Tag Archives: Catholic Church

Pope Francis-“Christians Must Reject Sovereignty-Embrace Globalism”

by Rev. Austin Miles

The Vatican—1/6/19-Pope Francis just stated clearly that Christians must reject Sovereignty and embrace Globalism in order to make the world a better place.  WHAT?? 

That sentence is actually saying that Christians must reject Democracy and embrace Globalism-meaning-Communism. Read that statement again.

Pope Francis identified himself as a Communist when he first addressed the public following his inauguration as Pope. It was never a secret, especially since he came from Argentina, a Communist country.

This writer who keeps close tabs on The Vatican and Washington, D.C.    watched in astonishment as the new prelate was brought on the floor, having never heard of him, saw him, nor witnessed any activities he exercised as a Cardinal.  He obviously had been virtually kept out of sight until this Divine Appointment orchestrated by George Soros.

We knew that George Soros had bought his way into the Vatican where he manipulated the Catholic Church from behind the scenes. That is where all confusion regarding that religious group began. But first, let’s begin at the beginning.

To receive blessings from God and to be able to fully serve God is based totally upon the holiness of the people approaching God’s Throne. The word ‘Holiness” is a Biblical term which is better translated as righteous living i.e. Living according to God’s Word, being honest, and exhibiting integrity at all times.

I have known many Holy priests during my lifetime, read the books of others, and I met one pope, Pope John V1 during an audience with him at the Vatican on World Communications Day where he gave me a small gold neck chain with pendant of his image which I still wear.

The reason for my invitation was that I was one of the first to have a religious program broadcast over the satellite reaching the entire world.  He was such a man of God that I could feel the anointing upon him even a few feet away.

George Soros got his grip on the Vatican and Catholic decisions. Someone in the hierarchy had given in to him. Most men have a price. Then the scandal of active homosexual priests began making headlines and causing division in the Catholic Church. And Soros made certain that this made international headlines since he controls most of the media.

What made matters worse, the Catholic Church began accepting obvious homosexuals in the seminaries, which they should NEVER have done. Common sense would have dictated that.  Altar Boys and Boys Choirs became the perverted playground for these sick ‘priests.’

The Catholic Priesthood would of course, appeal to homosexuals since they could wear costumes and capes while working in elegant surroundings with a lot of pomp and ceremonies while showing power. It is a constant living drama.

I personally doubt that any in the original Catholic hierarchy would have allowed sodomites to become priests or even to attend Catholic Seminary. This could only have been orchestrated by George Soros and his money. This would weaken the church and its congregations. And that was the point.

The church was the strength of many people who would be a threat to Communists. The ‘party’ could never enslave the minds of truly Christian people. This is why Soros and his cohort Democrats declared war on the church itself.

This entire story is exceedingly painful to write since I once considered becoming a Catholic Priest before becoming a Protestant minister and chaplain.

When the church lost its holiness, problems began to arise reaching a crescendo when an unknown, named Jorge Mario Bergoglio was positioned in the Vatican as Pope Francis. The inauguration ceremony introduced the new “Pope” who said that the first thing he was going to do was…now get this…“Re-distribute the wealth!” That is right out of the Book of Marx.

Then the following week he did a sermon in which he declared that “all rich people are going to hell.”  A wealthy woman in Pittsburgh called me frantically after hearing that, almost crying, saying to me, “I’ve worked hard and have a lot of money as a result, but this means that I’m going to hell like the pope said? I don’t want to go to hell!”

The Catholic Church for centuries was the epitome of strength and leadership. People followed the church leaders and generously supported the church to the extent that they had their own bank in Rome. It did not take too long for the bank to come under investigation because of misuse of funds, in other words, embezzlement. The sin had already begun.

Sex was always a problem going back to when priests and nuns were shacking up, resulting in pregnancies, abortions with the dead babies secretly buried behind various church buildings. I remember as a child hearing about this and being shown where they were buried. A lot of people knew about this. So why did they not rise up in righteous anger to put a stop to this?

Now, sin has totally taken over the church by the LGBTQ, meaning those who spend their lives in pursuit of the most sinful and health risking sexual practices, all which is an abomination to God.

How on earth could these wretches put on their collars each morning. Still, it is to be noted that sodomites have no conscious. The priests are not only to be holy in their own character but an effective teacher of God and the Bible.

How on earth can anyone stand as an authority on God and the Bible while living in the most filthy sin ever and not even thinking of the confession he is hearing, but thinking ahead to his next sodomite encounter?

As sin spread throughout the church, with an outraged nation reading the headlines, the weakening began. The church lost prestige and its authority. It began losing people, the Vatican lost enormous amounts of money due to lawsuits by victims of church rape.

Yes, rape. An authority figure who forces someone under his authority into sex, is a criminal and should be put in prison. I know what that is. A cub scout master named John Brockdorf violently sexualized me when I was 11 years old.

Churches have been closed due to financial collapse due to the lawsuits that could absolutely have been prevented by truly Holy Priests.  And these results have made George Soros proud. Mission Accomplished.

Only a Holy Church and a Holy priest, minister, chaplain can make the world a better place instead of the garbage can it has become. Preachers must preach the Gospel, preach against sin of all kinds, even those sins which cannot be considered great.

Sin is sin and even the slightest is a stain upon the person, the church they attend and friends and neighbors in the community. It affects all.

Preachers, take some quiet time in your study with no interruptions to think clearly about the vows you took before ordination in which you pledged a lifetime of service to God.

That service means constant prayer, study of Scriptures, and preaching a message that glories God and condemns Satan and the sinners he has corrupted. We are to be a representative of God wherever we go.

You are to be above all else, not ‘just a good ole boy who is just like one of us.’  We are supposed to be separate from the world (their passions and entertainment), yet part of the world in order to carry an aura of peace and God’s love into any situation encountered.

And to always be polite and courteous, to always keep your word, let integrity be with you during every step of the journey, and if ever you are given too much change, return that overage immediately, or, if discovered when you get home, drive back and return it.

We are to live the Gospel at all times. People should never hesitate or be afraid to approach you. We are to exhibit ourselves as Servants of God at all times.

Preachers, it is all up to you. MAN YOUR PULPITS!


The real low-down on Pope Francis’ Encyclical on Climate Change

By Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh — Bio and Archives for CANADAFREEPRESS.COM

Extremely curious at the media allegation that the “scientific Pantheist who advises Pope Francis” and has swayed “Laudato Si” (named so after St. Francis of Assisi’s canticle), “seems to believe in Gaia, but not in God,” I set out to read for myself the climate change encyclical in Italian.

Pope Francis, began his 192-page Lettera Enciclica, Laudato Si’ del Santo Padre Francesco Sulla Cura Della Casa Comune,” by quoting a St. Francis d’Assisi canticle, and by saying that we are abusing and irresponsibly using “our sister Mother Earth, which sustains and governs us and produces diverse fruits with colourful flowers and herbs.”

On page 5 he continues with, “Ogni aspirazione a curare e migliorare il mondo richiede di cambiare profondamente gli ‘stili di vita, i modelli di produzione e di consume, le strutture consolidate di potere che oggi reggono le societa.” As I translate, “Any aspiration to care for and improve the world requires changing profoundly lifestyles, the patterns of production and consumption, the established structures of power that today govern society.”

I have heard these words before written in the 40-chapter U.N. Agenda 21 document signed by 179 countries in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro and repeated by subsequent Rio conference participants and advocates who really want to destroy capitalism. Here’s a quote by Christina Figueres, Executive Secretary of U.N.‘s Framework Convention on Climate Change, in which she admits that environmental activists and lobbyists aim to destroy capitalism, not save the globe from ecological Armageddon.

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution”

To accelerate our compliance with United Nations demands on greenhouse gas emissions, Congress was informed in a CRS report on June 29, 2015 about the dangers of increased atmospheric CO2, even though, lost in the report is the following statement, “The atmospheric CO2 concentration was however higher in Earth’s more distant past (many millions of years ago) at which time paleolithic and geological data indicate that temperatures and sea levels were also higher than they are today.”

The objective of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is to “stabilize carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the Earth’s climate system.” To the U.N., according to this CRS report, “stabilizing carbon dioxide concentrations implies zero net emissions.” (Jane A. Leggett, Greenhouse Gas Pledges by Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Congressional Research Service , R44092, June 29, 2015)

As Leggett explains in the footnotes on page 2 of the CRS report, the UNFCCC’s covers only greenhouse gases influenced by human activity but implicitly includes gases that occur naturally and human-related such as CO2, methane, nitrous oxide, manufactured gases such as hydroflourocarbons (HFC), perfluorcarbons (PFC), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). Cloroflourcarbons (CFC) are apparently covered under the 1985 Vienna Convention to Protect the Stratospheric Ozone Layer and the Montreal protocol.

Quoting Patriarch Bartholomew on page 8, Pope Francis said that “by being human we are destroying the biological diversity of God’s creation, we are compromising the integrity of the planet, we contribute to climate change, deforest the earth, destroying its humid areas.” We are committing sins because “a crime against nature is a crime against ourselves and is a sin against God.” The 15-page preamble asks on page 13 for a “new universal solidarity.”

The following chapters deal with water, human life quality, social degradation, inequality on the planet, the greening of society, environmental justice for the poor, reproductive health, country inequality, poor countries of the southern hemisphere, universal communion, the common destination of goods, the human root of ecological crisis (read man-made), crises and consequences of the modern Anthropocene, the need to defend work, social, environmental, cultural, and economic ecology, ecology of daily life, the principle of the common good, justice through generations, sustainable agriculture, protection of natural resources and water, replacement of fossil fuels with renewables, Rio +20, the Rio Declaration of 1992, reparations for poor countries for the environmental damage caused by developed countries, etc.

These paragraphs are obviously an abbreviated and religiously-tinged regurgitation of Agenda 21 goals as spelled in the 40 chapterS of the U.N. Agenda 21 document signed in 1992 by 179 countries.

A dialogue between religion and science is proposed on page 152 because the majority on the planet view themselves as faithful. It is thus imperative for religion to enter the dialogue of curing nature, of abolishing poverty, and of building a network of respect and fraternity.

It is vital for education and spiritual ecology to merge together, he said, but to do so we must create change in our excessive consumerism, our collective egoism, and in our sense of precariousness and insecurity. We must strive for the common good, he added. The Christian community and churches have an important role to play in this educational change to form and educate the masses for responsible austerity, to cure poverty, and to care for the environment in this ecological conversion. (p. 163)

With all due respect to his Holiness and the church, this document reads just like any other communist-based environment manifesto and is full of transparent communist jargon (especially the bold-faced words) promoted and supported by various United Nations-affiliated environmental NGOs.

We already have an environmental Constitution for the world, The Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development (DICED). I spoke at length about some of the 79 articles of DICED in my book, “U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy.”
But having his Holiness support the goals of the climate change industry, gives their entire agenda a new and powerful façade.

The papal encyclical “Laudato Si” published on May 24, 2015 ends with a beautiful Prayer for our earth on page 184 and with a Christian prayer with the Creator on pages 185-187.

When Pope Francis asked on page 123, “What type of world do we wish to leave for our children who are now growing up,” it is clear to me what type, it is global communism ordered around the redistribution of wealth and around a one-world government under the guise of planet stewardship.

Vatican Speaker on Climate Thinks There are 6 Billion too Many of Us

One of the speakers slated for the Vatican rollout of the long-awaited Papal document on climate change once said the earth is overpopulated by at least 6 billion people.

The teaching document, called an encyclical, is scheduled for release on June 18 at Vatican City. Perhaps with the exception of the 1968 encyclical on contraception, no Vatican document has been greeted with such anticipation.

The political left is hoping for a document that ties belief in global warming to a religious obligation. Climate skeptics have already started criticizing the document.

The choice of Professor John Schnellnhuber (German, born in 1950; what did HIS parents do in Nazi Germany? – JL), founding director of the Postdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, as one of three presenters may be giving the left added hope and giving giving skeptics severe heartburn. He has been described as one of the more aggressive scientists on the question of man-made global warming.

In a talk given to what’s described as the “failed” 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, reported in the New York Times, Schnellnhuber, who has advised German President Angela Merkel and is a visiting professor at Oxford, said of global warming: “In a very cynical way, it’s a triumph for science because at last we have stabilized something –- namely the estimates for the carrying capacity of the planet, namely below 1 billion people.”

Schnellnhuber is also author of what’s called the “two-degree target” that says governments must not allow the temperature to rise more than 2 degrees higher than at the start of the industrial revolution. Any higher, the theory holds, and much life on earth would either perish or be gravely harmed.

To deal with climate issues, he has also called for an “Earth Constitution that would transcend the UN Charter” along with the creation of a “Global Council…elected by all the people on Earth” and a “Planetary Court..a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution.”

Follow Austin Ruse on Twitter @austinruse

Appeals courts order Catholic groups to ‘accommodate’ contraception, abortifacients

COURT

BY Drew Belsky FOR LIFESITENEWS

WASHINGTON, D.C., May 28, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) — Last week saw multiple disappointments for religious organizations seeking relief from a government that hopes to impose gravely sinful behavior on them – namely, by forcing these organizations to cooperate in the dispersal of contraceptives and abortifacient drugs via health insurance plans.

Two of the organizations, Priests for Life and the archdiocese of Washington, were denied relief on Wednesday from the Health and Human Services (HHS) Department’s contraception mandate by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The other, Notre Dame University, received its denial from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday.

All three organizations are Catholic, and thus bound by the Catholic Church’s condemnation of all forms of contraception as “intrinsically evil” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, ¶2370). But the D.C. Circuit and the Seventh Circuit both ruled that an “accommodation” from the Obama administration, where businesses sign a form stating their objections but still must cooperate with insurance companies dispensing contraceptives and abortifacients, is sufficient to alleviate such businesses’ concerns.

In a fundraising email, Fr. Frank Pavone, Priests for Life’s national director, claimed that “Barack Obama and [Senate minority leader] Harry Reid succeeded in packing this particular Appeals Court with Far Left judicial activists.” The archdiocese of Washington, meanwhile, released a statement declaring, “The archdiocese and its affiliates remain committed and determined to serve others freely in accordance with the Catholic faith.”

The archdiocese of Washington in its statement highlighted the discrepancy between the D.C. court’s ruling, which “conflicted with judicial precedent,” and the Supreme Court’s June 2014 decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. As Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito wrote at the time, “We must next ask whether the HHS contraceptive mandate ‘substantially burden[s] the exercise of religion. We have little trouble concluding that it does.”

However, D.C. Circuit Court judge Cornelia T.L. Pillard, appointed by Barack Obama in 2013, argued in denying relief to both organizations that Hobby Lobby‘s reasoning “is inapplicable here. The dispute between the government and the Plaintiffs … is not about religious implications of … support for contraceptive use; the parties disagree here about how the law functions, and therefore whether there is any causal connection at all between employers’ opt-out notice and employees’ access to contraception.” Pillard further called Priests for Life’s assertions – i.e., that even with an “opt out” notice, the organization would be forced by HHS to participate in a grave evil – “legally inaccurate.”

Judge Janice Rogers Brown, a George W. Bush appointee, disagreed with Pillard’s assessment: “Whether the government imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise and labels it an ‘accommodation,’ that burden is surely as distressing to adherents as it would be if imposed without such a designation.” Furthermore, “this Court is neither qualified nor authorized to so scrutinize any religious belief. The panel trespassed into an area of inquiry Supreme Court precedent forecloses.”

Both Priests for Life and the archdiocese of Washington intend to appeal the D.C. Circuit Court’s decisions to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In Notre Dame’s case, Judge Richard Posner, writing for the Seventh Circuit, concluded that “it is for the courts to determine whether the law actually forces Notre Dame to act in a way that would violate [Notre Dame’s] beliefs.” Posner further lambasted Notre Dame’s “delay in suing” in a separate but related 2014 case, in which he ruled similarly. He called Notre Dame’s timing “awkward,” since the regulations were to take effect with respect to the employee health plan – and did take effect – on January 1, 2014,” less than a month before the suit was filed.

Posner, who is notorious for his acerbic and freewheeling opinions, made headlines in September 2014 for his ruling demanding the redefinition of marriage in Indiana and Wisconsin. Shortly after, Ethics and Public Policy Center president Ed Whelan released a four-part series at National Review Online decrying Posner’s “sloppy sophistry” in that case; Whelan had also noted previously that “a number of appellate lawyers who follow the Seventh Circuit have conveyed to me their astonishment at how sloppy Posner is as a judge.”

Regarding Posner’s latest decision, Notre Dame said in a statement that they are “reviewing the opinion and weighing our options.”

Pope Francis Appoints Radically Liberal, Pro-Homosexual Priest To Vatican Council

By for NOW THE END BEGINS

Pope Francis has appointed radically liberal, pro-homosexual Dominican Father Timothy Radcliffe as a consultor for the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.

“And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.” Revelation 16:13 (KJV)

EDITOR’S NOTE: Pope Francis, the man we deem likely to fulfill the role of the False Prophet of Revelation, will bring the LGBT into the Catholic Church, with full papal blessing. And as such, the Catholic Church will cease to preach against homosexuality as the Pope continues to build the end times One World Religion, where all points of view will be welcome except that of the bible believing Christian.

The Holy Father made the appointment on Saturday, according to Vatican Radio. Father Radcliffe, an Englishman, author and speaker, was Master of the Dominican order from 1992 to 2001, and is an outspoken proponent of homosexuality.

pope-francis-appoints-homosexual-priest-timothy-radcliffe-to-pontifical-council

“We must accompany gay people as they discern what this means, letting our images be stretched open,” he said in a 2006 religious education lecture in Los Angeles. “This means watching ‘Brokeback Mountain,’ reading gay novels, living with our gay friends and listening with them as they listen to the Lord.”

In 2005, as the Vatican deliberated the admission of men with homosexual tendencies to study for the priesthood in the wake of the Church sex abuse scandal, Father Radcliffe said that homosexuality should not bar men from the priesthood, and rather, those who oppose it should be banned.

As a contributor to the 2013 Anglican Pilling Report on human sexual ethics Father Radcliffe said of homosexuality:

How does all of this bear on the question of gay sexuality? We cannot begin with the question of whether it is permitted or forbidden! We must ask what it means, and how far it is Eucharistic. Certainly it can be generous, vulnerable, tender, mutual and non-violent. So in many ways, I would think that it can be expressive of Christ’s self-gift. We can also see how it can be expressive of mutual fidelity, a covenantal relationship in which two people bind themselves to each other for ever.

Father Radcliffe often celebrated Mass for the U.K. dissident group Soho Masses Pastoral Council (now renamed the LGBT Catholics Westminster Pastoral Council).

The priest is also a supporter of the proposal of to allow communion for divorced and remarried Catholics. source