Tag Archives: Koran

THE BIRMINGHAM QUR’AN FRAGMENT: WHAT SHOULD CHRISTIANS THINK? [Excerpts]

REPOSTED FROM THEBEREANCALL.ORG

The BBC reports that some fragments of the Qur’an found at Birmingham University are among the world’s oldest. But it may be too soon for any definitive statements about the nature of this manuscript.
The parchment of the manuscript has been carbon-dated to sometime between AD 568 and 645. Muhammad lived in the seventh century AD, so this means the parchment dates to within a couple decades of his death. Carbon-dating is an accurate method for material within a few thousand years.
However, there are a number of very important things that the report does not note. The ink has not been carbon-dated, or if it has, this detail is not recorded in the news stories. It is a well-known fact that parchments can be washed and re-used – such re-used manuscripts are called¬†palimpsests. If something regarded as worthless was written on the valuable parchment, it may have been used to write a copy of the Qur’an much later. Understandably, testing the ink itself is a rare practice because it requires the destruction of part of the writing.
The manuscript has not been published in any academic journals, and it is generally considered “bad form” to release a manuscript find to the media before scholars have had a chance to vet it. We have noted this problem in the past with the lead codices and the so-called “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife,” both of which were quickly discredited by scholars.
Until scholars have had a chance to examine the manuscript and go through the proper channels, the value of this find cannot be assessed. In fact, some Saudi scholars have raised doubts about this manuscript, and say it may be a publicity stunt. They said, “The university should have examined the ink not the hide on which it was written.” Also, the order of the text was not the same as it was in that era. If some Muslims are rejecting the claims that the manuscript is ancient, surely Christians can, too.
The BBC has had a decidedly anti-Christian bias, but for various reasons, this does not apply to Islam. One cannot imagine a first-century New Testament manuscript receiving the glowing coverage that this seventh-century Qur’an fragment got.
Christians have the most well-documented text of all ancient documents-the New Testament. This new Qur’an manuscript does not change that.
http://creation.com/oldest-quran

THE BIRMINGHAM QUR'AN FRAGMENT: WHAT SHOULD CHRISTIANS THINK? [Excerpts]

REPOSTED FROM THEBEREANCALL.ORG

The BBC reports that some fragments of the Qur’an found at Birmingham University are among the world’s oldest. But it may be too soon for any definitive statements about the nature of this manuscript.
The parchment of the manuscript has been carbon-dated to sometime between AD 568 and 645. Muhammad lived in the seventh century AD, so this means the parchment dates to within a couple decades of his death. Carbon-dating is an accurate method for material within a few thousand years.
However, there are a number of very important things that the report does not note. The ink has not been carbon-dated, or if it has, this detail is not recorded in the news stories. It is a well-known fact that parchments can be washed and re-used – such re-used manuscripts are called¬†palimpsests. If something regarded as worthless was written on the valuable parchment, it may have been used to write a copy of the Qur’an much later. Understandably, testing the ink itself is a rare practice because it requires the destruction of part of the writing.
The manuscript has not been published in any academic journals, and it is generally considered “bad form” to release a manuscript find to the media before scholars have had a chance to vet it. We have noted this problem in the past with the lead codices and the so-called “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife,” both of which were quickly discredited by scholars.
Until scholars have had a chance to examine the manuscript and go through the proper channels, the value of this find cannot be assessed. In fact, some Saudi scholars have raised doubts about this manuscript, and say it may be a publicity stunt. They said, “The university should have examined the ink not the hide on which it was written.” Also, the order of the text was not the same as it was in that era. If some Muslims are rejecting the claims that the manuscript is ancient, surely Christians can, too.
The BBC has had a decidedly anti-Christian bias, but for various reasons, this does not apply to Islam. One cannot imagine a first-century New Testament manuscript receiving the glowing coverage that this seventh-century Qur’an fragment got.
Christians have the most well-documented text of all ancient documents-the New Testament. This new Qur’an manuscript does not change that.
http://creation.com/oldest-quran

Shocking documentary about Islam – The world’s most dangerous cult! ISIS ISLAMIC STATE

http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=5YsdbhIbZoc

Shocking documentary about Islam – The world's most dangerous cult! ISIS ISLAMIC STATE

http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=5YsdbhIbZoc