by Rev. Austin Miles
Lawrence Craig is a patriot who has an incredible library of research material, papers, old history books, and published records regarding practically everything that concerns American Citizens. Especially Godly citizens who truly care about America. He freely shares his gold mine of information with columnists such as this one. It has been suggested by this writer that he do his own column. However he chooses to stay in the background and simply help those columnists on the front lines fighting for the sovereignty of The United States.
The intermarriage of various office holders in America who combine their abilities to tear down our country is staggering. The unbelievable interconnection of the various ‘movers and shakers’ who work against America is shocking to say the least, and to CONNECT THE DOTS will cause readers to slap their foreheads and say, “WHAT?”
So put on a pot of coffee….COFFEE…not Brandy, since there is a risk of overdoing it when these stats are read. Especially when it is realized that the politicos have gotten away with it….so far…and how everybody is connected to everybody making one feel alone in a sea of political crabgrass.
So let’s follow the trail…but slowly and patiently. When all the pieces are sewn together, it obviously exposes conspiracy and treason. From 2001 to 2005, there was an ongoing investigation of The Clinton Foundation. A Grand Jury had been impaneled. GOVERNMENTS from around the world donated to the “Charity.” However, none of these “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.
Any honest investigator would have been able to figure this out. Within the muddle, this particular individual came forth front and center, to set the record straight. That individual was…..drum roll….JAMES COMEY.
From there a transfer to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Brand of the IRS turned out to be….FANFARE…Lois Lerner!
Meanwhile, the individual who ran the Tax Division inside the department of (in)justice from 2001 to 2005 was none other than, Assistant Attorney General of the United States….trumpets…Rod Rosenstein!
Of course this is all “coincidence” doncha know, but the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame was—Sustaining TYMPANY ROLL— ROBERT MUELLER.
And what did all four characters have in common? They were all briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation. Wow! Coincidences all over the place.
FAST FORWARD TO 2009….
James Comey left the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin. Hillary Clinton was running the State Department, on her own personal email server. The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of Hillary. Like all good public servants do in looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of U.S. Uranium to, no other, than the Russians! Notice that it was not a Donald Trump collusion with the Russians…it was Hillary.
This appeared to be a straight up deal, but was it? The people got absolutely nothing out of if. However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton rushed to Moscow, got paid Five Hundred Thousand bucks for a one hour speech, then met with Vladimir Putin at his home for several hours. Again, this was a Clinton, not a Trump.
Meanwhile, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme. And the FBI director during this time? Yep, Robert Mueller who even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009. And who handled that case within the Justice Department out of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland? Better sit down…Rod Rosenstein.
As for the informant, The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to put him behind bars if he spoke out about lt.
Sudden Thawt Dept. How did 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole, providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?
After the sale was approved, 145 Million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal. Lois Lerner was still at the Internal Revenue Service working with the Charitable Division where she regularly blocked legitimate churches and ministers from receiving a tax exemption.
WHOOSH! It is now 2015:
Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovered that Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of these emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was and is required by law.
He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email. (Let’s not forget-at least 10 CIA spies in China were killed by the Chinese because of the leaks, and God knows what else occurred.) Sparing you the State Departments’ cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.
Now here is the amazing part: Guess who became FBI Director in 2013? Guess who had secured 17 no-bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? None other than James Comey. Isn’t it amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at The State Department.?
Comey was the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after his FBI investigated the Lois Lerner “matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerated her. No crimes there. Really?
In April 2016, James Comey drafted an exoneration letter of HIllary Rodham Clinton as the DOJ was handing out immunity deals. A Grand Jury was NOT convened. James Comey then stepped out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July 5th of 2016, and exonerated Hillary from any wrongdoing.
It goes on and on. Rosenstein became Asst. Attorney General, Comey got fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaked government information TO THE PRESS, Mueller then was assigned to the Russian Investigation scam by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ.
FISA Abuse, Political Espionage…pick a crime, any crime, chances are…this group and a few others did it. All the same players. All compromised and conflicted. All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves. ALL CONNECTED IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER TO THE CLINTONS.
As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation as being the largest international Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Let us not forget that Comey’s brother worked for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes. Hillary Clinton was the common denominator to all the crimes above.
Next Question: WHO IS LISA BARSOOMIAN?
She is a U.S. Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protégé of James Comey and Robert Mueller. Brsoomian, with her boss, R Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998.
Her boss, Lawrence, also represented:
Robert Mueller three times;
James Comey five times,
Barack Obama 45 times
Kathleen Sebelius 56 times
Bill Clinton 40 times
Hillary Clinton 17 Times
Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times.
So why should we care about her or her work history? Someone cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian Court Documents for her Clinton Representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the D.C. District Court of Appeals Court Dockets. Someone cares so much that the Internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.
STAY WITH US FOR SHOCKER AT END.
Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative. Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. And although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the D.C. office of the U.S. Attorney, her email address is: LisaBarsoomian@NIH gov. The HIH stands for National Institute of Health. This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities
Why one more attorney with ties to the U.S. Intelligence Community really matters: Because it deals with President Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports. the Border Wall, Daca, Everything coming out of California. the Imo-Party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper Leaks, the Comey Leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions Recusal and 14 month nap with occasional forays into the Marijuana legalization mix…and last but not least, Mueller’s never-ending investigation into so-called Collusion between the Trump Team and the Russians.
SO WHY DOES CIA OPERATIVE BARSOOMIAN, MERIT ATTENTION?
BECAUSE…SHE IS ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ROD ROSENSTEIN’S WIFE.
Our gratitude to Lawrence Craig for sharing these files with us.
ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
Remember the time a presidential candidate suggested that Gandhi used to run “a gas station down in St. Louis.” No it wasn’t Trump. That was Hillary Clinton. Had Trump said it, we would still be hearing about it. But since Hillary Clinton was responsible for it, it went down the memory hole.
Along with her more recent “Colored People Time” gag.
And who can forget the time that Trump said, “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.” But that wasn’t Trump. It was actually Vice President Joe Biden.
But still it was indisputably offensive when Trump told the Asian Chamber of Commerce, “I don’t think you’re smarter than anybody else, but you’ve convinced a lot of us you are.”
Then he followed that up by joking, “One problem that I’ve had today is keeping my Wongs straight.”
You would have to be ridiculously politically incorrect or an outright buffoon to say something like that to the Asian Chamber of Commerce. And this is exactly why Trump is… but wait, those lines actually came from Democratic Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid.
Reid recently popped up to call Trump’s comments racist. And he ought to know. Harry Reid believed that Obama was electable because he was “light-skinned” with ”no Negro dialect”.
Memories are short when it comes to Democratic racial and ethnic stereotypes. Not to mention slurs.
Trump is certainly not the only prominent politician who says wildly politically incorrect things. Democrats do it all the time. And they do it in more pointed ways.
Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez is running for the Senate. Sanchez is a racist who accused the “Vietnamese” of “trying to take this seat” when running against a Vietnamese-American candidate. Last year she managed to ridicule both Hindus and Native Americans with one slur.
There was the time that Bill Clinton suggested that, Obama “would have been getting us coffee”. Or when Biden described his future boss as the, “first sort of mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and nice-looking guy.” Despite two terms in which Republicans were accused of racially stereotyping Obama with secret dog whistles, nothing any major Republican figure said was anywhere as bad as what Obama’s Democratic predecessor and his own Senate ally had said about him.
Democrats actually say politically incorrect things all the time. Trump has become famous because he’s one of the few Republicans who talks like a Democrat and says the sort of things that Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid have no problem saying in private and even in public speeches.
A Republican who told the Asian Chamber of Commerce that he had trouble “keeping my Wongs straight” would have been forced out in disgrace by a combination of media pressure and Republican shame. And having standards of respectable civic discourse is not a bad thing. But standards that are applied unilaterally to one side are not standards, they’re weapons.
Political correctness is a weapon brought out to punish political opponents for statements that run the gamut from offensive to those whose offensiveness is entirely manufactured by the media’s political echo chamber, such as Romney’s comments about having binders of qualified female candidates. Challenging political correctness does more than challenge these standards. It challenges the dishonest ways in which they are applied for political purposes.
Any of the above comments would have disqualified a Republican, but barely rate mention for Democrats. The truth about Trump is that he hasn’t said anything that plenty of Democrats haven’t said.
Long before Trump’s call for a Muslim ban, President Carter responded to the Iran hostage crisis by banning Iranians from America. Harry Reid had also proposed eliminating birthright citizenship long before Trump did. Building a wall with Mexico? Hillary Clinton called for it back in the Senate. Before she was condemning “talking about building walls”, she was talking about building walls. And warning that, “A country that cannot control its borders is failing at one of its fundamental obligations”.
The media has made a game out of pretending that everything Trump says is shocking. When Trump poses with a taco bowl and posts, “I love Hispanics”, the media gets giddy with outrage. But when Hillary Clinton foolishly panders to black voters by claiming to carry around hot sauce in her purse or posts, “7 Things Hillary Clinton has in Common with Your Abuela”, there are shrugs.
All politicians have their cringeworthy pandering moments. But the media chooses which of them it plays up and which of them it plays down.
That’s why Trump is shocking only in contrast to a Republican field that had been trained to carefully avoid even the faintest suggestion of insensitive or politically incorrect remarks. And that training did no good whatsoever with a media establishment that insisted on manufacturing gaffes no matter what.
Trump is often just as unrestrained as Democrats are. He feels the same freedom to speak his mind that is enjoyed by Joe Biden or Bill Clinton. He pays as little attention to political correctness as Harry Reid.
And it’s time that we were honest about that.
Sensitivity is not a bad thing. But what we have is not sensitivity as a value, but as a weapon. When one side is free to be as offensive as it wishes to be with no consequences whatsoever, then eventually the other side will escalate to match it. When oversensitivity becomes used to enforce an agenda that limits basic personal freedoms then the reaction to that will run roughshod over any and all sensitivities.
Political correctness, like all forms of censorship, is about power. Not fairness, sensitivity or decency. Trump is taking the license to be politically incorrect back from Democrats. The ability to determine what may or may not be said is the essence of power in a system where discourse dictates elections.
If Democrats are truly outraged by Trump, they might want to try looking in a mirror.