Monthly Archives: October 2015


Which Would You Choose?



My comments:  Sad isn’t it when we think the KGB leader of Russia is far better than the leader of the free world, America…but that’s really the case!  Please excuse language…


Budweiser 9/11 one-time commercial

This is a commercial Budweiser did for 9/11. They only aired it once so as not to benefit financially from it. They just wanted to acknowledge that horrible day and pay tribute to America and it’s heroes.  Every time I see it, it makes me cry.



Local Muslims Ban Christmas in MD Schools Because It’s “Offensive”



It seems that “CHRISTmas” has offended yet some more tender souls.

This time the aggrieved are Muslim families in Montgomery County, Maryland. They wanted to add the end of Ramadan (the Eid) to the list of religious holidays, just like Christmas or Rosh Hashanah. So the school board did something really, really brilliant. Kind of like what school boards do from sea to shining sea every time some over-zealous busybody mentions the “C” word and pitches a fit: they caved.

Yep. Instead of revising the school calendar to be more inclusive, they came up with a stroke of genius: eliminate all “religious holidays” and make their holiday schedule “religion neutral.”


The policy was enacted last year. So this year, Christmas is “Winter Break.” And “Easter Break” has gone the way of the dodo. As The Political Insider opines:

Thanks to these hyper-sensitive Muslims – many of whom come from intolerant countries which execute Christians in the streets – have taken advantage of political correctness to stomp out what was left of any religion in the Montgomery County schools.

Way to go.

For first time, US okays ground forces to fight ISIS in Syria



VIENNA/WASHINGTON – The United States disclosed plans on Friday to station its first ground troops in Syria for the war against Islamic State, saying dozens of US soldiers would be sent as advisers to groups fighting the militants.

Washington announced the small special operations force shortly before 17 countries, the European Union and the United Nations called for a nationwide truce in Syria’s civil war at talks in Vienna, attended for the first time since the conflict began in 2011 by President Bashar Assad’s ally Iran.

The United States said it would deploy fewer than 50 troops to northern Syria beginning in the coming weeks in an open-ended mission. Officials said the forces were not meant for front-line combat.

The participants in Vienna, including the United States and Russia, said “substantial differences remain” though they agreed it was “imperative to accelerate all diplomatic efforts to end the war” and the ministers will reconvene within two weeks.

In a rare hint of diplomatic progress, Iran signalled it would back a six-month political transition period in Syria followed by elections to decide Assad’s fate, although his foes rejected the proposal as a trick to keep Assad in power.

In addition to Assad’s fate, on which delegates said no breakthrough had been expected, sticking points have long included the question of which rebel groups should be considered terrorists and who should be involved in the political process.

In Washington, US officials said the small special forces contingent in Syria would work with local “moderate rebel” groups to fight against Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, and that it should not be considered a combat mission.

“The president has been quite clear that there is no military solution to the problems that are plaguing Iraq and Syria. There is a diplomatic one,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in Washington.

Earnest said the special forces’ mission would be to “train, advise and assist” local groups, adding: “I think if we were envisioning a combat operation, we probably would be contemplating more than 50 troops on the ground.”

U.S School District Removes Christian and Jewish Holidays From Calendar to Appease Muslims

The Grinch wants more than Christmas this upcoming year…


Ex-Disney employees on how it feels to train your foreign replacement


Ex-Disney employees on how it feels to train your foreign replacementTwo former Disney employees have broken their silence on what it was like to train their cheaper, foreign replacements before leaving employment with the company. And they have some advice for anyone who’s thinking about training to enter the high-tech workforce: Don’t.

“I would never recommend this field to anybody that is a student,” former Disney app developer Leo Perrero told Florida’s WWSB-TV News for a story that has since gone viral.

“People going into the tech field in college or in the universities, they probably won’t have a job,” Blackwell says.

“The grandparents in Sarasota, in Manatee County, wherever, you don’t want your kids coming out of college, your grandkids coming of college, and having no jobs,” Blackwell’s colleague David Powers, added. “The STEM program’s a joke.”


STEM, you likely know, is the acronym for science, technology, engineering and mathematics: cutting-edge educational and career tracks that high school guidance counselors, for years, urged aspiring students to consider. For a long time, a STEM career was an enviable one: high demand, high pay, job security and portability.

For some — primarily independent contractors, those who work in government and those who work for a stable employer — STEM jobs are still great jobs. But for an increasing number of U.S.-born graduates, they can’t buy a well-paying, long-term career. In some cases, that’s because the government’s literally buying those same jobs for foreign workers to fill.

In far more cases, though, corporate abuse (and winking government approval) of the H-1B foreign worker program is to blame. That’s what happened to Perrero and Powers, both of whom were told they were being replaced at Disney before being asked to train the imported workers who’d be filling their jobs at a reduced wage.

“I’m in the room with about two-dozen people, and very shortly thereafter an executive delivers the news that all of our jobs are ending in 90 days, and that we have 90 days to train our replacements then we won’t get a bonus that we’ve been offered,” Perrero told WWSB News.

With a severance package as incentive, Perrero and Powers obliged. But the experience demoralized them.

“When a guillotine falls down on you, in that moment you’re dead … and I was dead,” said Powers.

“I felt extremely un-American,” said Perrero. “I felt like I was part of destroying our economy because I had to train a replacement that was going to come here, take my job and potentially take other people’s jobs.”

Norway: Immigrants Brutally Gang Rape 14-Year-Old Girl

One Gets Off With Community Service

Comment: These people have no guns. When ours are taken we can expect the same treatment from the “immigrants” who are coming or already here laying low until that time…

Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? (Or your daughters?)


Norway: Immigrants Brutally Gang Rape 14-Year-Old Girl, One Gets Off With Community Service
by Paul Joseph Watson | October 30, 2015


Three African immigrants who brutally raped a 14-year-old girl to the point where she wanted to kill herself were given extremely light sentences by a court in Norway, with one receiving community service and avoiding prison altogether.

The incident happened on the night of July 30 when the three men accosted the girl on a commuter train before also molesting her in a farm house and at an apartment in Oslo.

During her ordeal, the girl was raped both orally and anally before being forced to take drugs. According to reports, the abuse, which lasted for hours, was so horrific that at one point the girl expressed a desire to take her own life to end the suffering.

The girl suffered “severe mental damage” and PTSD as a result of the incident, missed a year of school and is still struggling to deal with what happened.

The three men, 18-year-old Bile Mohamed Elmi, 21-year-old Abdirizak Nur Ali and 21-year-old Mohamed Abdirisak Mohamed, were initially charged with gang rape, which carries a maximum sentence of 21 years.

However, prosecutor Cecilie Schloss Møller insisted there wasn’t enough evidence and the three men were convicted of sexual contact with a child under 16 years of age, which carries a lighter sentence.

As a result, one of the men, Bile Mohamed Elmi received just 344 hours community service “for two counts of sexual intercourse with the girl in a particularly offensive manner.” Mohamed Abdirisak Mohamed received 17 months imprisonment, while Abdirizak Nur Ali received just 10 months imprisonment.

Despite the men’s names being known, some Norwegian news outlets are still refusing to publish them.

The case again underscores the huge rape crisis that has enveloped Scandinavia which has been completely ignored by liberals and feminists because the culprits in many of the cases are immigrants.

In Norway, almost half of all rapes committed in Oslo in 2011 were carried out by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin, despite the fact that Muslim immigrants only represent 1.5-2 per cent of the population.

In addition, 100 per cent of aggravated rapes involving physical violence were committed by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin.

Leftist political leaders responded to the figures by absolving “traumatized asylum seekers” of blame and instead pointed fingers at police for encouraging “xenophobia and prejudice” merely for reporting the statistics.

The wave of migrants flooding into Europe has stoked fresh concerns about an increase in rape cases. German police have been accused ofcovering up the scandal in order to not legitimize critics of mass immigration.

Meanwhile in Finland, cops have been ordered by the country’s national police board not to publicly identify migrants as criminal suspects over concerns that doing so would encourage a ‘racist’ backlash against the wave of asylum seekers entering Scandinavia.

It’s a fact: Today’s college students are warming to totalitarianism



A remarkable number of college students in the U.S. don’t know what the 1st Amendment is. They see no problem with campus speech codes, enforced political correctness and punishment for those who speak words that offend.

Those findings, including the discovery that 76 percent of students want their professors to use trigger warnings, come out of a newly released national survey sponsored by Yale University’s William F. Buckley Jr. program.

The 2015 Buckley Free Speech Survey found a striking contrast between the proportion of students who said freedom of speech is vital and the proportion who nevertheless had no problem with restricting it.

“At first glance,” notes the Freedom for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), “some of the findings seem to bode well for campus free speech.” That includes the 95 percent of students who agreed that free speech “is important to them,” and the 87 percent who believe it’s important to be exposed to views they disagree with.

But it starts to go downhill from there. From FIRE’s summary:

  • Nearly one-third (32 percent) of students could not identify the First Amendment as the constitutional amendment that deals with free speech. 33 percent of those who correctly identified the First Amendment said that the First Amendment does not protect hate speech.
  • More than half (51 percent) of students are in favor of their college or university having speech codes to regulate speech for students and faculty.
  • 72 percent of students said they support disciplinary action against “any student or faculty member on campus who uses language that is considered racist, sexist, homophobic or otherwise offensive.”
  • 49 percent of students said they have often felt intimidated to share beliefs that differ from their professors, and exactly half (50 percent) said they have often felt intimidated to share beliefs that differ from their classmates.
  • 55 percent of students said they are aware of “trigger warnings,” and 76 percent of these students favor their professors using them.
  • By a 52 to 42 percent margin, students believe that their institution should forbid people from speaking on campus who have a history of engaging in hate speech.

At least the Yalies involved in collecting the data are among the academics who are still worried by findings like these.

“The survey results confirmed some of what we expected, but they also revealed troubling surprises,” said Buckley program director Lauren Noble. “It is the opinion of the Buckley Program that university campuses are best served by free and open speech, but, lamentably, that opinion is anything but unanimous, the survey shows.”