Author Archives: Steve

Canada’s top 10 list of America’s Stupidity.

This is good. Well not really, but dead on true. Groannnn. Found this in my mail from conservativebyte.com.

—————————————————————————————-

# 10 Only in America… could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 per plate Obama campaign fund-raising event.

# 09 Only in America… could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black, 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to black Americans – 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!

# 08 Only in America… could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.

# 07 Only in America… can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.

# 06 Only in America… would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just ‘magically’ become American citizens. (probably should be number one).

# 05 Only in America… could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country’s Constitution be called EXTREMISTS.

# 04 Only in America… could you need to present a driver’s license to cash a check or buy alcohol, or board a commercial aircraft, but not to vote.

# 03 Only in America… could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. Oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).

# 02 Only in America… could you collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year – for total spending of $7 Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn’t have nearly enough money.

# 01 Only in America…. could the rich people – who pay 86% of all income taxes – be accused of not paying their “fair share” by people who don’t pay any income taxes at all.

PLEASE DON’T KEEP THIS – SEND IT OUT TO YOUR ENTIRE LIST.
Read more at conservativebyte.com

~Steve~

In your face Homie.

In your face Homie.

I’ll Take “What Took So Long” For $ 600 Chuck.

I mean are you surprised?

Call me when it's over.

Call me when it’s over.

——————————————————————————————-

Nathan Collier: Montana man inspired by same-sex marriage ruling requests right to wed two wives.

NEW YORK

The 46-year-old polygamist said he decided to act in the wake of recent Supreme Court decision

The 46-year-old polygamist said he decided to act in the wake of recent Supreme Court decision

Nathan Collier said he was inspired by the recent Supreme Courtdecision that made marriage equal. He said he was particularly struck by the words of dissenting Chief Justice John Roberts who claimed giving gay couples the right to marry, might inspire polygamy.

And so this week, Mr Collier and his two wives, Victoria and Christine, entered a courthouse in Billings, Montana, and sought an application to legalise the trio’s polygamous union.

“Right now we’re waiting for an answer,” Mr Collier told The Independent. “I have two wives because I love two women and I want my second wife to have the same legal rights and protection as my first.”

He added: “Most people are not us. I am not trying to define what marriage means for anybody else - I am trying to define what marriage means for us.”

The practice of bigamy - holding multiple marriage licences - is outlawed in all 50 of the US states, Montana among them. But Mr Collier said he planned to sue if his application was denied.

Mr Collier said he was former Mormon who had been excommunicated for polygamy and now owned a refrigeration business in Billings.

He married his first wife, Victoria, 40, in 2000. The 46-year-old, who appeared in the reality TV show Sister Wives, held a religious ceremony to marry second wife, Christine, in 2007 but did not sign a marriage license to avoid bigamy charges.

His first wife, Victoria, said that she and her husband’s second wife got along “like sisters”.

“We’re like any family. There are good days and there are bad days,” she said. “But there are more good days.”

Asked how she felt when her husband took a second wife, she said: “How can you know who you are going to fall in love with? This is our destiny.”

Yellowstone County clerk officials initially denied Mr Collier’s application, then said they would consult with the county legal officer before giving him a final answer.

Yellowstone County chief civil litigator Kevin Gillen, told the Associated Press that he was reviewing Montana’s bigamy laws and expected to send a formal response to Mr Collier by next week.

Mr Gillen said: “I think he deserves an answer.”

——————————————————————————————

And so do we. Right folks? In fact I love my dog. And under the Constitution……….. Beam me up Scotty.

Buh Buy.

Buh Buy.

A Laugh To Get You Started.

A man was telling his buddy “You won’t believe what happened last night.
My daughter walked into the living room and said, “Dad, cancel my allowance immediately, forget my college tuition loan, rent my room out, throw all my clothes out the window, take my TV and my laptop.

Please take any of my jewelry to the Salvation Army or Cash Converters. Then, sell my car, take my front door key away from me and throw me out of the house. Then, disown me and never talk to me again.
Don’t forget to write me out of your will and leave my share to any charity you choose.”
“Holy Smokes,” replied the friend, “she actually said that?”
“Well, she didn’t put it quite like that. She actually said,

‘Dad, meet my new boyfriend Mohammed. We’re going to work together on Hillary’s election campaign!'”

I know. It's bad.   :)

I know. It’s bad. :)

~Steve~ H/T Hujonwi

Feel Good Of The Day.

2a664773-8fae-447f-a23a-e116e816fcb2 Click Pics to enlarge.

This motorist that stopped to help an old man pass safely.

2d977f03-38fb-4ee1-95f9-91d18c02dea0

The person who decided to put new tires on a stranger’s car just because he needed it.

77dde342-b828-4682-a011-e7468a2337c0

This man who missed his train helping this older lady with her bags.

efd189af-e3c6-4a8f-bcb0-b61c432fc898

7222e16c-667d-4765-ad72-66d49c2abd9e 320774f5-3026-4c41-91f8-5c675411950c

bf305092-e85a-4c62-95b2-0af0f89a0329

d034bfdf-318e-4f83-a37d-19ec216198cc edf5083c-7e34-49ec-8d3f-c6deabaa0907

~Steve~ H/T Hujonwi.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules to UPHOLD ObamaCare Subsidies

From .http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/

BITE ME!!!!!

——————————————————————-

The decision was 6-3. Lose the 6 and keep the 3.

In the second major court win for President Obama on his signature health care

law, the Supreme Court on Thursday upheld ObamaCare subsidies in states that did not set up their own health care exchanges.
The decision was 6-3.
A ruling against the administration would have threatened subsidies in nearly three-dozen states. For months, though, the administration said it had no back-up plans, confident the Supreme Court would rule in its favor.
The Supreme Court previously upheld the law’s individual mandate in 2012, in a 5-4 decision.
This time, the justices said the subsidies that 8.7 million people currently receive to make insurance affordable do not depend on where they live, under the 2010 health care law.
Chief Justice John Roberts again voted with his liberal colleagues in support of the law. Roberts also was the key vote to uphold the law in 2012. Justice Anthony Kennedy, a dissenter in 2012, was part of the majority on Thursday.

More at Fox News Here

A Simple Math Trick.

I love math tricks and this one really works and will only take you about ten seconds!
Amazing it really works to reveal your all-time favorite movie.

I’m pretty good at math, so I did it in my head, then on paper, and finally on a calculator just to confirm my numerical capabilities.

Each time I got the same answer, and sure enough it IS my very favorite movie EVER!

DO NOT cheat. DO YOUR math, THEN compare the results to the list of movies at the bottom

You will be AMAZED at how scary true and accurate this test is

1. Pick a number from 1-9.
2. Multiply that number by 3.
3. Add 3.
4. Multiply by 3 again. Your total will be a two digit number.
Add the first and second digits together to find your favorite movie (of all
time) in the list of 17 movies below

Movie List :

1. Gone With the Wind
2. E.T.

3. Blazing Saddles
4. Star Wars
5. Forrest Gump
6. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
7. Jaws
8. Grease
9. The Obama Farewell Speech After Impeachment
10. Casablanca
11. Jurassic Park
12. Shrek
13. Pirates of the Caribbean
14. Titanic
15. Raiders of the Lost Ark
16. Home Alone
17. Mrs. Doubtfire
Now, isn’t that something?
~Steve~ Big H/T My Bud Hujonwi

Now This Is Amazing! 3D Chalk Art.

There is a Guy named Kurt Wenner, and well you will just have to see it to believe it. For more of his work go to http://kurtwenner.com/ - Steve-

—————————————————————————————————-

2a5104881edeaf946a488207b415167b

images last

Kurt at work

Kurt at work

1344537094_6134_wcover2 alice dd989faf14f589bfde47ddeb37020278

images (1)

The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness.

In Other words Liberal’s are nuts. In your heart of heart you knew it. I mean they just give you to much ammo. Well Dr. Kyle Rossiter has written a book that might help you understand why.—————————-

—————————————————————————————————-

Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD | Dec 04, 2025

Remind you of anyone?  :)

Remind you of anyone? :)

—————————————————————————————————-

Dr. Lyle Rossiter Jr.

Dr. Lyle Rossiter Jr.

Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr.,a forensic psychiatrist, explains the madness of liberalism in his new book The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. You can read an excerpt below, and read more at his websitelibertymind.com.

Like all other human beings, the modern liberal reveals his true character, including his madness, in what he values and devalues, in what he articulates with passion. Of special interest, however, are the many values about which the modern liberal mind is not passionate: his agenda does not insist that the individual is the ultimate economic, social and political unit; it does not idealize individual liberty and the structure of law and order essential to it; it does not defend the basic rights of property and contract; it does not aspire to ideals of authentic autonomy and mutuality; it does not preach an ethic of self-reliance and self-determination; it does not praise courage, forbearance or resilience; it does not celebrate the ethics of consent or the blessings of voluntary cooperation. It does not advocate moral rectitude or understand the critical role of morality in human relating. The liberal agenda does not comprehend an identity of competence, appreciate its importance, or analyze the developmental conditions and social institutions that promote its achievement. The liberal agenda does not understand or recognize personal sovereignty or impose strict limits on coercion by the state. It does not celebrate the genuine altruism of private charity. It does not learn history’s lessons on the evils of collectivism.

What the liberal mind is passionate about is a world filled with pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice. Those who occupy this world are “workers,” “minorities,” “the little guy,” “women,” and the “unemployed.” They are poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited and victimized. They bear no responsibility for their problems. None of their agonies are attributable to faults or failings of their own: not to poor choices, bad habits, faulty judgment, wishful thinking, lack of ambition, low frustration tolerance, mental illness or defects in character. None of the victims’ plight is caused by failure to plan for the future or learn from experience. Instead, the “root causes” of all this pain lie in faulty social conditions: poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization and imperialism. In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and persecutors: “Big Business,” “Big Corporations,” “greedy capitalists,” U.S. Imperialists,” “the oppressors,” “the rich,” “the wealthy,” “the powerful” and “the selfish.”

The liberal cure for this endless malaise is a very large authoritarian government that regulates and manages society through a cradle to grave agenda of redistributive caretaking. It is a government everywhere doing everything for everyone. The liberal motto is “In Government We Trust.” To rescue the people from their troubled lives, the agenda recommends denial of personal responsibility, encourages self-pity and other-pity, fosters government dependency, promotes sexual indulgence, rationalizes violence, excuses financial obligation, justifies theft, ignores rudeness, prescribes complaining and blaming, denigrates marriage and the family, legalizes all abortion, defies religious and social tradition, declares inequality unjust, and rebels against the duties of citizenship. Through multiple entitlements to unearned goods, services and social status, the liberal politician promises to ensure everyone’s material welfare, provide for everyone’s healthcare, protect everyone’s self-esteem, correct everyone’s social and political disadvantage, educate every citizen, and eliminate all class distinctions. With liberal intellectuals sharing the glory, the liberal politician is the hero in this melodrama. He takes credit for providing his constituents with whatever they want or need even though he has not produced by his own effort any of the goods, services or status transferred to them but has instead taken them from others by force.

It should be apparent by now that these social policies and the passions that drive them contradict all that is rational in human relating, and they are therefore irrational in themselves. But the faulty conceptions that lie behind these passions cannot be viewed as mere cognitive slippage. The degree of modern liberalism’s irrationality far exceeds any misunderstanding that can be attributed to faulty fact gathering or logical error. Indeed, under careful scrutiny, liberalism’s distortions of the normal ability to reason can only be understood as the product of psychopathology. So extravagant are the patterns of thinking, emoting, behaving and relating that characterize the liberal mind that its relentless protests and demands become understandable only as disorders of the psyche. The modern liberal mind, its distorted perceptions and its destructive agenda are the product of disturbed personalities.

As is the case in all personality disturbance, defects of this type represent serious failures in development processes. The nature of these failures is detailed below. Among their consequences are the liberal mind’s relentless efforts to misrepresent human nature and to deny certain indispensable requirements for human relating. In his efforts to construct a grand collectivist utopia—to live what Jacques Barzun has called “the unconditioned life” in which “everybody should be safe and at ease in a hundred ways”—the radical liberal attempts to actualize in the real world an idealized fiction that will mitigate all hardship and heal all wounds. (Barzun 2000). He acts out this fiction, essentially a Marxist morality play, in various theaters of human relatedness, most often on the world’s economic, social and political stages. But the play repeatedly folds. Over the course of the Twentieth Century, the radical liberal’s attempts to create a brave new socialist world have invariably failed. At the dawn of the Twenty-first Century his attempts continue to fail in the stagnant economies, moral decay and social turmoil now widespread in Europe. An increasingly bankrupt welfare society is putting the U.S. on track for the same fate if liberalism is not cured there. Because the liberal agenda’s principles violate the rules of ordered liberty, his most determined efforts to realize its visionary fantasies must inevitably fall short. Yet, despite all the evidence against it, the modern liberal mind believes his agenda is good social science. It is, in fact, bad science fiction. He persists in this agenda despite its madness.

~Steve~

More of Town Hall Story Here.

Cops Shoot Thugs Dead In Waco TX, And No Rioting Or Looting. Amazing.

Did I Mention the thugs were white Biker gangs?——————————-

motos06

Texas biker clash leaves 9 dead: ‘Police shoot at white thugs and no one gets mad, sets town on fire’

May 18, 2026 by

—————————————————————————————————-

No looting youts here.

No looting youts here.

A biker brawl in Waco, Texas, Sunday that left nine bikers dead and 18 injured is drawing the astonishing response from liberal media voices that the bikers are being treated differently from inner-city rioters because they’re white.

Barely had the news gone national before race-obsessed New York Times columnist Charles Blow posted a Twitter question wondering whether the National Guard would be activated — like a gang fight is somehow the same as a mass disturbance aimed at mass destruction.

One tweeter summed it up: “That awkward moment when police shoot white thugs and no one gets mad and sets the town on fire.”

Waco cops, though, seem to know exactly what happened — even if it was extreme.

“There were at least three rival gang groups here this morning for whatever reason. As they were here, we had officers on scene. We expected issues,” police spokesman Sgt. W. Patrick Swanton said, according to CNN.

“In my nearly 35 years of law enforcement experience,” he said, “this is the most violent and gruesome scene that I have dealt with.”

The shootings escalated from a fist fight at the Twin Peaks restaurant and overflowed into the parking lot. Biker “thugs” shot at each other, and at police, who returned fire.

Some restaurant customers and employees took refuge in the freezer, CNN reported.

The carnage was evident, with eight gang members dead on scene, and one pronounced dead at the hospital. No officers were injured, Swanton said.

Nearly 100 weapons were recovered from the scene, according to a local CNN affiliate television station.

The Waco police response and press coverage stands in stark contrast to the recent riots in Baltimore.

Read More BizPac Review Here!

~Steve~

 

 

 

 

Treason Anyone? Obama, And Hillary Knew Benghazi Was al Qaeda From The Start.

hot_news_animated_signgif

Judicial Watch has released a report yesterday blowing the whole Benghazi Farce wide open. If what obama and Hillary did does not amount to treason, then I don’t know what does.

~Steve~

—————————————————————————————————-

By 17 Hours Ago

Evidence Now Is Conclusive That Obama And Hillary Should Be Indicted And Put On Trial For TREASON. sangry_group_100-100 (2)

Judicial Watch announced today that it “obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State, revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance.”

Judicial Watch added what has been proven and obvious for years—that “Benghazi attack” was “not about a response to an anti-Muhammad video” or was it “the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo” and that A Defense Department document dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on “the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group” “to kill as many Americans as possible.”

While Judicial Watch did a fantastic job in proving that this document was sent to “then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council,” but what the Defense Department revealed was nothing new.

The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).”

15

The evidence for all this was already released, by Shoebat.com (while doubted by idiots) in 2012, which was researched with assistance from Libyan intelligence sources from which Shoebat.com not only obtained this confirmation but also sent findings to the National Center For Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism, a ‘huff-and-puff’ agency Shoebat.com dealt with, and to be frank, were unfit of being street sweepers.

This agency threw the valuable intelligence sources from Libya under the bus, an intelligence that not only helped resolve details about Benghazi, but would pin-point terrorist weapons cache with latitude and longitude accuracy. This was a team of x-Qaddafi intelligence who desired nothing more than to reverse U.S. policy in Libya and exposed the very assassins of Americans during the Benghazi affair. These were the true heroes and not these ‘street-sweepers.’

The Department of Defense agency’s information was lacking that the Muslim Brotherhood’s involvement stems from the top. Mohammad Morsi’s involvement in his defense for the blind Sheikh and his Egyptian Ansar Al-Sharia’s branch involvement with Ansar Al-Sharia in Libya, the very element that attacked the U.S. in Bebghazi which later became ISIS itself.

The countless documents and evidence Shoebat.com provided on this issue was immense and took years to compile. There should be no doubt now regarding the year’s worth: 450 reports on Benghazi affair alone.

~Steve~
Read Rest From Freedom Outpost Here

10 Tips On Not Being A Victim Of Crime.

Friends I have spent around 20 years doing personal security for people. I’ve worked in The Movie and TV industry and as such I often provided protection for some executives, but mostly celebrities. With that being said I’ve got a series short articles I’ll be running that might help keep you and your family a little safer.

~Steve~——————————————————————————-

TEN TIPS FOR AVOIDING CRIME

1. Be Alert!
Keep your head up. Eyes scanning.
Be aware of your surroundings. If something does not feel right, trust your instinct. It is usually right. Put your damn phone down and text when it’s safe.

( Condition Yellow, at all times )

2. Vary Your Routines
Predictability makes you a more likely target.

3. Lock It!
Home, car, office - locks are your first line of defense.

4. Make Your Home A Tough Target
Use floodlights, motion sensors, a security system, deadbolts, etc.

This is so Important. Always leave an outside light on. 90% of bad guys report they would skip house with light on for one with no light.

Here is a cheap cheat if you will. No security system? OK, go to ebay or Google and put in “ADT” signs. You can get them for about $ 10 and they work just as well. Again bad guy sees your house with sign, and light and your neighbor with no sign and no light what house you think he’s going to?

5. Foil Car-jackers
Keep windows/doors locked, check mirrors and blind spot when stopped.
Stay one to one and a half lengths away from the car ahead of you.
Sound your horn and flash your lights if you think you’re being approached by a car-jacker.

6. Avoid Car Theft
Lock it!
Use an anti-theft device.
Turn the wheels when you park.
Never leave a spare key inside the car.
Park in a well-lighted place.
Put packages in the trunk.

7. Be Creative
Think of unusual ways to protect yourself and your valuables.

8. Be Informed
Learn the crime trends in your area and work to protect yourself against them.

9. Get Involved
Have your joined or organized a Neighborhood Watch?10. Don’t Give Up!

Crime can be reduced - with action, not apathy!

More To Come. Stay safe.

~Steve~

It’s A Good Time To Remind You Of “Rules For A Gunfight”

Rules for a Gunfight,
By Anonymous.

Friends this has been around a while. It is usually good for a chuckle, but also good common sense. I say that because we live in dangerous times now. Please do all you can to protect your self and your loved ones.

I’ve spent 20 yrs in security, I’ll get to my story someday. The most important thing I can teach you know is “Condition Yellow”

1) Condition Duh! clueless and will always be a victim.

2) Condition Yellow. Head up, eyes scanning and sweeping. . slightest thing that does not feel right, trust your instinct because it is usually right. Walking to car in parking lot, 2 mooks by car. Turn around. You will not be a victim today.

3) Condition Red . Fight or flight time. It’s on. Now what? Are you prepared? Were you in yellow right before for options.

Do you carry a gun. Do you have A CCW. Can you get one in your state? If so why don’t you have one. Oh you do have one, but you left it in your …..wait for it….

Glove compartment.

Bring a gun. Preferably, bring at least two guns. Bring all of your friends who have guns.

Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap – life is expensive.

Only hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss.

If your shooting stance is good, you’re probably not moving fast enough or using cover correctly.

Move away from your attacker. Distance is your friend. (Lateral and diagonal movement are preferred.)
If you can choose what to bring to a gunfight, bring a long gun and a friend with a long gun.

In ten years nobody will remember the details of caliber, stance, or tactics. They will only remember who lived.

If you are not shooting, you should be communicating, reloading, and running.

Accuracy is relative: most combat shooting standards will be more dependent on “pucker factor” than the inherent accuracy of the gun

Use a gun that works EVERY TIME. “All skill is in vain when an Angel blows the powder from the flintlock of your musket.”

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty

Always cheat, always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.

Have a plan.

Have a back-up plan, because the first one won’t work.

Use cover or concealment as much as possible.

Flank your adversary when possible. Protect yours.

Don’t drop your guard.

Always tactical load and threat scan 360 degrees.

Watch their hands. Hands kill. (In God we trust. Everyone else, keep your hands where I can see them.)

Decide to be aggressive ENOUGH, quickly ENOUGH.

The faster you finish the fight, the less shot you will get.

Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

Be courteous to everyone, friendly to no one.

Your number one option for personal security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Do not attend a gun fight with a handgun, the caliber of which does not start with anything smaller than “4″.

You can’t miss fast enough to win.

( Note from Steve, While a large Cal does do more damage, I believe shot placement also has a place in the equation. Plus the added capacity of larger mags. Kinda like picking a tie for your suit. I Like a nice 9MM with 15 rounds, or hey just running in for milk a nice 38 will do. Don’t get me wrong Love my big boy toys too, just what ever you have get proficient with it and carry the damn thing at all times.)

:)

~Steve~

Draw Mohammad Contest Winning Cartoon. And Interview With Cartoonist.

For Free speech we present The winner of Draw Mohammed. Who was drawn by an ex-muslim

Fascinating story of winner here in a Brietbart story below.

Dear ISIS, Bite Me.   :)

Dear ISIS, Bite Me. :)

(click to enlarge)

—————————————————————————————

by JORDAN SCHACHTEL6 May 2026

Breitbart News spoke with Bosch Fawstin, an accomplished artist, cartoonist, and anti-Jihad activist who won first prize at Sunday’s “Draw Muhammad” free speech event in Garland, Texas.

The event came under attack by AK47-weilding jihadists, who were neutralized by a police officer before they could commit mass murder against the free speech art display’s attendees.

Fawstin talked about his unique experience growing up in the Bronx as a Muslim, how his life changed after the 9/11 attacks, and he shared strategies to defeat the global jihadist movement. His artwork is featured throughout the interview.

Breitbart News: You won first prize at the Muhammad Cartoon Contest? What inspired your first-place artwork?

Bosch Fawstin: Quite simply, I wanted to do something different because I’ve been drawing Muhammad for a long time. Ever since the Danish cartoons, and after the Charlie Hebdo attack. Every time something horrific happens. If free speech was under assault, under siege, I drew Muhammad.

This drawing of Muhammad showed him threatening me. He says, angrily, ‘You Can’t Draw Me,” with a sword in his hand. I respond, ‘That’s Why I Draw You.’”

Breitbart News: We understand that you were brought up in Islam. What is your background? How difficult was it to leave Islam?

Bosch Fawstin: I never set out to draw Muhammad. My purpose was never to be a critic of Islam.

I was born and raised a Muslim in the Bronx (New York). I have Muslim parents. We went to a mosque relatively rarely, but we were Muslims.

I did receive some flack for leaving Islam, but I didn’t feel like I left anything important behind. I wanted to get the hell out. Islam had no hold on me whatsoever. It wasn’t a heartbreak, I just left.

Right after I left Islam, 9/11 happened. I revisited everything. I reread the Koran. I read countless books on jihad, Islam, and Muhammad. I knew as a cartoonist, as an artist, I had a tool to respond to the atrocities. I made sure I knew Islam very well before making any move.

I became a follower of Ayn Rand’s philosophy and remain so to this day. Ironically, I went from the most misogynistic philosophy on earth, to that created by a woman. Without her work, I don’t know where the hell I’d be today.

Breitbart News: You grew up in a “moderate Muslim” family?

Bosch Fawstin: Almost all of the women in my generation were beaten by their husbands. There was strong admiration for Hitler in the household, because he killed more Jews than anyone. That’s why I refer to Hitler as Islam’s favorite infidel. They forgive him because he killed more Jews than anyone. we were “Moderate Muslims,” but there was still hardcore misogyny and Jew-hatred in my community.

I would interact with Jews, Christians, and they were my friends. When my father found out, he didn’t like it. They weren’t allowed to come to the house. Nonetheless, a Jewish friend and I were known to betray our religions in solidarity when we shared a pepperoni pizza.

Breitbart News: The beatings of innocent women, the Hitler admiration, and the Jew-hatred. These are events you personally witnessed growing up?

Bosch Fawstin: Yes. Absolutely.

Rest Of Brietbart Story Here

~Steve~

Prophet Cartoon I Believe Is A Defining Moment In Our History.

Pamela Geller Runs a contest where crazy jihadists shoot people. Well, actually they sucked, got killed and all’s well that ends well. Except right now this Country is torn apart on the 1st Amendment. I blame our Media for bowing down to Sharia law, by not publishing these cartoons.

There can be a debate if you agree with Pam’s methods (I agree) , but you must back her absolutely with no “BUT”. People argue you know it is offensive to draw Mohammy and death will result so you are poking them in the eye, therefore you should not do it. Fair enough. Equally offensive is Gay Marriage and homosexuality. So any News outlet or person who promotes Gay anything is also poking them, full well knowing the penalty in sharia is death.

You can not have it both ways folks. If you want gay this that and the other thing, you must stand with Pam. If you ask America to silence it self on Mohammy, then you have given into sharia law. Ask your selves this. After First amendment, who do they come for next.

Oh, I always like a chuckle so in honor of the contest I bring you this.

I've always loved this pic.

I’ve always loved this pic.

~Steve~——————————————————————————-—

Here is a grat blog piece by,

Posted by Nick Short on May 6, 2026 at 4:30pm

As Posted On TPN

It’s quite astonishing to watch what is unfolding in America today as our media engages in self-censorship while acting as apologists for the actions of Islamic terrorism. By doing this, the media not only sacrifices the freedom of speech that is essential to our pluralistic society, but it also promotes the fear that jihadists seek to instill by dictating what is and isn’t “off limits” to debate. This is already happening with news reporters such as Ayman Mohyeldin of NBC now calling for special speech protections for Islam in the wake of Sunday’s terrorist attack in Garland, Texas.

Pamela Geller ‘s American Freedom Defense Initiative had been hosting a “controversial” contest in Garland over cartoons that depicted the Prophet Muhammad. Towards the end of the event, Muslim convert Elton Simpson and his roommate, Nadir Soofi, armed with semi-automatic weapons and body armor, drove their vehicle into the parking lot and began shooting at nearby police. One officer was wounded before returning fire and killing both terrorists. The attack, which the Islamic State (ISIS) has officially claimed responsibility for, was carried out by “two soldiers of the caliphate on an art exhibit that was portraying negative pictures of the Prophet Muhammad.” ISIS then vowed more attacks to come warning, “We tell America that what is coming is more bitter and harder and you will see from the soldiers of the Caliphate what harms you.”

The media has responded collectively to this threat and the terrorist attack itself by faulting Geller for practicing her First Amendment right. It is now only a matter of time before the government gets involved in a manner similar to how the Canadian government sought to chill Ezra Levant. For instance, in 2006, Ezra Levant was the only publisher in Canada to allow his readers to see the so-called controversial “Mohammed cartoons” originally published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. “As a result he was investigated by the Government of Alberta and subjected to three long years of judicial harassment”, notes Mark Steyn. “Halfway through his ordeal, Mr. Levant observed that one day the Danish cartoons crisis would be seen as a more critical event than the attacks of September 11, 2001. Not, obviously, in terms of the comparative death tolls, but in what each revealed about the state of western civilization in the twenty-first century”, notes Steyn.

Nine years later, Levant’s statement sounds prophetic as we look at how our own society has responded in calls to curtail our freedom of speech and condemn those who dare engage in “provocations”. This is precisely what Congressmen Keith Ellison and Andre Carson attempted to do in their joint letter addressed to Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson regarding the “visit of Mr. Geert Wilders “, a Dutch lawmaker invited by Geller to speak at events like the one held in Garland, Texas.

The letter in it’s entirety can be read here PoliticallyShort.com

Ellison and Carson write that Wilders is “known for perpetuating ‘Islamaphobia’ [and] request that the U.S. government deny Mr. Wilders entry due to his participation in inciting anti-Muslim aggression and violence.” Furthermore they write that “In the U.S., freedom of speech is a bedrock principle that distinguishes free societies from ones living under oppressive regimes. Freedom of speech, however, is not absolute. It is limited by the legal and moral understanding that speech that causes the incitement of violence or prejudicial action against protected groups is wrong.”

In a pattern that is becoming all to familiar throughout the media, Ellison and Carson cite freedom of speech as being a bedrock principle to our society, then in the very next sentence, contradict what they previously said by claiming “however, it is not absolute.” It is this “however” that is antithetical to freedom of speech.

As Afshin Ellian of Time Magazine writes, “Today, some intellectuals and politicians are saying: ‘Freedom of speech is good, but…’ that but is a huge problem”, for it allows terrorists to determine the limits of free speech out of fear of provocation. If the drawing of a cartoon depicting Islam’s “prophet” is not protected under the First Amendment then neither is the elephant dung covered Virgin Mary painting by Chris Ofili or Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ which depicted a photograph of a 13-inch crucifix in a jar of urine. Essentially what the media and Congressmen like Ellison and Carson are attempting to say is that while the photograph Piss Christ and the feces covered painting Virgin Mary is considered art, a cartoon of Muhammad is considered a provocation. Slander Jesus Christ and its accepted, slander Muhammad and you deserve to be attacked, killed, and slaughtered.

This was illustrated on Monday during an exchange between Pamela Geller and CNN‘s Alisyn Camerota as Geller highlighted “the fact that we have to spend upwards of $50,000 in security speaks to how dangerous and how in trouble freedom of speech is in this country. And then we have to get on these news shows and somehow we are — those that are targeted, those that were going to be slaughtered are — the ones who get attacked speaks to how morally inverted this conversation is.”

Yet, that’s where we are in today’s society with a media apparatus that is far more concerned with upholding the fictitious narrative that deems those like Pamela Geller Islamaphobic. This has created an implicit assumption on behalf of the media to portray Geller as much, if not more than, the problem as the jihadists themselves.

Rich Lowry of National Review writes, “In today’s circumstances, criticism of Islam is at the vanguard of the fight for free speech, since it is susceptible to attack and intimidation by jihadists and calls for self-censorship by the politically correct.”

This is no understatement either, if we apply self-censorship to ourselves out of fear for terrorism, freedom of speech will become a hollow phrase. And this is only the beginning.

~Steve~ H/T TPN

Baltimore Burns, Crickets From Obama. But There was One Mom Who Is A Star

Hi, My name is Steve. I’ll be posting from time to time. A few things about me. First I’m an ex- NY yorker, and as such I write as I speak. Which means grammar is out the window. Don’t worry about it as youse guys will get use to it. :)

Second I do not do PC in any way, shape, or form. I call em like I see em.

Lastly, I’ll try and keep it light most days with a good joke or puzzle. ‘Cept on days when I need to rant.

So we all know the feral thugs are burning Baltimore down…ho-hum. But one little shinning light. One Mom out of ….she came out and found her thug and well, just kicked his sorry skinny butt. Watch the .49 vid it’s worth it to see just one Mom who cares.

~Steve~