Is Jill Stein’s Recount an Attempt to Steal the Election For Hillary?

Recounts only taking place in states where Trump won

Stein’s recount effort only began after computer scientists claiming anomalies between the electronic voting machine results and the paper ballot results met with the Clinton campaign and asserted that the vote may have been “hacked”.

That explanation also makes zero sense in the case of Michigan, which didn’t use electronic voting machines.

“We are an entire paper and optical scan state,” Chris Thomas, the longtime director of Michigan’s Bureau of Elections, told the Detroit Free Press. “Nothing is connected to the Internet.”

The vote has already been counted twice in Michigan. A quick count was conducted and the results announced on the morning of November 9th. A second certified count was then conducted, with the final results announced yesterday, with Trump winning by 10,704.

If a third vote count in Michigan, which only uses paper ballots, was to flip the state to Hillary, this would obviously suggest vote fraud not with regard to the original vote, but the recount itself.

Questions are also swirling as to how Stein managed to raise such a whopping sum of money, now over $4.7 million dollars, in such a short space of time given that she only raised around $3 million dollars for her entire campaign.

Suspicions over the regularity and timing of the donations have also led some to claim that the entire process is illegitimate.

The claims made by the computer scientists who met with the Clinton campaign have also been dismissed by other experts, including Carl Bialik and Rob Arthur, who write that, “There’s no clear evidence that the voting method used in a county — by machine or by paper — had an effect on the vote.”

Trump supporters seem remarkably relaxed about the recount, which is odd given how concerned they were about vote fraud before the election.

Is Jill Stein being used as a proxy by the Clinton campaign to be the face of the recount so as to avoid any kind of backlash? Who is funding the recount campaign and are any of Hillary’s donors or people like George Soros involved?

These questions remain unanswered, but the money keeps pouring in.

The deadline to file for a recount in Wisconsin is today, in Pennsylvania it’s Monday and in Michigan it’s Wednesday next week.


Follow on Twitter:



Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of and Prison

One response to “Is Jill Stein’s Recount an Attempt to Steal the Election For Hillary?

  1. williamjamesward

    The left is totally dishonest and well to borrow from Hillary “deplorable”.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.