Daily Archives: November 19, 2015

Subway Guy sentenced to 15.6 years in prison

Thumbs UP

If the Duck Dynasty boys love Trump, you know full well Trump gets it with second amendment and Bibles…GO TRUMP!  Don’t worry about his religious fundamentalist comment, the Duck boys will educate him on what to call Islamic terrorists.

duck dynasty

Students Petition to Oust Conservative Black Female Professor From Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt is in the heart of Tennessee, the very buckle of the Bible Belt.  Yet, all universities and colleges today are filled with communist and pro-communist indoctrinating professors.  If you’re not a liberal far leftist, then you need to be ousted…that’s what these spoiled rotten young people believe…brainwashed and propagandized!

House Passes Bill to Bar Syrian Refugees from U.S. Without More Vetting

Bill requires the nation’s three top security officials to certify to Congress that each Syrian or Iraqi refugee is not a security threat before the refugee can be admitted into the U.S.

Natural ginger is up to 10,000 times more effective than chemotherapy drugs at treating cancer, study shows

(NaturalNews) Ginger naturally contains a compound that is up to 10,000 times more effective than chemotherapy drugs at killing the cancer stem cells that make malignant tumors so dangerous, according to a study published in the journal PLoS.

The chemical, known as 6-shogaol, is produced when ginger roots are dried or cooked. The researchers found that 6-shogaol is active against cancer stem cells at concentrations that are harmless to healthy cells. This is dramatically different from conventional chemotherapy, which has serious side effects largely because it kills healthy as well as cancerous cells.

Cells responsible for 90 percent of cancer death?

Like other stem cells, cancer stem cells possess the ability to differentiate into various different cell types. In the case of cancer, stem cells differentiate into the various malignant cells that make up a tumor colony. Although they make up less than 1 percent of the cells in any given tumor, stem cells are impervious to nearly all known or experimental chemotherapy agents. These cells are also able to replicate indefinitely, and they are capable of splitting off from their originating colony to start new tumors elsewhere. They are key players in the process of metastasis, which is responsible for 90 percent of cancer-related deaths.

The persistence of cancer stem cells also explains why cancers can recur even after seemingly successful tumor eradication via chemotherapy, radiation or surgery.

“Cancer stem cells pose serious obstacle to cancer therapy as they can be responsible for poor prognosis and tumour relapse,” the researchers wrote. “To add into the misery, very few chemotherapeutic compounds show promise to kill these cells.”

Kills cancer cells on many fronts

The researchers found that 6-shogaol targets breast cancer stem cells along several different pathways, including reducing the expression of surface markers, altering the cell cycle to increase the rate of cell death, inhibiting tumor formation, directly inducing programmed cell death, and flat-out poisoning cancer stem cells (cytotoxicity).

The researchers then compared the cytotoxicity of 6-shogaol against human breast cancer stem cells with that of the widely used chemotherapy drug taxol. They found that while taxol did show cytotoxicity in a one-dimensional laboratory model of cancer (“monolayer”), it showed almost no effect in the three-dimensional (“spheroid”) model that is now believed to be a more accurate model of real-world cancer tumors. 6-shogaol, however, was effective in both the monolayer and spheroid models.

The researchers then increased the taxol concentration by 10,000 times, but it still showed no effectiveness in spheroid model.

“[T]axol, even though was highly active in monolayer cells, did not show activity against the spheroids even at 10,000 fold higher concentration compared to 6-shogaol,” the researchers wrote.

The promise of food-based cures

The fact that 6-shogaol naturally occurs in a widely consumed human food is promising for its safety profile, the researchers noted.

“Dietary compounds are welcome options for human diseases due to their time-tested acceptability by human bodies,” they wrote.

Another food-based chemical that has shown promise against cancer stem cells is phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC). This chemical is produced from the reaction of a compound and an enzyme that occur in cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli and cabbage. This reaction actually takes place simply when the vegetables are chewed, which means that eating cruciferous vegetables causes the human body to be exposed to PEITC.

According to a May 2015 press release by researchers from the South Dakota State University Department of Health and Nutritional Sciences, PEITC has been successful at killing cervical cancer stem cells. The concentrations used in the study are actually achievable simply from a diet rich in cruciferous vegetables, the researchers said. The vegetables highest in PEITC potential are watercress and land cress.

This research suggests that PEITC, and possibly even a diet rich in cruciferous vegetables, could assist in the prevention of or recovery from cancer.

Sources for this article include:

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052009_ginger_chemotherapy_cancer_treatment.html#ixzz3rqhJjzP2

Obama Plans To Veto Refugee Screening Bill, Despite Terrorists Having Entered US As Refugees

President says legislation would create “unnecessary and impractical requirements.”

Don’t Adopt Our Gun Control Laws, Australian Politician Tells US

“We are a nation of victims,” he said

German Hospital Forced to Hire Security Guards After ‘Refugees’ Physically Attack Nurses

Drunk migrants biting, spitting leaves staff “totally distressed”

When Obama forces Democrat states to take “refugees” he’ll deliver victory to Trump

By Kevin “Coach” Collins FOR COACHISRIGHT.COM

Donald Trump is taking the collapse of Europe and beating the Democrats over the head with it.

The issue of whether or not to bring Muslim “refugees” to our country is already explosive for Democrats; but Barack Obama insists on pouring gasoline on the fire. The attacks on Paris seem to have finally overcome the stream of lies from the Left about Islam being a “religion of peace” rather than the threat the civilized world it actually is.

Even the French Left has sobered up and is grudgingly come to acknowledge the simple truth: They must either fight or die. They don’t even have the option to run.

Likewise, Obama seems to have finally scared enough Democrats to make them begin to pull back and reassess their relationship to him.

His insistence upon delivering un-vetted Syrian “refugees” to America’s streets is bringing their fears of Obama to a new height.

Over the last seven years they have followed him like dutiful sheep over cliffs that have cost them the House the Senate and hundreds of state level elective offices. Now he seems bent on physically destroying America by importing seventh century savages who want to kill us and he will be sending them to their states.

The Republican controlled states are rising up and saying “No” to allowing these fake Syrian “refugees” into their states.

This sets up a trap for Obama that Democrats will suffer from. The states that say “No” won’t just fold. They will fight on and on because the stakes have never been higher. The reputation of the Republican Party can be redeemed or lost forever by what they do.

They will fight on knowing Obama needs these animals as voters in Republican states to destroy what they can and vote Democrat forever.

Nevertheless, if the Republican governors’ resistance keeps working until the spring Obama will be forced to bring the fake “refugees” in and dump them into the Democrat states until he can push them into Republican states.

This will set the Democrat states up for a disastrous Election Day.

Trump will fuel Democrat nightmares with body punch television spots over and over. It will be great for America but death to the Democrats.

Be Sociable, Share!

Just a reminder. They BELIEVE this stuff !

Uh, in case you forgot, we’re the infidels…



In Wake of Paris Attack, Trump has an Answer


donald trump

Donald Trump called in to MSNBC’s Morning Joe this morning, and discussed in depth the Paris attacks, and things he would do in response to them, if he’d been President.

He talked about going after the nations that pretend to be friends of everyone, but pour huge amounts of money into terrorist organizations. He said he did not advocate engaging in a ground war against ISIS in Syria, saying there are nations there already and groups like the Kurds who would need to be in the position of fighting ISIS. “I would tell other countries, “It’s time for you to get up and fight.””

He also hit on what seems like a controversial idea: news reports are coming from France, saying that the French are going to shut down mosques that are tied to radical Islam terrorists. Trump said, “I would hate to do it, but it’s something you’re going to have to strongly consider.” He continued “You’re going to have to watch and study the mosques because a lot of talking is going on at the mosques.”

Other GOP candidates such as Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz have both called for rejecting Syrian refugees in case one of them may be a terrorist out to destroy the culture of the United States. However, so far, only Trump has gone far enough to suggest shutting down religious gatherings of dangerous fundamentalists.

Many critics of Trump have pointed out that this would violate the First Amendment of the Constitution, as there are many Muslims in the United States that are citizens and have a right to worship in a manner they find fitting.

“It’s a very sad, sad situation,” Trump said. He pointed out that there are many peaceful Muslims speaking against ISIS, but that they’re being overshadowed by the evil being perpetrated in their religion’s name. “I know so many people, Muslims, who are such unbelievably great people, and they’re being so badly tarnished by what’s happening now, it’s a shame,” Trump said. “But it’s a tremendous amount of horror and damage and vitriol.”

This is a tough one. Do you shut down a church that’s involved in violence and hatred? I think yes. You have to do the same thing with mosques, right?


The Religion of Peace, Another Big Lie


“Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it…have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth…. Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.”—John Wesley (1703-1791) Methodist leader

“While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men.”—John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) Sixth President of the United States

“Qur’an… an accursed book… So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.”—William Gladstone (1809-1898) Prime Minister of Great Britain 1868-1894.

There are such “social values” today in Europe, America and Australia only because during those thousand years, the Christians of Europe possessed the warlike power to do what the Christians of Asia and Africa had failed to do—that is, to beat back the Moslem [sic] invader.—Teddy Roosevelt (1858 -1919) Twenty-sixth President of the United States

Moslems [sic] may show splendid qualities—but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”—Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) British Prime Minister

“Not all Muslims are terrorists but almost all terrorists are Muslims…. I view Islam not as a religion, but as a dangerous, totalitarian ideology—equal to communism and fascism.”—Geert Wilders Dutch politician, freedom fighter (has needed 24/7 protection for several years due to death threats by Muslims)

First let me say that my prayers and condolences go out to those killed or wounded in the recent Muslim terrorist attacks in Paris, and to their families and friends as well. Esprits de lumière et la véritévous guider.

The terrorist attacks in Paris on November 13, 2015 give us what is called “a teachable moment.” That is, an opportunity to elucidate, clarify, strengthen and deepen our understanding of something (in this case radical Islam) with minds that are (at least temporarily) more open to new ideas than is the norm.

I started seriously studying Islam about six years ago, and I would like to share with readers some of what I found. But first I would like to discuss a bit of my personal backstory.

In the late 1960s and early ‘70s, I was a big fan of philosopher/teacher/author Alan Watts. I read all his books, and also books that he gave favorable reviews to. One such book was “The Book of Strangers” by Ian Dallas (still being published by SUNY Press). I stumbled upon the book at a store in 1973; read the favorable blurb by Watts on the book’s cover (“He [Dallas] has…given a vision of God that, instead of summoning with duty, allures with delight”), and purchased the book.

I won’t describe “The Book of Strangers,” other than to say that I found its description of Islam very attractive. Around that time I also read several books on Sufism by Idries Shah, whose books were quite popular then. Without misrepresenting it too badly, Sufism may be described as a collection of mystical/spiritual teachings whose taproot is Islam.

In 1975, I attended a satsang/darshan (group/individual meeting, spiritual in nature) with a group of fellow devotees and Pir Vilayat Inayat Khan, head of a Sufi order started by his father, Hazrat Inayat Khan. The meeting was held at the then newly opened “Abode of the Message” in upstate New York. After the meeting, Pir initiated me into the “Chisti Order of the West” (renamed Sufi Order International (SOF) some years ago, it is currently led by Pir Vilayat’s son, Pir Zia Inayat Khan.

It is worth noting that Pir Vilayat served as an officer in the British Royal Navy during WW II, and his sister, Noor Inayat Khan, was (in the words of the BBC) the first female radio operator sent into Nazi-occupied France by the Special Operations Executive (SOE). She was arrested and eventually executed by the Gestapo.”

I mention all this in order to illustrate that when I first started to research Islam in greater depth a few years back, I brought with me a sympathetic attitude and a tendency to give Islam the benefit of the doubt when debatable questions arose. Although I have been for some years a practicing Christian (nondenominational), I retain a great fondness and respect for Sufism, at least as taught by Inayat, Vilayat, and Zia Khan (and certain others, such as Rumi and Hafiz), and, as I implied earlier, since reading “The Book of Strangers”, I had seen Islam in a favorable light.

So I was more than a little surprised and dismayed at the unflattering portrait of Islam that emerged as I delved into its history with an open mind and clear eyes.

Uninterrupted Islamic aggression

Perhaps the first thing to make me sit up and pay attention was the sheer number of aggressive invasions instigated by Muslims, century upon century.

This essentially uninterrupted Islamic aggression (which granted, ebbs and flows) has been largely hidden due to the fact that the Muslims responsible are often referred to by non-Islamic sounding euphemisms. For example, the “Barbary Pirates” that the United States fought its first war against were Muslims (in a very roundabout way I suppose Obama was correct when he claimed that “Islam has been woven into the fabric of our country since its founding”).

The word “Turk” and it variations is another euphemism for Muslims—as in “The Turks killed a million-and-a-half Armenians in 1915” (which could be rewritten as “Muslims killed a million-and-a-half Christians in 1915”). “Ottoman” is sometimes used in place of “Turkish” (a stand-in for a euphemism), as in “The Ottoman Empire besieged Vienna in 1683,” or “The killing of the martyrs by Ottoman troops, who launched a weeks-long siege of Otranto, a small port town [in] southern Italy, took place in 1480.” There’s the “Turkish” slaughter of 5,000 of the Bulgarian town of Batak’s 7,000 residents in 1876—and the list goes on, and on.

Another favorite euphemism is “Saracen,” as in “Saracen pirates were defeated by Italian forces during the ‘Battle of Ostia’ 849AD”—“Saracen” of course means Muslim. Around that same time “Saracen” invaders sacked the churches of St. Peter and St. Paul outside the city walls of Rome (846AD).

“Moor” is another euphemism—for example “Charles the Hammer (Martel) and his Frankish (French) army defeated the Moors at the ‘Battle of Tours’ after the Moors invaded France in 732AD.” Or in other words, Martel kicked Muslims out of France.

Then there’s Tamerlane (Timur) and the countless people he slaughtered in the name of Allah. There’s the “Arabian” slave trade that riddled and rotted the African continent for centuries (not to mention the millions of European and Slavic slaves captured by “Turks” and “Saracen pirates”).

1.5 million Europeans and Americans were enslaved in Islamic North Africa

”How many know that perhaps 1.5 million Europeans and Americans were enslaved in Islamic North Africa between 1530 and 1780?”

Christopher Hitchens (1949-2011) “Jefferson Versus the Muslim Pirates”

And oh, let’s see, there’s the centuries-long genocide of Hindus (the latest “incident” occurred at Mumbai, India in 2011).

”The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new foreigner made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.”

Dr. Koenraad Elst “Negation in India”

Eradication of the Nestorian Christian Empire

There’s the total eradication of the Nestorian Christian Empire that once ran from the Mediterranean Sea to China. A Nestorian Christian priest from China (named Bar Sauma) once traveled to Rome where he was given communion by the Pope (Nicholas IV), said mass, and in turn served communion to the King of England (Edward I—see “Timothy of Baghdad’s Lost Christian Empire”).

The longstanding and ongoing murder of Indonesian Buddhists and Christians by Muslims makes for some eye-opening reading—at least it did for me. Then there are the Muslim rebels in the Philippines (whom the US has some history with—ongoing history I suspect). And there’s…well, you get the idea by now, or don’t as the case may be. In any event that’s enough of that.

I would like to discuss one more euphemism for Muslims though—I’m speaking of the ubiquitous all-purpose word “terrorist.” You know, as in “Terrorist Tries to Blow Up Plane,” or “Why would Terrorists Kill Cartoonists” (“Gunman” is also good, as in “Gunman kills 12, Wounds 31.” “Bomber” works well too—“Boston Bomber Apologizes”). “Terrorist” is the king euphemism though—it describes everything and explains nothing. Why do these terrorists rape, murder, torture and maim? Apparently it’s simply because that’s what terrorists do isn’t it, they’re terrorists.

And all these “lone wolf” terrorists have nothing in common with each other outside of their penchant for killing people—or so we are told, over and over again.

Rather than go into more detail about what I uncovered about Islam during my research, I will stop here as I believe that I have provided enough information to open eyes that may have been shut. Those readers who refuse to open their eyes, or already have them open, will or will not continue researching Islam on their own.

So what’s going on here—why does Islam seem to periodically morph into a bloodthirsty intolerant monster from time to time, place to place? The simplest response is that the answer lies in the Quran itself, Islam’s holy book—that and certain historical teachings based on the Quran.

I do not mean that the Quran is an evil book, but when a certain type of Muslim cherry-picks particular passages from the Quran, Hadiths, and other Islamic teachings they can, and do, come up with a vile, poisonous, intolerant, hateful and hate-filled homicidal/suicidal perversion of Islam.

How to separate the wheat from the chaff, moderate Muslims from radical ones, is one tough nut to crack, because both Sufi saints and murderous zealots read from the same book. The difference is in which passages they focus on and emphasize in their hearts and minds.

In a way the situation is akin to the “old Indian tale” about the two wolves in your heart—one of love and one of hate—ever in conflict. Which wolf wins depends on which one you feed.

We know which one the radical Muslim terrorists feed, and you cannot, simply cannot reason with such hate filled zealots. There has historically only been one way to deal with such insane depravity, and I believe you know what it is.

If TSHTF time ever comes, I feel for the “good” Muslims, the ones not bent on violent jihad. Some few of them have been undeniably courageous in standing up to radical Muslims—but, at least up to this point, there appears to be too few of them to make much of an impact. I say I feel for them because if sufficient American blood is spilled on American soil a “kill ‘em all and let God sort it out” mentality will prevail in all probability, and the question of separating good Muslims from bad Muslims will drop by the wayside and become immaterial.

That is not in any way to be construed as a threat. It simply stems from the fact that I’ve been around awhile, and have considerable experience with human nature—and fearful people can quickly become angry people. And very fearful people more often than not become very angry people.

There’s one last major point I want to hit on as I wrap things up. Why have “we the people” been lied to for so long by the press, media, and others about the dangers posed by radical Islam? There are several answers to that question (including the billions spent by Muslim countries to promote Islam in kafir nations), but the one I will focus on ties in with my last article, “Right Wing Nazis: The Big Lie.”

Attentive readers might recall that I pointed out that fascism (and hence its offshoot Nazism) was, is, and always will be a Big Government (i.e. LEFT wing) ideology. Islam, by the by, is LEFT wing also. By its very nature a theocratic (in this case Islamic) government will tend toward totalitarianism, that is, tend to the extreme political left.

The French Revolution’s “Reign of Terror,” Stalin’s gulags, Hitler’s concentration camps, Pol Pot’s “Killing Fields,” ISIS’s cages…do you sense a pattern there?

One of the reasons, perhaps ultimately the main reason, the press, media, politicians (Democrats especially), and others have been covering up for radical Muslims is because the majority of them are all in bed together. Communists, fascists, NWO globalists, and Muslims are all LEFT wing, and you had better believe that Left wing communist/fascist extremists and radical Muslims are tight. Odd bed-fellows, no doubt, but they are united in their hatred of freedom, Western civilization, and Christianity.

The French Revolution’s “Reign of Terror,” Stalin’s gulags, Hitler’s concentration camps, Pol Pot’s “Killing Fields,” ISIS’s cages…do you sense a pattern there? I sure do—and the pattern tells me that Big (i.e. Left wing) Governments which are allowed to metastasize to cancerous proportions will eventually end in tyranny and bloodshed—it’s a proven truth you can take to the bank.

[Sidebar: I suppose you can’t blame the left wing for trying to pawn some of their more disreputable failed ideologies onto the right wing, but don’t you fall for the ruse. Keep the communists, fascists, Nazis, and Muslim totalitarian governments firmly pinned in your mind where they belong—on the LEFT side of the political spectrum. Benito Mussolini, the man who coined the term “fascism,” once proclaimed “Tutto nello Stato, niente al di fuori dello Stato, niente contro lo Stato”—which can be translated as “All within the government, nothing outside the government, nothing against the government.” You cannot get any more LEFT wing than that—yet the Left continues to bray their absurd “right wing fascists” nonsense regardless. They can sing to their choir all they want, but as I say, don’t you fall for it. “We the people” need to be awake and alert, now more than ever.]

If you have done your homework then you know that the Far Left has been busy, busy, busy for some time trying to destroy nation-states (i.e. countries) and painting them as pass√©, retardataire, and other French words. For one example read the Agenda 21 proclamation that President Bush Sr. signed “we the people” up for at the 1992 “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro (”National sovereignty is a social injustice”). National sovereignty is a social injustice? Now that’s something I’ll bet America’s Founding Framers did not realize.

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Maurice Strong, chief organizer of the Agenda 21 “Earth Summit”

Hijra is immigration designed to subvert and subdue non-Muslim societies and pave the way for eventual, total Islamization.
Janet Levy “The Hijra

If I didn’t know better I would think that the current Muslim “immigration” problem in Europe looks a great deal like the meshing of Islamic hijra with the Far Left’s desire to destroy nation-states (not to mention the destruction of Christianity in Europe as well—a sort of lagniappe as they say in New Orleans).

Actually I do know better and that’s exactly what it looks like to me. One world government…good God do you have any idea what a bloody nightmare that would be?

Any freedom loving American who suffered through the tin-eared indifference of the historically corrupt (which is saying something) 111th US Congress as they railroaded through ObamaCare, got a faint taste of how arrogant, unresponsive, and uncaring a global government would be.

In any event, my advice to globalists of various stripes and persuasions who have been playing so cute and clever with the Muslim extremists is STOP IT, or “we the people” will make you stop, and you will not like how that goes one bit. In addition, you elites might want to rethink that whole moral relativism/multiculturalism boondoggle you’re so fond of, and you students attending our education/indoctrination centers might want to pull your heads out of your butts for a minute and consider the full implications of what destroying the privilege of free speech means.

It all ties together when you connect the dots.

Jim ONeill — Bio and Archives | Click to view 18 Comments

Born June 4, 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two. Worked as a commercial diver in the waters off of Scotland, India, and the United States. While attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student in 1998 was presented with the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award,” 1st place undergraduate division. (The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with money she won from successfully suing a national newspaper for libel). Awarded US Army, US Navy, South African, and Russian jump wings. Graduate of NOLS (National Outdoor Leadership School, 1970). Member of Mensa, China Post #1, and lifetime member of the UDT/SEAL Association.

Jim can be reached at: lausdeo.jim@gmail.com




Don’t Elect One