Daily Archives: October 2, 2018

Envelopes sent to Mattis, Navy chief test positive for ricin

Envelopes sent to Mattis, Navy chief test positive for ricin


James MattisTwo envelopes addressed to Secretary of Defense James Mattis and Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson have initially tested positive for the deadly poison ricin at the Pentagon’s mail facility, according to a report.

The packages, which were delivered Monday, were intercepted before making it into the sprawling headquarters of the Defense Department in Virginia near Washington, DC, spokesman Chris Sherwood said Tuesday.
They triggered alarms as they underwent a security screening at the off-site mail processing center, according to the Military Times.
A defense official told CNN that the intended recipients were Mattis and Richardson.
“On Monday, the Pentagon Force Protection Agency detected a suspicious substance during mail screening at the Pentagon’s remote screening facility,” Army Col. Rob Manning, a Pentagon spokesman, said in a statement.
“The envelopes were taken by the FBI this morning for further analysis,” he said, adding that all US Postal Service mail received at the screening facility Monday was under quarantine and posed no threat to Pentagon personnel.
The FBI said in a statement that as the envelopes are undergoing further testing, “we will have no further comment.”
Ricin, a highly toxic compound extracted from castor beans, has been used in terror plots and is lethal in tiny doses if swallowed, inhaled or injected. It is 6,000 times more potent than cyanide.
If ingested, it causes nausea, vomiting and internal bleeding of the stomach and intestines, followed by failure of the liver, spleen and kidneys, and death by collapse of the circulatory system.

#WalkAway Becomes #MarchAway

This is the most unethical sham [I’ve seen] since I’ve been in politics.  If you really wanted to know the truth, you sure as hell wouldn’t have done what you’ve done to this guy.
Y’all want power, and I hope you don’t get it.
This is not a job interview, this is hell.  This is going to destroy the ability of good people to come forward because of this crap…the most despicable thing I’ve ever seen in my time in politics.
Lindsey Graham “Lindsey Graham tears into Democrats over ‘sham’ Kavanaugh hearing
We are walking away from the lies, the hate, the violence, and vandalism.  We are walking away from the vitriol, the name-calling, the censorship, the Fake News.  We are walking away from the phony and crooked investigations, the divisiveness, the race-baiting.  We are walking away from the attacks on our America.  It is time to fight back with the greatest weapon at our disposal – the truth.
We walked away alone, but now we march together.
Brandon Straka “#WalkAway March on Washington – October 26-28
The moderate to conservative Democrats, the so-called “Blue Dog” Democrats (“Trumpocrats”), are leaving the Democrat Party in droves.
They are fed-up with being ignored and ridiculed by the elites in DC and the MSM – and more recently, appalled and angered by the despicable way that a good man, Brett Kavanaugh, has been unjustly, vociferously, and viciously lied about and trashed by the Left.  The Trumpocrats, the Blue Dog Republicans, are incensed and they are here to stay.
The Democrat Party has traveled further and further left and they have done real damage to American workers and they have lost all affection from average folk.  Trump speaks their language and he’s telling them that if they vote for him, he will solve those specific problems.  The Blue Dog Republicans are here.
We won’t know until November how many of these Blue Dog Republicans actually exist, but if they exist in enough numbers to elect Donald Trump President of these United States, then it really is a whole new ballgame…Trumps’ Republican Party, might be here to stay.
Steven Brodie Tucker “The Rise of the Blue Dog…Republicans?
In addition to the “Blue Dog Republicans” there are many people leaving the Democrat Party because they are sickened by the non-stop bullying, violence, censorship, and crudity displayed by so many on the Left.  They are hip to the fact that the left-wing so-called anti-fascists, are in truth the very fascists that they claim to detest.  (Hint: the operative words in Hitler’s political party were “Socialist Workers’ Party”).
Brandon Straka’s video put a burr under the saddle of the walk-away movement, but folks have been walking away on their own for quite some time – for example, Dave Morrison of “Blue Collar Logic.”
I had no choice but to leave the Left.  Is the Right one big hug-fest?  Do we all gather beneath the sunset and sing patriotic songs?  No, there’s a lot of jerks over here too.  But at the end of the day conservatives are trying to hold on to the values that made us great and kept us free – trying to keep the individual as the basic unit of civilization. 
Progressives are trying to force us into a massive collective that they will control through the power of government.  My choice was clear, and I’m still walking it. 
Dave Morrison “Leaving The Left, My #WalkAway Story
The #WalkAway movement is holding a big rally, a march, during the upcoming weekend of October 26-28, a few days before the November elections.  It would be more than a nice gesture if “Bikers for Trump,” “Oath Keepers,” and others of their ilk would “ride shotgun” for these folks.  I imagine that, given the violent propensities of the Left, the #WalkAway folks could use the moral support if nothing else.
Speaking of walking away, mega kudos are due Kenye West for wearing a MAGA hat recently on “Saturday Night Live.”  His friend Candace Owens must be extremely proud of him, I know I am.  Big cojones brother – bravo!
“They bullied me backstage,” Kanye told the audience before NBC cut him off.  “They said, ‘Don’t go out there with that hat on.’  They bullied me backstage.  They bullied me!  And then they say I’m in a sunken place.  You want to see the sunken place?  Okay, I’m gonna put my Superman cape on, because you can’t tell me what to do.”
Samantha Chang “Kanye in MAGA hat on SNL, trashes Dems, praises Trump in jaw-dropping live speech, even as they bullied him
Democrats are busy erasing any and all positive aspects of America’s great history.  The Democrats have indeed become unhinged, and I strongly suggest that any sane members that may be left in that political party, run, not walk, away from the Democrat’s vicious, bullying, hateful insanity.  VOTE this November, vote for decency, sanity, and America’s rule of law.  It is fast disappearing before our eyes.
Many former Democrats are waking from their slumber and discovering that the party that they once belonged to no longer represents what they believe in.  To all of them I say “Welcome aboard,” you will find that Republicans are not the monsters you have been propagandized into believing they are.  In fact, Republicans are now the hip, cool, purveyors of truth, justice, free speech, patriotism, compassion, and racial equalityImagine that.


There's Nothing Feminine About Lying, Hysterical Left-Wing Women

There’s Nothing Feminine About Lying, Hysterical Left-Wing Women

They’re just putting on stupid t-shirts, vulgar costumes and hats, and crashing hearings, fundraisers or legislative meetings in order to convince themselves that their agenda is meaningful. It’s time to tell feminists to shut the hell up

By —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 1, 2018
Hysterical Left-Wing WomenThe #MeToo crowd, also known as “feminists,” have shown they are not rational, nor are they feminine. They are not ladylike, girlish, soft, tender, or effeminate, as is the definition of feminine.

Even more importantly, radical feminists are not on pleasant terms with the truth.
What causes these feminists to be so angry all of the time? I’ve long said their misplaced anger and deranged insanity is attributable to regrets. Every feminist I’ve ever met has had an abortion, led teen and college years full of promiscuity, alcohol and drugs. Mostly white and middle to upper class, educated and spoiled, they rebelled against decent parents, and the “boredom” of living a normal, virtuous life.
This behavior leads to regrets, very deeply held, but nonetheless regrets. And they’ve been told since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, that someone other than themselves is to blame for the shame—that it’s not their shame, and that men are to blame.
Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who claimed Judge Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school 36 years ago, is the new picture of this angry, wronged woman. And she needs someone to blame for her own years of shame.
Think about what the modern feminist left has been pushing and/or supporting: overturning social and cultural institutions to establish a female political hierarchy; redistribution of power away from “old white men;” gender neutral bathrooms (boys now use girls bathrooms); “birth control” which for feminists amounts to abortion through the ninth month of pregnancy; gender-equality, gender neutrality, gender fluidity; “radical self love;” fighting Capitalism; dismantling the patriarchy;… essentially, it’s about being in charge with no accountability.
The radical left has crushed decades of family values, the rule of law and decency, and has demonized half of America in the process. Yet they are still so angry.
Don’t believe me? Here is a Tweet sent out by the Sacramento Bee Editorial Board Thursday during the last Senate Judiciary Committee hearing of Brett Kavanaugh:

A crying Brett Kavanaugh. This is what white male privilege looks like.



A crying Brett Kavanaugh. This is what white male privilege looks like https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/erika-d-smith/article219146885.html 

Sacramento Bee editorial board is made up of angry, ugly and very nasty women and leftists

The Sacramento Bee editorial board is made up of angry, ugly and very nasty women and leftists. Mocking Brett Kavanaugh “crying” as he described how his family and reputation have been destroyed by the left may be one of the most despicable things they’ve ever said.
Here is a group of deranged and hysterical “feminists,” funded by the left and George Soros, accosting Sen. Jeff Flake (so ladylike, aren’t they?):

Then there were the protests of Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings earlier in September. These feminists were dressed Handmaid’s Tale costumes.
Those who have seen the “The Handmaid’s Tale” know that it depicts a dystopian America where women have no rights and are forced to have children for the ruling class, writes Madison Dribble at IJR. “Apparently, some feminists think that is what follows an overturn of Roe v. Wade.”
My favorite mocking Tweet of this charade was from Jon Gabriel:

jon gabriel


Since when are handmaids allowed to use iPhones? SECURITY!

Lisa Desjardins


NOW: Waiting outside Kavanaugh hearing room. A silent but rather clear protest. (Re: abortion.)

View image on Twitter


More Americans—and especially women—need to reject the fraudulent, hypocritical and irrational feminists still claiming outrage over white male privilege

Hillary Clinton joined the hysteria this past week, furthering the leftist Handmaid hysteria claiming Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation would surely allow him to bring back slavery. I kid you not.
Hillary, Speaking before the American Federation of Teachers labor union said, as PJ media reported:

“Let me say a word about the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court,” Clinton told the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) at its national convention. “This nomination holds out the threat of devastating consequences for workers rights, civil rights, LGBT rights, women’s rights—including those to make our own health decisions.”
“It is a blatant attempt by this administration to shift the balance of the Court for decades and to reverse decades of progress,” the former Democratic presidential nominee declared.
Then came the kicker: “I used to worry that they [the Republicans] wanted to turn the clock back to the 1950s. Now I worry they want to turn it back to the 1850s.”

Silly ambushes and protests in red cloaks or vagina hats

One stupid example is the repulsive Lena Dunham:

Lena Dunham


I’d honestly rather fall into one million manholes than have one single dude tell me to watch my step

… the same Lena Dunham who admitted to sexually abusing her younger sister… how is she even “famous?” For what? Hating men? She likely only “hates” men because they won’t date her.
“The View” co-host Joy Behar recently claimed that the “old white men” on the Senate Judiciary Committee “are not protecting women” because called Christine Blasey Ford’s bluff and asked for her testimony as part of its investigation into her accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s.
Apparently I’m right:

Lena Dunham


I’d honestly rather fall into one million manholes than have one single dude tell me to watch my step

Jeremy Bunn @JBunn2010

Trust me we wish the same.

Who even listens to these women? Forgetting for a moment that their protests are an affront to the original goals of the feminist movement—quality of opportunity for both sexes—these are just stupid, angry and lonely women who have regrets… lots of regrets. We need to stop giving them any attention, and start treating them with the disdain and antipathy we feel for them.
“The View” co-host Joy Behar recently claimed that the “old white men” on the Senate Judiciary Committee “are not protecting women” because called Christine Blasey Ford’s bluff and asked for her testimony as part of its investigation into her accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s.
They don’t know what they want. Even with every new law passed in their favor they only seem to get angrier… because despite their silly ambushes and protests in red cloaks or vagina hats, these women know they aren’t really standing up to some grand wrong or evil, nor are they really protesting a lack of human rights. Because if they were, they’d care about oppressed women in Communist countries, or women living in poverty and squalor under evil dictatorships in Africa. Or they’d talk to Juanita Broaddrick about real sexual assault. More is never enough for these broads, frauds.
They’re just putting on stupid t-shirts, vulgar costumes and hats, and crashing hearings, fundraisers or legislative meetings in order to convince themselves that their agenda is meaningful.
It’s time to tell feminists to shut the hell up… and let them fall into manholes.

The Creeping Death of the Second Amendment

The Creeping Death of the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment is slowly dying, and California just took another shot at it.

For those who might take CA Governor Jerry Brown vetoing bills that would grant illegal immigrants rights over citizens as a sign that some good sense is returning to the Golden State, think again. Governor Moonbeam recently signed a handful of gun control bills, firing yet another salvo into the already dying Second Amendment. Sadly, he’s not alone.
The right to keep and bear arms is being attacked nationwide. Though progressives and authoritarians would love to do so, no state could likely ban guns altogether and get away with it – yet. But the Second Amendment is dying, none the less. As states, municipalities, and even companies enact laws and policies that further restrict who can own what guns, when and where, what was to be an uninfringeable right is suffering a death by 1,000 cuts.

Narrowing the Gap

The California State Senate voted 23-10 to raise the minimum purchase age for all firearms to 21 back in May. Now Gov. Brown has signed the bill into law, stripping the right to buy guns – a key element in the right to keep and bear them – from hundreds of thousands of citizens who are otherwise adults, as well as the millions of others who aren’t yet, but will be. Since California also requires that all gun transfers go through a licensed dealer, none of these young adults who don’t already own firearms will be able to acquire them legally.
According to the “Population in Households” data from the U.S. Census Bureau, there are 805,016 Californians between the ages of 18-20, though that doesn’t account for the homeless or, quite likely, most illegals. Any of those who aren’t in the military or law enforcement are now barred from buying guns for self and home defense.
This is merely a narrowing of the gap remaining between where we stand now and the total disarming of the populace. For all those between 18 and 20, it may as well be a complete repeal of the Second Amendment.
If ever there were a time to wish we had been wrong, this is it. However, Liberty Nation has been tracking this unfortunate trend, and we predicted back in May that this law would pass:

“On Tuesday, May 29, the California Senate voted 23-10 in favor of their own bill to raise the gun buying age. The bill, SB1100, also limits the number of guns any one person can purchase to one per month. It isn’t law quite yet – but that it will succeed seems a foregone conclusion. This is California, after all, and the most surprising thing about this story is that the Golden State wasn’t the first in the Union to achieve this ‘common sense’ reform.”

Infringements Around the Country

As hinted by the quote above, California was not the first state to raise the minimum purchase age; this and similar violations occur nationwide. Federal law prohibits anyone under the age of 21 from buying a handgun or ammunition for one from a licensed dealer. For long guns – rifles and shotguns – and the ammo to match, the age is 18. For private transfers, the recipient of a  handgun must be at least 18, with a few exceptions. Long guns may be given to anyone of any age – though many states have a minimum age for shooting, even with parental guidance.
In addition to federal law, 17 states ban the sale of handguns to people under 21 even in private transactions, three set the age at 18, and the rest don’t specify, following federal regulations. For long guns, California now joins Vermont, Florida, Hawaii, and Illinois in raising the age from 18 to 21. Eighteen states require that anyone buying a long gun – whether from a licensed dealer or not – be 18, with another nine merely requiring parental consent for those who aren’t.
Of course, while gun purchase and possession ages are, perhaps, the most egregious of the infringements, as it keeps entire sections of the population wholly disarmed, they aren’t the only violations. Open carry is banned entirely in seven states, eight have gun registries, and 18 either prohibit private sales or require them to be overseen by law enforcement, which includes background checks. Only 27 of the 50 states have “stand your ground” laws, which means that in 23 states – nearly half those in the country – you’re required to attempt to retreat, if possible, before defending yourself – even in your own home!
It has been said many times that if one must first obtain permission from the government to do something, then it isn’t respected as a right. Of all 50 states that are supposed to stand beholden to the Constitution, too few allow any form of “Constitutional” carry.  Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, Vermont, and West Virginia are the only states in which anyone legally allowed to get a gun by the laws of that state is allowed to carry it, concealed or openly, without first obtaining a permit. Though even in some of these states, there are disputes as to what the law actually allows, making it potentially dangerous to carry.

A Tightening Grip

While the phrase “gun control” likely brings California, Illinois, and perhaps Maryland to mind first, every state has at least some restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms that are clear infringements – and are, therefore, entirely unconstitutional. There isn’t a state in the Union that hasn’t, in some way, contributed to the Second Amendment’s death by 1,000 cuts. Some are just worse than others.

Facebook Suffers Massive Security Breach, 50 Million Users Exposed

Facebook Suffers Massive Security Breach, 50 Million Users Exposed

There must be consequences

sparta report facebook
Facebook is the latest in a long string of large corporations which have grossly mishandled its users personal information. I think there should be serious legal consequences for this kind of negligence:

Facebook, already facing scrutiny over how it handles the private information of its users, said on Friday that an attack on its computer network had exposed the personal information of nearly 50 million users.

The breach, which was discovered this week, was the largest in the company’s 14-year history. The attackers exploited a feature in Facebook’s code to gain access to user accounts and potentially take control of them.

The news could not have come at a worse time for Facebook. It has been buffeted over the last year by scandal, from revelations that a British analytics firm got access to the private information of up to 87 millionusers to worries that disinformation on Facebook has affected elections and even led to deaths in several countries.

Senior executives have testified several times this year in congressional hearings where some lawmakers suggested that the government will need to step in if the social network is unable to get tighter control of its service. On Friday, regulators and lawmakers quickly seized on the breach to renew calls for more oversight.

Three software flaws in Facebook’s systems allowed hackers to break into user accounts, including those of the top executives Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, according to two people familiar with the investigation but not allowed to discuss it publicly. Once in, the attackers could have gained access to apps like Spotify, Instagram and hundreds of others that give users a way to log into their systems through Facebook.

Facebook said it had fixed the vulnerabilities and notified law enforcement officials. Company officials do not know the identity or the origin of the attackers, nor have they fully assessed the scope of the attack or if particular users were targeted. The investigation is still in its beginning stages.

Beware ‘Global Citizens’ (and Their Dumb Festivals)

Beware ‘Global Citizens’ (and Their Dumb Festivals)

By | October 1st, 2018

If you wish to understand America today, attend the Global Citizen Festival. Here you can see our institutions-media, political and corporate-march in perfect lockstep toward a new world order entirely disconnected from the nation’s founding vision.
Here you can see Cardi B and Jeff Flake on the same stage (sponsored by Citi Bank, Cadillac, and Johnson and Johnson) calling for the same thing: a new founding. Today, the words “global citizen” mean nothing because there is no global regime to which a global citizen can belong.
Not yet, at least.
That is why these revolutionaries gather: to reaffirm their commitment to the hoped-for future regime that will transcend kinship, history, and nature itself.
This political project is inherently anti-American. Ask yourself: would these “global citizens” fight and die for their countrymen, would they hold back an enemy tide from sweeping aside their kith and kin? Do they have any connection to this earth, to the land of their forefathers?
The answer, to the sane man, is obvious. The nation-state, America in particular (or, at least, America as she was) is a threat to the new global order. If I say I love my Anglo-Saxon ancestors and the nation they built above all others, how can I be a global citizen?
The answer is that I cannot be. I am a heretic and a traitor. I am an enemy of the coming state.
Perhaps, the Global Citizens can be stopped. Perhaps we can reconquer our institutions, reverse the insanity, and pull ourselves back from revolution. Maybe.
But if such a project is possible it must begin with the recognition that America is no longer “one nation under God.” Rather, we are a multitude of nations each struggling for control of the state.
America’s Cold Civil War has begun.

Much Ado About Nothing: Swetnick Walks Back Kavanaugh Accusations

Much Ado About Nothing: Swetnick Walks Back Kavanaugh Accusations

NBC’s Kate Snow interviewed the latest of the Kavanaugh accusers, but came up empty handed.

Of the accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Julie Swetnick’s are by far the most outrageous. They are the ones Kavanaugh said were a farce and straight out of The Twilight Zone.  She alleges that when she knew him in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh was a leader of a gang-rape party circuit.  Seriously.
Swetnick’s fantastic accounts came about from her sworn statement, released by celebrity anti-Trump lawyer and Democrat presidential hopeful, Micheal Avenatti. Her claims go far beyond any other accusation. If they are shown to be true, Kavanaugh must not just lose the nomination vote but spend the rest of his life in prison.

Julie Swetnick

Monday night, NBC ran an interview with Swetnick.  Interviewer Kate Snow tells you right up front that they couldn’t verify her story. Snow also points out various discrepancies in the accounts. She never explains why the hell they ran the story at all, given the 100% complete lack of corroboration on anything.
Let’s take a look at the key allegations – any of which would disqualify Kavanaugh for night court, much less the Supreme Court.  We’ll see how her sworn statement stands up to what she said on NBC.
Swetnick swore she knew Kavanaugh “spiked” punch at a party with “drugs and/or grain alcohol.” On television, this felony drugging becomes merely standing by the punch! She swears in her statement to seeing Kavanaugh lined up outside a room at a party, waiting for his turn to rape someone inside. On television, this claim became boys huddled by doors and laughing at a party, and that viewed in hindsight, the behavior is “too coincidental.”  We never learn in the interview what was too coincidental or how a group of boys laughing outside a room at a party filled with the sons and daughters of Washington’s elite is likely to mean unspeakable brutality is happening behind the door.

Brett Kavanaugh

Her most explosive claim, sworn under penalty of perjury, is that Kavanaugh was present while she herself was drugged and then gang-raped. On television, this claim gets walked back. She remembers Kavanaugh being at the party where she was later raped, she now says. Swetnick does not accuse him of raping her, knowing she was attacked, helping to assault her, or anything of the sort.
At first, she claimed in the interview that she decided to come forward six or so weeks ago, motivated by Christine Blasey Ford doing the same.  She seemed unfazed when Snow informed her that Ford’s allegation became public only two weeks prior to their Sunday, September 30 interview. Finally, we have another foursome of friends and acquaintances – without a single instance of corroboration. Snow reports that Swetnick gave them the names of four others who attended parties with her and could verify that part of the story, at least. What happened? Kate Snow says one is deceased, two didn’t call back, and the fourth – wait for it – does not remember a person named Julie Swetnick. It doesn’t take an FBI investigation to reveal this set of allegations, at least, as much ado about nothing.

Poll: 60% Want Kavanaugh Confirmed if FBI Dismisses Allegations

Poll: 60% Want Kavanaugh Confirmed if FBI Dismisses Allegations

John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is sworn in before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2018, to begin his testimony in his confirmation hearing to replace retired Justice Anthony Kennedy. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

If the FBI clears Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct allegations this week, 60 percent of Americans want him confirmed to the Supreme Court.

The Harvard CAPS/Harris poll of 1,330 registered voters also found some other interesting nuggets that are good news for Kavanaugh and his supporters.
The top line numbers show that 40 percent found only Christine Blasey Ford’s Thursday testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee “credible.” Ford testified that when they were both teenagers, Kavanaugh attempted to assault her at a 1982 house party.

By comparison, only 23 percent said they found only Kavanaugh’s rebuttal testimony “credible.”
However, 27 percent of those polled found both Kavanaugh and Ford “credible,” which means a total of 50 percent found Kavanaugh credible, compared to 67 percent for Ford.
Here is where things get interesting…
“But the credibility of their testimony does not appear to be the decisive factor,” pollster Mark Penn writes. “Rather, the question comes down to corroboration as the standard for tipping public opinion on whether Kavanaugh should ascend to the high court.”
As of now, in the wake of the testimony, only 37 percent want Kavanaugh confirmed, but only 44 percent say he should not be confirmed. But…
Because “corroboration” is the only standard a wide majority of Americans care about, if this FBI investigation clears him, a whopping 60 percent want Kavanaugh confirmed.
Moreover, once those polled were informed “that the named witnesses deny any knowledge of the allegation, this shifts to 57 percent who favor confirmation.”
In other words, once voters know the full truth (the truth the establishment media are hiding from them), they overwhelmingly side with Kavanaugh — those who call for his confirmation jump from 37 percent to 57 percent.
There are other numbers bubbling beneath the surface inconvenient to the false reality manufactured by the media. To begin with “69 percent agree with Kavanaugh’s pronouncement and Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-S.C.) statement that the proceedings have been a national disgrace.”
Secondly, the poll found that a whopping 75 percent believe Sen. Dianne Feinstein “should have turned over Ford’s letter months earlier so that this debacle might have been avoided.”
A full 63 percent believe Kavanaugh will eventually be cleared and confirmed.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.