Daily Archives: March 8, 2026

#3 Mini-Tuesday Election Results - Michigan, Mississippi, Idaho and Hawaii - Discussion Thread

The Last Refuge

10:00pm We anticipate the need for more than one Mini-Tuesday election results thread. Hence, we will number them (as above) depending on the volume of inbound data.

MASSIVE TURNOUT !!

♦ Michigan Donald TRUMP WINS√

♦ Mississippi Donald TRUMP WINS√

♦ Idaho ♦ *Hawaii

….all have Republican Primary voting contests today (*caucus).


◊ CNN Election Center – Link To Results HERE

◊ Politico Link To Results HERE

Local Mississippi Results Link

  • Michigan – Primary, Polls Close 8:00pm EST – 59 delegates (If 50% winner takes most, if not proportional w/ minimum 15% threshold for any delegates) √ Team Trump Wins
  • Mississippi – Primary, Polls Close 8:00pm EST – 40 delegates (12 district, 28 at large delegates) At Large delegates proportionally distributed based on state result. District delegates 50% takes all, if not winner gets 2, second place gets one. 15% threshold. √ Team Trump Wins
  • Idaho –…

View original post 32 more words

Representative David Vitter Accidentally Introduces House Bill To Pay For Trump’s Border Wall….

The Last Refuge

The word “accidentally” has to be used in the headline because while Vitter’s bill doesn’t specifically mention the southern border security wall, the intent of the revenue is to provide border security measures.

As far as we can tell only our analysis of the potential Mexican remittance fees have outlined the very plausible way to pay for the Mexican border wall. However, Louisiana Representative David Vitter has now presented a bill targeting the transfer of U.S. funds out of the country by illegal aliens.

Vitter has penned an Op-Ed in the Washington Times which includes two Governmental Accounting office reports – One HERE – and – Another HERE – which show the volume of removed revenue, remittances, as calculated/described by the GAO.

Representative Vitter explains his proposal thusly:

View original post 343 more words

Donald Trump in Madison, Mississippi

Sleep aids can turn you into a dangerously drugged driver

* Do our loved ones & friends KNOW ?

In this hypersensitive politically correct world, even good-natured jokes cause folks to get their panties in a twist.

You’re not supposed to generalize based on race, sex, or religion; and you’ll get in trouble if you joke that your left-wing friends are a little mushy in the head (probably because they know deep down it’s not a joke).

Yet those same PC blowhards have no problem generalizing about SENIORS!

Even researchers are getting in on the oldie-bashing act now, with a new study that claims seniors who take Ambien are highway hazards.

According to the study in the journal Sleep Medicine, older gals who take this infamously bad sleep drug are 61 percent more likely to get into a fender-bender over five years than folks who don’t touch the stuff.

And the older the driver, the higher the risk — Ambien users over the age of 80 are twice as likely to literally get smashed than those who don’t use it,.

Now, I don’t doubt that Ambien turns careful drivers into drugged-up zombies ready to enter the demolition derby.

But why are they focusing on seniors here?

Fact is, YEARS of science shows that Ambien hits some folks the way a tranquilizer hits a bear. You may sleep eight hours…but you feel like you could sleep eight days!

It doesn’t matter how old — or young — you are, the studies show that folks who pop these pills can act like drunks out on the highways the next day, which is no surprise since you can wake up feeling like you’re on the wrong end of a three-day bender.

Even the FDA warned of the risk three years ago, cutting the standard dose of Ambien in half for some patients — at least in part because of what it could do their driving.

If I were a mainstream hack, I’d say be careful the next day when you take this drug no matter what your age.

But I’m no hack.

I’m going to go a step farther and tell you not to take this drug at any time or under any circumstances. Whether you’re young, old, or somewhere in the middle, this drug can do a whole lot more than turn you into a drugged-up driver.

Heck, what it does to your driving the next day is NOTHING compared to what it could do to you while you’re still asleep. Some folks who take it get up in the night and engage in strange, bizarre, and even dangerous behavior… all while still asleep.

Even worse, sleep drugs in general can increase your risk of death by as much as 500 percent.

So forget the drugs.

If you can’t sleep, try some warm milk and brandy or at least some melatonin supplements. And if you STILL can’t sleep, speak to a doc who can find the cause and fix it.

Abandoning Ambien,
Jack Harrison

Ohio Republican Ballot Creating Confusion…

The Last Refuge

The Ohio Republican ballot for president is causing some confusion as outlined within this video:

Is the ballot intentionally confusing by design?

Given the previous discussions on State Party shenanigans, and the intent of state republican party leadership to hold complete influence over their delegate’s decision-making, many believe the answer is “probably”.

View original post

Fox News’ Bret Baier: Some Republicans Could Back Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

Fox News’ Bret Baier: Some Republicans Could Back Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

“Listen, there are Republicans in Washington who are privately saying that already,” the host tells The Wrap

Fox News Channel anchor Bret Baier said it’s possible that some Republicans will vote for Hillary Clinton just to stop Donald Trump from taking over the party.

“Listen, there are Republicans in Washington who are privately saying that already,” Baier told TheWrap on Monday. “Maybe some don’t publicly say it, but I think there are some who are that adamant about it who would.”

Baier will moderate Monday’s Democratic Town Hall, which is Clinton’s first appearance on the network in two years and Bernie Sanders’ first interview with Baier.

“Obviously, the never-Trump movement is trying to stop that from happening and trying to prevent him from getting to 1,237, the number of delegates needed,” Baier said. “But short of that and some kind of hail Mary at the Cleveland convention, there are definitely Republicans who are looking at that. … I think that, in the Republican party, it is a unifying force, if it is Hillary Clinton as the nominee, to find the Republican who can win and, so far, the Trump nomination seems to be steaming along.”

The last time Clinton appeared on Fox News was a joint interview with Baier and Greta Van Susteren back in 2014, when she was promoting her book “Hard Choices.” Clinton originally declined to participate in Monday’s event but apparently had a change of heart. The “Special Report” town hall airs at 6 p.m. ET/ 3 PT with an encore presentation at 11 ET/ 8 PT.

We caught up with Baier to discuss how this event came together, what he plans to ask and if he thinks anti-Donald Trump Republicans would vote for Clinton in the general election.

How did Fox News get Hillary Clinton to agree to this?

We’ve been working for a while. I had invited Secretary Clinton to this town hall originally. Sen. Sanders did agree a couple of weeks ago and confirmed, but we were told originally Clinton had a scheduling conflict and it wasn’t going to happen. We had Thursday night’s debate in Detroit, and then Friday got word that the Clinton camp wanted to see if it was still possible to happen, and they had reconsidered.

Right before my show at 6 p.m., we got confirmation that she would take part. I don’t know what was the impetus for the change, but we’re very happy that she’s here, and to have both Democratic candidates in the town hall on the No. 1 cable news station is great.

Sanders and Clinton had a debate last night in Flint. What still needs to be answered before tomorrow’s Michigan primary?
First of all, there are a couple of things in those exchanges last night that we could potentially follow up on. There are topics that have not been talked about or discussed on the Democratic side as of yet. Hopefully we’ll get to some of those. I’ll ask a few questions and then we have 300 Michiganders, mostly undecided Democratic voters, but there are a few who are independent and actually deciding between Trump and Sanders. There are a couple deciding between Rubio and Clinton. This is an open primary in Michigan, so we have a lot of great questions that have not been asked yet.

Will you question Clinton about calling for Michigan’s Gov. Rick Snyder to resign during last night’s debate, after her spokesperson said she wouldn’t do that during the pre-debate coverage?
[Laughs] Maybe. I don’t want to reveal too many of the questions ahead of time but I think there are things to follow up on from last night.

Do you think Clinton will use an appearance on Fox News to appeal to anti-Trump members of the GOP as she looks forward to the general election?


I don’t know. You’d have to ask the Clinton campaign of the calculation. I will say that there are an amazing amount of Independents and Democrats and Republicans who watch Fox, if you look at all the breakdowns as of late of our viewership. One would think that any campaign would want to hit the biggest audience in cable news. And as you get closer to the general election, I assume that factors into the equation.

 

 

Trump: “Crazy” To Compare Supporters’ Pledge To Nazi Salute

“If it’s offensive, if there’s anything wrong with it, I wouldn’t do it”

Trump urged that his supporters are just “having a good time” and want to show their loyalty by raising their right hands in a pledge to vote for the anti-establishment candidate.

Photographs of Trump supporters pledging to vote for him by raising their hands at a rally were shunted around social media at the weekend, with serious claims from detractors that they were imitating ‘Heil Hitler’ type salutes.

Trump asked supporters to raise their right hand and pledge to support him http://cnn.it/1TzGsR3 pic.twitter.com/X9y4KRiF81

“If it’s offensive, if there’s anything wrong with it, I wouldn’t do it,” Trump added, promising to “look into” the matter, saying it is a “big big stretch” to compare the pledge to a Nazi salute.

“They’re raising their hand in the form of a vote, not in the form of a salute,” Trump also told MSNBC’s Morning Joe, adding that the fact the issue has gotten any media attention is “crazy.”

Morning Joe 03/08/16

Trump: Those aren’t Nazi salutes at my rallies!

Trump again called for his supporters to make the pledge Monday in North Carolina and Mississippi.

“Should we do the pledge? Should we do the pledge?” the billionaire asked supporters. “Raise your hand: ‘I swear I’m going to vote for Donald Trump next week, I swear.’”

 

At N.C. campaign rally, @realDonaldTrump asks attendees to follow him in a “pledge” http://cbsn.ws/1ROYbAf

THE 60s FEMINIST AGENDA COMING TO FRUITION

By Mary Thompson
March 8, 2026
NewsWithViews.com

Three names associated with contemporary feminist agendas during the sixties and beyond were Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan, and Gloria Steinem. During the decade of the sixties, the stage was set for the agenda and stream of bills to be introduced for Universal National Service. Another earlier activist and feminist, Margaret Mead, had advocated for such a program “that replaces marriage for girls even more than for boys, as the route away from the parental home.”

In 1966 Former Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, proposed a public service requirement for all Americans starting at ages between 17-19 to serve the country for two years in military, health and social services, and welfare programs.

In 2003 Rep. Charles Rangel introduced “The Universal National Service Act of 2003” and reintroduced it in 2006, 2007, 2010 and 2011. Draconian implications of that Act, if enacted, were laid out in an article in 2003 in which this writer collaborated, “Uncle Sam Wants You, Your Sister, and Your Girl Friend or Wife”.

The article is posted on www.newswithviews.com under Charlotte Iserbyt’s name. Other articles including, “Returning the Draft: the Universal National Service Act of 2006” are also available on www.newswithviews.com under Charlotte’s name. Just drip, drip, drip through the years the nation becomes conditioned to ignore, or fails to take seriously the drum beat of implementing a system of mandatory universal service for every young person 18 to 25-26.

The Selective service Registration has been in effect for young men since President Carter re-actualized the registration in 1980 after it had languished for some years. A Universal National Service is quite another thing.

Fast forward to 2016 when a registration for women was discussed by military service leaders appearing before the Senate February 2, 2016. It would require women registering for Selective Service same as young men have been required to do since Pres. Carter’s Administration. (San Jose Mercury/News (2/3/2026)

Note the shift in EMPHASIS from Congressman Rangel’s Universal National Service Act comprising of “military service, OR a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes” which has its own cans of worms which articles mentioned above address in detail. The requirement for women to sign up with the Selective Service implies availability for military COMBAT service since the Secretary of Defense, Ash Carter, in December ordered all combat jobs open to women. That decree appears to open the prospect of requiring young women to register for selective service as a matter of gender equality.

Implications of that speak for themselves should a military draft occur. The societal implication would be the final cap on movements already in motion. If young women were drafted during some of their prime reproductive years, who would care for the babies and young children? Could the timing of planning for Selective Service draft of young women have anything to with the latest mantra of Universal early childhood “education” which calls for government schools’ oversight beginning with prenatal visits? And documents from “education” sources which say parents are partners of the state re: children? Big Brother dressed in Uncle Sam’s suit to the rescue while Mom is in combat on some foreign battlefield?

Feminism arrived at last! Ultimate equality! To quote the “sage” utterances of the 60’s feminist leaders:

Bella Abzug – “We are coming down from our pedestal and up from the laundry room.”

Betty Friedan – “It’s easier to live through someone else than to become complete yourself.”

Gloria Steinem – “Without legs of imagination or dreaming, we lose the excitement of possibilities. Dreaming after all is a form of planning”.

Excuse me but, “Up from the laundry room to a battle field” “Becoming complete with military combat experience” “Dreaming excitement of possibilities” Although I doubt Gloria Steinem who is anti-war, had the drafting of women for combat in her mind’s “Planning”. It doesn’t take a genius to predict that the feminist movement’s “dream-planning” would inevitably result in calls to draft women into military service. It’s been in motion for decades. Let us not forget Robert McNamara who recommended a form of universal service for all young people including women, was the same Robert McNamara who introduced PPBS (Planning, Programming, Budgeting System) into the Department of Defense. Planning accomplished, now the programming and budgeting coming next?

A question to ask the candidates during this campaign season.

© 2016 Mary Thompson - All Rights Reserved

Social Justice Warriors Demand Their Own Indoctrination College, Power to Fire Cops

Social Justice Warriors Demand Their Own Indoctrination College, Power to Fire Cops

To combat “white supremacy”

 

Safe space students at Western Washington University have issued an extensive list of demands which includes the construction of an entirely new college dedicated to “social justice” as well as the ability to fire police officers who commit microaggressions against them.

The Student Assembly for Power and Liberation (SAPL) has published a petition which calls for “the creation and full implementation of the College of Power and Liberation,” an institution that will be devoted to “social justice” and combating “systemic oppression” and “white supremacy”.

The group demands that the college be staffed by ten full time faculty members (chosen by them), and that it be launched with a lavish $50,000 opening ceremony that will mark “the beginning of the momentous history of the College of Power and Liberation.”

“Other than the cost of the opening event, SAPL does nothing to estimate the cost of this endeavor or suggest how the money be raised, stating bluntly that “acquiring such funding is the responsibility of the administration,” writes Blake Neff.

The group also demands that a 15 member student panel is created to “monitor, document, and archive all racist, anti-black, transphobic, cissexist, misogynistic, ablest, homophobic, islamophobic, and otherwise oppressive behavior on campus.”

Elsewhere in the list of demands, the group uses the words “persxn” instead of “person,” and “hxstory” instead of “history,” suggesting that this new “social justice” college will also ban words that are deemed to be sexist.

Another ludicrous demand is that students be given the power to fire police officers that they feel are engaging in “oppressive behavior” on campus.

The idea of students making absurd lists of demands in the name of “social justice,” which is in reality just a veil for an authoritarian power grab, became popular during last year’s SJW uprising which began at the University of Missouri and spread to other campuses.

The group expects all the demands to be implemented by the end of the spring 2016 term, an unlikely scenario given that WWU President Bruce Shepard asserts the list would violate federal law and threaten academic freedom.

Although the list of demands is preposterous, it underscores how universities are being overrun with entitled, cry-baby authoritarians who are determined to completely overturn the notion that colleges should be places of vigorous debate and dissent, supplanting that with censorship, political correctness, safe spaces and trigger warnings.

Muslim Rape Gang Victim: They Shouted ‘Swedish Whore’ And Cut My Breast With A Razor Blade

Comment: Coming soon to your wife, girlfriend, mother, sisters, and daughters right here in Obama’s Amerikan Caliphate if we don’t stand up now! This is already starting in the US. This must be stopped!Whatever it takes!

============================================

“They beat me black and blue and cut into one of my breasts, while shouting at me that I was a Swedish whore.”

Another glimpse into the future of Europe, and of the United States as well, unless these disastrous immigration and refugee resettlement policies are halted and reversed.

 

Nathalie, 29: They shouted “Swedish whore” and cut my breast with a razor blade. the Rape attempt failed – so the gang smashed their victim’s face in and cut up one of her breasts

Nathalie Hager, 29, was on her way home from a bus stop when a group of Arabic-speaking men suddenly attacked her outside a church. She managed to fight her way out of a gang rape but was left badly injured.


“They beat me black and blue and cut into one of my breasts, while shouting at me that I was a Swedish whore,” Nathalie told Fria Tider.

The attack took place near the church in the picturesque town of Nora, west of Stockholm, late Tuesday night. Nathalie Hager, who has suffered memory lapses because of the hard blows she received to her head during the attempted gang rape, had followed a friend to the bus stop.

Later, she went back to the bus stop again, since her friend thought she had forgotten her gloves there. When Nathalie was walking home for the second time, she noticed a group of men walking briskly behind her. She called her boyfriend and started to run, but after a chase of about a hundred meters the men caught up with her.

“They pushed me down on my stomach and dragged me by my hair up a paved hill and into an alley. I have no memories of them beating me, but my face is all blue and swollen. They also cut into one of my breasts with something that must have been a carpet knife or a a razor blade, the wounds are long and narrow. I also have big black marks on my arms where they held me.”

Ms. Hager has no recollection of what happened until when she saw the men pulling their trousers down.

“Then I came around and noticed that they had ripped up all of my clothes. Somehow I managed to get away, I guess I must have beat them and clawed my way free because my hands are blue and black and swollen. I also had blood under my nails, which has been sampled by the police.

While running away Nathalie saw her boyfriend 50 meters away. At that point, the men departed from the scene. Soon thereafter, at 11 p.m. on Tuesday, she contacted the police. She went to the police station to report the assault.

According to Nathalie, who has worked with Arabs, the men were about 30-35 years old and spoke Arabic with what she believes is the Syrian dialect. One of them was wearing a white baseball cap and the others regular winter caps.
“My friend, whom I had earlier followed to the bus stop, had observed a bunch of foreign guys at the bus stop after I walked away. Some of them climbed aboard the bus but three or four remained here,” Nathalie said.

In addition to speaking Arabic, the men used a few simple insulting expressions in Swedish during the attempted gang rape.

“It was only dirty words. ‘Swedish whore’ or ‘Swedish slut’ and ‘cunt’. No full sentences. In my impression, they spoke no Swedish except these words, so I assume they were asylum seekers.”

According to Nathalie, the police have not been in contact with her since she reported the assault on Tuesday evening. She herself has tried to contact them, having discovered more injuries and having realized that some details of her recollection had been inaccurate. But nobody has called back.

“They dismissed me and said nobody could help me right now. I have to wait for an officer to be appointed for the case, they said. Now I can’t get hold of anyone and nobody seems to want to help. I spent a long time on the phone with the police and was connected to different people. None of them showed any interest or took notes when I named persons, including my friend at the bus station who saw the men and most likely would be able to provide accurate descriptions of them.”

The only newspaper that has reported on the assault is the local Nerikes Allehanda, NA, in a miniscule notice, skipping over the bruises and cuts inflicted on the victim. According to NA, the victim “got her jacket and other clothing torn” in connection with an attempted rape.

“It made me very angry to read the tiny article. I also know of several people, including female friends of mine, who have contacted NA in the past and told them about molestations that they had been subjected to. The newspaper never reported any of it,” Nathalie Hager told Fria Tider.

A POLITICAL PARTY GONE BERSERK

By Sheriff Jim R. Schwiesow, Ret.
March 8, 2026
NewsWithViews.com

The Republican Party is in the process of self destruction, given the continuing and seemingly enduring dim-wittedness of the collection of present and past so-called conservative Republicans that have, and are, exhibiting a complete diminishing and passing out of sight of any semblance of honorable integrity. The disappearance of these numbskulls from the political scene would be a blessing and in the very best interest of the nation as a whole.

These halfwits most certainly contribute nothing of value in regard to the best interests of the people. A people that have, I might add, already lost any respect or regard for the arrogant imbeciles that make up this simple-minded collective, and I need not name names as the people have had ample demonstrations of those responsible for this goofy flight from common sense and reality.

It is readily apparent to any who have been witnessing this mad flight from realism and good sense that these nattering jackasses are effectively diminishing any hope for success as affective representatives of the people. And the worst of the bunch seem to be those who bleat most loudly about their so-called conservative values. I do not know which values they address as I can discern no illusion or likeness of any quality (positive or negative) that renders something desirable or valuable in regard to the people of this nation or its people.

What seems to have precipitated this flight into insanity is the candidacy and conversion to conservative principles of Donald Trump who is mounting an effective and possibly effectual campaign for the Office of the Presidency. Mr. Trump who has in the past held other than strictly conservative principles in regard to politics, or otherwise, has for reasons unknown incited the vindictive hatred of an ample number of those who righteously embrace their so-called purity as conservative politicians, rather than value and welcome the turnabout - in their estimation - of a convert to their political philosophy they have done everything in their destructive hearts to devastate his sincere ambition to lead this nation in an elimination of inimical political policies.

Examples, galore!

At the present time the dimmest of the dimmest are Senator Marko Rubio of Florida and Ted Cruz of Texas. These two donkeys parading as elephants have done everything in their power to eliminate any sign of unity or wholeness from the campaign process. Their underhandedness and invectiveness has been absolutely inimical to the election process, to the point that the Republican Party should be wiped out and remade in to a party of undivided and unbroken completeness of totality with nothing wanting. Everything that they have done to date is exactly the opposite. They use verbal abuse as a crude substitute for argument.

Cruz in Iowa

Cruz, who claims to be a born again Christian, has done just about everything to diminish such a claim…he claims to have won the Iowa Caucus, but the truth is that he obtained it through trickery and chicanery, and by doing so he may well have doomed the political career of a true Republican conservative. That person is Iowa Congressman Steve King.

Ted Cruz used Congressman King deceitfully and dishonestly, to spread false information about another candidate in order to enhance his own political interests. Unfortunately Congressman King was taken in by Cruz’s deception and at Cruz’s behest tweeted that Dr. Ben Carson was withdrawing from the race, it worked and Cruz went back to Texas and boasted that he had actually won the Iowa Caucus, which was in fact false, he gained the so-called victory through trickery and deceit. To this day he claims that as his lone victory over Donald Trump, when he could not defeat Donald Trump on his best day. So this fraud hi-tailed it back to Texas and left Congressman King swinging in the breeze.

Marco Rubio, here is another so-called Christian

To observe Senator Rubio, one must imagine that he must have stolen his election to the Senate because everything that he has done in his bid for the presidency has been underhanded, sneaky, and marked by deception. He has only proved in my sight that he is a master liar and dispossessed of moral soundness, this guy is not fit to be a dog catcher. In my years I have run across many who are liars and cheats, but this guy seems to hold that title most legitimately, if his candidacy is an example of his true integrity that has to be the case.

Vote for Donald Trump and feel good about it

Throughout of his candidacy Donald Trump has been convincing that he has the will and expertise to root out the governmental corruption that has so angered the people of the United States. The best thing that he has going for him is that he is neither a Cruz nor a Rubio. If he has something to say, he will say it outright and then do his best to live up to his word. This is an important election and we need capable and honorable representatives who will live up to their words. I would ask that this article be forwarded to all of the political individuals identified in it, and also to Mitt Romney the incompetent who was so soundly defeated by another loser, Barack Obama. Good Luck with the reformation of the Republican Party.

© 2016 - Jim R. Schwiesow - All Rights Reserved

Why Threaten North Korea And China? Would Obama Start A War To Stay In Office?

Late in his second term, Obama is starting to become extremely aggressive with the rest of the world.

Is Barack Obama trying to start a war, and will that war be used as an excuse to stay in office once his term is over?

Late in his second term, Obama is starting to become extremely aggressive with the rest of the world. He just angered China by sailing an aircraft carrier task force past disputed islands in the South China Sea, he is provoking North Korea by simulating an invasion of that nation during a military exercise that is going to involve more than 300,000 troops, and he is backing Saudi Arabia and Turkey as they make moves that could very well start World War III in the Middle East. If a war did begin, that could give Obama the excuse that he needs to exercise his emergency powers, and that could potentially include suspending the election that is scheduled for November.

I know that all of this sounds a little bizarre, but it would help to explain Obama’s extremely aggressive behavior lately.

For example, why is the U.S. military risking a major incident on the Korean peninsula?

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is about as paranoid as they come, and he is extremely alarmed by the massive military exercise that is about to begin in South Korea. More than 300,000 troops are gathering for what is being billed as the biggest military exercise in the history of that nation.

Reportedly, U.S. and South Korean forces plan to simulate an invasion of North Korea and practice the elimination of North Korea’s weapons of mass destruction.

In response to these “exercises”, Kim Jong Un has placed his nuclear weapons on standby for “use at any moment”, and he is warning that North Korea may launch a “preemptive and offensive nuclear strike”…

North Korea warned it would make a “preemptive and offensive nuclear strike” in response to joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises that began Monday.

The news was announced in a statement by the National Defense Commission of North Korea and published in the state-run Korean Central News Agency.

“As the joint military exercises to be staged by the enemies are regarded as the most undisguised nuclear war drills aimed to infringe upon the sovereignty of the DPRK, its military counteraction will be more preemptive and offensive nuclear strike to cope with them,” the statement read.

I don’t care how crazy someone is – if they have nuclear weapons and they threaten to hit the United States with a preemptive nuclear strike, I am going to get alarmed.

Remember, North Korea did claim to successfully test a hydrogen bomb in January, and the North Koreans did successfully launch a satellite into orbit in February.

The North Koreans absolutely hate us. In fact, hatred for the United States is one of the pillars of their society. I know that may sound strange to many Americans, but it is true. If you can believe it, each year they actually have an entire monthduring which hatred for America is celebrated.

Tensions on the Korean peninsula are running extremely high, and a single hydrogen bomb could potentially kill millions of people.

So why risk an incident?

Why provoke North Korea more than necessary?

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has been provoking China in the South China Sea.

Yes, it is a problem that China has seized control of several important islands in the Spratly and Paracel island chains. But there are other ways to handle this crisis rather than trying to show how tough you are.

Last month, China deployed surface-to-air missile systems on the disputed islands. Obama’s response was to sail an aircraft carrier task force past the islands to see if China would start shooting at it. The following comes from an article about this incident that was posted by the Navy Times…

The U.S. Navy has dispatched a small armada to the South China Sea.

The carrier John C. Stennis, two destroyers, two cruisers and the 7th Fleet flagship have sailed into the disputed waters in recent days, according to military officials. The carrier strike group is the latest show of force in the tense region, with the U.S. asserting that China is militarizing the region to guard its excessive territorial claims.

Stennis is joined in the region by the cruisers Antietam and Mobile Bay, and the destroyers Chung-Hoon and Stockdale. The command ship Blue Ridge, the floating headquarters of the Japan-based 7th Fleet, is also in the area, en route to a port visit in the Philippines. Stennis deployed from Washington state on Jan. 15.

Do we really want to go to war with China over these islands?

The first time we sailed a military vessel through those waters after China had claimed those islands, a Chinese state-run newspaper boldly declared that China “is not frightened to fight a war with the U.S. in the region“.

Most Americans don’t realize this, but our relationship with China is rapidly going downhill. There is more to this than just the South China Sea, but without a doubt this is a major point of contention as far as the Chinese government is concerned.

At the same time, we keep getting closer to World War III erupting in the Middle East. Last month, defense ministers from 49 different nations met in Brussels to discuss a ground invasion of Syria, and since that time forces have been massing in northern Saudi Arabia and southern Turkey.

If a ground invasion of Syria does take place, the goal would be to go to Damascus and take down the Assad regime. That would put “coalition forces” in direct conflict with Iran, Hezbollah and most importantly the Russians. It could very easily be the spark that sets off World War III, but Saudi Arabia, Turkey and their allies will never go ahead without the direct approval of the Obama administration.

Barack Obama does not need all of these flashpoints to erupt in order to evoke his emergency powers.

He just needs one of them.

Throughout American history, presidents have always had emergency powers, but since 9/11 these powers have been greatly enhanced. Given the right circumstances, a U.S. president could now essentially declare himself (or herself) a dictator for the duration of the crisis.

Of course the word “dictator” would never actually be used, but that would be the reality of the situation.

And if we had a “national emergency” that was bad enough, Barack Obama would have the authority to postpone or suspend the upcoming election.

Let us hope and pray that does not happen, but the truth is that such a scenario could actually take place. Hopefully what we are witnessing around the globe right now are not attempts by Obama to artificially manufacture such a crisis. Let us hope and pray that when his time is up that Obama is ready to gracefully move into retirement.

Florida Poll: Donald Trump 38%, Marco Rubio 30%, Ted Cruz 17%….

The Last Refuge

Caterpillars never-ever, ever-ever, wear brown boots. That sensibility is about as useful as polling this time of year. Just about every poll hitting the media airwaves has some sort of media-purchased agenda behind it. Through the end of the primaries all of them should be taken with a grain of salt.

For today’s narrative Pollster Patrick Murray (he’s now infamous) puts his chicken on a string and submerges it beneath the media surface – SEE HERE. The frenzy ensues. (full pdf below):

(FULL POLL DATA)

Here’s the problem. Patrick’s polling uses 83 registered “independent” voters amid a total poll of 403 respondents. See the issue?

View original post 99 more words

ATF: Gun Production More Than Doubled Since Obama Took Office

Nine million firearms were built and sold in 2014

The production of guns has more than doubled since President Barack Obama’s inauguration in 2009, amid his frequent demands for more gun-control and fewer guns.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has released its annual Firearms Manufacturing and Export Report, which shows that nine million firearms were built and sold in 2014, that’s up from 4.3 million firearms in 2008.

The March 7 report covers production figures from 2014, and shows that 3,633,454 pistols, 744,047 revolvers, 3,379,549 rifles, 935,411 shotguns, and 358,165 miscellaneous firearms were manufactured that year. That adds up to a total of 9,050,626 firearms.

And the 2014 figures, as high as they appear, were down slightly from the 2013 manufacturing total of 10,844,792.

To really grasp how great a surge the figures from 2014 and 2013 represent, consider the ATF’s report for 2008, when a total of 4,298,187 firearms were manufactured.

Or the figures from 2007, when a total of 3,922,613 guns were manufactured.

There is simply no comparison between the two pre-Obama years and what are the last two years of record for gun manufacturing during Obama’s second term.

Breitbart News previously reported that this surge was being fed in late 2015 via the huge growth in demand for guns.

According to CNN Money, Smith & Wesson’s sales for the quarter ending January 31, 2016, were up “61.5%” over the where they were at the end of the same quarter a year before. More broadly, on Black Friday 2015 the FBI conducted 185,345 background checks, not only breaking the previous record for background checks on a given Black Friday but also breaking the single-day record for background checks, period.

And on March 2 Breitbart News reported FBI figures showing that February 2016 was the tenth straight month of record background checks.

So firearm manufacturing continues to surge, but it does so because demand is through the roof.

Under Fire - Candidate Donald Trump Hits Back In Florida - Campaign Commercial (video)…

Trump needs to hit hard against lying Cruz as well as leftist moderate Repub Kasich

The Last Refuge

Just about every political enterprise in the known universe is spending millions on negative attack ads against Donald Trump in Florida. Some reports put the spending over $50,000,000 per week.

Approximately 14-18% of all broadcast commercials -depending on media market- are targeting Trump. For perspective that’s approximately one-tenth the money spent by Mitt Romney in 2012 attacking Newt Gingrich – and that level alone was brutal.

Today candidate Donald Trump began to push back:

View original post