Daily Archives: March 2, 2026

Tripwire Alert - Candidate Ben Carson Suspends Campaign, Well, Sort of…

The Last Refuge

How many people knew Ben Carson’s campaign manager, Barry Bennett, is a DC political consultant partnered with Dick Cheney’s daughter Mary Cheney? “BKM Strategies”

Probably not many…. but do things at least make a little more sense now?

Today Ben Carson suspended his presidential campaign, well, sort of.

Carson didn’t technically “suspend” the campaign, his statement is: he’s “pausing” the campaign.

The difference?

A suspended campaign stops fundraising, a paused campaign continues the legal ability to raise money; and therein you find the evidence of everything we previously researched and presented about the candidacy of Ben Carson.

For everyone around him, it was always about the money.

The strange thing is it’s still difficult to tell if Ben Carson was actually aware of the objectives or whether he was duped. Recently he stated he wasn’t quite sure himself.

View original post 1,036 more words

An Ordinary Voter Writes To Donald Trump…

I’ve used that last photo in two articles…it’s absolutely precious, and shows what the MAN really is all about. I pray to God protection for him every day and I pray the evils of the MSM, DNC, GOPe, all fall and fail, because this is the peoples’ man…We love him. I’ve done so much research on all of them, including Mr. Trump, and I know what I know, what I know…He’s the best thing we’ve seen since Barry Goldwater in 1963.

The Last Refuge

Shared from Scott Adams’ Blog as written by Troy Morton

To: President Trump
From: Just a simple man

I’ve been following your campaign since your announcement, reading millions of words written about you, watching thousands of hours of video and speeches, listening to many talk radio show segments, and engaging in dozens of debates with people around me.

No candidate has ever captured my attention the way you have.

Now that it’s clear you will be the Republican nominee, I want to share with you something so personal, painful, and uplifting, that I almost don’t want to write it, but I will anyway…trolls be damned:

My whole life, up until yesterday, has been based on reaction to fear.

Growing up as a black man in Washington D.C. during the “crack 80’s”, when Marion Barry was mayor, I lived a lower middle class childhood in one of the most dangerous cities…

View original post 735 more words

Romney to Give Speech on State of Presidential Race

comment: look out kiddies, Here It Comes—

____________________________________________

Editor’s note: Consummate Trump insider Roger Stone warned of the Koch Bros plan to Stop Trump last week: CLICK> Republican establishment may try to run Mitt Romney if Rubio failed.

 

No word on what the announcement will entail

Mitt Romney will give a speech on the state of the 2016 presidential race on Thursday, his office said.

Romney is scheduled to address the Hinckley Institute of Politics Forum at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City on Thursday morning, according to an advisory sent to reporters. Utah holds its Republican caucuses on March 22, a day after the last scheduled debate in Salt Lake City announced last month.

Romney has been outspoken in denouncing front-runner Donald Trump, calling on him to release his tax returns and questioning his fitness to be commander in chief.

Republican Establishment Plans to Support Hillary

Vote fraud may be the final solution

According to Rep. Steve King, an Iowa Republican, the Republican establishment may give tacit support to Hillary Clinton if Donald Trump wins the nomination.

King said Clinton is somebody “they can do business with” if Cruz or Trump come out on top.

“We’re going to have something like 70 percent of the vote that comes in here today, and they’re going to be anti-Establishment votes,” King told Breitbart News Daily. He characterized the 2016 primary as a “revolt against the Establishment in the Republican Party.”

King said he believes Republicans will support Clinton “because I’m watching them throw a tantrum right now in Iowa, and they have put, I will say, millions of dollars on the table to recruit a primary opponent against me, because they are sore losers in the Iowa caucus,” King explained. “When Cruz won the Iowa caucus, they decided, we’re going to teach Steve King a lesson.”

Crossover Republicans

In October a Quinnipiac poll found Clinton narrowly ahead of Trump, thanks in part to 10 percent of self-identified Republicans backing her.

In November WND reported a lunch hosted by former US Ambassador to the European Union Rockwell Schnabel.

“In attendance in a private dining room of the Hotel Bel-Air were powerful donors said to include Ronald Spogli, the venture capitalist and former ambassador to Italy under President George W. Bush; his business partner Bradford Freeman” and former Los Angeles Mayor Dick Riordan.

The donors were reportedly asked a hypothetical question: “If it was Donald Trump running against Hillary Clinton, who would you vote for?”

“One version has it that most of the Republicans at the table put their hands up for Clinton,” The Hill reported.

The Republican establishment is so horrified they “will do anything they can to stop Mr. Trump from being the GOP nominee,” according to Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s campaign manager.

Beyond social issues there is little substantive difference between Democrats and Republicans. Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state has been roundly praised by many Republicans and those who served Republican presidents, including Henry Kissinger.

Clinton’s predecessor, Condoleezza Rice, believes “Hillary Clinton, is an extremely talented woman. She is a woman of integrity” and has “done a fine job” at the State Department.

Former Secretary of Homeland Security under Bush, Tom Ridge, “offered some praise for Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, saying he always had ‘productive’ meetings with her when he was in the Cabinet and she was a senator,” The Hill reported.

“Hillary Rodham Clinton, who many believe can win the 2016 Democratic nomination for president, if she wants it, is the winner of the 2013 Liberty Medal,” the Philadelphia Inquirer reported in 2013. “The award is to be presented Sept. 10 to Clinton by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, chairman of the National Constitution Center and a possible contender for the 2016 Republican nomination. Politics aside, Bush praised Clinton in a statement released Thursday announcing her selection. ‘Former Secretary Clinton has dedicated her life to serving and engaging people across the world in democracy,’ Bush said. ‘These efforts as a citizen, an activist, and a leader have earned Secretary Clinton this year’s Liberty Medal.’”

In 2014 Mike Huckabee, who recently dropped his candidacy for the Republican nomination, described Clinton as “smart” and “tough” and said she is “a policy genius.”

“I know her. I like her. I’ve worked with her,” said John Kasich, who is remains in the race despite dismal numbers.

Rick Perry, the former Texas governor who failed to gain support for the nomination, “agrees with Hillary Clinton. Or at least, pretty close to it. Asked [on August 12, 2026] at the Iowa State Fair whether he agreed with the former secretary of state’s assessment that a lack of prior U.S. intervention in Syria emboldened jihadists to penetrate Iraq, the GOP governor of Texas found some daylight with the potential future presidential rival. ‘I think on that issue she was closer to being right than she has been on some other ones,’ he replied,” according to US News & World Report.

Other miscellaneous Republicans also praise Clinton (see Correct the Record), revealing there is very little difference between establishment Republicans and Democrats, at least on foreign policy.

The Establishment’s Final Solution

Donald Trump threatens to upset the establishment apple cart and disrupt its decades-long control over who sits not only in the White House, but also Congress.

As a wrecking ball Trump will likely swing the election in Clinton’s corner, although many observers are convinced he will beat her and become the next president.

This underestimates the control the establishment has over the “democratic” election process. On Tuesday in Texas voters complained votes for Trump were flipped to Rubio.

Election “irregularities” are now common. In 2015 a mathematician at Wichita State University said “some voting systems were being sabotaged” while Princeton researchers conducted a demonstration showing how it’s possible to steal an election with a Diebold voting machine in under a minute.

“In Republican primaries, the bias has been toward the establishment candidates over tea partiers. In general elections, it has favored Republican candidates over Democrats, even when the demographics of the precincts in question suggested that the opposite should have been true,” writes Jon Green.

Judy Frankel believes we cannot trust Diebold voting machines or the establishment.

“The 2014 midterm election results may have been a complete farce. All it takes is one insider who knows how to flip a switch and the outcome changes. When it comes to voting, should we trust our votes to a computer that doesn’t even spit out a receipt for confirmation? Do you trust your voting machine manufacturer?” she writes.

Vote fraud may be the final solution for the establishment in their desperate effort to defeat Trump and put favored insider Clinton in the White House.

War Candidate Clinton Wins Big on Super Tuesday

If elected the architect of the Libya invasion will continue the neocon agenda of endless war

On Super Tuesday Democrat Hillary Clinton once again trounced rival Bernie Sanders and won contests in Georgia, Virginia, Arkansas, Alabama, Massachusetts and Tennessee.

If she wins the Florida primary on March 15 her nomination is all but a done deal. In past elections the state has proven pivotal in determining who is selected.

Democrats, especially black Democrats, are enthusiastic about Clinton and have rejected Sanders socialist bromides. In their zeal to defeat Donald Trump and the Republicans and put yet another statist Democrat in the White House, they have blithely ignored her track record.

On February 28, several days before the primary, The New York Times ran a piece highlighting the role Clinton played in the destruction of Libya and the murder of its leader, Muammar Gaddafi.

The newspaper cites former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who said Clinton controlled the decision to invade the African nation and kill approximately 100,000 Libyans.

The invasion of Libya was “arguably her moment of greatest influence as secretary of state” and serves as “a working portrait rich with evidence of what kind of president she might be,” according to the Times. If elected her past support for illegal war will determine “when and how the United States should wield its military power in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East.”

Unlike Obama, who is viewed and often pilloried as weak and indecisive, “her record on Libya illustrates how, facing a national-security or foreign-policy quandary, she was inclined to act” with devastating result.

Beginning in 2014, well before Donald Trump stormed the Republican party, the neocons began signaling support for Clinton. Robert Kagan and Max Boot, both members of the Council on Foreign Relations and diehard neocons, praised Clinton.

Kagan served as a Clinton foreign policy adviser during her tenure at the State Department. Boot celebrated the illegal intervention in the Balkans by Hillary’s husband. He was also a cheerleader for the Libya invasion. In addition to advocating the use of Super Hornets to pummel Gaddafi into submission, Boot urged the US to send Special Forces trainers to assist the “rebels” who were in fact, according to CIA linked Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, members and fellow travelers of al-Qaeda. Many would later join the Islamic State.

Social issues—abortion, gay marriage, and environmentalism—have historically driven Democrat voters and this election is no exception. Few care to realize, however, that when it comes to war and the national security state Clinton varies little from her Republican challengers, in particular Marco Rubio.

“A President Hillary Clinton would undoubtedly launch a more aggressive policy in Syria at a time when her party seems to want a deescalation from Mid-East wars,” writes Trevor Law. “While foreign policy doesn’t seem to be playing a large role in the Democratic primary it is still shocking that neither of her Democratic rivals have pounced on this disparity with her party. It remains to be seen if this will have a larger impact on the election as a whole but if she wins the primary it is bound to create an interesting dynamic for any of her GOP rivals.”

It appears the only dynamic in play is the prospect of Republicans crossing party lines to back Clinton to avoid voting for Trump or not voting all.

“I’m literally losing sleep over Donald Trump,” Max Boot told Zack Beauchamp of Vox on Tuesday. “She would be vastly preferable to Trump.”

“I’m not wild about Hillary, and I think she has a lot of weaknesses. I would be much happier if Sen. Rubio became president, and I’m much more in agreement with him… But at least Clinton is informed and serious on foreign policy issues.”

In other words neocons back a Clinton presidency because it will continue their agenda of conquest and destruction in the Middle East and a dangerous brinkmanship with Russia.

Democrat voters are oblivious to this. In November, when Clinton faces Donald Trump, those who rallied behind Bernie Sanders will line up and vote for Hillary Clinton. Both Democrats and Republicans vote along partisan lines and for Democrats the prospect of continued war and mass murder comes in a distant second to the prospect of Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office.

Why the Marine Hymn Contains the Verse “To the Shores of Tripoli”

This is very interesting and a must read piece of our history. It points out where we may be heading.

Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam and Thomas Jefferson led the charge!

At the height of the eighteenth century, Muslim pirates (the “Barbary Pirates”) were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.

They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their government and family members to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.

These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers - collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast - and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic.

Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets.

Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, seventeen years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America ‘s Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations w ho paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war.

In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments. Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.

In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli ‘s ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over twenty percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming. That changed everything.

Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit. Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough, decided that it was finally time to meet force with force.

He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to “cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify”.

When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli. The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line “to the shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as “leathernecks” for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.

Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply.

America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. A religion based on supremacism, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers, was unacceptable to him. His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States .

This should concern every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and on….

It’s death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America . By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our own culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further the Islamists agenda. Sadly, it appears that today America’s STUPID leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious!

If you have any doubts about the above information, just Google “Thomas Jefferson vs. the Muslim World.

Cancer Medicines and Ginger

Do our loved ones & friends KNOW ?

* Note taken from Health Sciences Institute e-Alert - Jenny Thompson - 2/29/16



Dear Reader,

Imagine a cancer medicine 10,000 times more powerful than chemo — but that won’t cost you your hair or leave you doubled over a toilet.

In fact, if it wasn’t melting your tumors away, you’d probably forget you were taking it at all.

It almost sounds too good to be true. But researchers say they’ve recently discovered what may be one of the greatest cancer breakthroughs in decades.

I’m talking about a natural substance that may keep tumors from growing, spreading, or maybe even developing in the first place.

And the best part? It’s probably sitting in your kitchen right now.


The spice of life

You know what happens when you just try to mow over the weeds in your yard, right?

They just grow right back — and sometimes worse than ever.

And according to researchers at the Stanford School of Medicine, that’s the problem with mainstream cancer treatments today.

They may shrink tumors and even put you in remission temporarily (while they’re making you miserable with their laundry list of side effects). But they don’t yank cancer out by the root… they don’t attack the cancer stem cells that can start the disease and keep it growing and spreading.

That’s why so many cancers return, often more aggressive than they were before.

And that’s where ginger comes in.

Yes, ginger. That spice that sits up high in your cupboard, only coming out when you’re making a stir-fry or pumpkin pie.

A recent study published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal PLoS One found that a component in dried ginger called 6-shogaol was able to successfully attack and kill breast cancer stem cells.

It did that without harming any healthy cells, which is something you sure can’t say about chemo and radiation.

And here’s the best part. Researchers found they had to increase the concentration of the chemo drug taxol by 10,000 times just to get the same cancer-killing results as the 6-shogaol in ginger.

So it looks like a humble root, one used as a spice and remedy for centuries, is able to specifically target cancer’s root cause.

That remarkable study, however, isn’t the first one to show how ginger can stop cancer in its tracks.

Four years ago, Georgia State University researchers found that whole ginger extract (which contains 6-shogaol as well as other compounds) could shrink the size of prostate tumors in mice by 56 percent! And again, without causing any damage to healthy cells.

And a study just published a few weeks ago discovered that the 6-shogaol compound from ginger was able to “considerably reduce tumor incidence” in hamsters treated with a chemical to give them oral cancers.

Of course, Big Pharma can’t patent ginger. So don’t expect to see a Pfizer or Merck cancer treatment utilizing ginger’s powerful punch anytime soon.

But certainly there’s no reason you can’t start incorporating ginger into your daily routine now — either as a supplement or a delicious spice.

One caution, though — ginger may act as a blood thinner, so don’t take excessive amounts if you’re on an Rx drug for that purpose. And always make sure you stop using it a couple of weeks before surgery.

To Your Good Health,

Jenny Thompson

Sources:
“Ginger kills cancer more effectively than chemo: only kills cancer cells study reveals” Diane Ting, February 22, 2016, Parent Herald, parentherald.com

Video - George H.W. Bush Motions Throat Cut At Trump

#5 - Midnight Super Tuesday GOP Election Results - Trump Wins Seven: Vermont, Arkansas, Virginia, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, Massachusetts…

Oh brother, I sure would have liked to have Texas go to Trump. People are so damned stupid today and don’t see the lies and treachery of Cruz…like Cubans…both of them are ineligible to even run for prez…what is this, payback for the Bay of Pigs?

The Last Refuge

MIDNIGHT – We anticipated the need for more than one Super Tuesday election results thread. Hence, we numbered them (as above).

♦√Alabama ♦ ΧAlaska ♦√Arkansas ♦√Georgia ♦ √Massachusetts ♦Χ Minnesota ♦ Χ Oklahoma ♦ √Tennessee ♦ Χ Texas ♦√Vermont ♦ √Virginia

….all had Republican Primary voting contests today.


◊ Politico Link To Results HERE

◊ Decision Desk HQ Link To Results HERE

Poll Close Times – Minimum Delegate Threshold

  • Vermont 7:00pm (Eastern) Need 20% vote for any delegates √ TRUMP WINNER
  • Virginia 7:00pm (Eastern) Need 5% vote for any delegates √ TRUMP WINNER
  • Georgia 7:00pm (Eastern) Must get 20% for any delegates √ TRUMP WINNER
  • Alabama: 8:00pm (Eastern) Need 20% vote for delegates √ TRUMP WINNER
  • Massachusetts: 8:00pm (Eastern) 5% vote for any delegates √ TRUMP WINNER
  • Oklahoma: 8:00pm (Eastern) Need 15% vote for any delegates √

View original post 67 more words

Super Tuesday Debrief, Primary Results and Anticipated GOPe Reactions….

The Last Refuge

The election results are linked and discussed HERE, so we’re not going to go into depth and repeat the information other than to pull out some results to showcase the next phases. Overall it was a good night for Donald Trump with seven state wins.

(Delegate Count Link) However, that’s done. The more important aspects are: A.) what those results mean and B.) what comes next.

To grasp the meaning we must first remind and reinforce the basic structure of this election because everything is dependent on predicting the future by understanding the past; that means understanding the origin and intents of the GOPe design.

Always remember the various influencers of the next steps are the big money, Wall Street, financiers. The Vested Interests. They direct legislative priorities, they are the ones with the real agenda which underpins the maneuvering of the GOPe, the Democrat party, and the…

View original post 1,261 more words

Lady Gaga’s Riveting Oscar Song POWERFUL!

My comments: If you didn’t see this gal sing the National Anthem at the Super Bowl, you missed a great performance and a beautiful voice there too…Austin mentions it…

by Rev. Austin Miles

The 88th Annual Oscar’s self congratulatory grandiloquence ceremony carried on as usual with the actors using it as a platform to push political issues including global warming, LGBT issues and especially racist charges of deliberate success-hindrance to all blacks. Indeed the entire 10 minutes of M.C. Chris Rock’s opening monologue centered on white’s mistreatment of blacks.

Some of his lines were funny, but others were strained breast strokes in attempts at humor to make specific points, such as: “This year’s in-memorandum presentation will feature blacks on their way to the movies being shot by (white) cops.” Unfunny, crude and in bad taste, yet the robots in the audience dumbly ‘laughed’ and applauded which they felt necessary to do. This is part of Political Correctness doncha know?

White people take the insults in stride, including this one where Rock stated that the reason blacks have not objected to past white Oscar Nominees (which is based on exceptional performance) was because; “We were too busy being raped and lynched to care about who won best cinematographer.”

Oscar nominations are based on superior acting skills…not just good acting but SUPERIOR acting. It took Leonardo DiCaprio 22 years and 4 tries to finally win an Oscar even though he was a very competent actor, but was not SUPERB, up until this film. One does not receive an Oscar just for being in a film.

It is to be noted that the ceremony this year was the least watched in 8 years. The public has had its fill of Staritis aggrandizement.

And that is how it went until Lady Gaga was introduced. The singer who began her career as a creature of curiosity, later evolved into a first-class singer. Her rendition of our National Anthem at this year’s Super Bowl ranked among the very best along with Whitney Houston.

She was introduced by Vice President Joe Biden, not by video, but in person on the stage. She sang about an issue close to Mr. Biden’s heart, that of sexual abuse. His introduction of her was right on target. “We must change the culture,” he said. “We must and we can change the culture so that no abused woman or man, like the survivors you will see here tonight, ever feel that they have to ask themselves, ‘What did I do?’ They did nothing wrong.”

Lady Gaga took the stage to sing a song she helped compose, Til It Happens to You. Several name actors and actresses in the audience broke down crying as well as many TV watchers around the world. Millions of people of all ages have been set upon by these perverts who cannot control their lusts and who cannot be trusted to be alone with anybody, male or female.

They cannot be cured because they cannot control themselves. This affects victims for the rest of their lives, something they never get over. Many become promiscuous, others frigid, while a majority takes to alcohol and drugs. All future relationships they may have are affected and damaged. One thing for sure, relationships established in later life by victims seldom last.

Some who have been violently sexualized by a Scout Master develop a hatred for anyone in authority or anyone in a uniform. Many are left with physical injuries including a torn rectum which leaves them in constant pain. Lady Gaga, it turns out, was sexually abused as a child.

For her to address this severe societal problem in such a dramatic forceful way was very much needed, and hopefully will result in much tougher laws being enforced against sexual predators.

Imagine how it affects someone struggling with the after-effects of being sexualized by a Scoutmaster to see how insane political correctness not only allows but encourages “gays” to become scoutmasters with insistence that the public accept this perversion. Gay Pride days also stab the hearts of those who have been forcibly sodomized as children by homosexuals. To see such conduct encouraged, rather than condemned, stretches the imagination to the breaking point.

Surrounded by victims, male and females who have been violently sexualized by out of control maniacs, with messages scrawled on their arms, such as, “Not Your Fault,” Not to blame,” “It happened to me,” Lady Gaga sang a powerful song that strongly resonated.

Vice President Joe Biden is to be commended for the stand he has taken against one of society’s’ greatest problems and especially Lady Gaga for bringing the issue front and center during a hugely watched major TV program. This was a valuable contribution.