Tag Archives: Second Amendment

Florida School Shooting Account FAKE!!

by Rev. Austin Miles

Let’s cut to the chase. Do you actually believe the facts as given of that Florida school shooting? Has anyone actually taken the time to THINK of the glaring problems with the accounts given of the attack as planted by the Soros Communist Controlled “news media”?

What was the purpose of the murderous school attack followed by national protests by CHILDREN?  The purpose is gun control. Meaning all guns must be confiscated from all citizens for, now get this, “the safety of our children.”  Now there is a benevolent switch to the narration. New tactic but very effective.

The most evil man in the world, George Soros, is also an evil genius. He has tried his best to create a reason to strip Americans from their guns by staging killings, but nothing worked.

But to recruit children to stage mass protests against gun ownership in order to protect THEM, now that is indeed ingenious.

And indeed, we are to believe that all these students in that school suddenly were able to arrange and hire buses to transport them to various capitol buildings to demand gun control with the protests instantly exploding all over the country.

Some Communists volunteered their private airplanes to transport students to various cities for protests. Examine this fact. We did.

And we noticed the protest signs that instantly appeared. This writer is certain they were prepared some time before the shooting.

I remember seeing a demonstration in Ferguson and Maryland. The signs were professionally done, thousands of them. Taking a closer look, this writer clearly saw a logo at the bottom of the protest signs stating:

CPUSA-Communist Party USA.

While visiting Italy a communist riot was taking place, destruction, chaos, fights, cars set on fire. They actually had a COMMUNIST party in Italy. We actually have one here, only it is called a different name. Here it is called, Democrat Party.

Then a very articulate, nice looking young man, David Hogg, presumably a student at the school that was shot up, like Obama, suddenly appeared and was immediately a media star appearing on everything. He claimed to be in the school when the shooting took place.

He immediately became the de facto leader of the “spontaneous” movement to demonize private gun ownership in the U.S.

Now let that soak in.

Now, as the late Paul Harvey would say, “You will now hear,  the REST of the story”.

We’ve now learned that David Hogg was nowhere near the school during the shooting. What? Where was he and how did he become the leader and organizer of the protests??  It all came together rather quickly. Too much so.

Something else of interest: It is reported that Hogg’s father is a retired FBI agent. Something very fishy in all of this. Billionaire George Soros owns most of the government which would include FBI men.

By Soros using children to influence personal gun confiscation, by pleading for their own safety, how can most people fail to back them?  Yes, an ingenious plan by Soros.

So how many non-staged school shootings over the years actually happened?

Years ago a school yard shooting took place in Stockton,California. This writer drove there to examine the school yard. By what was observed in the yard and surrounding areas convinced me that this shooting was staged.

Staged shootings for a personal political reason has an interesting history. Wars have broken out over money—there’s a lot of money in war.  Yes, MONEY. What have we become?

In 1898, The M.S Maine blew up in the Havana Harbor. A war against Spain was for some reason desired. Newspaper icon William Randolph Hearst cabled Cuba and told his workers, “You get me the photos and I will give you the war.” And the war broke out.

But here is something little known: It was discovered many years later that it was not a Spanish bomb that destroyed the M.S. Maine, killing 160 of 400 American Soldiers. It happened due to a fire that broke out in the munitions section of the MS Maine. Didn’t matter. Mission accomplished.

Since this Florida school shooting has turned into a national protest, led by children, financed by George Soros to provide a reason to disarm all Americans—and considering his skills, what do you think?

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

 

DEAN OF WASHINGTON GUN LOBBY JOHN M. SNYDER ENDORSES TRUMP

By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
February 18, 2016
© 2016 NewsWithViews.com

The man known in the nation’s capital as “the dean of Washington gun lobbyists” has come out and joined the growing number of United States VIPs and endorsed a true “Inside the Beltway” outsider — Donald J. Trump — who is expected to win the South Carolina and Nevada Republican primaries.

“GOP presidential candidate Trump is four-square on gun rights,” former NRA publications editor John M. Snyder said in his office in Titusville, Florida, earlier today. “The attempt to undermine the Trump candidacy with firearm owners is an outrage,” he added.

Snyder is referring to certain Democratic Party news media hacks and even some Republicans who claim Trump is not a strong advocate for America’s gun owners who are under attack by the Obama-Clinton coalition.

“One Republican [presidential] opponent has even charged that Trump as president would nominate to the Supreme Court justices who would eviscerate the Second Amendment,” Snyder noted. “This is shameful and desperate,” he said.

“As far as I know, Trump is the only presidential candidate with a permit, issued by New York City, to carry a concealed firearm. [Trump also] believes a citizen with a [concealed handgun] permit issued by one state ought to be able to carry in other states as well,” added Snyder, who serves on the Board of Advisors for the 15,000-member National Association of Chiefs of Police (NACOP).

“Trump has repeatedly defended the individual Second Amendment civil right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. He has criticized severely restrictive gun control laws as partially responsible for a number of high-profile murders, including multiple murders. His book, Crippled America, even includes a chapter on the importance of Americans’ gun rights.”

Snyder said that, “Criticism of Trump on the right to keep and bear arms issue seems to have come about at least partially because his pro-gun rights position represents a reversal of previously-held attitudes.”

“However, that is ridiculous. Our pro-gun rights, pro-individual freedom movement needs converts in order to continue expanding throughout the United States. Where would the United States be today if our Founding Fathers had continued to seek reconciliation with the English Crown rather than promoting American independence? Even modern conservative icon Ronald Reagan switched from Democrat to Republican.”

Snyder asserts that, “Instead of voicing suspicion and even condemnation of Donald Trump, lovers of individual gun rights and personal freedom should welcome him and support his campaign to make America great again.”

In the past, there have been a number of political leaders who changed their positions on key issues. For example, former Democratic Party presidential hopeful Al Gore was pro-life for many years until be became a liberal U.S. Senator. George H.W. Bush was a pro-choice Republican but changed his position on abortion when he became President Ronald Reagan’s second-in-command.

A practicing Catholic, Snyder has been named “the dean of Washington gun lobbyists” by both the Washington Post and the New York Times. He’s been dubbed “a champion of the right of self-defense” by the Washington Times, the “gun dean” by Human Events magazine, and “the senior rights activist in Washington” by Shotgun News.

He holds AB and MA degrees in government from Georgetown University. He has been an NRA magazine editor and official of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and the Second Amendment Foundation. He directs Telum Associates, LL.C, and serves on boards of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, Council for America, and the American Federation of Police & Concerned Citizens.

LARGEST POLICE ORGANIZATION ENDORSES TRUMP

During a Republican presidential campaign bash in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, a key primary state for both the GOP and Democratic Party, the 5,000-member New England Police Benevolent Association, that represents rank-and-file police officers from the Granite State, as well as Massachusetts, announced the PBA’s “proud endorsement of Donald Trump.”

Officials from the police officers association said during the Dec. 10, 2015 event, that they believe they have endorsed “the candidate who best serves our membership.” Speaking to the powerful and influential law enforcement group the man known as “The Donald” promised that upon being elected as Commander in Chief and being inaugurated in January 2017, one of his very first actions will be to sign an executive order.

“Anybody killing a policeman, a policewoman, a police officer, anybody killing a police officer: Death penalty is going to happen, okay?” he told the cheering crowd. “The police and the law enforcement in this country — I will never ever let them down, just remember that.”

Federal criminal procedure law already has a provision giving the federal government the power to execute cop-killers at the federal level. Former police lieutenant and a director of corporate security, Thomas Wollinsky, told the Conservative Base that he’s heard numerous law enforcement officials praise Trump and criticize the majority of Democrats. “Trump reminds us of people like Reagan and Guiliani who didn’t pander to the enemies of cops the way far too many politicians do today,” said Wollinsky.

“They still use the tired, old narrative of racist cops oppressing blacks in order to garner votes and gain power over the blacks who are in the end the primary victims of lawless and violent individuals,” Wollinsky added.

Constitution Amendment 11-27

[Article XI] (Amendment 11 – Suits Against States)

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.   ratified #11  affects 10

[Article XII] (Amendment 12 – Election of President)

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;—The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;—The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.14  —The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.  ratified #12   affects 8

Article XIII (Amendment 13 – Slavery and Involuntary Servitude)

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. affects 11

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.   ratified #13

Article XIV (Amendment 14 – Rights Guaranteed: Privileges and Immunities of Citizenship, Due Process, and Equal Protection)

1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

2: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-oneyears of age,15  and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.   affects 2

3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

4: The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.   ratified #14

Article XV (Amendment 15 – Rights of Citizens to Vote)

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.   ratified #15

Article XVI (Amendment 16 – Income Tax)

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionmentamong the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.   ratified #16    affects 2

[Article XVII] (Amendment 17 – Popular Election of Senators)

1: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for sixyears; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. affects 3

2: When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issuewrits of election to fill such vacancies:  Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct. affects 4

3: This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.   ratified #17

Article [XVIII] (Amendment 18 – Prohibition of Intoxicating Liquors)16

1: After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

2: The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

3: This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.   ratified #18

Article [XIX] (Amendment 19 – Women’s Suffrage Rights)

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. affects 15

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.   ratified #19

Article [XX] (Amendment 20 – Terms of President, Vice President, Members of Congress: Presidential Vacancy)

1: The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.   affects 5

2: The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3d day of January, unless they shall by law appoint a different day.   affects 5

3: If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.   affects 9    affects 14

4: The Congress may by law provide for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the House of Representatives may choose a President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them, and for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the Senate may choose a Vice President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them.  affects 9

5: Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect on the 15th day of October following the ratification of this article.

6: This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures ofthree-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission.   ratified #20

Article [XXI] (Amendment 21 – Repeal of Eighteenth Amendment)

1: The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed. affects 16

2: The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.

3: This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.   ratified #21

Amendment XXII (Amendment 22 – Presidential Tenure)

1: No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

2: This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures ofthree-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.    ratified #22

Amendment XXIII (Amendment 23 – Presidential Electors for the District of Columbia)

1: The District constituting the seat of government of the United States shall appoint in such manner as the Congress may direct: A number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a state, but in no event more than the least populous state; they shall be in addition to those appointed by the states, but they shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and Vice President, to be electors appointed by a state; and they shall meet in the District and perform such duties as provided by the twelfth article of amendment.

2: The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.   ratified #23

Amendment XXIV (Amendment 24 – Abolition of the Poll Tax Qualification in Federal Elections)

1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.   ratified #24

Amendment XXV  affects 9 (Amendment 25 – Presidential Vacancy, Disability, and Inability)

1: In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

2: Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

3: Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

4: Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, withintwenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.   ratified #25

Amendment XXVI (Amendment 26 – Reduction of Voting Age Qualification)

1: The right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age. affects 15

2: The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.   ratified #26

Amendment XXVII (Amendment 27 – Congressional Pay Limitation)

No law varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives shall take effect until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.   ratified #27


NOTES

skip to Dates  up to Amendments

Note 1: This text of the Constitution follows the engrossed copy signed by Gen. Washington and the deputies from 12 States. The arabic numerals preceding the paragraphs designate Clauses, and were not printed (but are referred to) in the original and have no reference to footnotes that appear as small superior figures (superscripts). ratification

Note 2: The part of Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3 relating to the mode of apportionment of representatives among the several States has been affected by Amendment XIV Section 2, and as to taxes on incomes without apportionment by Amendment XVI.

Note 3: Article 1 Section 3 Clause 1 has been affected by Amendment XVII Section 1.

Note 4: Article 1 Section 3 Clause 2 has been affected by Amendment XVII Section 2.

Note 5: Article 1 Section 4 Clause 2 has been affected by Amendment XX.

Note 6: Article 1 Section 6 Clause 1 has been affected by Amendment XXVII.

Note 7: Article 1 Section 9 Clause 4 has been affected by Amendment XVI.

Note 8: Article 2 Section 1 Clause 3 has been superseded by Amendment XII.

Note 9: Article 2 Section 1 Clause 6 has been affected by Amendment XX and Amendment XXV.

Note 10: Article 3 Section 2 Clause 1 has been affected by Amendment XI.

Note 11: Article 4 Section 2 Clause 3 has been affected by Amendment XIII Section 1.

Note 12: The first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States are known as the Bill of Rights

Note 13: The Bill of Rights only had ten of the twelve articles ratified and these were then renumbered. Of the others only the13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th articles of amendment had numbers assigned to them at the time of ratification.

Note 14: This sentence of Amendment XII has been superseded by Amendment XX Section 3.

Note 15: Article XIV Section 2 is modified by Amendment XIX Section 1 and Amendment XXVI Section 1.

Note 16: Amendment XVIII repealed by Amendment XXI Section 1.

 

Dates

skip to Spellings  up to Notes

  • May 25, 1787: The Constitutional Convention opens with a quorum of seven states in Philadelphia to discuss revising the Articles of Confederation. Eventually all states but Rhode Island are represented.
  • Sept. 17, 1787: All 12 state delegations approve the Constitution, 39 delegates sign it of the 42 present, and the Convention formally adjourns.
  • June 21, 1788: The Constitution becomes effective for the ratifying states when New Hampshire is the ninth state to ratify it.
  • Mar. 4, 1789: The first Congress under the Constitution convenes in New York City.
  • Apr. 30, 1789: George Washington is inaugurated as the first President of the United States.
  • June 8, 1789: James Madison introduces proposed Bill of Rights in the House of Representatives.
  • Sept. 24, 1789: Congress establishes a Supreme Court, 13 district courts, three ad hoc circuit courts, and the position of Attorney General.
  • Sept. 25, 1789: Congress approves 12 amendments and sends them to the states for ratification.
  • Feb.  2, 1790: Supreme Court convenes for the first time after an unsuccessful attempt February 1.
  • Dec. 15, 1791: Virginia ratifies the Bill of Rights, and 10 of the 12 proposed amendments become part of the U.S. Constitution.

~Steve~

http://constitutionus.com/

Bill Of Rights. Or The Original 10 Amendments. Added 1789

billofrights

Amendments to the Constitution

begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.12

(Articles I through X are known as the Bill of Rights)   ratified

Article the first. ….  After the first enumeration required by the first Article of the Constitution, there shall be one Representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which, the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred Representatives, nor less than one Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of Representatives shall amount to two hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one Representative for every fifty thousand persons.

Article the second. ….  No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened. see Amendment XXVII

Article [I] (Amendment 1 – Freedom of expression and religion) 13

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,

 

or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances.

Article [II] (Amendment 2 – Bearing Arms)

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Article [III] (Amendment 3 – Quartering Soldiers)

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Article [IV] (Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure)

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Article [V] (Amendment 5 – Rights of Persons)

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Article [VI] (Amendment 6 – Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions)

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Article [VII] (Amendment 7 – Civil Trials)

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Article [VIII] (Amendment 8 – Further Guarantees in Criminal Cases)

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Article [IX] (Amendment 9 – Unenumerated Rights)

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Article [X] (Amendment 10 – Reserved Powers)

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

( READ THAT AGAIN FOLKS! THIS IS WHERE WE HAVE MANY PROBLEMS! )

Attest,
John Beckley, Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Sam. A. Otis  Secretary of the Senate.
Frederick Augustus Muhlenberg  Speaker of the House of Representatives.
John Adams, Vice-President of the United States, and President of the Senate.

(end of the Bill of Rights)

Cops Killing Un Armed Black Yout’s Everywhere. Well Those Darn Facts Again..

Did you say “Yout’s”, Yes sir I said “Yout’s”     🙂


The myth of the cop killing ‘epidemic’

 

To hear the media tell it, America is in the grip of an unprecedented crime wave, an orgy of wanton murder in which heavily armed thugs randomly gun down innocent unarmed people, some of them teens, just for sport.

Except that these homicidal goons are wearing the blues and badges of American police departments.

It’s the narrative that’s given rise to the protest movement Black Lives Matter and to a growing public mistrust of the police in general. From Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., to the recent shooting of a middle-aged woman and a teen in Chicago, the body count seemingly keeps rising, exacerbating racial tensions and keeping the nation on edge. And each incident is breathlessly reported by a media determined to show that America remains deeply, irredeemably racist.

Problem is, it’s simply not true.

Last week, The Washington Post published a study of the police shootings that took place in 2015. Likely they intended the story to be shocking — as on Dec. 24, 965 people were killed by police! Instead, the report quells the notion that trigger-happy cops are out hunting for civilian victims, especially African-Americans. Among its key findings:

  • White cops shooting unarmed black men accounted for less than 4% of fatal police shootings.
  • In three-quarters of the incidents, cops were either under attack themselves or defending civilians. In other words, doing their jobs.
  • The majority of those killed were brandishing weapons, suicidal or mentally troubled or bolted when ordered to surrender.
  • Nearly a third of police shootings resulted from car chases that began with a minor traffic stop.

The moral of this story is: Don’t point a gun at the cops and don’t run when they tell you stop, and you’re likely to survive.

Since the population of the US is about 318 million people, a thousand deaths at the hands of police works out to 1 in 318,000.

You have a better chance of being killed in a violent storm (1 in 68,000) or slipping in the tub (1 in 11,500) than being shot by a cop, no matter what color you are.

But even these figures are deceptive. On those 965 killed, only 90 were unarmed, and the majority of those were white. (And that doesn’t take into account other extenuating circumstances besides a weapon that would have caused a police officer to fire).

Still, the “killer cop” narrative refuses to die, and The Washington Post decided to throw fuel on the racial fire with context-free statements like these: “Although black men make up only 6% of the US population, they account for 40% of the unarmed men shot to death by police this year.”

This ignores the fact that black violent-crime rates are far higher than those of whites. According to the Department of Justice, blacks committed 52.5% of the murders in America from 1980-2008, when they represented 12.6% of the population.

This certainly does not excuse cases of police misconduct. Bad cops should be investigated and tried. The death of Walter Scott in South Carolina last spring — shot in the back while fleeing a white police officer after a routine traffic stop — resulted in the indictment of the cop, who is now awaiting trial. And the killing of Quintonio LeGrier and Bettie Jones in Chicago on Dec. 26, after the troubled LeGrier allegedly became “combative” with officers, cries out for further investigation.

But these incidents don’t prove that the “real problem” is cops. This isn’t an “epidemic.” And it isn’t racist to suggest that some perspective is warranted here.

Yet, encouraged by liberal politicians, the rhetoric of protesters has become more heated, poisoning relations between local police and the folks they serve. Most tragically, it’s resulted in the murders of police officers, such as NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos, killed in a Brooklyn ambush just over a year ago.

Against the numbers cited by The Washington Post, what about this one: The worst neighborhoods in Chicago — say, West Garfield Park, where gangs run rampant — have a higher murder rate (116.7 per 100,000) than world murder capitals like Honduras (90.4).

But no, best not to mention. That only distracts from the real problem — the cops trying to stop it.

~Steve~

nypost.com

Gun Control. My Butt.

ATT00001 ATT00002 ATT00003 ATT00004 ATT00005 ATT00006 ATT00007 ATT00008 ATT00009 ATT00010 ATT00011 ATT00012 ATT00013 (1) ATT00014 ATT00015 ATT00016 ATT00017 ATT00018 ATT00019Steve~                                   H/T   Hujonwi

Muzzie Threatens Wrong Woman. Bullets, And Bacon.

Friends you have got to watch this epic response from this Ex Military Women who responds to some muzzie who is threatening her on the net.


MUSLIM MAN THREATENED TO RAPE AND MURDER: The Wrong Woman, Watch Her Epic Reply

~Steve~

http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com

Roseburg Paper Tells Obama Stay Home. Don’t Play Silly Games Here.

Nope folks The Roseburg Beacon publisher David Jaques has told skippy stay the hell out of Roseburg. Apparently most in town feel the same. This is a very pro second amendment town. It was amazing to see even the survivors  saying more laws are not the answer. Other than the  gunman’s “Idiot Father” who sounds like another “Useful Idiot” The good people of Roseburg sound like good strong folks. Please say a few prayers for them while they grieve.


Beacon Publisher Says Obama Is Not Welcomed in Roseburg After Politicizing the Tragedy

Barack Obama and his ilk are using the tragedy in Oregon to attack the Second Amendment. His argument is completely illogical but people are so desperate to stop these horrific murders that they will buy into it without truly thinking about the impossible logic of eliminating every gun and the illegal gun trade. They won’t consider that the gun grabbers will go after knives next as former NYC mayor Mike Bloomberg did during his reign.

The people of Roseburg will not go along with Obama’s agenda. This is one tragedy he won’t be able to fully exploit.

The Roseburg Beacon publisher David Jaques says Obama is not welcome after his comments politicizing the shooting death of nine people at Umpaqua Community College.

~Steve~

More Here http://www.independentsentinel.com/beacon-

Vet Prevented From Stopping Oregon Gunman

My comment: The Sheeple Rule. The Christians Die. The “Religion of Peace” in full fury. Good help us all!

Armed Air Force Vet Was Prevented From Stopping Oregon Gunman

“The staff wouldn’t let us go to assist”

by Paul Joseph Watson | October 2, 2015

Armed Air Force Vet Was Prevented From Stopping Oregon Gunman

An Air Force veteran who had a licensed concealed carry gun was prevented by staff from intervening in the shooting yesterday at the Umpqua Community College during which ten people were killed.

John Parker was situated in a building about 200 yards away from where the shooting began.

“There were a few people in the vet center and then when we heard the shooting happened, we got up and we were gonna go out and see what we could do,” Parker told Fox News’ Sean Hannity.
“Immediately the school staff stopped us and told us to get inside of the building….essentially the staff wouldn’t let us go to assist,” he added.

One courageous man who also tried to apprehend the shooter, Army veteran Chris Mintz, ended up being shot five times. Mintz was unarmed.

In asserting his right to concealed carry, Parker was knowingly violating a rule which declared the college to be a gun free zone.

As we reported yesterday, a post on the college website made it clear that even water pistols were banned on campus.

The single security officer working on the campus was also unarmed, according to the Associated Press.

Meanwhile, as news emerges that the gunman, 26-year-old Chris Harper Mercer, was a potential Islamist sympathizer who dabbled in the occult, expect the left to lose interest in the incident quickly.

The fact that Mercer is mixed race will also make it impossible for progressives to blame the shooting on all white people, as many did in the aftermath of the Dylann Roof shooting.

Mercer reportedly targeted Christians during the shooting, asking victims about their religion and shooting anyone who identified as a Christian in the head.

“[He started] asking people one by one what their religion was. ‘Are you a Christian?’ he would ask them, and if you’re a Christian stand up. And they would stand up and he said, ‘Good, because you’re a Christian, you are going to see God in just about one second.’ And then he shot and killed them,” Stacy Boylen, whose daughter was wounded at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore., told CNN.

Hillary Taking on NRA in Quest for More Gun Control

Written by  for THE NEW AMERICAN MAGAZINE

FIREARM

With the odds makers continuing to pick Hillary Clinton not only as the Democrat Party’s nominee but the odds-on favorite to win the White House in the November 2016 elections, she has decided to take the gloves off. She is now blatantly targeting and challenging the gun rights movement and the National Rifle Association as obstacles to be overcome in her drive to diminish further Americans’ Second Amendment rights.

Following the on-air shooting of two television reporters in Roanoke, Virginia, she declared: “I feel just great heartache at what happened. I want to reiterate how important it is [that] we not let yet another terrible instance go by without trying to do something more to prevent this terrible killing that is stalking our country.”

She added: “We have got to do something about gun violence in America — and I will take it on.”

She said the same thing back in July, in an obvious shift away from avoiding Second Amendment issues during the presidential campaign to avoid offending gun owners: “We have to take on the gun lobby. This is a controversial issue. I am well aware of that. But I think it is the height of irresponsibility not to talk about it.”

She apparently feels that she has clear sailing to the White House, especially as Vice-President Joe Biden continues to waffle in his decision to run and the president himself has all but given up the gun control battle. The only apparent leftist contender remaining with the clout to challenge the front-runner is Bernie Sanders, who himself supports gun rights coming as he does from the gun-friendly state of Vermont where Vermonters “may carry open or concealed without permit as long as you are a citizen of the United States.”

Despite the running sores of Benghazi and her e-mail controversy, Clinton has openly declared war on the Second Amendment, a move that she hopes will galvanize her and her staff before and after they arrive at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in 2017.

Chris Cillizza, writing at The Fix, noted that Obama has waved the white flag of surrender in his efforts to infringe further on those rights. Watching carefully as Obama grieved publicly over the murders of nine people at a church in Charleston, South Carolina, on June 17, he noted elements of his body language:

The first was anger — at the fact that he was, once again, addressing the country in the wake of a mass shooting. The second was more along the lines of resignation — a head-shaking weariness about the almost-certain fact that this latest shooting would do little to move the needle on gun control legislation.

Added Cillizza:

This is the most powerful politician in the country acknowledging that he has little to no ability to effect a change he quite clearly believes needs to happen.

Phillip Rucker at the Washington Post noted the definite shift in Hillary’s strategy as far back as July:

In a sign that the political environment on guns has shifted in the wake of recent mass shootings — and of Clinton’s determination to stake out liberal ground in her primary race against insurgent Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — Clinton is not only initiating a debate about gun control [now] but also vowing to fight the National Rifle Association.

The shift was obvious also to Wayne LaPierre, the NRA’s executive vice president: “We’ve been down this road before with the Clintons. She needs to read her husband’s book [My Life].” In that book her husband noted that one of the primary reasons Al Gore lost the 2000 presidential election was because of backlash over Clinton’s ban on “assault weapons” he signed into law in 1995. He also noted that many anti-gun Democrat lawmakers also lost their seats in elections after that ban was put in place.

This was confirmed by David Saunders, a Democratic strategist in Virginia, who warned that the Clinton “shift” could have negative consequences as well:

Never in the history of the Democratic Party have they started a gun control debate that didn’t cost them numbers in the general election.

She’s trying to get to the left of Bernie, but I think it’ll hurt her in the long run — and it’ll cost anybody on the down ticket in the South and in rural America.

Nevertheless, Clinton has been steadfast:

In 1993, she praised the Brady Bill.

In 2000, while campaigning for the Senate, she supported legislation sponsored by Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to license handguns with photo-IDS.

In 2004, she voted against banning lawsuits against gun makers.

In 2007, referring to the Columbine High School shooting she stated her goal: “to limit access to people who should not have guns.”

In 2008, she said she “want[s] to be sure that we keep guns out of the wrong hands.”

In 2014, she told a town hall meeting that she believed reinstating the assault weapons ban and a ban on high-capacity magazines would help limit gun violence, adding “I was disappointed that the Congress did not pass universal background checks after the horrors of the shootings at Sandy Hook.”

And, following the murders in Roanoke, she raised the volume of her anti-gun rhetoric further:

It happens every day, and there is so much evidence that if guns were not so readily available, if we had universal background checks, if we could put some timeout between the person who is upset because he got fired or the domestic abuse or whatever other motivation may be working on someone who does this — that maybe we could prevent this kind of carnage.

In an apparent effort to pick up where Obama is leaving off, Hillary Clinton is taking advantage of what appears to be an unsurmountable lead in the race to the White House to make clear exactly where she stands on the Second Amendment: The long war against guns will continue under her administration.

A graduate of an Ivy League school and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at http://www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics.

 

Ladies And Gents. Society Has Started To Break Down. Pick A Side….Quick!

Lock-N-Load is my advise for this AM kiddies. Because I think the proverbial Shiite is about to hit the fan. Everywhere you turn society, well let me rephrase that Black society has seemed to jump the tracks (obligatory, no not all blacks) It’s one story after another of Blacks committing violence or calling for violence against Police, or White people. You would think that would be a crime. Oh yea I forgot obama, and Loretta Lynch are black. Payback Whitey. So CZ posted a great story this morning all about this topic of blacks run amuck . why-blacks-are-given-the-power-to-rule

I found this story below of a poor cop trying to do his job when the crowd turned against him. Led by these 2 sub-humans below. Sorry, but they are a problem in this world. It started when their parents gave them their names. Call me whatever you want, but I guarantee you with names like that they will never ever get beyond a fast food check out in their life. They are doomed to failure from birth. Can you see any Corporation hiring yet promoting either one into the ranks of upper management?

Stock up. Don’t play nice with others. Always play to win. Screw them before they screw you or your family.         ~Steve~  

As long as people keep naming people with these names 

Latonya B. James and Nanyamka N. James.  Read the names. Need I say more.

Latonya B. James and Nanyamka N. James.
Read the names. Need I say more.

MPD officer confronted by crowd, punched, police say

Police: Crowd voiced anti-police sentiments

Published On: Sep 03 2015 11:06:57 AM CDT   Updated On: Sep 03 2015 05:42:53 PM CDT
MADISON, Wis. –A Madison police officer was confronted by a crowd and punched after a street fight on Prairie Road Wednesday night, according to a release from Madison police

The officer stopped in the area of Prairie Road and Jacobs Way around 6:20 p.m. after spotting a large number of people in the street. He said that as he approached he saw a woman punch a man in the face, and he could see that the woman had a can of pepper spray.

The officer said that as he went to arrest the woman he was surrounded by a crowd that was voicing anti-police sentiments, including “We need to start killing these officers.”

Police said the woman’s daughter was grabbing the officer while trying to free her mother. The officer said he tried to diffuse the situation by explaining to the crowd that the woman had just punched someone and was armed with pepper spray. Police said his words were ignored, and the struggle with the two people continued.

The older woman punched the officer in the face and grabbed him by the throat, according to the release.

The officer said he could see many in the crowd were recording the incident on their cellphones while some accused him of misconduct and using excessive force.

A witness told police he or she “felt the officer was in trouble” and said it appeared someone had gone for his gun.

The two women were arrested when more officers arrived.

“He demonstrated fantastic patience and restraint in dealing with these folks,” Madison Police Department Capt. Vic Wahl said. “He was able to literally get assaulted in the midst of a large crowd and still take these women into custody without causing any injuries to anyone.”

Police said Latonya B. James, 40, of Madison, threatened many times to kill the officer while on her way to jail. She was arrested on suspicion of battery to a law enforcement officer, possession of pepper spray, disorderly conduct and resisting.

Nanyamka N. James, 20, of Madison was arrested on suspicion of disorderly conduct, resisting and on a parole hold.

Police said a nearby resident who was not involved in the melee told a detective the officer who was battered has, in the past, done a great job reaching out to residents and communicating with the neighborhood.

http://www.channel3000.com/news/MPD-officer-confronted-by-crowd-punched-police-say/35082128

NRA AND GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA SHOULD FIGHT REAUTHORIZATION OF E.S.E.A. ACT

PART 1 of 2

By Anita Hoge
August 11, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

All Americans Should Fight the Reauthorization of ESEA Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Could it be that something happening in education will impact gun ownership? Is President Obama ensuring his legacy to transform America by disqualifying individuals for gun ownership? Does your local school district log information on the social, emotional, and behavioral data of your child and feed anecdotal psychological observation information into federal databanks? Is adjustment of attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions to the State’s image the main aspect of the Reauthorization of ESEA, Elementary and Secondary Education Act? Will federal databases eventually disqualify citizens from owning a gun? Yes, emphatically yes! Read on.

The following four reports, two released this past week, and the ESEA Reauthorization legislation moving forward for passage this Fall, reveal that, by tramping on our Constitution, President Obama is transforming America into a collectivist state. Analyzing the intersection of these key initiatives will bring into focus the total scheme changing America into something that most Americans won’t recognize. You need to fight against this totalitarian goal.

Please read the following analysis and pray that it is not too late.

FIRST Blow To Gun Rights

Concurrent with the restructuring of society through education President Obama has engineered a plan to re-organize neighborhoods. Leo Hohmann, WorldNetDaily, July, 2014, first exposed this plan in his article detailing how President Obama is re-structuring housing. The Hohmann article, “New Obama Rule Could Force Cities To House Illegals, Regulation fits perfectly in line with promise to transform America,” offers a glimpse of how President Obama is restructuring ZIP codes. Hohmann rightly calls President Obama’s move the “Common Core for local zoning.”

Paul Sperry, in an article, July 18, 2015, from the New York Post, “Obama Collecting Personal Data For a Secret Race Database,” reports how HUD (Housing and Urban Development) plans to integrate illegal immigrants, minorities, and felons into EVERY neighborhood through ZIP CODE analysis. President Obama’s plan for equity in housing is to relocate minorities and illegal aliens into your neighborhood if your town or city is 50% or more white. This is a giant leap away from privacy and the ability to live your life free of government control and free from fear of reprisal. According to Sperry there are five areas that will be analyzed for patterns of “racial disparities and segregation” — Housing databases, Mortgage databases, Credit databases, Employment databases, and School databases.

Quoting from the Sperry article.

A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”

Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.

This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.

Federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in affluent areas in the suburbs, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites. [Emphasis mine]

HUD plans to drill down to an even more granular level, detailing the proximity of black residents to transportation sites, good schools, parks and even supermarkets. If the agency’s social engineers rule the distance between blacks and these suburban “amenities” is too far, municipalities must find ways to close the gap or forfeit federal grant money and face possible lawsuits for housing discrimination.

Civil-rights groups will have access to the agency’s sophisticated mapping software, and will participate in city plans to re-engineer neighborhoods under new community outreach requirements. [Emphasis mine]

…Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing database, which the Department of Housing and Urban Development rolled out earlier this month to racially balance the nation, ZIP code by ZIP code….will map every US neighborhood by four racial groups — white, Asian, black or African-American, and Hispanic/Latino — and publish “geospatial data” pinpointing racial imbalances.

The agency proposes using nonwhite populations of 50% or higher as the threshold for classifying segregated areas. Cities and towns that accept federal funding will be pressured to change zoning laws to allow construction in affluent neighborhoods, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites. (Emphasis mine)

The National Mortgage Database Project compiles 16 years of lending data broken down by race, individual credit scores, employment records, all credit lines, credit cards, student loans, car loans, and anything reported to credit bureaus. The FHFA*collects data on personal assets, debts, bankruptcies, even square footage and lot size of your home and your interest rate.

Through its mandatory Civil Rights Data Collection project, the Education Department is gathering information on student suspensions and expulsions, by race, from every public school district in the country. Districts that show disparities in discipline will be targeted for reform.

…even if there is no other evidence of racism, the numbers themselves will “prove” that things are unfair. Such databases have never before existed. Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history. He is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society.

* Federal Housing Finance Agency

Explaining how this will impact your town or city, Stanley Kurtz’s articles in National Review, July 8, 2015, called, “Massive Government Overreach- Obama’s AFFH Rules Are Out,” and July 20, 2015, called, “Attention American Suburbs, You Have Just Been Annexed,” explains how America’s suburbs will be federally re-engineered in nearly every American neighborhood “nullifying municipal boundaries.” Is it the government’s job to diversify neighborhoods by income level and “undo America’s system of local government and replace it with a ‘regional’ alternative that turns suburbs into helpless satellites of large cities?”
(Source 1 and Source 2)

The consolidation of these named databases intersect all aspects of our lives in every ZIP code, in every city, town, and hamlet in the United States.

SECOND Blow To Gun Rights

The next step is to re-define who is mentally disabled and who can own a gun. President Obama now pushes to include SSI beneficiaries, deemed being no longer able to “manage their own affairs” in the broad definition of what is a “mentally deficient” person. President Obama collects data on ex-military or anyone receiving benefits from the government who would meet these same definitions from the Social Security Administration. This data would be logged into the National Instant Criminal Background Checks System, decidedly removing the right to purchase a firearm. The following key question must be answered: What is the definition of mentally deficient or mental illness?

In Alan Zarembo’s article in the Chicago Tribune, July 18, 2015,”Obama pushes to extend gun background checks to Social Security” he quotes the following information: (Source)

Seeking tighter controls over firearm purchases, the Obama administration is pushing for a ban on Social Security beneficiaries from owning guns if they lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs, a move that could affect millions whose monthly disability payments are handled by others.

The push is intended to bring the Social Security Administration in line with laws regulating who gets reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, which is used to prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, immigrants in the country illegally and others. A potentially large group within Social Security are people who, in the language of federal gun laws, are unable to manage their own affairs due to “marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease.” [Emphasis mine]

Social Security would generally report names under the same “mental defective” category. The agency is still figuring out how that definition should be applied, LaVelle said. [Emphasis mine]

The NRA issued a statement from its chief lobbyist, Chris W. Cox, saying: “If the Obama administration attempts to deny millions of law-abiding citizens their constitutional rights by executive fiat, the NRA stands ready to pursue all available avenues to stop them in their tracks. [Emphasis mine]

THIRD Blow to Gun Rights

These four reporters – Mr. Hohmann, Mr. Sperry, Mr. Zarembo’s, and Mr. Kurtz – need to extend their research of President Obama’s agenda into the education area. Why? President Obama is already pushing equity in education, and has already redefined who is poor under Title I and who is disabled under IDEA (Special Ed) – to gain control of ALL children and to label them as “mentally deficient” under the Common Core mental adjustment banner!

The results are staggering. The targeting of mostly white neighborhoods and the controlled relocating of minorities and illegals into every ZIP code will effectually artificially inflate the poverty statistics in education. Title I guarantees schoolwide one-on-one interventions with EVERY CHILD if the poverty threshold is met. This will be guaranteed with ZIP code population redistribution. This means that in every school district accountable to federal guidelines EVERY child will now be labeled a child “At-Risk” of failing to meet government standards – even if his/her parents are millionaires and the child has 120 or higher IQ. For part two see the next article.

NRA AND GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA SHOULD FIGHT REAUTHORIZATION OF E.S.E.A. ACT

PART 2 of 2

By Anita Hoge
August 11, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

In the Reauthorization of ESEA, Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the federal government must have a scheme to identify (1) the child, (2) the public/charter/private/religious school, and (3) the interventions to snare the entire population into its net:

(1) ALL children will have to be identified as “At-Risk.” Title I is being used to envelop EVERY child as “educationally deprived” and therefore “At-Risk” because of not meeting Common Core psychological standards, which include a child’s attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions.
(2) The criteria for poverty must be corrupted to mean EVERY CHILD IN THE ENTIRE SCHOOL. Schoolwide would be implemented under Title I, thereby throwing a blanket over the entire school identifying ALL CHILDREN as “At-Risk.” Title I Portability (“Choice”) grabs the private/parochial schools under the same net called “direct student services” that must be provided to ALL Title I “At-Risk” students who have that voucher in their hand.
(3) All of these “At-Risk” labeled children must receive interventions and services. The interventions and services are extreme combinations of identifying, screening, and remediating EVERY STUDENT to the government-prescribed minimum attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions. Schools would use Special Education funding (IDEA) to identify and remediate these mental health “defects.” Every child is identified as needing remediation in an “Individual service plan” thereby justifying the use of psychological interventions on normal children, not just physically disabled or physically related impaired children. (see below)

Realize that a child is now “At-Risk” if they are not meeting Common Core psychological standards, and that 45 states that have adopted Common Core have already agreed to this psychologically manipulative agenda. The remaining states are furthering this scheme under different names and labels. Literally, local control over education has been usurped in every state.

The schools are collecting more data than just discipline and race equalization, as Sperry has pointed out. Every movement that your child makes can be tallied and logged into spy software. The screening and interventions through Special Ed will be based on attitudes, values, opinions, beliefs, dispositions, behavior, using social and emotional traits to identify children who do not match the government’s socialist goals. This screening system identifies “weaknesses” in our American children’s psyches, especially if they do NOT go along with the group. True leadership qualities ARE NOT the goals of the government, and our American children who would be leaders of tomorrow will be identified and selected for remediation and interventions to embrace collectivist goals.

Scientifically-researched techniques and testing called evidence-based curriculum are being used for teacher training in order to comply with this agenda. Techniques are included under such things as Specialized Student Support, Response to Intervention, Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports, Early Intervening Services, Multi-Tiered System of Supports, and Instructional Support Teams. Monitoring behavior and using DSM V psychological codes to evaluate conduct will target EVERY child for psychological treatment, thereby forcing them into subservience. There is NO code for normal!

Teachers are copiously entering students’ personally identifiable information (PII) into local databases that are digitized and instantly transferred electronically to state longitudinal databases, and on to the national databases (NCES/IES). If your school is telling you there are no national databases, they are lying to you. If your school says they are testing “grit”, citizenship, or ethical behavior, they are identifying and scoring your child’s “threshold”, meaning that point at which your child decides to do the wrong thing. This is conformable to government goals and is manipulated by rewards and punishment. For example, at what point will your child change his/her behavior? If punishment is incurred, will your child obey? The INFORMATION COLLECTED is the vehicle to see how much intervention your child needs to mold them into drones to meet government compliance. Therefore, an individual plan is promoted to make sure your child fits into the government’s mold. Personalized plans for screening, monitoring, and interventions are put in place with a constant feedback loop of remedial interventions… until the child complies.

Whatever happened to academics? Not to be found in these education bills! What about electronic federal government portfolios? Yes! Data is gathered by the bucketful on your family in every state monitoring personalities and remediating individuality. (Source)

Because of President Obama’s Executive Order 12866, the state longitudinal data systems were developed in each state. These aligned each student and teacher with a unique national ID. On top of the collection of psychological, mental (erroneously called) “health” data that is also being collected on students and families – because of Common Core, Title I, and Special Education – the government has also been amassing and accessing entire psychological profiles called psychometric dossiers. These profiles reflect what parents have instilled in their children in the areas of attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions. Education databanks are swollen with social, emotional, behavioral, and dispositional personal data on American families – unbeknownst to parents, citizens, and legislators! (See Hoge Testimony, 15 min, PA House Education Committee, Feb. 2105)

FOURTH Blow to Gun Rights.

This next step is the future of America’s Second Amendment, the future of our children, and the future of our neighborhoods. The legislation to Reauthorize ESEA is the biggest restructuring of society agenda to be legislated in history. Right now the legislation has passed both houses of Congress and is in Reconciliation for a bipartisan agreement.

The call for bipartisanship has been voraciously reported all over the media and D.C. Many have said that President Obama vowed to veto Title I Portability (so-called “Choice”) but wants Universal Pre-K. The Republicans have vowed to pass Title I Portability (“Choice”) and are against Universal Pre-K. What does this compromise look like to you? To me this compromise will ensure that ESEA passes thereby legalizing psychological data-tracking and data-trafficking of your child from conception (before birth) on.

To make sure the psychoanalyzing of the baby starts at birth, Universal Pre-K must be included in ESEA. Common Core for babies must also be passed collecting data at birth, even starting at conception. (Source).

ALL children (starting with babies) will have a psychological diagnosis code behind their names. Remember, there is no code for normal!

The implementation of Title I Portability extended for private and parochial schools, pushed by Republican members of Congress, will force this agenda onto those private and parochial schools to comply with Common Core Psychological “services.” This places President Obama’s thumbprint on every American child. It also forces every school in America to be chartered.

To further this socialist agenda that ensnares every child equally, President Obama commissioned this exact plan quoted below, for equity called, For Each and Every Child.”

First, we begin with a restructuring of the finance systems that underlie every decision about schools, focusing on equitable resources and their cost-effective use.
Second, we examine the most critical resource of all: quality teachers and school leaders, the supports they need to be effective with all learners and ways to make sure all students have access to high-quality instructional opportunities.
Third, we explain the importance of starting early—making the case for high-quality early learning for all children, especially for low-income children, who need it most.
Fourth, there is the matter of providing critical support— including increased parental engagement, access to health and social services, extended instructional time and assistance for at-risk groups—that students in high-poverty communities need to start strong and stay on track.
And fifth, we lay out the changes in accountability and governance necessary to ensure that, a decade from now, there doesn’t need to be yet another commission appointed to call public attention to the corrosive effects on the nation’s children and our future of the failure to advance equity and excellence in America’s public schools.

Lurking in the ESEA legislation to provide all this psychotherapy is President Obama’s STEP 4, using MEDICAID in the schools to accomplish this agenda. This plan was an older plan being pushed in 1995 under the 3rd Option in HillaryCare when Hillary Clinton and her national healthcare scheme was being pushed at that time. MEDICAID billing at school for ALL children was the agenda. It was based on the premise that if ALL American children could have access to healthcare, and be diagnosed by the school as having mental health problems, UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE WOULD BE BROUGHT IN THROUGH THE BACKDOOR, AGE 0-21. So the HillaryCare plan raises its ugly head once again to gather all children into the federal government’s net through the current Obamacare mandate.

Schools apply for partial hospitalization provider licenses to bill for MEDICAID. That means every time a TEACHER, SPECIAL EDUCATION TEAM, INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT TEAM, SOCIAL WORKER. PSYCHOLOGIST, OR PSYCHIATRIST interfaces with a child, they will have the ability to bill MEDICAID. To bill MEDICAID one must place a DSM V psych code on the student’s permanent record for the school to be reimbursed for those psychological services. This psych-coding identifies EVERY child as having a mental health disorder or as “mentally defective.” This psych dossier follows your child for life like a shadow.

Absolutely no child, beginning with conception, will escape these psychological codes.

Step by step the government has made sure that no of-age person will ever qualify to own a gun due to a history of psych diagnoses as described above. In just a few years, with this piece of legislation, the President’s Executive Order 12866, and his equity in housing plan, President Obama will have effectually deleted the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

Unless we stand and thwart this totalitarian tank moving out of D.C., and before it rolls right into our ZIP codes, we’ll be left without even a single gun to defend our families, homes, and country.

NRA and GOA, PLEASE HELP US.

AMERICA NEEDS YOUR HELP TO STOP ESEA, NOW.

NRA and GOA, America needs you to join the parents and teachers to fight for academics in the classroom and for all of us to live our lives free of totalitarian government-mandated attitudes, values, and behavior profiling and databanking.

We cannot allow America to become a collectivist regime.

STOP THE REAUTHORIZATION OF ESEA.

STOP SENATOR CORNYN’S MENTAL HEALTH & SAFE COMMUNITIES ACT.

STOP UNIVERSAL PRE-K BY SENATORS CASEY AND MURRAY.

STOP DATA-TRACKING AND DATA-TRAFFICKING.

RESCIND PRESIDENT OBAMA’S EO 12866.

CALL YOUR FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES.

© 2015 Anita Hoge – All Rights Reserved

Anita B. Hoge, lecturer, educational researcher, parent.

In 1990 a federal investigation was completed against the Pennsylvania Department of Education, after filing a federal complaint against the Educational Quality Assessment, EQA, & the US Department of Education’s National Assessment of Educational Progress, NAEP, under the Protection of Pupils Rights Amendment. Forced the Pennsylvania EQA to be withdrawn. Forced the US Department of Education to do their job to investigate the psychological testing of children without informed written parental consent. NAEP was never investigated because the Department said I didn’t have standing, although documents had proven that NAEP did experimental research & used different states to pilot their agenda by embedding their test questions into the Pennsylvania EQA as well as other state tests.

Subject & main researcher for the book, Educating for the New World Order. My story is told about an incredible journey into the devious & deceptive operations of our government to change the values, attitudes & beliefs of American children to accept a new world order. The first to document the expansive data collection operation of our government establishing micro-records on individual people in the United States. Experimentation, illegal testing, & data collection is exposed.

Lectured all over the Unites States in the 90’s about illegal & controversial testing, curriculum, & collection of data by our government. Arranged & lectured town hall meetings all across the state of Pennsylvania to withdraw affective student learning outcomes to stop Outcome Based Education. In January of 1992, parents in Pennsylvania won the battle against OBE when the Independent Regulatory Review Board had requested that the State Board of Education remove all outcomes which dealt with attitudes, habits, traits, feelings, values, & opinions which are difficult & subjective to measure & that the remaining outcomes be defined & coordinated with academic requirements that can be measured. The battle continues.

E-Mail: hogieshack@comcast.net

Image

Political Correctness

liberals

Rep Louie Gohmert – Anti-Military Obstructionist John McCain Refused To Sponsor House Bill To Arm Military

By Rick Wells for CONSTITUTION RISING.COM

GOHMERT

In what is clearly a preemptive excuse designed to cover his backside following the murder of five service members in Chattanooga, John McCain issued a statement saying, “long before the Chattanooga attack, we had been working to clarify a post commander’s authority to allow carrying of personal firearms.” Rep Louie Gohmert (R-TX) is asked, “Why didn’t the Pentagon act on this long ago?”

He speaks to John McCain specifically, saying, “John McCain is a war hero for what he suffered during the Vietnam War, but he’s certainly no hero for what he’s been stopping. We couldn’t find a single senator that would bring the same amendment [to arm military personnel]. We got it as a part of the National Defense Authorization Act. The Senate is now negotiating with the House on that final bill. They would not, not one single Senator would bring that amendment to the Senate floor, John McCain didn’t want it.”

He adds, “So I am thrilled that John McCain is at least verbalizing that he wants to allow our military to protect themselves. That has not been his position in the past.” They also address a tweet from a viewer which addresses the fact that John McCain twice voted against body armor as well.

Gohmert points out other legislative attempts to correct vulnerabilities that have been made by the House, which have failed to pass in the Senate. He says, “We just need John McCain to match his words with his acts. He also points out that the perpetrator of the shootings in Chattanooga was the type of individual, particularly with his travel records, that the Patriot Act was supposed to protect us from. He says, “Instead, they spend so much time going after every America that they haven’t had time to watch the real suspects.”

He also has a common sense rebuttal to the argument that there are some in the military that shouldn’t be armed, saying those are the ones who should be processed out, so that we then know we can trust our men and women in uniform, all of them.

Gohmert’s comments once again point to the efforts of John McCain in opposition to the American military men and women he supposedly is an advocate for. Perhaps the shiny paper that John McCain has been wrapped in is starting to lose its luster.