Tag Archives: leftists

Left Wing Nazi Brownshirt Bully-Boys

By Jim O’Neill

Leftist agitators employed fascist tactics at a Donald Trump fundraiser in Minneapolis on Friday night.

Kyle Olson “Agitators bang on doors at Trump fundraiser, punch attendees in ‘gauntlet’”

As the above quote implies, left-wing agent provocateurs accompanied by their “useful idiot” groupies used Fascist methods to intimidate, frighten, and physically attack people attempting to exercise their right to free speech in Minneapolis yesterday. Nazi Brownshirt bully-boy tactics all the way.
This might be an opportune time to remind readers that Fascism and Communism are both big government LEFT wing ideologies.

Benito Mussolini is credited by most historians with creating, or at least coining the term “Fascism” (of which Nazism is a branch). It is not too far off the mark to say that Fascism is a nationalistic variant of global Communism. Both ideologies promote a strong central government – huge bureaucracies to implement their social engineering agendas.

One of Mussolini’s better known pronouncements is: “All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state” (Tutto nello Stato, niente al di fuori dello Stato, niente contro lo Stato) – which in “Americanese” might read: “All is inside the federal government, nothing is outside the federal government, nothing shall stand against the federal government.” A right-wing conservative sentiment? Not hardly.

That my friends is LEFT wing lingo any way you slice it. Mussolini’s Fascist rallying cry is LEFT wing down to its tuttos. I repeat, and will keep on repeating ad nauseum until the truth takes hold: FASCISM IS A LEFT WING IDEOLOGY, AND THE NAZIS WERE/ARE LEFT WING AS WELL.

The term “Nazi” comes from Hitler’s political party “National Socialist German Workers’ Party” — the operative words being “Socialist Workers’ Party.” Does that sound like a right wing group to you? No, me neither. Fascism in general, and the Nazis in particular, are, and always have been, LEFT wing.

The Fascists and Nazis were never, and can never, be right wing – to claim otherwise is a blatant, scurrilous lie. A flagrant lie that is nonetheless accepted by the majority of people as “common wisdom” due to decades of disinformation and BS put out by the Left in a successful attempt to (1) disassociate themselves from the Nazi atrocities and, (2) saddle the right-wing with the left-wing’s crimes.
And “we the people” had d—n well better wake up to that truth, and soon! Why is it important? It is important because until we wake up to the fact that Fascism and the Nazis were, are, and always will be LEFT wing, then we remain woefully ignorant of the fact, the truth, the certainty that LEFT wing ideologies (e.g. Communism, Fascism, Nazism) are largely, almost solely, responsible for the horrific deluge of terror, violence, and bloodshed that the world has known for the last century. Furthermore, we remain asleep to the fact that Communists and Fascists (and their kissing cousin “Globalism”) are by their very nature diametrically opposed to freedom and democracy.

“We the people” stand on a precipice, and we are one slight slip away from permanently losing our freedoms. Our right to free speech, our right to bear arms, our right to freedom of assembly – all of these rights and so much more are frighteningly close to being lost to us and our children forever.
The thugs who attempt to shut down Trump rallies are not “left wing protesters.” They are left wing Fascist Brownshirt bully-boys seeking to shut down free speech and the right to assembly by using violence, intimidation and fear, just as their role models did in Nazi Germany.

The nationalists, the patriots, in Germany and the rest of Europe, who seek to stop the destruction of their historic cultures by foreign “immigrants” are not “right wing fascists.” There is no such thing, can be no such thing as a “right wing fascist;” a “right wing Nazi.” It is used as a derogatory term to smear patriots/nationalists by political elites and their fawning media. It is a lie and “we the people” must stop believing that lie.

Accusing your enemy of crimes which you yourself are guilty of is an old (and effective) tool of the Far Left. This ploy accomplishes two important things: (1) it immediately puts the opponent (the right wing) on the defensive, and (2) it draws attention away from the culpability of the Left.

Patriots/nationalists are not Fascists/Nazis – the globalists and media are. “We the people” must come to understand this truth down to our bones. Wake up, the watch on the wall is ours and there is no time left for delusion and lies.
You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.

political spectrum

The Progressive Crime Wave Grows

My Comments:  This is what Obama has given us…race riots, murder and mayhem, hatred between races, and cop killings.  And nothing is being done about Louis Farrakhan telling 10,000 blacks to go out and kill cops and whitey.  Why isn’t this man in jail?  Because he’s Obama’s buddy, and they both hate white America.

REPOSTED FROM FRONTPAGEMAG.COM

Murder, murder, everywhere, but Obama’s not to blame.

Murder rates are skyrocketing in large U.S. cities, but President Obama’s progressive pro-crime policies and endless racial provocations have nothing to do with it, the New York Times predictably declared in a recent article.

Nowadays Americans are being killed and maimed explicitly because of their race. Execution-style cop killings are becoming distressingly common. Killings and vicious assaults based on the skin color of the civilian victim are also becoming common.

That any of this is happening shouldn’t surprise anyone who follows public events. For years media outlets have acted as uncompensated publicists for the Obama administration’s ongoing campaign to turn America into the progressive paradise that is Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe.

And they’re still doing it today. Some downplay the evidence of a crime wave.

Smug left-wing journalists Jason Linkins of the Huffington Post and Jesse Walker of Reason snickered at the Manhattan Institute’s Heather Mac Donald when she argued in late May that after two decades of falling crime rates nationwide, anti-cop sentiment was boosting crime rates.

The “most plausible explanation of the current surge in lawlessness is the intense agitation against American police departments over the past nine months,” wrote Mac Donald in a Wall Street Journal op-ed. Walker wrote at the time that “any talk of a ‘nationwide’ crime surge is at best premature, at worst sheer fearmongering.” Linkins wrote that Mac Donald’s column contained “a load of hot nonsense.”

The legacy media has helped to inflame racial tensions in a country that had relative racial harmony before Barack Hussein Obama was inaugurated. So it shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has been following the news that the dead-tree and TV network media outlets are now covering up Obama’s role and their own in stirring the pot.

Reporting from Milwaukee, Wisc., the Old Gray Lady explains:

Cities across the nation are seeing a startling rise in murders after years of declines, and few places have witnessed a shift as precipitous as this city. With the summer not yet over, 104 people have been killed this year — after 86 homicides in all of 2014. More than 30 other cities have also reported increases in violence from a year ago.

According to the New York Times article dated Sept. 1, homicides committed to this point this year are outpacing homicides committed to this point in 2014.

The report highlights these troubled cities: Milwaukee (murders up 76 percent); St. Louis (up 60 percent); Baltimore (up 56 percent); Washington, D.C. (up 44 percent); New Orleans (up 22 percent); Chicago (up 20 percent); Kansas City, Mo. (up 20 percent); Dallas (up 17 percent); New York (up 9 percent); and Philadelphia (up 4 percent).

But Obama and the Left are not to blame.

Times reporters Monica Davey and Mitch Smith seem genuinely perplexed, scratching their heads wondering where all this bloody violence might be coming from.

Law enforcement experts blame “disparate factors” though “no one is claiming to know for sure why murder rates are climbing,” Davey and Smith write. Recycling boilerplate from old news articles, they write that rivalries between “organized street gangs,” “the availability of guns,” and “a growing willingness among disenchanted young men in poor neighborhoods to use violence to settle ordinary disputes” are major factors.

Maybe it’s the “Ferguson effect,” they speculate, describing it as “the notion that less aggressive policing has emboldened criminals.” Although it “is a popular theory for the uptick in violence,” they write that “many experts dispute that theory.” They quote criminology professor Alfred Blumstein of Carnegie Mellon University saying, “[t]he equilibrium has changed between police and offenders.”

St. Louis, Mo., police chief Sam Dotson has been credited with coining the term the “Ferguson effect.” He was referring to the Left’s never-ending drumbeat against the police which is causing some cops to refrain from using force when it is appropriate. Recently in Birmingham, Alabama, a plainclothes police officer was beaten senseless by an angry black driver. The cop admits he hesitated in defending himself because he was afraid he might be called racist.

This pervasive cop-hatred contributed to civil unrest last fall in Ferguson, a St. Louis suburb, both before and after a grand jury decided not to indict white police officer Darren Wilson for killing young black male Michael Brown. Brown, who had just held up a convenience store minutes before, battered the policeman, and tried to grab his handgun. Wilson shot Brown in self-defense but the politically motivated lie that Wilson gunned him down while he was trying to surrender persists and the media perpetuates this lie by continuing to describe Brown as an unarmed black man instead of explaining the circumstances of the case. (One notable exception is the Washington Post‘s Jonathan Capehart, a black left-wing columnist who acknowledged in March that Wilson was a victim of Brown, and not the other way around.)

Of course the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media have done everything in their power to ramp up racial hostility across the fruited plain during the Obama presidency.

They lied about why Darren Wilson had to shoot his would-be killer “gentle giant” Michael Brown. They turned racist, black, gay Obama supporter Vester Lee Flanagan II, who murdered two white former TV station colleagues (in part because they were white) during a live broadcast in Virginia, into an example of why more gun control was needed. They sat by silently as then-Attorney General Eric Holder let voter intimidation charges against New Black Panther Party members in Philadelphia slide because black-shirted black nationalists are an important component of the Obama coalition.

Then there is President Obama’s relentless anti-police rhetoric, a toxic blend of anti-white racism and Marxist cop-hatred. It is as if Obama pal Bill Ayers, the unrepentant terrorist and Black Power supporter who helped to launch Obama’s political career, were running the White House communications office.

Execution-style cop killings and assaults on police are becoming more commonplace ever since two New York City police officers were gunned down in their squad car last December.

Houston sheriff’s deputy Darren Goforth, a white man, was shot point-blank in cold blood 15 times last month reportedly by a black man named Shannon J. Miles. But there is no racial motive, we have been assured. “Mental illness” is to blame, the media report. The riots in Baltimore and Ferguson, Mo., were understandable “uprisings” against the unjust status quo that holds black people down, they say.

Obama’s progressive soulmates have also played a role in the new crime wave.

This summer oft-deported illegal alien Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez became the poster child for so-called sanctuary cities across America which harbor illegals and frustrate federal immigration enforcement efforts. He murdered Kate Steinle in cold blood at a San Francisco tourist destination for no apparent reason.

Steinle’s blood is on the hands of the radical left-wing sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi (D), who set Lopez-Sanchez loose on the streets over the objections of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Federal officials had characterized the man as an “enforcement priority” and filed an “immigration detainer” asking jail officials to hold him until they could take custody. Mirkarimi let him go because like a good progressive he doesn’t believe the nation should have enforced borders. That any desperado who wants should be able to saunter in the United States is also apparently the view of the Obama administration.

Meanwhile, much of the anger in the streets that has turned into rioting and looting sprees has been underwritten by radical anti-American financier George Soros to advance the goals of the Black Lives Matter movement. Much of the rest of it has been inspired by the community organizer in the White House and his minion, the former Attorney General Eric Holder. The mainstream media has been playing a supporting role, turning every police shooting of a person of color into a cause célèbre, regardless of the circumstances leading to the shooting.

And as each day goes by the rhetoric from the black-nationalist Left grows more chilling, unchallenged by the Obama administration and the mainstream media.

Last month Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan openly called for the slaughter of white Americans. Farrakhan called for “10,000 fearless men” to come forward and get the massacres underway. “Retaliation is a prescription from God to calm the breasts of those who kill us. Stalk them and kill them let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling.”

Black-supremacist King Noble announced in a YouTube video that it’s time to start to murdering Americans, Breitbart News reports.

“It’s open season on killing white people and cops. It’s unavoidable, unescapable.

It’s funny that now we’re moving to a time where the predator will become the prey.”

Noble continued:

Today we live in a time where the white man will be picked off and there’s nothing he can do about it. His day is up. His time is up. We will witness more executions and killing of white people and cops than we ever have before. We see with the Houston, Texas shooting and we see with the news reporting shooting in Virginia, it’s about to go down. It’s open season on killing white people and crackers. The Black Lives Matter movement wasn’t enough.

He added:

It’s not safe no more to be white in America. Lurking behind any corner could be an angry black man ready to take yo ass out. It’s a reality. It’s open season on killing whites and police and they better make some serious, serious changes, social changes, at this point, but it ain’t looking good.

At time of writing, the viral video posted Aug. 30 had been viewed more than 444,000 times.

Normally this kind of extremist rhetoric would be ignored or laughed at, but we do not live in normal times.

President Obama doesn’t condemn any of it, which is reason for all Americans to worry.

Judge Suggests Human Rights for Animals Are Coming Thanks to Gays, Blacks, Indians

BY S. NOBLE FOR INDEPENDENTSENTINEL.COM
JUDGE
Judge Barbara Jaffe
Hercules and Leo are unwilling residents of a biomedical lab at Stony Brook University and they must be freed according to a group of lawyers representing them.
Hercules and Leo are chimps.
baby
Baby In The Womb, No Rights
While Planned Parenthood is harvesting baby body parts of ‘delivered’ babies and the administration, the NY Times and Planned Parenthood are pretending it’s a hoax, these same breed of leftists are demanding human rights for animals.
chimp
Chimpanzee, Give Them Human Rights
Chimps can’t arrange for lawyers or ask for release from confinement but that didn’t stop the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP or NRP) from filing a lawsuit claiming chimps at Stonybrook University in New York want their liberty. NRP, a group of left-wing lawyers, is the only organization that seeks legal rights for species other than humans.
In Manhattan Supreme Court in April, Justice Barbara Jaffe ruled that someone from Stony Brook, a state university on Long Island, must appear in court this past May to explain why the chimps were being ‘detained’, according to Science magazine.
The Nonhuman Rights Project (NRP) had filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to free them from unlawful imprisonment. To some degree it recognizes their rights as persons.
After word spread that Justice Jaffe recognized the writ and therefore recognized chimps as humans, she amended the writ, saying that it was simply a formal way of directing the university to her courtroom to present its case.
This past Wednesday, Judge Jaffe rejected the claim that Hercules and Leo had the right to bodily liberty but she did so with an alarming proviso that Slate magazine is touting with glee.
The NRP wants a habeas right for nonhumans written into New York common law and that’s why this case was brought.
Judge Jaffe, following in the mold of leftist crazy judges everywhere, cited gay rights as a reason to broaden nonhuman rights.
Citing the Supreme Court decisions for LGBT rights, she said, “If rights were defined by who exercised them in the past,” she notes, quoting Obergefell v. Hodges, “then received practices could serve as their own continued justification and new groups could not invoke rights once denied.”
The NRP argument was not made on a chimp’s biology but as a policy matter. Jaffe finds their argument that Chimps are like humans “understandable”. Chimps can get depressed, have compassion and a sense of humor – some say. They are our relatives from 7 million years ago and we share 99% of their DNA.
Since we share DNA with all animals, all animals will have human rights one day. Anyone can make a case for a lizard looking sad. Judge Jaffe forgot to mention that chimps can’t give consent.
She thinks a higher court should answer the question of chimp autonomy.
In her conclusion, Judge Jaffe referred to another gay rights case to deny the petition but left it an open question. Earlier in her statement, she compared this battle to black slaves seeking freedom and Native-Americans being mistreated before eventually securing rights.
Jaffe’s final statement read:
“The similarities between chimpanzees and humans inspire the empathy felt for a beloved pet. Efforts to extend legal rights to chimpanzees are thus understandable; some day they may even succeed. Courts, however, are slow to embrace change, and occasionally seem reluctant to engage in broader, more inclusive interpretations of the law, if only to the modest extent of affording them greater consideration. As Justice Kennedy aptly observed in Lawrence v. Texas, albeit in a different context, “times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress. (539 US 558, 579 [2003])”
It’s okay in the leftist world of judges to compare chimps to blacks seeking freedom, gays seeking marriage, and Native-Americans being released from oppression?
Judge Jaffe felt bound to the “times” but not to the idea of human rights for animals. It’s just “not today.”
Slate.com, a truly vile leftist rag, is promoting the idea, gleaned from this judge’s decision, that LGBT cases show that rights are not defined by who exercised them in the past and that human rights for animals are an open case.
Slate.com declared that chimps are no longer needed for biomedical research though they are lauding the research being done thanks to Planned Parenthood’s harvesting of dead baby body parts.
Perhaps they are thinking the dead babies can easily take their place, even the ones who have been ‘delivered’ and are then killed by savages who call themselves medical professionals.
The author of the Slate article, Mark Joseph Stern, wrote that “if current trends continue, the twilight of chimp research could also be the dawn of chimp personhood. And if it is, Jaffe’s opinion denying chimps rights could turn out to be unexpectedly prophetic.”
Actually, it would be hard to go any further left than Slate. The only thing they’re missing is the Communist logo.
In 2012, this NRP group was a friend of the court in the case filed by PETA when they sued Seaworld for “enslaving” Orcas.
NRP also sent speakers to the Personhood Beyond the Human conference at Yale University in 2013. The speakers promoted the elevation of “personhood” to animals, condemning Christianity as “abominable” for elevating people above animals and claiming that man is made in the image and likeness of God.
The goal of the speakers is actually to “animalize” mankind.
Obama’s former Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Cass Sunstein, has argued for providing lawyers for animals to sue in court and he entertained the notion of banning hunting. He is married to Samantha Power, the U.N. Ambassador.
That’s who Americans listen to now. This is a sickness and these people can’t think logically because of their ideology.
If only they cared as much about human babies in and just out of the womb.
Court Decision

No Truce With the Left

POSTED BY DANIEL GREENFIELD ON HIS SULTAN KNISH BLOG
There comes a time when every conservative thinker tries to find some common ground with the left in some area. Today it’s criminal rights and the headlines have Rand Paul denouncing the racist justice system while Grover Norquist and the Koch Brothers join with the left to back their reforms. As usually happens, the conservatives or libertarians turn out to be the useful idiots of the left.
Liberals have a long history of being the left’s useful idiots. It’s only fair that libertarians get a turn.
Republicans are still trying to figure out a truce on gay marriage. They retreated to civil unions, then accepted a full defeat on gay marriage and then acted baffled when Christian bakery owners were dragged into court for refusing to participate in gay weddings. When the left insisted that gay marriage was a civil rights issue, they refused to take them as their word.
Now they’re wondering how an accommodation can be made with tranny rights. A brief look back at gay rights will show that the only possible accommodation is one in which men in dresses have a legal right to use the ladies room and every single closed female space and event. And yes, that means your business will be shut down if you object to Steve using the female locker room.
After a few skirmishes, some fundraising and angry letters, the accommodationists will find ways to accommodate that and we can look forward to conservative activists eagerly crowing about the first gay Republican presidential candidate around say, 2024, and the first Republican man in a dress in the Senate around the same time.
Of course by then it will be something else. Maybe pedophiles. Gay rights activists don’t like the analogy, but their movement and its assorted allies, particularly in Europe’s Green parties, have a long history of advocating it. The same pop culture methods that were used to sell gay rights and Bruce Jenner can easily be flipped around to sell NAMBLA.
By 2024, the Republican gay and tranny candidates will be dismissed as tokens while the media oohs and aahs over a vocal and charismatic campaigner for some other love that dare not speak its name.
And that’s the point. It has always been the point.
The left does not care about gay rights. If you doubt that, consider how many of the left’s favorite Muslim countries have gay rights. The left has recently divided its campaign passions between gay marriage and defending Iran. Iran denies the existence of gays and hangs them where it finds them.
The USSR treated homosexuality as a crime even while it was recruiting gay men as spies in the West. Cuba, the darling of the American left, hated both gays and blacks. The ACLU backed the police states of Communism. If the left supports an enemy nation, the odds are excellent that it is also a violently bigoted place that makes a KKK rally look like a hippie hangout.
To understand the left, you need to remember that it does not care about 99 percent of the things it claims to care about. Name a leftist cause and then find a Communist country that actually practiced it. Labor unions? Outlawed. Environmentalism? Chernobyl. The left fights all sorts of social and political battles not because it believes in them, but to radicalize, disrupt and take power.
The left does not care about social justice. It cares about power.
That is why no truce is possible with the left. Not on social issues. Not on any issues.

The left is a drunk in a bar trying to pick a fight with you. Trying to convince him that you didn’t disrespect him, put something in his beer to make him dizzy or make his feet so heavy won’t work. There’s no ‘agree to disagree’ possible here. He’s picking a fight with you because he wants a fight.
The left does not care about Bruce Jenner. It does not care about gay rights, equal pay, police brutality or even slavery. Its activists ‘care’ about those things a great deal right now, but they could easily be persuaded tomorrow to be outraged by telephone poles, shredded wheat or people in green sweaters.
They care mainly about emotional venting and exercising power over others. It’s the same phenomenon witnessed during the Salem Witch Trials, the French Revolution or any other mob scene. Except the individual elements of the mob are on social media and have a hashtag.
The outraged social justice warrior was laughing at tranny jokes a few years ago. Now he’s ready to kill over minor verbal missteps. A few years from now he’ll be laughing at them again.
There’s a long human history to such atrocities, to mobs whipping themselves up into spasms of manufactured outrage, subsuming their own doubts, confusion and unhappiness into the ’cause’.
The cause is progress, but the real cause is the power of its enforcers to vent their unhappiness and destructive impulses on everyone else under the guise of reform.
You can’t find common ground with the left because it is an activist machine dedicated to destroy common ground, not only with the right, but even with its own allies on the left. Progress turns what was once progressive into what is reactionary. And what was reactionary into what is progressive.
These changes have the mad logic of a byzantine ideology behind them, but to the ordinary person their definition of progress seems entirely random.
A Socialist a century ago considered factories progressive instruments of the future and men in dresses a decadent reactionary behavior. Now factories are reactionary pollution machines of globalization and men in dresses are an oppressed victim group who have transcended biology with the power of their minds.
Republicans, conservatives, libertarians and other class enemies cannot possibly ‘progress’ enough to be acceptable to the left because it identifies progress with political conformity. A tolerant and progressive Republican is a contradiction in terms.
If he were truly tolerant and progressive, he wouldn’t be a Republican.
The left will destroy the things you care about, because you care about them. It will destroy them because that gives them power over you. It will destroy them because these things stand in the way of its power. It will destroy them because a good deal of its militant activists need things to destroy and if they can’t attack you, they’ll turn on the left in a frenzy of ideologically incestuous purges.
The left’s social justice program is really a wave of these purges which force their own people to hurry up and conform to whatever the Party dictated this week. Examples are made out of laggards on social media to encourage the rest to stop thinking and start marching in line. As Orwell knew well, these shifts select for mindless ideological zombies while silencing critical thinkers.
Yesterday we were against fighting Hitler. Today we’re for it. Retroactively, we were always at war with Oceania. Retroactively, Bruce Jenner was always a woman. Retroactively, Obama was always right about Iraq, even when he appeared to be making the wrong decisions.
These changes are a test of reason. If you can reason, you fail. If you can Doublethink, you pass.
The constant shifts create their own version of future shock. They leave people baffled and uncertain. Society no longer seems to resemble what they knew, even though the real society of men and women has not really changed much, only the media’s presentation of it has. But a beaten down mass of ordinary people now imagines that the country is filled with gay men and trannies. They accept that what they thought was common sense no longer applies and that it’s someone else’s country now.
And that is the prize that the left dearly wants. Surrender.
The left’s media machine makes its madness seem cool even though behind all the agitating young things are a bunch of bitter old leftists. But the madness is a means, not an end. So is the facade of revolutionary cool to each shift.
The Futurists of Russia vowed to heave the past “overboard from the steamship of modernity”. But when the Revolution came, the classics came back into the libraries and the Futurists were forced to stop drawing triangles and make their art conform to the conventional structure of a totalitarian state. The time of change had ended. Once the left was in power, the future became a lot like the past.
You can’t accommodate the left on social issues. You can’t accommodate it on fiscal issues. You can’t do it. Period.
The left exists to destroy you. It does not seek to co-exist with you. Its existence would lose all meaning. Any common ground will be used to temporarily achieve a goal before the useful idiots are kicked to the curb and denounced as bigots who are holding back progress.
The purpose of power is power. The left is not seeking to achieve a set of policy goals before kicking back and having a beer. The policy goals are means of destroying societies, nations and peoples before taking over. If you allow it a policy goal, it will ram that goal down your throat. It will implement it as abusively as it can possibly can before it moves on to the next battle.
It’s not about gay marriage. It’s not about cakes. It’s about power.
More fundamentally it’s about the difference in human nature between the people who want to be left alone and those who want power over others.
You can’t work out a truce with tyrants. You can give in or stand up to them. There’s nothing else.