Tag Archives: PeTA

Where the Hell is PETA?!

By Jim O’Neill

“I’ve seen cats being played football [soccer] with.  I have seen cats with their legs torn off and their eyes gouged out.  We see cats that have had their heads torn off, and ones that had skin ripped away, or had their legs and back broken. …The worst thing I saw was a bunch of kittens crawling around with their bowels hanging out because they had their bellies cut open.” 

 

The above is the testimonial of a Danish Animal Protection worker, as translated by Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels.  But don’t expect the wider Left to get on the case anytime soon.  Not only are the atrocities being committed abroad, in the suburb of Vollsmose in Denmark, but the perpetrators are from a “protected” group: Muslims.                               

 Selwyn Duke “Kittens’ Guts Ripped Out: Heinous Cruelty to Animals in Muslim ‘No-go Zone’”

The godly care for their animals, but the wicked are always cruel.

Proverbs 12:10 (NIV)

 

Warning: The following link contains extremely graphic photographs of European Muslim cruelty to cats – including cat crucifixions mocking Jesus.  Gloating sadism on parade.

Perhaps you are not a “cat person,” and their torture and killing leaves you unmoved.  Do you like dogs then?  Because Muslim cruelty to dogs leaves their cat cruelty in the dust.  Try this link, and if it interests you then you will find links there to many other similar articles.  If you claim to love dogs then you should be willing to become at least somewhat aware of their suffering under the boot of Islam.

In Britain, which has become “ground zero” for Europe’s canine controversies, blind passengers are being ordered off buses or refused taxi rides because Muslim drivers or passengers object to their “unclean” guide dogs.

Soeren Kern “Muslims Declare Jihad on Dogs in Europe

 All of which brings me to the main point of this article, which is where the hell is PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) in all this?

They have no problem comparing the “American Kennel Club (AKC) to the KKK (despite the fact that the AKC has not burned a cross on anyone’s lawn to the best of my knowledge), and protecting fictional characters such as Pokemon.  Nonetheless, PETA is oddly silent when it comes to Muslim mistreatment of domesticated animals.

To PETA’s credit, they have brought attention to the cruelty of Muslim halal slaughterhouses in the past.  But their silence in the face of undeniable evidence of horrific cruelty toward cats and dogs by Muslims is cowardly, hypocritical, and in itself cruel.  By remaining quiet about such torture they are in effect sanctioning it.

The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together….  “They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain,” says the LORD.

Isaiah 11:6, 65:25 (NIV)

Bogus PETA Case Against “Dog’s Purpose” Movie

by Rev. Austin Miles

quaid-and-dog

The PETA organization has, out of the blue, attacked the upcoming movie, A Dog’s Purpose, due to open this weekend. But because of their uproar and organized protests, the opening of the movie has been cancelled. Furthermore, PETA has blatantly told the public to boycott this film because, they falsely claim, animals were mistreated in the filming. They were not.

They bolstered their case by trotting out a video of a dog balking at being tossed in artificial rapids to show the animal jumping in and rescuing a little boy who the dog knew as “the boy” who had been swept away by the currents. The edited video was circulated by PETA and shown widely on TMZ and other TV programs just before the premier of the film to gain for them full attention.

Now get this–the incident of the balking dog happened 15 months ago! Again 15 months ago! So why, if that video was a true account, did they not immediately take action instead of waiting 15 months? Did they just now think of it?  No.

The publicity would be greater just before the opening of the film and attracting more donors to their stated cause of protecting animals, even though animal protection is not the focus of their business.

First of all, the dog had rehearsed this scene, but at another location near the water. That was the location he was familiar with and balked at doing it someplace else. Also, those who have a dog will know by experience that when teaching a dog something, or even playing fetch, the dog will eventually balk at further activity simply because he or she has had enough. That was what happened here.

Animal workers on the set, including an animal rights representative, did not see any cause of concern regarding the treatment of the dog. Not only that, but the author of the book that the movie was based upon, W. Bruce Cameron, who no doubt was on the set, would never have allowed any kind of mistreatment to the animals in the film.

He would have jumped in immediately and put a stop to it. The author, Mr. Cameron, obviously loves dogs and his writings capture the heart and soul of the dog unlike any author I have ever read. He would NEVER allow any dog to be put in any precarious situation.

The misrepresented outfit called, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, known as, PETA, claims to protect animals while at the same time, kills 90% of the animals dropped off at their ‘shelters.’  These kills have often been animals that were up for adoption. For more info on this outrage Google-Peta Kill Shelters. You will be shocked at the stats and documentation that will come up.

A solid case in Norfolk Virginia spotlighted two PETA workers snatching a little girl’s dog from the front porch of her home, taking it to their shelter and euthanizing it. The main purpose of their “shelters” is to kill animals.  Not only dogs, but they will kill any and all kittens they can get their hands on.

The parents of the little girl whose beloved little dog was virtually kidnapped from her front porch by these low-life’s, sued PETA that didn’t even keep the pet in the shelter for the required length of time before killing it. But their lawyers stated that this case was all fabricated even though the family had videos of the thugs stealing the pet from that front porch. And PETA got off Scott free thanks to their lying lawyer.

This is where your PETA donation money goes, to lawyers to keep them out of trouble and to get cash settlements for their complaints. The protection of animals is the least of their concerns. That claim is nothing but a front.

They are able to afford the highest priced legal eagles to protect them. Their General Counsel on payroll is Jeffrey S. Kerr, who declares any plaintiff untruthful, such as the parents of the little girl whose precious dog they stole to kill.

THIS is where your PETA donation money goes, to lawyers to keep them out of trouble for the crimes against animals they commit as well as for the profit given them by victims to stop the protests.

My own experience with PETA was in San Francisco with a circus performing there. I knew every animal on that circus and every trainer. I saw first-hand that all the animals were treated with care and respect. Yet, on opening night, here they came. The unwashed sloppy sign-carrying hippie types with vulgar language who pumped their fists in the air triumphantly as cars went by honking their horns in support.

This was to mark territory only and exhibit power which they must have learned from animals which I am loath to compare them to since it would be an insult to animals. There was absolutely no cause for concern with the animals with that show. That entire demonstration was bogus.

Peta now brags; “We shut down the Ringling Brothers Circus.” This is all about ego and power, not about helping animals. All of their so-called “animal shelters” are ‘kill shelters.’  Even the most liberal city in America, San Francisco, objects to the PETA kill shelters. San Francisco has “no kill” animal shelters. They want them all adopted.

You can say anything about liberals; however, they are all very protective of animals. I worked personally with the Senator Dianne Feinstein offices in San Francisco and D.C. to draft and introduce legislation to make the import and export of Ivory illegal, since the ivory is brutally taken from elephants and rhinos. That law WAS drafted and passed.

PETA more resembles a mafia extortion business than an organization to protect animals. Indeed, the protection of animals appears to be the least of their priorities. Do NOT listen to these misfits or give them your money. There are many animal organizations this writer supports. Animals are very close to my heart and my love for them is deep. But PETA takes away money from the legitimate animal protection organizations.

And do NOT boycott the movie, A Dog’s Purpose.  This columnist, who was touched by the book more deeply than any book I’ve ever read–and I have a huge library–will be there and will encourage friends to be there as well.

Those who have not really known an animal will for sure know more about them and appreciate them after reading the book and seeing the film. Those who truly love animals, such as this writer, will love them even more and give them extra hugs.

 

Breaking: HSUS Loses Charity Rating

IMHO,the HSUS is one of the biggest scams around. But lately they have finally started to get their comeuppance. Last year they had to pay almost $16million to Feld/Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey Circus for the settlement for their involvement in the case brought under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that the U.S. District Court ruled was “frivolous,” “vexatious,” and “groundless and unreasonable from its inception.” The settlement also covers the related Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) case that Feld Entertainment filed against the groups after discovering they had paid a plaintiff for his participation in the original lawsuit and then attempted to conceal those payments.”

Now Awesome Ocean tells another truth that HSUS would have liked to keep hidden.   The lawsuit was last year, this year their rating from Charity Navigator went from 4-star to a “donor advisory” warning.  Woo Hoo.  The article below, from Awesome Ocean, is very explicit about HSUS’s tactics.  

_____________________________________________________

Earlier in July, word got out that America’s non-profit media darling, the Humane Society of the United States, ran into a bit of bad luck. And when we say bad luck, we mean they finally got what was coming to them. Their fingerprints were all over the movie Blackfish and they’re currently leading the smear campaign against aquariums to raise money for their own selfish interests.

When you think of the HSUS you automatically think of the saintly organization that operates shelters nationwide and saves hundreds of thousands of animals, the organization that stands up for the adorable and abused animals in TV commercials, and above all you probably believe this is the organization that big-hearted animal lovers should donate to. Right?

Wrong. All those associations are complete crap.

The HSUS has historically bragged about their 4-star rating from Charity Navigator, one of the most trust-worthy charity evaluators in the game. Recently, they were downgraded to a 3-star rating and now their rating has been completely revoked, a “Donor Advisory” warning taking its place.

The deceiving game of bait-and-switch has been played for years, with the HSUS inviting misplaced associations between themselves and local animal shelters (sometimes called Humane Societies). To put this in perspective, let’s break down what this despicable organization did to motivate you to reach for your wallet and fork over millions of dollars to a corrupt “charity”.

A film crew would go to a local humane society pet shelter and film some of the cute, cuddly, abused animals that volunteers dedicate their lives to rescuing. Those commercials would air on national television, pulling on America’s heartstrings and leading unsuspecting viewers to believe that the HSUS had a hand in rescuing that animal or providing care after the rescue.

Want the truth? The HSUS didn’t have anything to do with rescuing that animal. They didn’t provide medical assistance or care for that animal and that poor animal won’t see a penny of your donation. They scandalously only give 1% of their budget to local pet shelters and the HSUS doesn’t even operate one pet shelter of its own. Yes, you read that correctly. Even though 85% of their fundraising propaganda features shelter animals, they do not operate a single local pet shelter.

Check out this national commercial featuring Wendie Malick. But while you’re watching, keep in mind what we just told you. Feeling deceived yet?

IMHO,the HSUS is one of the biggest scams around. But lately they have finally started to get their comeuppance. Last year they had to pay almost $16million to Feld/Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey Circus for the settlement for their involvement in the case brought under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that the U.S. District Court ruled was “frivolous,” “vexatious,” and “groundless and unreasonable from its inception.” The settlement also covers the related Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) case that Feld Entertainment filed against the groups after discovering they had paid a plaintiff for his participation in the original lawsuit and then attempted to conceal those payments.”

Now you might be wondering, “Where exactly do those donations go?” Here’s a hint.

In June, the Charity Navigator donor advisory warning went public.

HumaneWatch.org : “The advisory notifies website visitors of the $15.75 million settlement of a racketeering and bribery lawsuit that HSUS was a part of last month.”

Also according to HumaneWatch.org, you can read more about that settlement here, but the lawsuit involved HSUS money allegedly paying a witness who lied to a federal court. Yikes.

Aside from the lawsuit, it has come to light that the HSUS diligently moved money to several funds in the Cayman Islands, calling them “investments”. We’re pretty sure that moving $26 million to offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands is called stashing money. And it’s shady as hell.

The HSUS has essentially operated under the same donation-guise as PETA, where a large portion of their funding comes from people who are clueless about their real agenda. The time has come for American citizens to open their eyes and stop allowing the HSUS to misuse their hard-earned money.

In fact, PETA and the HSUS are driving the anti-captivity movement not for the welfare of animals, but to make money for themselves. They use and deceive people to promote corrupt agendas and the Cayman Island accounts confirm just how rotten this organization has become.

So if you care about puppies and kittens, as opposed to lobbyists and corrupt organizations, send your donations to local pet shelters instead of the HSUS. The animals will thank you for it.