Yes, sir. I’m a sucker for this country. I’m a sucker for the Star-Spangled Banner, and I like what we got here! I like it! A guy can say what he wants – and do what he wants – without having a bayonet shoved through his belly. Quote from the movie, -Meet John Doe
Pro-Life Supreme Court Judges
Odd way to start an article on the choice of supreme court judges? Well, not really, because it is up to all of us. It’s up to us to be the John Does who speak up for life…life of the unborn. It is ultimately the most important decision our new President will make, and it’s a decision that will affect America for decades to come. We need to be the catalysts who ensure pro-life Supreme Court Judges.
The movie, Meet John Doe, with Gary Cooper and Barbara Stanwyck, is just one of the many famous Frank Capra movies that were so successful. Mr. Smith Goes to Washington is another famous Capra film starring Jimmy Stewart and Jean Arthur about a newly appointed United States Senator who fights against a corrupt political system. Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, with Gary Cooper and Jean Arthur, is another wonderful Capra film, but it’s the John Doe movie that represents the common man.
Truly, the common man elected this outsider, Donald J. Trump, who will not play the globalist games or buy into the one-world-order agenda put forth by both Republicans (the Rockefeller Kingmakers) and the Socialist Democrats for far too many decades. This outsider has promised us pro-life supreme court justices, and we need to help him achieve that goal in spades!
Pro-Life Coalition Letter
A remarkable 90 pro-life groups have signed onto the a fabulous coalition letter, drafted by Andy Schlafly and loyalists and friends of Phyllis Schlafly’s who were early Trump supporters. The letter with the pro-life group signees has been delivered to both President-elect Trump in New York, and Vice President-elect Pence in Washington D.C.
Please review the letter, because it contains an Appendix which includes six candidates on President-elect Trump’s list of 21 Supreme Court Justices who lack any pro-life record and have even shown an unwillingness to take a pro-life position publicly.
On January 1st, 2017, Fox News Sunday read from the coalition letter, and the segment was aired again later on Sunday. This widely viewed news show also used Andy Schlafly’s superb analysis of the candidates, which you can read here.
There are, indeed, vast differences among candidates on the list, especially with respect to Trump’s pro-life pledge. Some of the candidates (including Sykes and Colloton) have even repeatedly taken the pro-abortion side.
Schlafly stated, “We need to hold self-described ‘pro-life’ groups in D.C. more accountable. Some don’t even say they support Trump’s pro-life pledge, while others are obviously not speaking out as they should. Some have even tried to talk others out of speaking out for life.”
In early January, 2017, the Democrats in opposition said they would try to block whoever the nominee is. Schlafly is right when he states, “So, we should continue to insist on a pro-life nominee worth fighting for, because it is going to be a fight regardless. If Trump’s advisors persuade him to break his pro-life pledge, then it will become a disastrous replay of the first President Bush’s breaking of his famous “no new taxes” pledge.”
Andy Schlafly believes that media and the senators will push for a woman simply because all four women on Trump’s list are not pro-life. Two true pro-life judges are Jennifer Elrod and Edith Jones who could be interviewed for the job, and I’d certainly like one of them to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg. However, my personal opinion leans toward a strong Constitutional originalist and pro-life male candidate to replace Antonin Scalia. The three women presently on the court are far left liberals appointed by Socialist Democrat presidents.
Trump promised the American people in the last debate, and even afterwards, that he would pick only pro-life nominees, and not just from his list whose nominees came from the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation. [Link]
It is up to us, the John Does of the country, the common man who elected Mr. Trump, to stand up and fight for life. Our force is greater than we know…just look at what we have accomplished already with the outsider who is now our 45th President. We won the battle, but the war wages on, and we cannot rest on our laurels now. We can shut down the DC capital switchboard as we’ve done before. Let your voices be heard, loud and clear! Pro-life Supreme Court justices for the unborn…this is the rallying call!
The Origin of Eugenics
The history of population reduction, of the falsely alleged “genetically inferior,” via eugenics goes back farther than most Americans are aware, and it involves many of our past leaders. So, let’s do a short refresher course of Planned Parenthood and the elitists who promoted and funded eugenics.
Margaret Sanger (1922), was the first president and founder of Planned Parenthood. The origins of Planned Parenthood date to October 16, 1916, when Sanger, her sister Ethel Byrne, and Russian immigrant, Fania Mindellopened the first birth control clinic in the U.S. in the Brownsville section of the New York borough of Brooklyn.
At a March 1925, international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the “black” and “yellow” peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.
Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as “unfit,” a plan she said would be the “salvation of American civilization.” This makes my blood boil…
While Planned Parenthood’s current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history proves otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925), “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928), and many others. (See Black Genocide)
Politicians Behind Black Genocide
According to the New American Magazine, a documentary called Maafa21, which details how the elite have been targeting African Americans since the days of slavery, has some juicy info in it regarding the politicians behind Black Genocide. Maafa21 begins in the mid-1800s with Francis Galton, (cousin of Charles Darwin) the British statistician who coined the word “eugenics,” or “selective breeding as proposed human improvement.”
From there, Maafa 21 weaves a chilling tale of the efforts of racists in the United States to eliminate African-Americans from the population. Hitler credited American eugenicists with influencing his European agenda. Through the 20th century these influential bigots planned tactics such as injecting a sterilizing agent into public water supplies. The documentary explains how their racist efforts continue to the present day, and provides a legitimate explanation of the relatively unchanged size of the black population as compared with other races in the United States.
The Rockefeller Foundation was established in 1912, and immediately began giving money to eugenics research organizations. (Edwin Black’s War Against the Weak) Eugenics was a pseudo-scientific and social science movement that emerged in the late 19th century, and gained significant traction in the first half of the 20th century.
The vast wealth and fortunes of the major industrialists and bankers in the United States flowed heavily into the eugenics organizations, promoting and expanding this racist and elitist ideology. Money from the Ned Harriman railroad fortune (father of W. Averell Harriman), with millions given by the Rockefeller and Carnegie family fortunes were subsequently “devoted to sterilization of several hundred thousand of American ‘defectives’ annually, as a matter of eugenics.” [Link]
Powerful American Bigots
In a 1913 letter written by Theodore Roosevelt to American Eugenics Society founder, Charles Davenport, Roosevelt writes, “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind…some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizen of the right type, is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type.”
In 1966, Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) accepted the Margaret Sanger Award, and it is mentioned that Dwight D. Eisenhower and Harry S. Truman are co-chairs of Planned Parenthood honorary council. [Link] (Source: Lodi News-Sentinel – Oct 10, 1966)
In 1965, former Republican President, Dwight Eisenhower, complained that the United States was spending money to slow the population growth of responsible families while at the same time providing financial incentives for ignorant, feebleminded and lazy people to have more babies. He said that history would rightly condemn the United States if we didn’t link welfare to family-planning. At that time, Eisenhower was the co-chairman of a Planned Parenthood fund-raising campaign along with former Democratic President Harry Truman.
LBJ Birth Control Cited: “President Johnson has been the major force in shaping a virtual revolution in government thinking to help meet the global population crisis.” Planned Parenthood- World Population (Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette – Oct 11, 1966)
Remembered for the Vietnam War, the War on Poverty, and the Great Society, Johnson was also the first U.S. president to back federal support for birth control in social welfare and public health programs (at the urging of a Republican representative from Texas, George H. W. Bush). Margaret Sanger died midway through Johnson’s presidency in 1966.
John Ehrlichman, who was an assistant to President Richard Nixon, wrote that Nixon once told him that African-Americans could not really benefit from federal programs because they are genetically inferior to whites. Later, Nixon would label birth control a national priority and sign legislation to make it available as a service of the U.S. government. Then in March of 1972, the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future which Nixon had created three years earlier with the help of Congressional Democrats, began calling for the nationwide legalization of abortion.
Nixon stated, “A majority of people in Colorado voted for abortion, I think a majority of people in Michigan are for abortion, I think in both cases, well, certainly in Michigan, they will vote for it because they think that what’s going to be aborted generally are the little black bastards.” [Link]
The Bottom Line
In a 2009 New York Times Magazine interview, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told Emily Bazelon that, “…I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” The “Populations” Ginsburg and the rest of the Political Elite referred to is clearly defined in Maafa21.
Trump reminded America during his third debate with Hillary Clinton that he is not afraid to stand up for the unborn, spelling out what partial birth abortion really is…the murder of fully developed babies in the womb.
Abortion, an unjust, murderous procedure, should of course be illegal. Donald Trump has said that if he is elected president, he will appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade and return the issue to the states where it belongs.
Planned Parenthood’s founder wanted to eliminate the black race, and abortion by the numbers, is a racist institution. In the United States, black children are aborted at three times the rate of white children; Hispanic children are aborted at one and a half times the rate. Whatever the intentions of the abortion industry, by functional standards, abortion is a racist institution.
So, tell me, who are the racists? Certainly not our 45th President, Donald J. Trump
Yes, it’s up to us, the John Does of America, to stand up for life. The bottom line is that we need true pro-life justices. What greater right do we have than the right to life?