Daily Archives: March 1, 2026

The Craziest Political Prediction Article Ever Written….

Sure hope you’re right…I was right on the GOPe pulling out the stops to attack their own front runner

The Last Refuge

It’s been right there all along; a sense, an instinctual sense, a gut feeling, since late June 2015, and in all the subsequent months, it just kept reoccurring – and with the passing of events, each time it became more and more difficult to dismiss….

Before getting to the heart of this entirely speculative presentation, and specifically because it’s so far out there that, well, if accurate, a litany of people will claim we had to hold some insider connection, we must restate and remind everyone – we have never had any contact with any entity from the Donald Trump organization. Period.

Two semi-connected articles surface recently which tip the scales toward actually sitting down and writing these words.

One is an obscure but accurate summary of the GOPe Road Map and Splitter Strategy (which we have outlined since 2014, and presented with specific detail in 2015) which a person took up, expanded and tried to explain in…

View original post 1,287 more words

Voters Awake To Election Rigging

Infowars hits the streets of Austin to see what voters make of potential fraud

Austin voters are shocked to find out about potential election rigging and reveal who they will be supporting this Super Tuesday.

Virginia Voter Receives Ballot Already Marked for Rubio

Incident follows reports in Texas of Trump votes being switched to Rubio

 

A Virginia man attempting to vote in the presidential primary Tuesday says he received a ballot already marked for Republican candidate Marco Rubio.

The voter, who photographed the ballot in question, noted to WTVR News that the issue was highly concerning.

ballot

When questioned by reporters, General registrar for the City of Richmond Kirk Showalter argued that “there was no reason for voters to be alarmed.”

Showalter instead blamed a female voter who allegedly filled out two ballots at once, handed one in, and returned the other without telling polling staff that it had been inadvertently marked.

“Two ballots were stuck together when they were issued and the woman they were handed to voted on both of them,” Showalter said.

Other issues in the area included ballots being placed inside of duffle bags instead of ballot counting machines.

“There was a lady working the polls who asked me to put my ballot in a duffle bag. I could see the other completed ballots, so I was trying to conceal mine,” Richmond voter Danyale Little said. “I felt like my privacy was violated.”

Poll workers said the duffle bag was being used for temporary storage after the ballot counting machine key was lost early Tuesday morning.

While reported incidents in Virginia appear to be minor according to local officials, other voters across the country have experienced similar issues with ballots favoring Marco Rubio.

More than a dozen Donald Trump supporters in Texas reported to Austin-based radio station KLBJ Tuesday that their ballots had been changed to show a vote for Marco Rubio.

 

Bomb Squad Evacuates Neighborhood Over Small Sealed Box Of .40 Cal Ammo

Bomb Squad Evacuates Neighborhood Over Sealed Box of Ammo

Residents call bomb squad response paranoid overreaction

Adan Salazar | Infowars.com - March 1, 2026

Fire officials in San Antonio, Texas, evacuated several homes and dispatched the police department’s bomb squad unit over the weekend after a harmless box of ammo was discovered under a home.

 

On Saturday, the San Antonio Fire Department captain, Troy Balcar, told WOAI that a family member had located a “sealed box with about 75 rounds of decades-old ammunition underneath the house.”

“He said the rounds are .40 caliber and about 40 years old, based on a date written on the box,” reports WOAI. “Half a dozen nearby homes were evacuated for about three hours.”

Captain Balcar reportedly told the NBC affiliate the ammo posed “a big danger, because they’ve been under there so long.”

“They’ve rusted, they’ve been exposed to the weather, elements outside so we definitely want to get them disposed of as quickly as possible,” Balcar said.

The family said the ammo was likely owned by a veteran who resided in the home until recently.

bomb-ammoDozens of first responders called in to secure 75 rounds of ammo. / Image credit: News 4 San Antonio

 

Astonishingly, the bomb squad had just visited the same house last week and “spent about half an hour disposing of shotgun shells found there,” according to WOAI.

Commenters on the WOAI Facebook page were quick to call out the paranoid overreaction as a waste of department resources and taxpayer money, with some calling for the “fire and bomb experts” to be fired.

ammo-paranoia

ammo-tax ammo-resources

ammo-cargill3

ammo-list ammo-life ammo-smh ammo-house1

Still others pointed out the report was inaccurate because .40 cal ammunition barely appeared in 1990.

ammo-1990

ammo-1990-2

 

Report: Trump Supporters in Texas See Votes Switched to Rubio

Callers to KLBJ report ballot irregularities

People voting for Donald Trump in today’s Super Tuesday Texas Primary are seeing their ballots changed to show a vote for Marco Rubio.

Numerous callers flooded Austin-based radio station KLBJ this morning with reports of mistakes after they tried to vote for Trump.

Linda S. Prestridge ‎@LindaSPrestrid1

4 people state voted for Trump and checked ballot, and it was changed to Rubio on three and Gray on fourth. Radio KLBJ, Austin,Tx.

9:33 AM - 1 Mar 2026

According to KLBJ, “computer freezeups” and other “glitches” are causing voting snafus at locations all around Travis County.

Trump supporters previously accused the Rubio campaign of stealing votes in Iowa after the Florida Senator achieved a surprise third place finish.

If Rubio fails to secure a strong finish in today’s primaries he could be forced to drop out of the race altogether.

Rubio’s Super Pac has poured $1.5 million of its budget into Texas in an effort to take delegates away from home state favorite Ted Cruz.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

WW3: Fighters From Turkey Are Pouring Into Syria And Attacking Targets Despite The Ceasefire

The ceasefire in Syria is a joke

The ceasefire in Syria is a joke.

Turkish military units continue to mass along the border, and militants are pouring across the border to attack targets in northern Syria. The Prime Minister of Turkey is now openly admitting that his government is supporting the militants that are trying to overthrow the Syrian government, and the Turkish government has also made it abundantly clear that they have no plans to stop shelling the Kurds on the other side of the border. So despite the “ceasefire”, the truth is that the threat of World War 3 breaking out in the Middle East is greater than ever.

At times it is difficult to see the dividing line between the Turkish military and the radical jihadists that are hopping back and forth across the border with the full support of the Turkish government. Over the weekend, militants from Turkey that crossed over into northern Syria were supported by artillery fire from the Turkish military as they attacked a key Kurdish town…

In the Raqqa province, a group of some 100 fighters crossed into Syria from Turkey. The group later joined forces with other militants and attacked the Kurdish town of Tell Abyad.

The 250-strong group was supported by artillery fire from the Turkish territory, a fact that Russia said the US should explain. The Kurdish YPG militia fended off the attack, the report said.

This is an act of war, and yet the Obama administration does not seem to mind.

If Turkey will not even honor the ceasefire, what hope is there that anything will be able to stop them from acting so aggressively?

At this point, the Turks are not even pretending anymore. Just the other day, Turkey’s Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu openly admitted that his nation is backing the militants that are trying to overthrow the Assad regime…

“How would they be able to defend themselves if there was no Turkish support of the Syrian people? … If there’s today a real moderate Syrian opposition, it’s because of the Turkish support. If today the [Assad] regime isn’t able to control all the territories [it’s] because of Turkish and some other countries’ support,” he told Al-Jazeera earlier this week.

Obviously this ceasefire is not going to work. Turkey has not even pressed pause in their relentless campaign against the Assad regime and the Kurds.

The Turkish government has become absolutely obsessed with their neighbor to the south, and that is a very dangerous thing for the rest of the planet. The only way that Turkey, Saudi Arabia and their allies are going to be able to win the war now is to conduct a massive ground invasion of Syria. Such a move would lead to direct conflict with Iran, Hezbollah and the Russians, and since Turkey is a member of the NATO alliance, that could threaten to drag the U.S. and western Europe into the war as well. The following comes from the International Business Times…

The wider consequences of any disagreement between Ankara and Moscow could lead to a standoff between Russia and NATO. Jen Stoltenberg, secretary general of the Brussels-based organization, said in late 2015 that it would be prepared to defend the member state of Turkey if it were attacked by Russia.

“NATO will defend you, NATO is on the ground, NATO is ready,” Stoltenberg said in the aftermath of repeated breaches of Turkish airspace by Russian jets and just one month before Ankara shot down a Russian jet in November.

The 28-country alliance is bound by Article 5 of its treaty to collectively defend its members. “Collective defense means that an attack against one ally is considered as an attack against all allies,” the article states.

Saudi Arabia does not appear ready to back down either.

The Saudis continue to reiterate their position that either Assad must go peacefully or he will be removed by force…

Saudi Arabia is prepared to send troops to Syria if President Bashar Assad doesn’t resign and leave his war-torn nation peacefully. Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir warned Sunday that his country will take military action if Syria violates the terms of a ceasefire agreement.

“I believe that abiding by the truce would be an important indicator of the seriousness to reach a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis that would include setting up a transitional council and the transfer of power from Bashar to this council,” he said during a joint press conference with his Danish counterpart Kristian Jensen in the Saudi capital of Riyadh.

Al-Jubeir warned that Saudi Arabia has prepared a “Plan B.” If “the coalition decided to send ground troops into Syria, Saudi Arabia is ready to contribute,” he said.

The goal since 2011 has been to get rid of Assad so that Syria could become a full-fledged Sunni nation with a Sunni government.

Saudi Arabia, Turkey and their allies have poured enormous amounts of money and resources into this conflict, and they don’t appear to be willing to walk away now that the tide of the war has turned. In fact, how the Saudis have been behaving lately has been causing a tremendous amount of anxiety in the Middle East…

Saudi Arabia’s recent actions have caused a great deal of anxiety within its region. On February 4, a military spokesman suggested that Saudi Arabia was ready to send troops ground troops to fight ISIS in Syria. A week later Saudi Arabia announced that it will send combat aircraft and soldiers to Turkey to participate in the U.S.-led coalition against ISIS.

Three days later the Saudis launched “Northern Thunder,” described as the “largest military exercise in the history of the Middle East.” Participants from 20 countries sent troops to the maneuvers run over three weeks in Hafar al Batin in northern Saudi Arabia, not far from the Iraqi and Kuwaiti border. According to a Saudi media outlet, some 350,000 troops were expected to participate in the maneuvers.

So if Saudi Arabia, Turkey and their allies are preparing for war, then what is the purpose of the ceasefire?

Well, first of all the goal was to stop the bleeding. The Sunni militants were losing ground steadily, and this pause will enable them to regroup and get resupplied.

Secondly, this pause in the action gives “the coalition” time to move forces into position for a potential ground invasion of Syria.

But more than anything else, this ceasefire seems to be a trap. It appears to be inevitable that the U.S. and other western powers will accuse Russia, Iran, Hezbollah and the Syrian government of breaking the ceasefire, thus providing “legal justification” for “the coalition” to militarily intervene.

Watch developments in Syria very closely. Many had hoped that this ceasefire would bring the five year civil war to an end, but the truth is that it could just be setting the stage for something far, far bigger.

 

The Progressive Jihad Against Bottled Water

Gov’t water is a danger to your health

In the wake of numerous cases of lead poisoning through Flint, Michigan’s government-managed water supply, some commentators immediately began looking for ways to blame the private sector.

Shortly thereafter, David Brodwin of U.S. News and World Report wrote “Flint: The Big Cost of Small Government.”

According to Brodwin, what caused lead-tainted water to gush forth from faucets in Flint were “attacks on investment in public infrastructure and on regulation of all kinds.” For these he blames “right-leaning libertarian interests,” although he does not name a single one.

America, writes Brodwin, has fallen under an “obsession with tax cuts [which] has reduced budgets to the point where they can no longer sustain basic infrastructure.” Attacks on regulation supposedly caused the failure of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to do its job. “Either its staff was buffaloed by those in power, or its professionals had been replaced by political hacks willing to ignore the mission of the agency.” Brodwin does not support these assertions with evidence.

But then comes a strange concession from Brodwin: “Local officials of the federal [Obama administration] Environmental Protection Agency failed as well.”

Brodwin’s conclusion is that “[i]f we don’t address the underlying ideologies that led to this problem, we’ll face it again and again, all over the United States.”

If you are wondering at what point in its history Flint, Michigan jumped onto the cutting edge of free-market thinking and practice, join the club.

Obviously Brodwin’s contradictory essay doesn’t begin to explain how small government caused lead-tainted water to pour out of Flint’s taps. From an economics perspective, what all the facts of the Flint case clearly point to is the all-too-typical failure of central planners to adequately think through the most important implications of a decision.

On 25 March 2013, Michigan state officials and the Flint city council (by a 7–1 vote) decided to switch the city’s water source from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) to the new Karegnondi Water Authority (KWA), which would not begin operating until 2016.

In the meantime, an alternate source of water had to be found. The 26th of June 2013 was when the actual decision by the city (signed by the state-appointed emergency manager, Ed Kurtz) was made to hire an engineering firm to put Flint’s water plant into full-time operation, thus switching Flint’s water supply from Detroit to the Flint River. (The river was already Flint’s back-up water source.)

What city, county, and state officials all failed to do was take measures to ensure that the river’s corrosive water was sufficiently treated so that it did not absorb toxic lead from Flint’s water network.

Far from being unusually negligent for a government, this sad story is unfortunately understandable and predictable. Unlike the numerous suppliers of private bottled water, central planners have no competitive pressures to rigorously think through any and all of their decisions.

One civil servant in Spain, for example, just recently ended a stint of not showing up for work for six years. Successfully executing such a stunt in a private-sector job in a competitive industry is just about impossible.

Sebring, Ohio; Jackson, Mississippi; and the Trouble with Government Water

While most readers of this site will have undoubtedly heard a lot about the lead-tainted water in Flint, Michigan, the stories that comparatively few will have heard about are lead in the water in Sebring, Ohio and last Wednesday (February 24) in Jackson, Mississippi.

Again, what should come as no surprise is that the same type of government bungling that put lead in Flint’s waters is on full display in Sebring and Jackson as well.

On 17 February 2016, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fired two of its employees and demoted a third. The first employee who was terminated failed to verify that lab test results were received by a field office. In turn, this employee’s boss was terminated for not double checking the work of said subordinate who had a long record of incompetent job performance.

The third employee, the one demoted, was a manager who failed to notify his bosses that Sebring officials ignored warnings about their town’s lead-contaminated water.

None of the three individuals are being publicly identified. So much for state transparency.

In Jackson, Mississippi, of a hundred homes tested in January of 2016, almost a dozen had tap water with levels of lead that require correction. Fifty-eight of these homes had been tested in June of 2015 but the Mississippi State Department of Health did not (as required) notify Jackson officials that some homes had forbidden levels of lead in their tap water until January of 2016.

The Progressive Jihad Against Bottled Water

Progressives have placed a spotlight on Flint but not Sebring and Jackson because their ideology precludes them from acknowledging systemic problems with government and its central-planning process. Progressive economists such as Brodwin lay the blame at the feet of libertarian ideology. Worse than their delusions about the state, the ultimate dream of progressives is to outlaw just about all competition to government water.

They (including filmmaker Michael Moore) are apoplectic about Flint (and by extension Sebring and Jackson) residents consuming bottled water: it has to be transported in on “pollution-spewing” trucks and it creates waste and environmental damage in the form of empty plastic bottles.

When progressives succeeded at banning bottled water at the University of Vermont in 2013, the number of empty plastic bottles being discarded on campus actually increased as students, staff, and faculty members switched from consuming bottled water to less healthy bottled soft and other drinks. In other words, even in Bernie Sanders’s government-worshipping Vermont, consumers did everything they could to avoid government taps.

Before Lead, There Was Viagra and Anti-Psychotics

Years before the Flint, Sebring, and Jackson contaminations, an AP investigation in 2008 discovered everything from antibiotics, antidepressants, sex hormones, erectile-dysfunction drugs, to tranquilizers in the water supplies of twenty-four metropolitan areas with 41–46 million Americans exposed.

Consuming government water is a bad idea. At its very best, it has a repulsive over-chlorinated swimming-pool smell and even worse off-putting saturated chemical taste. At its worst it can be tainted with everything from trace or higher levels of Viagra or estrogen to dangerous levels of lead. Only a complete fool would regularly and solely consume it to the exclusion of its private alternatives.

RUSH LIMBAUGH SPARKS OUTRAGE After Suggesting Trump is Pandering for KKK Vote

That seems like quite a stretch, Rush

On Sunday Donald Trump went on CNN and was asked once again about David Duke’s endorsement. Trump told Jake Tapper he didn’t know anything about David Duke or white supremacy.

This sent shock waves across the liberal media and GOP establishment circles.

Trump already disavowed David Duke’s endorsement on Friday

On Monday Rush Limbaugh suggested that Donald Trump was pandering to the KKK and racists because of polling numbers.

That seems like quite a stretch, Rush.

Via the Rush Limbaugh Show:

RUSH: Everybody is stunned over Trump. Nobody understands how Trump is still breathing. Nobody understands how Trump’s still pulling this off. You wouldn’t believe the theories that I’ve received from people sending me notes telling me what they think is really going on. And I guess the latest brouhaha with Trump is, he was on CNN with Jake Tapper yesterday, and he tried to act like he didn’t know what David Duke was, and he would not denounce David Duke nor would he denounce the Ku Klux Klan. Yet he had done so on previous occasions. He used to be in the Reform Party.

Now, the Reform Party was the offshoot of Ross Perot’s 1992 presidential effort, although Perot wasn’t part of it. Buchanan became the titular head, and Trump’s out there insulting Buchanan. He said he left the Reform Party because Buchanan’s a neo-Nazi had David Duke and the KKK in it. He said that’s not the company he wanted to keep. So he was on record as having denounced Duke and having denounced the Klan and wanting nothing to do with ’em…

… But there has to be a reason that Trump, on the actual show with Jake Tapper, hems and haws and acts like he doesn’t know who Duke is and the Klan and (imitating Trump) Well, I need to investigate. I never heard of the group. You need to send me a list.” And Jake says okay, I’ll send you the list, but I’m just talking about David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan. “Well, you know, there’s a lot of different people in these groups, and I gotta research it.”

Let me throw a theory out there to you. The Sunday shows have, amazingly still, their own separate and distinct stature. What is said on a Sunday show is treated differently and may be different in terms of its weight than what is said in a little sound bite that’s part of the nightly news, for example, or part of a guest appearance on a cable news show during the evening. A Sunday show, that’s stature, by reputation.

A Sunday show is serious, no fooling around. It’s like “for the record,” what you say on the Sunday show. And it could well be that Trump thinks of it that way and just didn’t want the quote, did not want any sound bite from the Sunday show one way or the other because maybe Trump’s nervous.Maybe he’s nervous after that debate. Maybe he’s worried. The polls don’t indicate it. Maybe he’s worried that Cruz and Rubio are gaining on him, and he doesn’t want to tick off anybody that might vote for him.

Hey, my speculation’s as good as anybody else’s, because I can think of no reason that he would purposely dodge, when he’s not dodged it before. I think about it being on a Sunday show, and that having more weight, more stature, something about it being these Sunday shows are TV shows of record, as opposed to your average cable news show which happens every day or every night.

This theory did not go over well with the Trump supporters.

Joe ‎@JoeThebabe2015

@rushlimbaugh you sir have lost your soul accusing trump of SEEKING KKK endorse.thats slander.you r no different than beck, thru with you!

RejoiceMagazine.net ‎@TemiaBrinson

Listening to saying the only reason Trump dodged the KKK question w/Tapper is bc it was a heavily viewed Sunday show. Wow!!

PINK ‎@PinkwvPink

@rushlimbaugh is officially a LYING STINKING FILTHY POS. He just accused Trump of seeking the KKK vote because he fears Cruz. Incredible.”

Bill Mitchell ‎@mitchellvii

Rush said, “Trump didn’t want to tick off the KKK because he is worried about Cruz/Rubio.”

OMFG are you KIDDING me Rush? You are a POS

Image

That’s A Nice Tower…

US Intelligence Director Says Genome Editing is a WMD

Gene Editing with CRISPR/Cas-9 Can Heal or Kill

Genetic modification using new technologies like CRISPR has been called a “weapon of mass destruction and proliferation” by James Clapper, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, in his annual Worldwide Threat Assessment report.

Gene editing is the latest brainchild of the biotechnology industry. It has been touted as entirely different from gene insertion, the genetic modification technique used over the past several decades to create GM crops and GM animals. Gene editing technology alters the DNA inside living cells. The biotech industry says it is an easy and cheap way to mess with Mother Nature – but, as with other GM technology, the outcomes can’t be precisely controlled.

The rapid development of gene editing is due to tools like CRISPR/Cas-9, an injectable protein. It can locate a specific DNA strand in a person’s genome, delete it, and replace it with a new DNA sequence designed by genetic engineers. That’s quite a powerful technology that could be misused in the wrong hands.

Many scientists herald genome editing (‘germline editing’) as a way to correct conditions like Huntington’s disease or muscular dystrophy by changing the DNA in sperm, eggs or embryos. But others fear this is just a tactic to create “armies of blue-eyed super-intelligent babies.”

Genome editing’s relative ease of implementation worries the U.S. intelligence community, according to the threat assessment report. It states:

“Given the broad distribution, low cost, and accelerated pace of development of this dual-use technology, its deliberate or unintentional misuse might lead to far-reaching economic and national security implications.”

Naming gene editing as a potential weapon of mass destruction, or WMD, surprised Piers Millet, a bioweapons expert at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, DC. Making bioweapons generally requires skill in a “wide raft of technologies.” Also, gene editing was the only biotechnology noted in a tally of six otherwise conventional threats, such as North Korea’s suspected nuclear detonation on January 6 or China’s modernization of its nuclear weapons.

Clapper oversees national intelligence and spying agencies with combined budgets of over $50 billion. His insights in the report reflect data from the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and half a dozen other U.S. spy and fact-gathering operations.

His report doesn’t mention CRISPR by name, but Clapper clearly had this newest and most versatile of the gene-editing systems in mind. The CRISPR technique’s relative ease of use and its low cost—the basic ingredients can be bought online for $60—seems to have spooked intelligence agencies. The report continues:

“Research in genome editing conducted by countries with different regulatory or ethical standards than those of Western countries probably increases the risk of the creation of potentially harmful biological agents or products.”

Indeed; and as the case is with many technologies, it can be used for good or for evil.

The report noted that new discoveries “move easily in the globalized economy, as do personnel with the scientific expertise to design and use them.”

A gene could be edited to contain a self-destruct virus, for example, or to help eradicate disease. The possibilities are endless, but that’s also why genome editing is so dangerous.

Daniel Gerstein, senior policy analyst at RAND and former undersecretary at the Dept. of Homeland Security, seems to call out the very industry that many in the U.S. government seemed at one time hell-bent on supporting:

“Biotechnology, more than any other domain, has great potential for human good, but also has the possibility to be misused. We are worried about people developing some sort of pathogen with robust capabilities, but we are also concerned about the chance of misutilization. We could have an accident occur with gene editing that is catastrophic, since the genome is the very essence of life.”

Considering that many scientists have been bought by companies like Monsanto, Dow and Syngenta already, it isn’t a far stretch to imagine that this technology could be used for ill-intentioned purposes.

The intelligence assessment also drew specific attention to the possibility of using CRISPR to edit the DNA of human embryos to produce genetic changes in the next generation of people—to remove disease risks, e.g. Mankind’s history, however, shows a tendency toward ethnic cleansing. CRISPR could be used to single out genes that are perfectly fine, but not ‘desirable’ by a ruling authority.

Considering the Serbian campaign to cleanse the world of certain ethnic tribes, the Nazis’ attempt to exterminate the Jews and Romani, and the white settlers in the Americas killing hundreds of thousands of Indians, we can be certain that genome editing must be guarded by a morally upright set of laws. Just because we CAN use certain technologies–like nuclear weapons–doesn’t mean we SHOULD use them. The naming of genome editing as a weapon of mass destruction seems apropos enough.

Just what Clapper and other security heads plan to do about it is another question entirely. Just as there are hackers for Internet technologies, there are scientists who will know how to edit genes, without regulatory approval. This is perhaps the most alarming aspect of the situation, aside from naming the technology for what it is – a WMD.

This article originally appeared at Natural Society.

CNN/ORC National Poll - Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz Suffer Stunning Drops, Trump and Carson Gain…

I’d love to see both Florida (Rubio) and Texas (Cruz) go to Trump…However, there are many idiot Christians with no discernment out there, I’ve already lost two people I thought were friends when I put out my last article on Cruz. He is such a filthy liar and a devious little twit, that I don’t know how anyone with a brain could vote for him. Proves many in our electorate shouldn’t even vote because they’re so damned stupid.

The Last Refuge

A new CNN/ORC national poll (full pdf below) is being highlighted in the media discussion based on the top-line results: Donald Trump 49% !

However, that’s not the real headline in the data. The real lead story should be the damage Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz have done to themselves as they continue a scorched-earth campaign.

The first signals of a backlash appeared over the weekend’s polling when it became clear Senator Rubio and Senator Cruz where losing support at an exponential rate the longer they continued to make unfounded accusations. Donald Trump and Ben Carson are benefactors of the Rubio/Cruz kamikaze mission:

FULL POLL DATA

There’s an increased possibility Cruz may lose Texas if enough Trump supporters can turn out in any similar proportion to previous state turnouts. Ted Cruz entire campaign apparatus has fallen back upon Texas, and his latest rally (today) drew only a few hundred supporters.

It is increasingly improbable to…

View original post 287 more words

A Little Old Guy Humor This Morning.

HOW OLD GUYS PICK UP WOMEN

I am getting on in years and not the best looking guy anymore. Some would even say I’m a little frayed around the edges….

But, I have a nice car, a comfortable home, a little money, and I spend most of my time casually traveling from place to place and enjoying life.

I met a nice looking girl in the park the other evening. There was an instant “spark” between us.

All of a sudden, she did this cute little dance, then immediately dropped to her knees and lay on the grass at my feet.

As we lay there making love, I thought ….. “Wow, these Taser guns really work!!”

~Steve~ H/T Hujonwi

And Now For Something Completely Different

With Apologies To Monty Python!

Shock Video: Alex Jones Is Assaulted After Turning On Trump

Martial Law Gets Oscars Cameo: ‘Hundreds of police up and down every street’

“People are submitting to all of this tyranny”

The American police state was on full display in Hollywood this weekend during the 88th Academy Awards.

Prior to the Oscars ceremony beginning Sunday, LAPD officers stopped and interrogated incoming attendees, searched their vehicles’ trunks and ran mirrors below undercarriages looking for bombs.

Once their papers checked out, drivers were free to proceed through a labyrinthine obstacle course of barricades where yet more officers were stationed.

Giant lines also formed at the fenced-off Hollywood Walk of Fame, where people walking the sidewalk were shaken down by police with metal detectors, while cops on motorcycles patrolled open areas.

“Everybody’s being suspected of a terrorist here on Hollywood Boulevard,” a man filming the spectacle said. “People’s bags are being checked. People are being wanded. People are submitting to all of this tyranny. We have a massive police state here in this country now brought on by 9/11, which was an inside job.”

Insiders last week blamed the Paris terror attacks for the upcoming Oscars’ “military state,” but it’s also possible police were concerned with a potential Black Lives Matter protest due to the “Oscars So White” controversy, as BLM demonstrators have previously protested and shut down various events.

With any luck, the outrageous martial law display will illustrate to BLM followers that the burgeoning police state is a threat to all races.

 

Rumors Swirl: Florida Governor to Endorse Trump?

Last-minute Super Tuesday press conference fuels speculation of another high profile endorsement

Republican Florida Gov. Rick Scott may soon endorse presidential frontrunner Donald Trump, the Washington Examiner reports.

Trump schedules last-minute Super Tuesday presser. Could this be the Rick Scott endorsement? http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2584550

Following news of a last-minute Super Tuesday press conference at the candidate’s Mar-A-Lago Club in Florida, rumors are swirling that the state’s governor could be preparing to back the billionaire hotel mogul.

“Some speculate that Florida Gov. Rick Scott could announce his support of Trump at the press conference, which is scheduled two weeks before Florida’s Republican primary,” writes Gabby Morrongiello.

Although Governor Scott has yet to officially support any candidate, an endorsement of Trump would be a major embarrassment and blow to the campaign of Marco Rubio, who has held office in Florida for over 15 years.

The backing of Scott would add yet another high-profile endorsement to Trump’s growing list of conservative supporters, which include New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, former Arizona Governor Jan Brewer and most recently Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions.