Daily Archives: December 12, 2025

‘Transgender’ Father Abandons 7 Children to Become ‘6-Year-Old Girl’

Some liberals express support for Stefonknee Wolschtt

A transgender father who abandoned his seven children to start a new life as a “6-year-old girl” is being celebrated by some liberals as a shining example of diversity.

46-year-old Stefonknee (pronounced ‘Stephanie’) Wolschtt is being profiled by numerous media outlets after he/she/xe revealed her story in a video interview for The Transgender Project.

Wolschtt is now dressing up and pretending to be a 6-year-old girl with her adopted family after being given an ultimatum by her ex-wife, who said she had to “stop being trans or leave”.

Wolschtt chose to abandon her 23-year marriage along with her seven kids and is now fulfilling her role as “little sister” to her new parents’ youngest granddaughter.

If you are having trouble trying to understand this insanity, don’t worry, the video below will help clear things up.

“I have an adopted Mommy and Daddy who are totally comfortable with me being a little girl and their children and their grandchildren are totally supportive,” said Wolschtt, who originally decided to be 8-years-old but then changed to being 6-years-old so she could be the youngest.

“We have a great time, we color, we do kids stuff – it’s called play therapy,” said Wolschtt.

The clip has received over 160,000 views, but feedback is overwhelmingly negative, while comments have been completely disabled.

Several liberals reacted by expressing support for Wolschtt and celebrating her story.

Wolschtt herself reacted to critics by vowing to take on “haters” face to face at a location in Toronto.

She also called for doxxing people who sent her mean messages on Twitter. Doxxing is where private information about an individual is broadcast on the Internet without the target’s permission, usually with malicious intent.

However, the vast majority of respondents to the Independent article had a very different opinion.

“Aww, it’s so great, what a hero, how brave, fawn, fawn…This is what happens when lunacy is championed by the right-on,” wrote one.

“This is not news, this is a mentally ill person who does not need pandering to but needs psychiatric help,” added another.

Another gay man accused Wolschtt of being an “interloper” and a “fetishist”.

One commenter also made a number of accusations against Wolschtt that – if true – demolish her attempt at framing herself as a victim.

“What this report doesn’t tell you is that this person was charged with assault and abuse of his wife and family. They were awarded a restraining order against him. He has also been convicted of harassment and threatening a a neighbour and being a peeping tom. Also, his arrangement with his “mummy and daddy” is a sexual one. He has waxed lyrically about visiting a fetish club with his daddy and how “girlie” he felt when “daddy” penetrated him for the first time. He is a disturbed, violent individual with a creepy fetish. And commentators think it’s ok for a six year year old girl to be brought into that situation to act as his “playmate” or “sister”? What the heck is wrong with you people. When will you wake up and smell the coffee about what is being pushed as some kind of noble vanguard of “trans rights”?

Given that multi-millionaire fame whore Bruce Jenner was handed a “courage” award by ESPN when he announced he was Caitlyn (no one was ever able to figure out why), surely it’s time for a similar accolade to be bestowed on Wolschtt.

It’s also fascinating how many social justice warriors and feminists, who would normally crucify a man for abandoning his wife and kids, are extremely supportive of Wolschtt simply because she now professes to be a 6-year-old girl.

Watching the Bear

By Jim Emerson, staff writer for COACHISRIGHT.COM

Russia has modernized her hardware, professionalized her military and begun using the modern tactics in Iraq and Afghanistan that have been used for decades by Western nations. Putin has learned a great deal from the Afghan invasion and the wars in Chechnya. He has adopted American tactics, especially those employed in air operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Under Putin’s leadership the Bear has learned to no longer rely exclusively on overwhelming brute force to win a war.

In 2014, the Russians started a proxy war to regain eastern Ukraine and annexed Crimea. Ukrainian forces have been fighting Russian-trained soldiers using Russian equipment and capabilities. Ukraine’s military has suffered heavy casualties at the hands of separatists. The United States sent advisers to train the Ukrainians as well supplying them with more modernized equipment to fight the Russian-trained fighters.

The United States military in Europe has been watching the Russians and is incorporating their tactics into a Joint Multinational Training Command Center in Hohenfels, Germany. For the first time in decades the Intelligence community is monitoring how the Russians are using their new weapons and capabilities, helping decision makers figure out how to defeat Russia’s new tactics. They had to be impressed by the Russian version of “Shock and Awe.” The tactics being used in Syria involve striking supply convoys with bombers and cruise missiles.

Russia is using drones to gather real time intelligence about the enemy to adjust their own schedule, once an advantage enjoyed exclusively by the U.S. Now American troops will have to deal with and learn how to neutralize another threat. The Russians have improved their capabilities of intercepting and jamming drones. Now Americans must determine how to defeat Russia’s drones and Special Forces.

The American intelligence community hasn’t taken Russia’s training and equipment upgrades seriously since the end of the Cold War. But now they are paying attention. Russia is being closely watched and Western militaries are taking note, seeing how Putin deploys his country’s forces and conducts forward operations. America is also watching how the Russians are working with allies to fight rebel forces in Syria. American military training is being updated in order to provide the advantage to our forces against Putin’s military. Most likely they will fight the West in a manner similar to the way Americans fought in Iraq and Afghanistan before Obama took office.

VIDEO: ‘Homeland’ Refugee Screening Coordinator Can’t Answer Basic Questions About Program

“I’m sorry, I didn’t bring any of the refugee numbers with me.”

The Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Screening Coordination in the Department of Homeland Security had one job Thursday: answer questions about the review of Syrian refugees.

She couldn’t do it.

“I would like to see if you could give us some numbers, so that the committee and the American people have this information,” Ohio U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, co-chairman of a joint subcommittee hearing on “Terrorism and the Visa Waiver Program,” told senior DHS employee Kelli Ann Burriesci yesterday.

In a 5 minute exchange posted to YouTube, he questioned: “How many Syrian refugees have entered the United States in the last year?”

“I’m sorry, I didn’t bring any of the refugee numbers with me, because I was prepared to talk about visa waiver, but I can certainly have us send that to you,” she replied.

“Do you know how many Americans have traveled to Syria in the last year?” Jordan pressed.

“I don’t have that number on me either,” Burriesci said.

Jordan: “So don’t know how many Americans have traveled and then returned?”

“I don’t have that number on me,” she said.

“How many visa program overstays are there currently in the United States?” Jordan asked.

Burriesci: “Sorry, I didn’t bring that number with me.”

The exchange clearly frustrated lawmakers.

Jordan: “Ms. Burriesci, when I look at the witness list, you have the longest title: Deputy Assistant Secretary Screening Coordination Office of Policy Department of Homeland Security. … It says screening coordination, now what screening are you coordinating? Is that inter agency or intra agency?”

Burriesci: “It’s both.”

“And the two biggest issues we’re dealing with right now, we had these terrible tragedies, these terrible terrorist attacks, and we’re talking about the refugee issue and the visa waiver program issue, and you can’t give us any numbers on either program?” Jordan questioned.

Burriesci: “So I came prepared to talk about the visa waiver program …”

Jordan cut her off there: “I just asked you how many visa program overstays are there and you said I don’t know.”

Burriesci: “Sir, I don’t have a number.”

“So when I ask you how many overstays of the visa waiver program may have traveled to Syria before they got here, do you know that number?” Jordan continued.

The question prompted Burriesci to attempt to steer the conversation into the details of the program, but Jordan wasn’t having it.

“Do we know if that person who’s here today, maybe not even on an overstay, do we know if that person has been to Syria before they came to the United States? Do we know that?” he questioned.

“ … I don’t know …,” Burriesci replied.

After a brief exchange, a frustrated Jordan tried to coax other information.

“How many American citizens are on the no-fly list right now? Can you give me that number?” he asked.

“I know there are American citizens on the list. It is an extremely small number, but I don’t have my numbers with me …,” Burriesci said.

Jordan summarized, according to BizPac Review:

“Ms. Burriesci, I’ve asked you the number of American’s who’ve traveled to Syria, you don’t know. The number of Americans who may have traveled and returned, you don’t know. The number of Syrian refugees who’ve entered the country in the last year, you don’t know. The number of visa waiver program overstays, you don’t know. The number of visa waiver overstays who may have been to Syria before they came here, you don’t know. And the number of American citizens on the no-fly list and you don’t know. And yet you are the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Screening Coordination, Office of Policy, Department of Homeland Security in front of the oversight committee and you can’t give us one single number to some, I think, pretty basic questions?”

Burriesci, a 1997 graduate of Binghamton University, struggled with other simple questions, as well.

U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, of Utah, also tried to pry out information to no avail, according to a video posted to YouTube.

She couldn’t explain whether most people come into the country by plane or by vehicle or on foot, how the department tracks those who leave by car, the number of people who have come in legally and overstayed, the departments or agencies that have access to the list of people who overstay, the databases the list is entered into, or how DHS asses potential threats among those who overstay.

Chaffetz pointed out that the subcommittee never requested to speak with Burriesci to begin with, and made it clear her non-answers to important national security questions aren’t going to fly.

“The request we sent was for (DHS Secretary) Jay Johnson, and Jay Johnson sent you as the expert on these topics, so this is why I think … Mr. Johnson, the secretary himself, needs to come answer these questions,” he said.

“You strike me as a very nice person, but these are basic questions about the functionality here and when we’re having a congressional hearing it is a waste of this committee’s time to send somebody who doesn’t know the answers to very basic questions,” Chaffetz continued. “ … You are accelerating the need to have multiple hearings on this.”

This spring, Burriesci discussed her role in DHS with Pipe Dream, “Binghamton University’s oldest and largest student newspaper.”

“I work on policies that facilitate the travel of individuals to the United States,” she said proudly in March. “The legitimate issuant of immigration benefits and policy that deters bad guys that threaten the United States.”

Ironically, Burriesci touted her experience and “preparedness” for the 30-something’s blazing-fast path through the ranks of the department.

“People tell me I’m lucky, but luck is when preparedness meets opportunity,” Burriesci said. “I was prepared to step up to the role. I knew my job and had the management skills needed if the opportunity was offered to me.”

The Middle Class Is Dying

America’s economy destroyed by design

 

Barack Obama is not seeking “legacy”

By Sylvia Thompson

To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is “legacy building” in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.

The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver’s benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.

I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.

Barack Obama’s sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama’s behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to “legacy building” is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.

This is my take.

Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that’s why.

Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America’s strength, and our strength infuriates him.

Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.

He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama’s objective is its destruction.

Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America’s attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.

Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.

Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.

It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump’s entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.

These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is “black.”

The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his “legacy building” will not be soon enough for me.

Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives’ getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump’s entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.

Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.

© Sylvia Thompson

The Death Of Great American Car Freedom

Communistic you say?

Kurt Russell Schools Reporter On Gun Control

Snake Plissken is right

These are the people who wait hours to see Trump

BY JON WARD FOR YAHOO.COM

Attendees at a rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump board the aircraft carrier USS Yorktown in Mount Pleasant, S.C., Monday, Dec. 7, 2015. (Photo: Mic Smith/AP)

CHARLESTON, S.C. — The people kept coming, and the line kept growing and growing.

The line of people to see Donald Trump snaked from the entrance to the USS Yorktown aircraft carrier down the parking lot, back up toward the entrance again and then back around alongside another lane of cars. By the time the fire marshal stopped letting people in, with almost 2,000 people onboard the ship, there were still around 1,000 people waiting outside.

For three hours, I walked among the Trump supporters standing in line, engaging them in conversations that lasted between 10 and 20 minutes, trying to better understand who they were and what had drawn them to come see Trump.

The portrait of a Trump supporter — drawn from those conversations as well as an extra three hours of interviews with attendees at a rally in northern Virginia the week before — did correspond much of the time to the basic profile: white, middle or working class, resentful of immigration, overwhelmed by dramatic changes in morality and technology, and fearful and angry about being left behind culturally and economically.

And so there were plenty of men like Willis Priester, a 63-year-old independent contractor, who told me that President Obama is a Muslim and that gay people are “the devil.” He was quick to condemn Muslims but hesitant to voice his objections to homosexuality. Once he did, however, it was clear he felt just as strongly, if not more so, about both the acceptance of gay marriage and about the sudden social disapproval of his views.

There was also no question that the heightened alarm over terrorism after the San Bernardino, Calif., attack on Dec. 2 was drawing some people toward Trump. Trump’s “toughness with the situation” was a point of appeal to one man who gives guided tours of the Yorktown, and others voiced similar sentiments.

But I was surprised at how a fair number of those I met at the Trump rallies were not like Priester. Trump is drawing people who defy stereotype. They were not necessarily older, or all that conservative, or even white. What’s needed, they feel, is someone larger-than-life, someone who they hope can bring about change and fix what’s broken in the country through sheer force of personality.

For these people, Trump’s nativism and faux-populist appeals weren’t the main appeal. For some, Trump stood for a return to hard work and personal responsibility. For others, Trump appeals to something instinctive about their sense of what’s needed. And for others, his celebrity and entertainment appeal drew them and functions in their view as a form of leadership that may carry over into effective governance.

Curtis Quinn, 54, and his wife, Janelle, were stylishly dressed like the kind of couple you might see at a hip Brooklyn bar. The considerably younger Mrs. Quinn wore expensive-looking boots, formfitting pants with a camouflage design, and made the black “Make America Great Again” cap on her head look like a fashion statement.

She was originally from Milwaukee. Quinn was from just outside Boston originally, and is a thoracic surgeon here in Charleston. He wore a leather jacket covered in colorful patches, which represented the military service of five men in his family. One grandfather, he said, served in the “Lost Battalion” in World War I. Another served in the U.S. Navy. His father fought in the Battle of the Bulge. One uncle flew 48 bombing missions over Germany in World War II. And another uncle took part in the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in 1961, Quinn said.

“I will never be the caliber of people these people are,” Quinn told me in a Northeastern accent, referring to his forebears. “Never will be. I don’t have that in me. But I see that however lax I’ve became from this generation, the now generation is so much worse.”

“I just don’t see motivation. I don’t see hard work. I don’t see ethics. Things like that that I think are totally lacking,” Quinn said. He spoke with passion, but did not come across as angry. He was warm, engaging. The Quinns have two young children, and Curtis said he didn’t want them to grow up in a country where the government controls too much of human activity, commerce and thought.

Quinn thought Trump was the type of public figure who can bring back a cultural attitude of personal responsibility because he is “not afraid to say things.”

“I don’t think that he’s afraid to offend people. And I don’t think he’s trying to be offensive, but I also don’t think that he’s trying to also be so politically correct that he’s, like, bland,” he said.

I found in Quinn the kind of admirable decency I’d experienced in talking with Justin and Shelley Neal, both 39, in Manassas, Va., the week before. Justin works as a mechanic at Marine Corps Base Quantico, and Shelley in the local public school system. They have two daughters in high school, and we spoke at length about their fight to be good parents when their influence over their children has to compete with all that is coming at them through the Internet and mobile technology.

“These things,” Justin said, pulling out his iPhone, “are poisoning our kids’ minds.” The Neals have no-phone zones in their home and try to eat dinner together most nights and then do activities or watch movies or just talk with their girls afterward.

Justin said he preferred either New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie or former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, but he was at the Trump rally because the real estate magnate and reality TV personality was leading in the polls, and he wanted to see him firsthand. Justin said he doesn’t like the “modern day Robin Hood” mentality that takes money from hardworking Americans to give it to those on public assistance. And he described with frustration the medical bills that a friend was left with after the death of his wife. He looked tired.

Shelley shared her concern that younger generations are increasingly entitled and disrespectful, don’t know the value of work or responsibility, and often have immature parents who don’t teach their children right from wrong. “I work in the public schools,” she said. “I see what’s coming.”

The Quinns and the Neals were quite different from the caricature of the average Trump supporters, the kind of men who in Manassas yelled as Trump walked onstage, “Kick Hillary’s ass!” Another yelled back, “Which part of it?” And a third chimed in, “It’s disgusting!” Another man in front of me hopped up and down in excitement.

Sometimes ugly sentiments came from surprising sources. I talked with a middle-aged woman with short, close-cropped blond hair who wore a Red Cross pin on her cream-colored sweater. She helped raise money for the disaster relief organization across the region, she said. But when I mentioned illegal immigrants, she declared, “I want ’em all gone.” However, she was the only person I spoke with who said she agreed with Trump that all undocumented immigrants should be deported.

More puzzling than those who broke the mold of a typical Trump supporter were those who represented the gut factor. These were people who couldn’t articulate much about why they liked Trump or what they thought was wrong with the country, in part because they had never paid attention to politics before. But Trump was speaking to them on some deeper, primal level.

Alison Garbarini, a 30-year-old transplant to Charleston from Rumford, Me., who is working toward her master’s degree in public health, wore a mustard-colored pea coat. The first issue she mentioned was marijuana legalization. The second was the political influence wielded by large pharmaceutical companies. She favored a ban on military-style weapons.

“This is really the first time I’m really into politics,” she said. “I don’t know what it is. Something this year just started to get me more interested in politics and knowing that something needs to change — that’s obvious.”

I asked her why she felt that way. “Because the way things are going is not working. I know that. I don’t really have a more detailed answer. But I can see that things are not going well and have not been going well,” she said.

Obama is not “a strong leader,” said Garbarini, who also said she was no fan of former president George W. Bush. She said that “there’s just something about [Trump] that I think is very independent.”

“There’s something about the way — the issues he talks about, the way he talks, just the way he is in general — I find to be very independent,” Garbarini said.

Having never voted for president before, Garbarini said she’d watched every Republican and Democratic debate so far and definitely planned to vote in this election.

Spencer Guinard, 18, stood in line in Charleston by himself, without a jacket over his short-sleeved shirt as temperatures dropped into the 40s. His close-cropped hair gave him away as a recent military recruit, and indeed he had recently finished basic training in the U.S. Coast Guard.

Guinard, originally from Boise, Idaho, had never heard of most of the Republican presidential candidates. When I mentioned Marco Rubio, the Florida senator, Guinard told me he’d “never heard that name.” Trump, however, had got his attention.

“I just saw that he was breaking through in the news and thought I’d follow him a little bit, and I just liked some of the stuff he says, and I’m trying to learn more about him,” Guinard said.

“What was Trump saying that he liked?” I asked.

“Just how he says it, how it is,” the young man said.

Then there was the entertainment factor, which is drawing some people to Trump rallies who will never vote. But plenty of them probably will, like Mike Montiel, a 26-year-old temp agency recruiter.

Montiel seemed more than anything to want to be part of the spectacle himself. He had a Mexican flag and an American flag draped over his back and tied together around his neck, a sombrero on his head, and a small American flag in each hand. He held the flags up and shouted randomly, “Presidente Trump!”

“I’m a Mexican-American, and I thought it’d be fun to come support Donald Trump, like to show my heritage and that I like Donald Trump. I think he’s cool. I think he’s a straightforward guy,” said Montiel, who told me his father was born in Tijuana.

Mike Montiel, 26, is drawn to Trump’s celebrity. “I think he’s cool. I think he’s a straightforward guy,” Montiel said. (Photo: Jon Ward)

Montiel has lived in Charleston ever since visiting from Georgia for the weekend. “I really liked the beach, so like I went back to Augusta and I put my two-week notice in and then moved here with my friend and slept on his couch for like a month,” he said.

“I’m the only one in my family who likes Trump,” Montiel said. “I went to visit my family in Tijuana a couple months ago, and they’re like, ‘Mike, why do you like Trump?’ I’m like, ‘I don’t know.’”

John Mack, a 57-year-old African-American who owns a construction company and a radio station in the western part of the state, drove three hours to see Trump. Mack voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012 and praised the president’s performance in office. Mack, tall and fit in a dark suit and overcoat, said he is torn between voting for Trump and Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton. But he also rattled off a list of Trump’s shortcomings.

“Yeah, he says he’s gonna create jobs. Yeah, he says he’s gonna control the border. Yeah, he said he’s gonna make America better. But what’s the process? And I haven’t heard that, and I don’t know if he’s really got a firm hand on how to do it,” Mack said.

“So why was he open to supporting Trump again?” I asked.

“Well, he creates excitement that the world need to see. He creates that. That’s something he does. His knowledge of business is something that draws a lot of these folk out here,” Mack said. “He knows what it takes to stir up the people. He knows he has that vernacular.”

I asked whether Mack thought Trump wasn’t stirring up negative, ugly sentiments.

“No, it’s not negative. It’s not negative. It’s positive, because folk need to see the excitement of who we are supporting and if that’s who we choose to support, and folk need to figure out how to rally around him,” he said.

Mack laughed off Trump’s call to ban all Muslims from entering the U.S. in the wake of the San Bernardino terrorist attack.

“That’s not gonna happen. He knows that. But you got to say things and promote things that’s gonna tickle the ear of people to make them believe that’s what you’re going to do. But you know it and I know it that it’s not gonna happen,” he said. Mack added that Trump needed to “be careful with saying any negative things to any ethnicity.”

What I heard from Mack and from others is that they thought Trump was big enough for the job and for the problems facing the nation. Most people I talked to expressed a sense of being overwhelmed by the number and scope of challenges the country is facing, and bewildered about how to fix them. Trump could do something, anything, they thought.

“I think that people see Trump as just something different and looking for a change, and because he’s so far out there, there’s hope that he’s going to go in and shake things up in D.C.,” said Clyde Ray, a 54-year-old small business owner at the Manassas rally.

Ray, who started his own business in 2008 in the wake of a divorce before the economic crisis hit in the fall of that year, was frustrated with the economic impact of illegal immigration, with the cost of regulations and health care costs on his business, and with the nation’s fiscal challenges.

Ray understood that any president will “have his hands tied because you still gotta get everything pushed through Congress and the Senate, and they got the power of veto.”

And he recognized that Trump’s rhetoric and ideas are over the top, provocative and preposterous. “I think he’s out in left field,” Ray said.

Nonetheless, “people see it as an opportunity that even if the Senate or the House can veto some of what he’s going to do, there’s still checks and balances, but at least he’s going to be in there trying to seek the truth,” Ray said. “That’s what I see.”

 

BREAKING: U.S. Lawmakers Make Stunning Move To Investigate Obama For Helping ISIS

3REPOSTED FROM CONSERVATIVETRIBUNE.COM

Three committees in the House of Representatives announced Friday that they were launching concurrent investigations into allegations that President Barack Obama deliberately manipulated intelligence reports from Syria and Iraq, allowing the Islamic State group to thrive.

According to the Washington Examiner, Republican Reps. Ken Calvert of California, Mike Pompeo of Kansas and Brad Wenstrup of Ohio will lead the investigations for the Armed Services Committee, Intelligence Committee and the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, respectively.

“In addition to looking into the specific allegations, the Joint Task Force will examine whether these allegations reflect systemic problems across the intelligence enterprise in CENTCOM or any other pertinent intelligence organizations,” read a joint statement from Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Rodney Freylinghuysen, R-N.J.

The investigations by the House committees joined an investigation by the Pentagon’s inspector general’s office in relation to the Obama administration’s alleged manipulation of Islamic State group intelligence at U.S. Central Command.

A September report said that 50 intelligence officials at CENTCOM had signed a letter claiming intelligence on the Islamic State group had been doctored.

The report claimed that the Obama administration would deliberately punish any intelligence official who gave accurate assessments of terror group strength and didn’t doctor the information to make it look like the United States was winning the battle against them.

The Hatred of Muslims Against Jews

PROFILING is Wrong

Only Israel seems to be smart enough to actually know who they have to profile.

PROFILING is Wrong
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims …
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims

Also, Consider:

Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem

However:

Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem

MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM

Thus, This Naturally Leads To:

They’re not happy in Gaza
They’re not happy in Egypt
They’re not happy in Libya
They’re not happy in Morocco
They’re not happy in Iran
They’re not happy in Iraq
They’re not happy in Yemen
They’re not happy in Afghanistan
They’re not happy in Pakistan
They’re not happy in Syria
They’re not happy in Lebanon
They’re not happy in Nigeria
They’re not happy in Kenya
They’re not happy in Sudan
So - Where Are Muslims Happy?
They’re happy in Australia
They’re happy in England
They’re happy in Belgium
They’re happy in France
They’re happy in Italy
They’re happy in Germany
They’re happy in Sweden
They’re happy in the USA & Canada
They’re happy in Norway & India
They’re happy in almost every country that is Not Islamic. And who do they blame? Not Islam… Not their leadership… Not themselves… THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN. They want to change the countries they’re happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy and eventually got hammered.
Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
ISIS: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
(Oh, By The Way, most of these organizations are funded by the Nation of IRAN, to which Obama and Kerry want to give a few 100 Billion Dollars to show “our good faith” on the Nuclear Bomb deal)
Aha! Stupid me. These are the facts . . . so . . . please tell me again about the evils of profiling. I am certain that I will understand . . . eventually.
Ha! What a farce!