Tag Archives: Fascism

Taking Jack Reacher to School

By Jim O’Neill
Once upon a time Jack Reacher was a mensch among men, an uber-mensch.  O how the mighty have fallen.
I recently read a tale of Reacher’s escapades (“Night School”) in which one of the main enemies he confronts consists of a group of “far-right” neo-Nazis.
Jack, Jack, Jack…and to think that I always considered you to be the smartest guy in the room.  To call neo-Nazis far-right is so wrong on so many levels that I hardly know where to begin.  Let’s start with some basics and take it from there.
The traditional Western political spectrum runs from massive centralized government on the extreme left, to increasingly smaller government as you move further right, to no government (anarchy) on the extreme right.
Bigger Government on the Left, Smaller Government on the right.  Bigger Government on the Left, Smaller Government on the Right.  Are we clear so far Reacher — I’m not going too fast?  Good.
We should note in passing that as government increases individual freedom decreases, and vice versa.
Let’s move on to fascism shall we?  Benito Mussolini (1883-1945) is widely credited with founding fascism.  Following are a couple of quotes from him:
For the Fascist, everything is in the State, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the State.
All within the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State!
Let me Americanize those quotes in order to help elucidate things:
For the Fascist, everything is in the Federal Government, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the Federal Government.
All within the Federal Government, nothing outside the Federal Government, nothing against the Federal Government!
Pop quiz Reacher: Do the above quotes sound like they come from someone on the left side of the political spectrum (Big Government), or someone on the right side of the political spectrum (Small Government)?  Take your time, I know it’s a real head-scratcher.
Bingo!  You are correct sir, it sounds like something someone from the left side of the political spectrum would say.  Maybe there is hope for you after all.
Fascism is a left-wing ideology all the way.  The “Spanish Civil War” (1936-1939) for example, was a left vs. left turf war – left-wing communism against left-wing fascism.  (Think Shia and Sunni Islam – same basic ideology, differing details, at each other’s throats).
Which brings us to the Nazis – a subset of fascism.  The Nazi political party was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei).  Left-wing or right-wing?
Let me give you a hint Reacher – Socialist Workers Party.  Left-wing or right-wing?  Put it all together, come on I know you can do it.  The Nazis were and are a subset of fascism, which as we have seen is a left-wing (Big Government) ideology, and the operative words in the Nazi party label are “Socialist Workers Party” which means that the Nazis are….
Oh you’re close, it’s on the tip of your tongue I can tell.  That’s right!  The Nazis are left wing.  Atta boy, I knew you could do it.
One more teensy hurdle to jump and you’re home free Reacher.  If fascists and Nazis were, are, and always will be left-wing, then neo-Nazis are…?  Left-wing.  Correctamundo my man!  (You are on a roll Reacher.  If it’s not too much trouble I suggest you clue your pal Lee Child in on all this.  It’s what a friend would do).
Don’t feel too bad that you were duped by the Left for so many years – you have LOTS of company.  I did expect you to see through the lies, obfuscation, misdirection and smoke ‘n’ mirrors though.  Ah well, as I say, you have lots of company.
The late Oriana Fallaci – an undeniably bright and astute person – was also fooled by “this Left that gave birth to Mussolini then Hitler.”  Fallaci was an anti-fascist partisan during WW II, and an iconoclastic lifelong leftist.  Late in her life she compared the communists and fascists to two soccer teams that appeared to be in passionate opposition, but behind the scenes were working together hand in glove.
“And there are moments when I curse myself for not having understood it earlier; for having let myself be fooled by the two soccer-teams for so long.  Dammit.”
Oriana Fallaci “The Force of Reason” p.206
Are you with me so far Reacher, is everything copacetic?  Excellent.
Once one understands that fascism in general, and Nazism in particular were, are, and always will be, left-wing ideologies, then the scales drop from your eyes, heavenly choirs rejoice, and “I Saw the Light” will play in stereo surround-sound inside your head.  Well okay, maybe not that dramatic, but many previously muddled and perplexing incongruities will clear up and disappear.
That’s it for today’s lesson Jack.  Perhaps we will get together again and talk about the collusion between globalists and jihadists…you know, the collusion that is intentionally destroying western Europe’s nation statesThat one.  (The “useful idiots” are clueless about all this because, well, they’re idiots.  You are not an idiot are you Reacher?  No?  Good to hear).
You’re a smart guy Reacher; I am sure you will be able to figure things out for yourself, now that you know your left from your right.
 

Left Wing Fascist Anti-fascist Fascism

By Jim O’Neill
That the morally bankrupt, intellectually stunted thugs of ANTIFA (ANTI FAscist) wallow in ignorance is to be expected; as recently demonstrated during the riots in Berkeley – but that purportedly “conservative” writers and pundits continue to regurgitate the same old leftist lies about fascism is simply unacceptable.
As the title of this article implies, the left-wing is up to their standard leitmotif of clueless idiocy yet again.  In this case, they are reincarnating as Hitler’s fascist brown-shirt thugs in order to protest Hitlerian fascist brown-shirt thugs (although in a nod to modernism they have traded in their brown shirts for black ones, a la Hitler’s SS or Mussolini’s “black shirts”).  How thoroughly liberal of them.
I realize that I may have gone a bit overboard with the repetitions of “fascism” and variants in my title, but I am trying to make a point here – and apparently it is a point that bears repeating, and repeating, and repeating.  My point being: FASCISM IS A LEFT-WING IDEOLOGY.
Permit me to highlight, underline, and BOLD why fascism is, always has been, and always will be a LEFT-WING IDEOLOGY.  On the off chance that a liberal might read this article I will go s-l-o-w-l-y in the hope (faint though it be) that they may see the light.
First, some ground rules.  I will be referring to the traditional political spectrum throughout this article – the one that runs from Big Government on the left, to No Government (anarchy) on the extreme right.
The further to the left you move on the political spectrum the bigger and more intrusive the government (individual freedom diminishes).  The further to the right you move the more limited and restrained the government becomes (individual freedom increases).
The United States has traditionally been considered a “center right” country.  Meaning that the majority of “we the people” favor a government slightly to the right of the midway point between the far left and the far right.
I would say that for the majority of “we the people” that is still the case, but our politicians and media (among others) have moved far to the left – resulting in a huge disconnect between “we the people” and our political “leaders” (especially Democrats) and the media, who have become unapologetic propaganda venues for globalism.  (“Globalism” is, of course, the new and improved label behind which the old and unimproved concept of “global communism” hides these days).
So, big government to the left, limited and restrained government to the right.  Fascism, which is big government on steroids, indisputably belongs on the LEFT side of the political spectrum.  Consider the following couple of quotes by Italian dictator Benito Mussolini (1883-1945), who is widely credited with popularizing fascism (and coining the term itself).
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state!
For the Fascist, everything is in the State, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the State.
Benito Mussolini
Perhaps putting the above quotes in the American vernacular will help to clarify things:
Everything within the federal government, nothing outside the federal government, nothing against the federal government!
For the Fascist, everything is in the Federal Government, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the Federal Government.
Fascism is, always has been, and always will be a big government LEFT-WING ideology.  The battles between communism and fascism during WW II and the Spanish Civil War were essentially turf wars between competing left-wing movements — comparable to Shiite and Sunni Muslims fighting one another.
A few words on the Nazis: Adolph Hitler was a left-wing fascist; whose political party was the “National Socialist German Workers Party” – the operative words being “Socialist Workers Party” – hardly the name for a conservative right-wing outfit.  The leftist nature of the Nazis is rather tellingly spelled out in the 10th item of their party platform:
It must be the first duty of every Citizen to carry out intellectual or physical work.  Individual activity must not be harmful to the public interest and must be pursued within the framework of the community and for the general good[italics added]
Party Platform of the NAZI Party
To associate the Nazis in particular, and fascism in general, with government restraining conservatism is deceitful beyond words.  It is willful ignorance magnified, multiplied, and dished out by the various globalist propaganda outlets.
The “Bill of Rights” from the US Constitution is the antithesis of fascism.  It does not so much list the rights of “we the people,” as it puts chains on government and restricts what government can do.  The US Constitution stands in exact opposition to the leftist big government tenets of fascism/Nazism.
To call the pro-Constitutional moves of President Trump “fascist” is so ludicrously wrongheaded that the absurdity of it all is stunning.   It would be funny, but for the fact that so many people actually buy into this nonsense.
The left-wing can, and will, continue to peddle their nonsense and ignorance, but “we the people” need to WAKE THE F—K UP.  Fascism and Nazism are NOT to be conflated with right-wing patriotism and conservative thinking.  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A RIGHT-WING FASCIST/NAZI.  Such an animal simply cannot exist.  Left-wing fascist/Nazis, on the other hand, are all over the d—n place.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

What law says the text of the TPP must remain secret?

Written by

To the US Con­gress: reveal the con­tents of the TPP now

It seems like a case of mass hyp­no­sis. Peo­ple claim­ing they can’t say what’s in the TPP trade agree­ment. And main­stream media accept this premise.

That’s right. Con­gress must stay silent.”

Pop quiz: who says the text of the TPP must remain secret?

Under what authority?

Mem­bers of Con­gress are scut­tling around like weasels, claim­ing they can’t dis­close what’s in this far-reaching, 12-nation trade treaty.

They can go into a sealed room and read a draft, but they can’t copy pages, and they can’t tell the pub­lic what they just read.

Why not?

If there is a US law for­bid­ding dis­clo­sure, name the law.

Can you recall any­thing in the Con­sti­tu­tion that estab­lishes secret treaties?

Is there a prior treaty that states the text of all treaties can be hid­den from the people?

I see no author­ity any­where that jus­ti­fies with­hold­ing the text of the TPP.

Gov­ern­ment leg­is­la­tors in the other 11 nations: why can’t you reveal what’s in the TPP?

Mass silence around the world. “Sorry, we can’t say what’s in the treaty. We’ll vote on it, but you the peo­ple have no input. You have to take what we do on faith.”

Who says so? By what authority?

If a US Sen­a­tor held a press con­fer­ence today and explained every­thing he read in that sealed room about the TPP, what exactly would hap­pen to him? Would he be arrested?

Would he be charged with a fed­eral crime?

What crime?

If he used his cell phone to take pic­tures of pages of the TPP, and came out of the room and sent the pic­tures to 500 press out­lets, what would happen?

Would the DOJ roll a few tanks up to his house and put him in cuffs? Would he be placed on trial?

If so, on what charge?

Would the trial itself be secret?

Or would every­one sud­denly look at each other and say, “We never real­ized it before, but the emperor has no clothes!”

What would hap­pen if a Sen­a­tor went into the sealed room, picked up the whole TPP text or the lap­top on which it’s stored, bulled his way out of the room, passed the text to his secu­rity staff, and had them for­ward every page to a few hun­dred media out­lets around the world?

Would DHS agents shoot these peo­ple in broad day­light, just to pro­tect the inter­ests of David Rock­e­feller and his Glob­al­ist heavy hitters?

Why haven’t the New York Times, the Wash­ing­ton Post, CBS, NBC, ABC, the BBC and other out­lets run major sto­ries that detail under what pre­cise author­ity the TPP text is being kept secret?

What are we miss­ing here?

Is it sim­ply that a bunch of national lead­ers and cor­po­rate big shots and trade rep­re­sen­ta­tives nod­ded and said: “Keep the text a secret”?

Did they arbi­trar­ily give the TPP nego­ti­at­ing process a name, a label, with the word “author­ity” in it?

I just met with myself and decided to estab­lish The Naked TPP Author­ity. I gave it pri­macy over all other nego­ti­at­ing bod­ies, and by its dec­la­ra­tion, the full text of the TPP must be pub­lished for the whole world to see, for two years, before any fur­ther votes take place.

There. It’s done.

I fully believe my Naked Author­ity car­ries more Con­sti­tu­tional jus­ti­fi­ca­tion than the cur­rent scheme, which is clearly criminal.

US Con­gress­man: “I’m sorry, my lips are sealed, I’m bound, I can’t reveal what’s in the treaty that will adversely affect the lives of hun­dreds of mil­lions of people.”

Wrong. You’re lying. You can reveal secret text. In fact, it’s your duty. Oth­er­wise, you’re guilty of coop­er­at­ing in a RICO crim­i­nal con­spir­acy. Now, let’s start at the begin­ning. Who told you that you had to remain silent? What US law did they cite? Take your time. We’ll stay here as long as it takes.”

Arti­cle 2, Sec­tion 2, Clause 2 of the US Con­sti­tu­tion states: “[The Pres­i­dent] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Con­sent of the Sen­ate, to make Treaties, pro­vided two thirds of the Sen­a­tors present concur…”

Noth­ing there about secret treaties. Noth­ing there about the Pres­i­dent hav­ing the dis­cre­tion to keep the text of treaties secret.

Of course, a Pres­i­dent could argue that treaties, if exposed to the light of day prior to a Sen­ate vote, would face so much crit­i­cism and cross-talk that they would never pass.

But that’s a prac­ti­cal issue and prob­lem. It’s called “free speech.” It’s also some­times called “dissent.”

How our Federal Constitution Secures our Unalienable Rights

by Brent Parrish

Hitler

Since our public schools no longer teach civics, in any meaningful way, many Americans are utterly clueless when it comes to the U.S. Constitution and the enumerated powers contained therein. When the American people no longer know their rights, then any manner of usurpation and violation against those rights is possible by an overreaching federal government.

In cooperation with Publius Huldah, I have put together a series of slides written by Publius Huldah in the hope that they will be shared with others so Americans can begin to reclaim their God-given rights, and gain a better understanding of the enumerated powers spelled out in the U.S. Constitution.

Enumerated-Powers-PH-3 Enumerated-Powers-PH-4 Enumerated-Powers-PH-5 Enumerated-Powers-PH-6 Enumerated-Powers-PH-7 Enumerated-Powers-PH-8