their pockets and increase after-tax wages.
2. Simplify the tax code to reduce the headaches Americans face in preparing their taxes and let everyone keep more of their money.
3. Grow the American economy by discouraging corporate inversions, adding a huge number of new jobs, and making America globally competitive again.
4. Doesn’t add to our debt and deficit, which are already too large.

Our veterans are very important to Mr. Trump, and the guiding principle of his plan is to ensure our veterans have convenient access to the very best care. I couldn’t agree more.

The Trump Plan Will:

1. Ensure our veterans get the care they need wherever and whenever they need it. No more long drives. No more waiting for backlogs. No more excessive red tape. Just the care and support they earned with their service to our country.
2. Support the whole veteran, not just their physical health care, but also by addressing their invisible wounds, investing in our service members’ post-active duty success, transforming the VA to meet the needs of 21st century service members, and better meeting the needs of our female veterans.
3. Make the VA great again by firing the corrupt and incompetent VA executives who let our veterans down, by modernizing the VA, and by empowering the doctors and nurses to ensure our veterans receive the best care available in a timely manner.

Second Amendment Rights – The Donald says protecting our Second Amendment rights will make America great again. He says, “The Constitution doesn’t create that right – it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.” It is a God given right.

Mr. Trump wants a National Right to Carry, and soldiers on all military bases to be armed. Only logical. Gun and magazine bans, and background checks are basically a failure because criminals will not obey the laws. In reality, these laws are to document gun owners for the federal data base.

It is my opinion that we have the right to carry without the purchase of a permit. That right is granted in the US Constitution, but Trump has gone farther than any politician in the last 60 years in wanting to guarantee our Second Amendment rights.

Immigration Reform is at the top of the list for Donald Trump and it is what has coalesced the people to get behind this man. The mere fact that thousands upon thousands of illegal aliens cross our borders every year, the fact that this administration is bringing in thousands upon thousands of young Muslim refugees into our country now, does not bode well for the safety of American citizens. Donald Trump wants it stopped!

Here are the three core principles of real immigration reform:

1. A nation without borders is not a nation. There must be a wall across the southern border.
2. A nation without laws is not a nation. Laws passed in accordance with our Constitutional system of government must be enforced.
3. A nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation. Any immigration plan must improve jobs, wages and security for all Americans.

Trump says Common Core is a disaster, it has ruined American education. He’s also talked about ending Student Data Mining and FERPA in his New Hampshire Speech. [Link]

Obamacare needs to be trashed according to The Donald, and he’s absolutely right about that. There is so much more that Mr. Trump wishes to do to make America great again.

Mr. Trump really is our only hope to salvage our nation, and to at least bring her back to where we can once again be proud to be Americas. He is not perfect, but he listens to the people, and he reads what is sent to him. Donald Trump is an extraordinary businessman and a very brilliant one at that. Can he save our nation? You bet he can! Oh, and by the way, Ben Swann says,Trump is Right About Legal Authority to Ban Muslim Immigrants, Other Pres. Candidates Hypocritical on Muslims?


Ted Cruz

Kelly Nelson’s recent article: Ted Cruz, Henry Kissinger, and the Globalists, covered a great deal about Ted Cruz, his wife Heidi, and the North American Union. It also covered many of his advisors and their very neo-conservative leftist connections. In the article, I mentioned billionaire Robert Mercer being the top funder for Cruz. Well, guess what the UK Guardian just revealed?

A little-known data company, Cambridge Analytica, now embedded within Cruz’s campaign and indirectly financed by his primary billionaire benefactor, Robert Mercer, paid researchers at Cambridge University to gather detailed psychological profiles about the US electorate using a massive pool of mainly unwitting US Facebook users built with an online survey.

Cambridge Analytica is now using so-called “psychographic profiles” of US citizens in order to help win Cruz votes, despite earlier concerns and red flags from potential survey-takers. They have received at least $750,000 this year from Cruz’s campaign. The “behavioral microtargeting” company has received around $2.5m over the last two years from super Pacs to which Mercer or his family members have donated.

Cruz said his funding and outreach apparatus “is very much the Obama model – a data-driven, grassroots-driven campaign – and it is a reason why our campaign is steadily gathering strength.”

Oh yeah Ted, we all loved the “Obama model.”

When Nelson Mandela died, Ted flew over to attend his funeral. Mandela was a cruel Marxist, who would not renounce violence, even to get out of prison. (My close friend recently learned, at an event where Heidi Cruz spoke in Raleigh, that Heidi’s father was a pastor and was a missionary in Africa for 40 years. Maybe that explains Ted’s devotion to South Africa. However, it does not explain showing respect for that violent Marxist, Nelson Mandela.) [Link] See video below of Ted Cruz supporting Obama’s trade deal, “Trans Pacific Partnership” (TPP).H

Ted Cruz has stated that “School Choice is today’s civil rights issue.” Obviously, he knows that federal law states that if one penny of tax monies go to a private, religious or home schooled child, all the federal regulations go along with it. [Link]

Ted Cruz, the Senator from Texas, has gone on record supporting an Article V convention. This man should know better. The dangers of a Constitutional Convention today are horrendous. Why is a supposedly Constitutional candidate pushing for something that the Left wants so badly? Even more disturbing is the fact that this GOP candidate for President is not only on board with it, but has very close ties to some of the more nefarious plans for the convention. [Link] The Right and the Left are Working Together to Rewrite our Wonderful Constitution.

There’ll be much, much more on Ted Cruz in Kelly Nelson’s future articles.

Marco Rubio

Consider the situation with Sheldon Adelson and Marco Rubio.

Adelson is a very wealthy casino owner. He wants cheap labor which means he wants amnesty for illegal aliens. Rubio wants to sell Adelson the amnesty he wants, and Adelson wants to buy Rubio. In the last election, Adelson gave $20 M to Third Waver, Newt Gingrich. Heidi and Alvin Toffler’s “Third Wave” was originally founded by Marx, Hitler, and Plato.

But Adelson’s support is heavily conditioned on his main priorities: a warmongering foreign policy, amnesty, and outlawing internet gambling.

Where does Rubio stand on those issues?

On the foreign policy front, Rubio has been eager to continue the failed policies of regime change in the Middle East. He got his wish in Libya and Egypt and now wants to continue the pattern in Syria. This is the guy whosaid of Iraq, “Well, it’s not nation-building. We are assisting them in building their nation.” For good measure, Rubio recently stated his openness to shooting down Russian jets, a major plus for those who feel we haven’t had a world war recently enough.

On the immigration front, Rubio helped craft the Gang of 8 bill which offered citizenship to illegals, which he later recanted. This so-called conservativeSenator had no problem joining with the likes of the other Gang of Eight senators—Republicans John McCain and Jeff Flake of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Democrats Dick Durbin of Illinois, Chuck Schumer of New York, Michael Bennet of Colorado, and Robert Menendez of New Jersey. This group leans more towards communism and never heard of old-right Constitutional conservatism.

However, in 2015 he again came out in favor of a pathway to citizenship. Rubio also supports Obama’s executive amnesty. Oh, and he says different things to Hispanic audiences.

Finally, Rubio signed onto a bill to outlaw internet gambling. Of course, Adelson opposes internet gambling because it competes with his brick-and-mortar casino business. These candidates will do anything for money for their campaigns, and then they are beholden to their donors. Trump is the only one who is not.

Rubio’s other donors are equally as troublesome, the Koch brothers, Paul Singer, who attends the World Economic Forum, and dumped hundreds of thousands into Common Core. Singer was also a major financial force behind the Rubio-Obama amnesty and immigration expansion push in 2013. Another donor is Doug Deason who is a member of the Koch brothers’ political network.

Rubio’s donors alone should convince anyone that Marco Rubio is no conservative. More on Rubio in another article.


“She has fooled, and made fools of, many, many people over the years. Those who think she would be a good president are worse than fools.”  Patricia McCarthy, the American Thinker.

Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation when she was a young lawyer of 27? The information came from Democrat Jerry Zeifman, a counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Clinton on the Watergate investigation. Zeifman’s 2006 book, “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” states that she “… engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules.” [Link]

Fraud and ethics violations? You be the judge. Watch the four minute video below.

t would be impossible to list all the lies, flip-flops, scandals, hypocrisy and more that we’ve endured with this woman. I’ll cover just a few, and then link to websites who go through her entire life of deceit and evil.

Whitewater scandal,Chinagate, Travelgate scandal, Vince Foster Jr. Mystery (Read the link entitled “The Man Who Knew too Much.” Filegate Scandal – Craig Livingstone, director of the White House’s Office of Personnel Security “improperly” accessed FBI files on several hundred individuals. Mrs. Clinton called it a, “completely honest bureaucratic snafu.” “Cattle Future’s Miracle,” “Lootergate,” theft of White House furniture, and the Clinton Foundation scandal.

Then there’s Benghazi, where four men died because help was not sent. The White House and Secretary of State claimed it was over an anti-Muslim short film. Ironically, Hillary’s decision to obfuscate and dodge accountability to the public by using a private server for emails at the State Department, may actually be what has allowed her to “survive” an investigation relatively unscathed.

Check out “The out Hillary Clinton List of Lies.” It’s only 16 pages long.


We are in this mess because we have voted the wrong people into office locally and nationally. Remember, not everything that glitters is gold. Not all smooth talkers that smile have your best interests at heart or know what they’re doing. People have ears but can’t hear, they have eyes but can’t see. We as Americans must put on the whole armor of discernment. Look, Obama fooled us twice. Let’s not be fooled again. Remember “Hope and Change”? It’s time to wake up.

Who would you rather have as president to save America? The Good, the Bad, or the Ugly? The choice is up to you, the American electorate. God has given us another chance to save what is left of our beloved Republic. Come election day, please come out in droves and vote, because the enemy will. This is not a conservative, liberal, or independent issue, it’s a survival issue. Do it for the love of God and your children and grandchildren.


If You Don’t Make This Go Viral, You Have No Sense of Humor

A Suspicious Mind

Reposted from HenryMarkHolzer.blogspot.com

Despite leaks, insiders opining, considerable disinformation, and mixed signals, VP Joe Biden finally copped out from seeking the democrat party nomination for president. Essentially, the undergraduate and adult plagiarizer confessed to waiting too long and now being unable to organize the indispensable staff and ground game to compete with Hillary Rodham Clinton–even though he’s had months, if not longer, to do so.

But what if….?

What if Biden’s handlers, aided and abetted by the White House, perhaps at the last minute, have another game plan?

What if the pro-Biden, anti-Clinton forces thought that his coming in now might, at least, cause ill will among many democrats and, at worst, cause a schism in the party that could cost Clinton unacceptable defections on her road to the nomination and then hurt her in the general election?

What if they (especially the White House) has inside knowledge that, at best the forthcoming FBI report will wound Clinton considerably and, at worst that she will be indicted thus costing her (and the democrat party) the general election?

What if the game is to keep Biden out, and allow Hillary to be irreparably wounded?

What if, when that happened, a “spontaneous” draft-Biden movement suddenly appeared?

What if Biden then, doubtless with tears in his eyes, answered the call of his party and for the sake of the country (and the children) jumped into the ring–the old-warrior savior of all that’s good on the far-left spectrum of American politics?

No fingerprints, no having hurt Hillary, no dividing the party. Just good old uncle Joe standing tall once again to defend mom, apple pie, and, of course, the working man and middle class.

Just wondering……………


Trump: I’m the Reason Why Biden Won’t Run… Here’s the Bombshell Reason Why [EXCLUSIVE]


A source with strong political connections told Conservative Tribune exclusively Wednesday morning why Vice President Joe Biden would not be getting into the Democrat primary after all.

According to the source, current GOP front-runner Donald Trump has “dirt” on Biden that would presumably prevent his winning the Democrat nomination.

The precise nature of the information Trump has about Biden was not immediately available, but the source expected Trump to release — or at least hint — at it later Wednesday, probably through social media.

Biden made the announcement earlier in the day, telling the American people: “Unfortunately, I believe we’re out of time,” according to the Associated Press.

Speculation has risen about the possible entrance of Biden into the race as Hillary Clinton’s campaign has begun to stumble. Accusations of improper handling of classified materials on her private email service while secretary of state, and an FBI investigation into it, have dampened some Democrats’ enthusiasm for the former first lady.

As recently as today, political pundit and former Bill Clinton consultant Dick Morris speculated that if Biden were to enter the race, it would be a good indication that the vice president holds insider knowledge about the possibility of a forthcoming indictment against Clinton.

Now, our source tells us there is definitely some insider knowledge involved in the dynamic of Biden’s decision — but it’s knowledge held by Trump about Biden, not Biden about Hillary.

The Video Hillary REALLY Does Not Want You To See

On that tragic and fateful day, September 11, 2012, at 5:50 am, Hillary sent this email to her closest aide, Huma Abedin:

Hillary -Henri Levy film request 9-11-12

It ‘s a French documentary called, “Le Serment de Tobrouk”  aka “The Oath of Tobruk”   featuring Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton bragging, “I told the president that there was a good argument for American involvement and leadership.”

Her buddy, Harvey Weinstein bought the rights to the English language version in May, 2012 saying,  American audiences will get a behind-the-scenes glimpse of how our government and the French government worked together to stop the slaughter of innocent civilians and brilliantly handled the overthrow of a government.”

Le Serment de Tobrouk


Of course, it’s been suppressed by her buddy, Harvey Weinstein.  We will probably never have an English language version.

The subtitled French version has a trailer on YouTube.  It’s damning enough, I think.  Hillary’s bit is at the 45 second point.

VCDL: McAuliffe Comes After Guns With Executive Orders



Showing once again that he’s a politician and not a statesman, our illustrious governor, Terry McAuliffe, put in place some executive orders dealing with firearms. One of those orders prohibits open carry (and soon, concealed carry) in state agency buildings!

Not only does McAuliffe owe some payback to Michael Bloomberg for a million dollar campaign donation, but McAuliffe also wants to be Hillary’s running mate. He’s puffing up his chest, so he can say on the campaign trail, “I single-handedly saved Virginia from gun violence!”

Of course, he’s doing no such thing, but he is about to set Virginia up for a massacre in one of our state agencies now that’s he’s telling all the criminals, terrorists, and criminally insane that Virginia state agencies are going to be “gun-free zones.”

Forget that all but one of the public massacres over the last decade or two have been in “gun-free zones.” But hey, in the “big scheme of things” how important is a massacre or two in comparison to the absolute necessity that McAuliffe become the next U.S. Vice President? <eye roll>

So, let’s take a look at McAuliffe’s executive orders and see what they really mean or really do:

1. Establish a joint task force to prosecute gun crimes

I had no idea that Virginia wasn’t prosecuting people who committed crimes with a gun! Oh, wait, we ARE already prosecuting them… So what is this about?

It’s about Universal Background Checks and also harassing private sellers.

The Universal Background Check part is all choreography: McAuliffe’s having the Task Force “identify ways to pursue the illegal transfer of weapons.” The Task Force he’s setting up will be pre-programmed to say that Universal Background Checks are needed so that the government knows exactly what guns each person legally owns for the purpose of tracing all guns used in crimes. Of course criminals don’t go through background checks, as they typically buy stolen guns off the street or use straw-purchasers to buy their guns. But this isn’t about stopping crime, it’s about McAuliffe being VP, registering guns, and eventually being able to do confiscations as they are doing right now in California!

On private sales, McAuliffe is signaling that he’s going to harass private sellers by trying to show that they are selling enough guns (some arbitrary number) to make them dealers and then prosecute them for being dealers operating without a license. BATFE already does this, but for McAuliffe you simply cannot have enough government harassment when it comes to gun owners.

2. Authorize the Attorney General to coordinate and bring criminal cases against firearms law offenders

Here we go again: I had no idea that Virginia wasn’t prosecuting people who committed crimes with a gun! Oh, wait, we ARE already prosecuting them… So what is this about?

Grandstanding/politics and nothing more.

3. Establish a tip line for illegal gun activity

We need a special “tip line” in order to contact the police about illegal activity using a gun? And here I thought that’s what 9-1-1 was for! Silly me. So all this time the police were not getting calls about guns being used illegally? Wow.

4. Trace guns used in crime

The police know when it makes sense to trace a gun based on the crime committed, the person(s) involved in the crime, and the exact circumstance of the crime. That way they don’t waste precious police resources (Federal, state, and local) by unnecessarily tracing firearms.

This is just more grandstanding/politics and part of the scheme to push for Universal Background Checks.

5. Encourage judges and prosecutors to seek gun forfeiture in felony and other cases

Here McAuliffe condescendingly deigns to “educate” judges and prosecutors, while asking them to ABUSE their power by ordering the confiscation and destruction of firearms routinely. I hope we have better judges and prosecutors than that, but we’ll see.

When someone loses their driver’s license, does the government confiscate his home or his car? No. He just can’t drive a vehicle on a public street anymore. His wife can still drive and use that car.

The value of someone’s firearms collection rightfully belongs to the person and his family. If someone picks up a bald eagle feather in the woods then gets convicted of the associated felony, he can no longer own his guns. But at least he can give those guns to his wife, son, daughter, uncle, or anyone else. Or he can have those guns sold for him and the proceeds go back to him and his family.

What McAuliffe is doing is asking for a blanket confiscation of firearms, with associated loss of a considerable amount of money to a family.

6. Banning OPENLY CARRIED firearms in state government buildings

We need to do something about all those shootings in Virginia state agency buildings that are in the news every day! Uh, wait, er, you know – I don’t recall there EVER being a shooting in a Virginia state government building.

McAuliffe plans on fixing that situation by creating victim rich environments for criminals, terrorists and the criminally insane to shoot fish in a barrel in new gun-free zones without risk to themselves. Lives, safety, and truth are all expendable when the vice presidency is at stake.

Effective sometime in the next 30 days, or possibly immediately, we don’t know for sure, McAuliffe is prohibiting OPEN CARRY in STATE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS such as:

  • DMV;
  • The Aviation Museum;
  • ABC;
  • Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Department of Conservation and Recreation; and
  • Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Department of Education Department of Health Housing Development Authority to name just a few.

7. Banning CONCEALED firearms in state government buildings

McAuliffe is going to have the Department of General Services create a proposed regulation to prohibit CONCEALED CARRY in STATE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS.


VCDL will be watching these bans closely and will advise you on the next steps as necessary. For now, just standby as the VCDL Board of Directors and our attorneys plan our moves.

McAuliffe’s ban on firearms in state government buildings is a dangerous overstep of his powers. He is making law and the Executive branch cannot do that. This sets a bad precedent that even members of his own party in the General Assembly may not be happy with.

VCDL is definitely NOT going to roll over and take these actions lying down. VCDL IS going to fight McAuliffe every step of the way and, as a grassroots organization, we are going to need all of you to help in that fight! Once again – if you haven’t been participating in Lobby Day, thinking others will step in each year to carry your water, NOW is the time to stand with us.

And, Governor McAuliffe – this is for you: Since you believe that guns in government buildings are such a bad idea and endanger the safety of everyone, then I DARE YOU TO STAND ON YOUR PRINCIPLES AND DISARM OR DISSOLVE YOUR SECURITY TEAM! I DARE YOU.

Of course you won’t, because you know that criminals, terrorist, and the criminally insane can strike anywhere and at anytime and that they will urinate on your “gun-free zone” signs when they do so.

You, sir, are a hypocrite who places your life and your aspirations ahead of all else. Get used to the letters “VCDL,” as you will be seeing them frequently in the future.

Trump Leads Nevada Poll with Overwhelming Hispanic Support

Comment from a cyber friend:  The Establishment LIE that we must stop talking about immigration has been blown out of the water. Hispanics like Trump far more than most folks.


WASHINGTON, July 16, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — One America News Network, “OAN”, a credible source for 24/7 national and international news, released today its most recent 2016 Republican and Democratic Presidential Polling Results for Nevada conducted by Gravis Marketing. The results show that GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump has a commanding lead of 27.7%, with recently announced Presidential Candidate Scott Walker in second with 15%. In third is Ben Carson with 7.8% with Jeb Bush a point behind at 6.8%. Marco Rubio rounds out the top five with 5.4%. Undecided voters remain high at just over 20%.

With polled Hispanics, Presidential Candidate Trump received 31.4%, higher than his overall performance of 27.7%. The only other Presidential Candidate to receive double digit support by Hispanics is Scott Walker with 11.4%.

Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton leads with 55.4%, a 37.1% lead over Bernie Sander’s 18.3%. Clinton and Sanders are the only two candidates receiving double digit results. Coming in third and fourth are Senator Elizabeth Warren and Vice President Joe Biden. Ironically, neither have announced their candidacy. Warren has firmly stated that she will not be a 2016 Presidential Candidate.

The recently conducted One America News national poll also shows a heavily divided country when it comes to the job approval rating of President Obama. Democrats give President Obama a 73.5% approval rating whereas only 9.4% of Republicans approve of the President’s performance. The overall approval rating of President Obama stands at 42%.

According to Robert Herring, Sr., CEO of One America News Network, “The strong showing by Donald Trump can’t be ignored. Trump is clearly resonating with voters and, at least in Nevada, his 20 percent lead over Jeb Bush is commanding. Scott Walker, Ben Carson and Marco Rubio continue to poll well, yet it’s still early in the campaign process with over 20% of the Republicans polled still undecided. Bernie Sanders continues to poll in the double digits and possesses the closest threat to the Clinton campaign. One America News is pleased to provide our viewers with on-going up-to-date poll results and we have more upcoming state and national polling underway utilizing the polling firm Gravis Marketing.”

Doug Kaplan of Gravis Marketing states, “We see a significant change in Nevada from the last poll we conducted. Trump is taking the oxygen out of the room. He is taking votes from Bush and Cruz. Hillary is still over 50% and cruising to the nomination.”

Gravis Marketing, a nonpartisan research firm headquartered in Florida, conducted the polling. The random survey of 1,276 registered voters in Nevada was conducted during July 12 and 13th. The sample includes 623 Republican Primary participants, 416 Democratic Primary participants, and 237 planning to vote in 2016, but will not participate in the primary elections. The overall poll has a margin of error of ± 3% with 4% for Republican Primary and 5% for Democratic Primary. The total may not add up to 100% because of rounding. The polls were conducted using interactive voice response, IVR, technology and weighted separately for each population in the question presented. Gravis Marketing is the recipient of the 2013 American Association of Political Consultants award for 2012 Presidential Primary domestic and international phone calls.

One America News Network has been providing extensive coverage of the 2016 Presidential campaign, including numerous exclusive one-on-one interviews with the leading candidates. One America News Network will be releasing on-going 2016 Presidential polling results, including national Presidential polling results at the end of July. Complete poll results are available at http://www.oann.com/pollnevada