Tag Archives: traitors

SECRETIVE TRUMP BASHING Op-Ed PUBLISHED BY NYT!!

by Rev. Austin Miles

The Gray Lady has become bald since, by a hair, the New York Times has scored its greatest triumph, so it thinks.  By publishing an elaborate thought out piece proclaiming that Trumps’ own administration officials hate him and want to force him out, stimulates public suspicion about him. (Why even his own cabinet sees what he is!! my my)
Yep, that’s the idea which is a typical Communist strategy to destroy those they wish to destroy: using suspicion, confusion and of course, downright lies. Again, typical communist strategy; This is what’s in their lunch boxes.
HOWEVER, this columnist is pushing for a defamation lawsuit to be filed against the writer of the piece, New York Times Op-Ed editor, JAMES DAO.  And the case is there. 
The writer of a news piece is identified with the story by his or her name being listed under the title. One cannot  publish a story without the writer’s name connected with it, even with the name ‘anonymous’ as the ‘source.’ This does not make if legit.
Didn’t anyone from the New York Times go to journalism school? A reporter cannot publish defaming-libel claims on someone and then state that the writer is anonymous, or in other words, secret, as a way to attribute dirt assault on someone they do not like.  However, that N.Y Times writer is not anonymous. He is the one who wrote it.
The person who writes the story is RESPONSIBLE for the story. And in this case, his employer, The New York Times, was the instrument of making these claims to the world, so they are responsible as well.
So who is the actual writer? Everyone of the administration officials denies writing and having that piece published. We know who the writer is, James Dao, since his own name is on the story.
It was not anyone in President Donald Trump’s Administration who was the traitor to publish that story as an ‘insider’ who wants Trump to be taken out of office as every Communist wishes.
The New York Times’ manufactured, created, wrote that story and published it in what was at one time America’s most respected newspaper.  Pity.
This is now a legal problem. A lawsuit is proper under these circumstances. Subpoena James Dao and The New York Times and charge them with slander. The intent was there by the very publishing of this false story in order to undermine our president.
The reason for such prattle is, according to the law, a reference to one who is engaged in trade or business. It is defamatory and actionable per se’. because a business man must have credit to succeed in his calling.
This would certainly apply to the President of The United States. Plus threatening the president is a serious crime which can bring stern punishment.
The law states: Defamatory statements actionable per se’. There are three classes of defamatory statements which are actionable per se’ in themselves; that is, without proof of special damages. These are: words imputing crime, words disparaging a person in his trade (running the country), business, OFFICE, or profession, and words imputing a loathsome disease.  Special damage is not required to be shown, probably because these are among the most serious charges that can be made; the law allows the plaintiff to sue at once without making sure that he can prove damage, and thus gives him better legal protection. (This is straight out of the law books.)
Read that carefully for this is the law. And this shows that James Dao and the New York Times itself can be sued and rightfully so. Let us insist that this happens.
We urge ALL NEWS SITES and readers to get on this and demand that these charges be filed without delay.
(Rev. Austin Miles attended Law School when much younger.)

Anti-gun Loretta Lynch Sworn in as Attorney General

DO YOUR SENATORS NEED TO BE THANKED OR SPANKED?

ACTION: Please take action by clicking here to hold Senators accountable — “spanking” Senators who supported the anti-gun Loretta Lynch, and thanking those who opposed her. This is an action item for which everyone (even those living in anti-gun states) should be able to take part!

Twenty Republican Senators helped break filibuster against Lynch

SCUM

Loretta Lynch was sworn in as the 83rd Attorney General of the United States on Monday.

Lynch is an extreme, anti-gun advocate who supports reenacting the so-called “Assault Weapons” ban which sunset in 2004.

While every Democrat supported her, the Republicans listed below cast their support, as well. For starters, every Senator below — both bolded and non-bolded — voted to break the filibuster against her nomination. They are:

Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Burr (R-NC)
Capito (R-WV)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Flake (R-AZ)
Gardner (R-CO)
Graham (R-SC)
Hatch (R-UT)
Johnson (R-WI)
Kirk (R-IL)
McConnell (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rounds (R-SD)
Thune (R-SD)
Tillis (R-NC)

The bolded Senators voted for Lynch twice. (More on this in just a second.)

But to be clear, if these Republicans had voted AGAINST Lynch on the cloture (or filibuster) vote, the Lynch nomination would have failed.

Why? Because the Democrats would NOT have had the 60 votes needed to defeat the Republican-led filibuster.

However, the Republicans listed above — those whose names are NOT bolded — tried to “have it both ways.” Having voted to break the filibuster, they then turned around and voted “pro-gun” against Lynch on the final confirmation vote.

This allows them to sell their constituents on the false premise that they opposed Loretta Lynch. But that’s not true, since they betrayed gun owners on the most crucial “cloture” vote.

But the Senators whose names are bolded took that extra step of actually VOTING TO CONFIRM Loretta Lynch. In essence, they voted for Loretta Lynch twice.

They not only voted to break the Republican filibuster, they also voted for her final confirmation.

Sen. McConnell twists arms to get Lynch confirmed

Why would so many Republicans vote to confirm President Obama’s anti-gun nominee — given her anti-gun record, and given the fact that she wants to legalize millions of anti-gun voters?

Because the pressure to support her came straight from the top, straight from Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office.

Senate Republicans, who opposed Lynch, report that Majority Leader McConnell was quietly twisting arms, getting the support needed to overcome a filibuster.

Here’s what was reported in one of the Capitol Hill newspapers:

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) worked quietly to round up more than 60 votes to end a filibuster of attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch, Republican senators say.

After holding up Lynch’s confirmation vote for weeks, McConnell worked to ensure she would overcome a filibuster with a strong bipartisan vote, pitting him against Tea Party firebrand Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and other conservatives. (The Hill, April 23, 2015)

Having overcome the filibuster against Lynch, Sen. McConnell then voted IN FAVOR of the President’s anti-gun nominee.

It is imperative that gun owners take the Republican Senators listed above to the political “wood shed,” lest they be emboldened by their perfidy.

But it’s also important to THANK those Senators who resisted the Majority Leader’s arm twisting to support the Constitution.

As GOA mentioned last week, there were twice as many Senators opposing Lynch as opposed Eric Holder in 2009. So even though we don’t have a majority yet, the good news is that we are getting close.

Having said that, politicians are a lot like children. And just as a child doesn’t learn to change his behavior if he is never disciplined, neither do politicians if you don’t tell them they screwed up and put the heat on them.

ACTION: Please take action by clicking here to both email a Thank You to Senators who opposed the anti-gun Loretta Lynch on both votes and to “spank” those Senators who helped push her through.