Tag Archives: Economic Development

Secrets of the Secret Society in Idaho

Secrets of the Secret Society in Idaho

Yates was pretty cagey but I have no doubt that he knows what’s going on.  He just didn’t want to tell Doyle Beck because Doyle is going to blow a gasket when he finds out.   Here’s the story Doyle… and this is for everybody’s grandchildren.

Steve apparently learned about it from a woman named Ann Rydalch.   A quick search on her name turned up this article in the Idaho State Journal:  Group to study Bonneville Community College Idea.  Ann Rydalch was appointed to be on a committee to study the idea of turning the Eastern Idaho Technical College into a Community College.   The article says that the Research & Business Development Center (RBDC) has been studying the issue to determine the economic impact.  I don’t even need to see the report to know that they will conclude that turning EITC into a Community College would be the best thing to ever happen to Idaho Falls.  [ NOT ]    I don’t want to get distracted on the RBDC, but there is a big clue on the brief bio about the founder of Center, Bob Pothier:

Bob is the founder of the E Center and later helped found SIRI. He is a partner with the RenewableTech Ventures and Epic Ventures. Prior to his work in the eastern Idaho region, he was chairman and chief executive officer of Rockford Corporation. Bob specialized in management team building, sales and marketing strategy development. He completed the Executive Program at Stanford University and holds a BS in finance from Brigham Young University.

From the Journal article above, here is the key to the conspiracy Doyle:

To help with the study, Regional Economic Development for Eastern Idaho (REDI) and the Idaho National Laboratory, thanks to funds from Battelle Energy Alliance, donated $25,000 and $20,000, respectively, on Tuesday.

REDI’s chief executive officer Jan Rogers, who’s worked in economic development in southern Idaho for 14 years, said she has seen the value of a community college firsthand. She called the College of Southern Idaho’s efforts to meet students’ and businesses’ needs “a really critical aspect of economic vitality for that region.”

Jan Rogers was the Director of the Southern Idaho Economic Development Organization (SEIDO) located in Twin Falls. She resigned from that position sometime in the summer of 2015.  The announcement of her appointment to the Regional Economic Development Corporation (REDI) says that REDI was formed out of two economic development organizations – one in Bonneville County and one in Bingham County.

“We are thrilled to have Jan Rogers join REDI as CEO” said Park Price, President REDI and the Chairman of the Bank of Idaho”.

According to a REDI press release on July 23, Rogers is responsible for the “Magic Valley Miracle” because of SEIDO’s success in landing food manufacturing giants such as Chobani and Clif Bar.


SEIDO is embedded in the office of the President of the College of Southern Idaho.   The following is a diagram on the various entities that are operating from within the College of Southern Idaho (CSI) that have nothing to do with the mission of educating Idaho young people.


Notice that Jan Rogers is or was on the Board of Directors of the International Economic Development Council.   And she is connected with Obama’s  Select USA program that seeks foreign direct investment in the U.S.  They are not particular where the money comes from – nor are they concerned about destroying the culture and character of American rural communities.   In fact, their objective is to destroy that culture and character by changing the demographics, the politics and the “governing structure” of the region.

While Jan Rogers was at SEIDO, she brought Chobani, Inc.  formerly Agro Farma to Twin Falls.  Hamdi Ulukaya, CEO of Chobani is a Turkish Kurd.  He came to the U.S. in 1994 as an exchange student.   There is a lot to say about Hamdi Ulukaya that that can’t be said here because the story is too long.  Suffice it to say that the Fulton County Economic Development Corporation in New York ensured his success by facilitating substantial loans and grants to him from banks, but also the state and federal governments.   He had the political support of Senator Chuckie Schumer and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo during the New York phase of Agro Farma.    When the pieces of the puzzle of Hamdi Ulukaya are all laid on the table, they don’t fit a normal business model.  He was given extraordinary assistance that he was not qualified on any level to get.

In Twin Falls, Jan Rogers of SEIDO also extended extraordinary assistance to Ulukaya.  The Deal Sheet that was published on the Twin Falls City website showed that Ulukaya, an alleged billionaire put in only $18,000 on a $25 million deal for the property and infrastructure requirements for Chobani in Twin Falls. Curiously, that $18,000 was for water meters.

While researching Ulukaya’s activities in New York, I found a publication produced by the Fulton-Montgomery Community College that explains the new role for Community Colleges in “governance” of regions.   The title of the publication is “Community Colleges:  Partners in Community Development”.   On pages 15-16, it says the following concerning the role of community colleges:

Historically, community colleges’ role in the local economy included: 1) it’s presence (payroll, purchases, etc.); 2) preparing students to enter the workforce; 3) improving basic skills; 4) providing the first two-years of education for professionals; 5) providing business specific courses; 6) providing student interns and co-ops to area businesses; 7) pre-screening for employment in area companies; 8) providing placement service for students; and, 9) providing customized training for local companies.24 Again, all of these services center around education and workforce development.

Some states are beginning to consider how their community college system can assist the state with economic development beyond preparing the workforce. Virginia has been exploring the community college role in economic development for decades…

Community colleges can, and should, play a larger role in community and economic development. They can serve as leaders for resolving community issues even when a solution is not one of education.  Community colleges are comprised of highly educated and creative people who can assist with problem-solving in any number of issues that may affect a community. This is especially true for rural community colleges (over 50% of the community colleges in the U.S.) as these institutions are often the only institution of higher education in the region. History suggests that rural communities are often difficult to change because of highly entrenched political and economic structures. However, community colleges as highly visible public institutions can bring together business, government, and community members as a convener of people and a facilitator of discussions around an issue. They can work to move a community forward and energize a core group of people for change with a fact-based, creative, and unemotional approach to visioning the future.

Add to the unemotional approach, unaccountable because there is no accountability with this systemic change in our government structure.    In the “reinvented” governing structure, the American system of government with elected officials is being covertly replaced with a “governance” system that operates out of community colleges within rural communities.   It is a technocratic fascist-led system of communism  –  “commun – ism”.    Our elected representative government stays in place but it becomes just a façade and elected officials become eunuchs.  The “commun”  – partnership of business and governance officials operate in the shadows of the community college.  That’s where the real political and economic power resides in the “commun-ist” system of governance.

As for the Secret Society, it can’t be named for sure because it is secret, but they are following the model and patterns of the Tammany Society of New York.  The Tammany Society has a formula for corruption famously known through the story of Boss Tweed and the corrupt political machine he built through the Democrat Party.   From the George Washington University website:

“Throughout the 1830s and 1840s, the society expanded its political control even further by earning the loyalty of the city’s ever-expanding immigrant community, a task that was accomplished by helping newly arrived foreigners obtain jobs, a place to live, and even citizenship so that they could vote for Tammany candidates in city and state elections. By 1854, all these factors had combined to make Tammany a political force of hegemonic proportions in New York City, conferring immense power on the society’s bosses and allowing them to enrich themselves and their associates through corruption and administrative abuse. William M. “Boss” Tweed’s infamously corrupt reign was nefarious enough to incite an attempt at reform in the early 1870s, but Tammany was consistently able to function in spite of such efforts and continued to direct the flow of money, patronage, and votes into the early 1930s.”

 In the modern context, the way they keep power is through community policing.  The immigrants are encouraged to demand rights and accommodations from the majority population.  Trouble ensues.  “Peace talks” between the immigrant community and public officials lead to the installation of the community policing program which brings members of the immigrant community into the local political power structure including the police even though they aren’t qualified.  The corruption that follows causes good policemen and good public officials to leave or they are forced out.  With corrupt police in place, the political machine is free to operate their corrupt system relatively openly – oppressing the majority who are left to wonder what happened to their city, county, state and federal governments because this corruption reaches all the way to the top – to the White House.

What are we to do?   We need to form citizen grand juries to investigate this systemic corruption and to begin to educate the public on the form of “governance” that has been imposed upon them.   They need to understand how our elected, representative government has been gutted and dis-empowered – replaced by the system of “governance” that is operating out of the community colleges and universities and how it is nourished by federal programs and money.   And it is imperative that these investigations begin immediately while there is still a chance to save our country from the ravages of communism or fascism depending upon which side of the “power line” you sit.

Please watch this video and consider the information that I’ve given you as the method of the infiltration that they speak of in the video.

Failing Government

Posted By: Vicky in theTecnocratictyranny.com

Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma was on C-Span recently to talk about a new report his staff put together on the wasteful spending of our government agencies. The report is titled, Fumbles: 100 Ways the Government Dropped the Ball. It’s a good report – lots of waste, fraud and abuse in it. The problem is (yawn) members of Congress have been writing reports like this for at least thirty-five years beginning in this writer’s memory in 1975 when Senator William Proxmire started producing his Golden Fleece Award.

It was clear this summer when Senator Mike Crapo hit the small towns in Southcentral Idaho that the Republican message for this election season was going to be the federal deficit (yawn). It was also clear that the only subject the participants in the town hall meetings wanted to talk about was refugee resettlement.

The obvious problem with Senator Lankford’s report is that he’s a Senator. Government spending is within the Constitutional jurisdiction of the House of Representatives so his report, nice as it is, is simply campaign material produced with government money so he should add the cost of it to his report and make it 101 Ways the Government is Dropping the Ball.

The real problem is that our government is like a tree with a diseased core. Republicans wants to lop off a few branches but leave the diseased core alone. Why? Because it’s easier and because they – all the members of Congress are products of the diseased core so they won’t even talk about the real problems which are structural. By way of example, Senator Lankford talked about a piece of legislation he is sponsoring The Taxpayers Right-to-Know Act.

The Taxpayers Right-to-Know Act

S.282, sponsored by Senator James Lankford, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Introduced January 28, 2015

H.R. 598, sponsored by Representative Tim Walberg, House Oversight and Government Reform, Introduced January 28, 2015.

This legislation requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to include an inventory of government programs on its website:

  • any activity that is commonly referred to as a program;
  • any activity specifically created by law, or referenced in law, as a program;
  • each program that has an application process;
  • each program for which financial awards are made on a competitive basis; and
  • any activity identified as a program activity in a budget request; and
  • for each program identified in the program inventory, the information required under paragraph

That’s nice, but why are they doing this through legislation when Congress has subpoena power? It’s because the Congress can’t get this information from the agencies of government directly so they are setting it up so that non-profits and citizens can get the information for them. The agencies of government are non-responsive to Congressional requests for information. That’s a problem that won’t be fixed by the Taxpayers Right-to-Know Act. Nor will it be fixed if they lop off a few branches of the diseased tree that has some low-hanging, diseased fruit.

If Congress can’t or won’t define the problem correctly, they will never be able to fix it and our government will continue to fail the citizens they are supposed to serve.

[To be continued]

A Mission from God

A Mission From God

A Mission From God

An emergency press conference was called a couple of days ago to allow Refugee Resettlement Leaders to explain why the U.S. shouldn’t stop the admission of Syrian refugees in the U.S. They are concerned because the attacks in Paris have a growing number of U.S. Governors and national leaders calling for an end – or at least a moratorium on resettlement of refugees from Syria.

The representatives from the Refugee Resettlement sector were:

Kevin Appleby, Director of Migration Policy, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
Linda Hartke, President, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service
Lavinia Limon, President & CEO, U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants
Naomi Steinberg, Director, Refugee Council USA (Moderator)

What was striking about the statements from every one of them is that in their view, the United States has a heavenly assignment to be the humanitarian leader of the world and as such, it is our obligation to take in refugees. Really? A mission from God?


The press conference was moderated by the Refugee Council, USA. RCUSA is the association of associations that lobbies Congress for laws favorable to “The Mission From God”. One of the conferees mentioned 9 agencies (VOLAGS) that are involved and every one of them – save for one is built on a foundation of religion. It kind of makes me want to break out in song:

During the call, the Refugee Act of 1980 was mention 3 or 4 times. The following is from the RCUSA history section:

The U.S. has a proud history of admitting refugees of special humanitarian concern into the country. Following the admission of over 250,000 displaced Europeans in the wake of World War II, the first refugee legislation enacted by the U.S. Congress was the Displaced Persons Act of 1948. This legislation provided for the admission of an additional 400,000 displaced Europeans.

Later laws provided for admission of persons fleeing Communist regimes from Hungary, Poland, Yugoslavia, Korea and China, and Cuba. Most of these waves of refugees were assisted by private ethnic and religious organizations in the U.S. which formed the basis for the public/private role of U.S. refugee resettlement today.

In 1975 the U.S. resettled hundreds of thousands of Indochinese refugees through an ad hoc Refugee Task Force with temporary funding.

This experience prompted Congress to pass the Refugee Act of 1980, which incorporated the United Nations definition of “refugee” and standardized the resettlement services for all refugees admitted to the U.S.

The Refugee Act provides the legal basis for today’s U.S. Refugee Admissions Program and is administered by the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (BPRM) of the Department of State in conjunction with the Office of Refugee Resettlement in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and offices in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Most of everything that was said in the conference call was SOS different day but there was something intriguing about Kevin Appleby, Director of Migration Policy for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops so I did a search on him and hit the jackpot. There is a profile of Appleby on the Georgetown University, Berkley Center website:

“Kevin Appleby directs the Migration and Refugee Services Office of Migration and Refugee Policy at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. In that role he assists the bishops in the development and promotion of migration and refugee policy positions within the context of the Church’s social and moral teaching; he also implements communication, public education/outreach and legislative strategies that foster greater advocacy, awareness, understanding, and support for the work of MRS and the vulnerable populations it serves…. Appleby has worked on Capitol Hill for Senator Russell Long of Louisiana and the Senate Select Committee on Iran-Contra.”

The big prize was finding a March 12th panel discussion on C-Span titled, Catholics and National Immigration Policy. I started to take clips out of it but soon realized I was probably going to cut ten minutes out of a ninety minute program so please do watch the whole thing. I did however take two short clips that focus on a very important subject.


In the first video clip, Todd Scribner is introduced and then he talks about the early history of immigration policy. I’ve included it because of his reference to port cities.

Understanding port cities is essential to understanding what is happening to our country. Because of that, I’m going to give some drive-by history.

In international commerce, the ability of ships to dock at foreign harbors becomes of paramount importance probably in the 16th century if not before. The timeframe is not as important as understanding that this requirement for trade was the beginning of international law. The British and East India Trading Companies are the most well-known of the early international trading companies because they were involved in the colonization of the United States. It’s my understanding that they were the originators of Admiralty Law for international trade.

On the high seas, the ship’s Captain is the supreme authority with all powers afforded to a supreme ruler. On land, there needed to be an authority with power equal to that of the ship’s captain. The Harbor Master became that authority. Because of the character and nature of ports, the jurisdiction of the Harbor Master was restricted to a district so essentially, an international port – a seaport became a separate and distinct jurisdiction recognized under Admiralty Law.


In 1919 at the end of World War I, the Versailles Treaty was signed creating the League of Nations inter alia. The Convention and Statute on the Regime of Navigable Waters (see 1.1.2) was signed in Barcelona, Spain as an Annex to the League of Nations Treaty in 1921. It’s called the Barcelona Declaration. It extended Admiralty Law to include navigable rivers connected to the ocean.


In 1921 through an Act of Congress, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey was created as an overlay to land-based governments for the purpose building and maintaining transportation infrastructure. On this page, there is a map of the Port District that is the jurisdiction of the Port Authority.

All of the above is to lay the conceptual groundwork for understanding internationally connected governing structures over the top of existing land-based governments.

Getting back to the Catholic Church, in 1929, the Roman Catholic church signed the Lateran Pacts with Italian government under Mussolini’s control recognizing the Vatican as an independent city-state. The 1921 Barcelona Declaration provided the legal basis for the Lateran Pacts because the location of the Vatican is on the Tiber river – a navigable waterway making Vatican City an international port under maritime (Admiralty) law.


The point of all of this is to demonstrate unequivocally that Catholic Church historians have to have a very clear understanding of ports and maritime law to the extent of port districts under maritime law because of the history of the Vatican as an independent city-state. Whether or not it is the location of the true center of Catholicism is not for me to say except that apparently, it’s disputed by some. Anyway, this was an extremely interesting line of research that I can’t include here so I’ll set up a separate webpage for it: Seven Hills.

In the second clip of the Conference: Catholics and Immigration Policy, Todd Scribner gives a very good description of the political involvement of the Catholic Church as an institution. Then Kevin Appleby talks about the legislative agenda of the church as it pertains to immigration. Pay particular attention when he mentions 2001.

Appleby mentions Vincente Fox’s speech before Congress and how excited they all were because their agenda was moving. So what was that agenda?

Vincente Fox speech to a joint session of Congress on September 6, 2001

Vincente Fox had a plan: The Partnership for Prosperity.

And here is an interesting one about California and Mexico signing a trade pact. Of course that’s in violation of the U.S. Constitution Article 1, Section 10 – but hey… they were a region now – a state no longer. Notice the intent to establish 15 trade centers at Community Colleges. It adds context to the piece I just finished – Saints, Sinners and the Marriage From Hell.

Mexico also had an economic development plan. See Losing Our Sovereignty #2, United Islands of North America. And towards the end, see the Marine Highways. I’m not sure how they did this but I suspect it was Ted Stevens defining the routes of the Alaska ferry system and connections – the Alaska Marine Highway Ferry System – highways for transportation funding.

I have a lot more info on the above at my old website: Channeling Reality.

The other thing Appleby talked about which makes absolutely clear the political and unAmerican activities of his activities with respect to the Catholic Church was the Guest Worker program.

Guest Worker and Slave Management System

So what is the objective? If you are going to eliminate nation-states, you must eliminate national identity among the people – hence the “global citizen”. If you are going to bring down a country, you must have a foreign occupation force to run the operations formerly run by government. You don’t want nationals in key positions, you want foreigners loyal to the objective – or at least desperately loyal to the paycheck. And you want a replacement population large enough to swing the votes in a direction that allows you to do what you are doing – which is to bring down the nation-state. The refugee program does that and they’ve been doing that 65 years.

So how do I link all of this together? Vatican II. Vatican II was a reorganization of the church to “bring the band back together”. Who is the band? The Holy Roman Empire – with the elimination of nation-states. Port cities as centers of commerce connected to the global empire under the auspices of the United Nations. This is a link to a video of Sister Corinne giving a keynote speech at the National Federation of Community Development Credit Unions… Serving the Underserved. (3rd video down). Vatican II got the Nuns out of the church and on The Street. Kevin Appleby explained why the church was involved in the immigration issue. He said, “Jesus was a refugee” and for 150 years, papal teaching has been to “Welcome the Stranger”. Put another way, welcome the invader. Stranger Danger.

1962 was the year the Marshall Plan – OEEC reorganized to become the OECD headquartered in Paris, France.

So is there anything we can do about this? Yes, absolutely. Understanding it is half the battle. I’m not going to include what we can do here because this is already too long. What I will say though is that these people are committing treason behind the mask of humanitarianism. Because of that, you must not think with your heart, you must think with your head and hide your heart.


The Gates of Edu-Hell: University Centered Insurgency


As a student of the functional organization of government with a particular emphasis on the technocratic tyranny that is being imposed on us, my location in Idaho couldn’t be more perfect to see the methods of the insurgency in operation in the United States. It’s a university-centered insurgency and the insurgents are hiding in plain sight. If you’re a keen observer, you can see them for yourself.


For those of you who have been following the story of refugee resettlement, you are no doubt aware that the College of Southern Idaho (CSI) in Twin Falls is in the spotlight because they are running a sideline business of refugee resettlement despite the fact that their charter was to educate the students of Idaho… period.

This morning as I was preparing to begin the next part of the series I’ve been writing about the infiltration of the Public Health system connected to the Human Genome Project, I found a report on my hard drive that was published in 2001 titled, an Evaluation of the EDA’s University Center Program. The EDA is the Economic Development Administration. It was created in 1965 as a Great Society program.

The following is an excerpt from the Executive Summary of the report:

The University Center Program

The Economic Development Administration’s (EDA’s) University Center Program provides annual funding to higher-education institutions throughout the United States for the support of local and regional economic development. There are currently 69 University Centers located in 45 states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

The primary purpose of the Program is to improve the economies and economic development capacity of Center service areas, with emphasis on economically distressed communities. A distinguishing characteristic of the Program is that it leverages staff, students, facilities, research capabilities, and other resources of partnering institutions.

Centers generally undertake three broad categories of activity: direct technical assistance to clients, applied research, and information dissemination. Technical assistance activities typically have one of two types of clients: economic development organizations or individual

I could be wrong, but I don’t believe that accommodating communist central planners was in the charter of the community college – nor any college in this state for that matter. But CSI got on this gravy train and they’ve been riding it ever since – no doubt enriching all of their friends and family members as they’ve sold out the people who merely wanted to educate Idaho young people.

The following is a headline from a paid advertisement put into the Washington Times by a concerned group of citizens – Charlotte Iserbyt being one of them. She’s been on a crusade to educate people about the treason ever since. The only mistake she made was to focus attention on primary school education – and not the universities but it’s the universities that have been infiltrated and now we see, taken over by “economic developers” which is just a new way of saying, communist.


For more information on this read, The Parallel Universe and in particular, the section on ‘the battle of ideas’. The agreements that Ronald Reagan signed with the Soviets were the implementation of the educational exchanges called for in the Helsinki Final Act that was signed by Gerald Ford in 1975.

On the EDA website, there is a section on the University Center Economic Development Program. (In previous research, I called them Trojan Triangles).

Continue reading HERE